Free Trial

FTC Solar (FTCI) Competitors

FTC Solar logo
$1.80 -0.13 (-6.74%)
As of 01:47 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FTCI vs. OESX, CBAT, ULBI, BLNK, and TYGO

Should you buy FTC Solar stock or one of its competitors? FTC Solar's main competitors and comparable companies include Orion Energy Systems (OESX), China BAK Battery (CBAT), Ultralife (ULBI), Blink Charging (BLNK), and Tigo Energy (TYGO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electrical components & equipment" industry.

How does FTC Solar compare to Orion Energy Systems?

FTC Solar (NASDAQ:FTCI) and Orion Energy Systems (NASDAQ:OESX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

45.4% of FTC Solar shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.6% of Orion Energy Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.0% of FTC Solar shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Orion Energy Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Orion Energy Systems has a net margin of 0.04% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of -51.02%. Orion Energy Systems' return on equity of 11.66% beat FTC Solar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FTC Solar-51.02% N/A -37.99%
Orion Energy Systems 0.04%11.66%3.40%

In the previous week, FTC Solar and FTC Solar both had 6 articles in the media. Orion Energy Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat FTC Solar's score of 0.65 indicating that Orion Energy Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FTC Solar
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Orion Energy Systems
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

FTC Solar has a beta of 1.76, suggesting that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Orion Energy Systems has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

FTC Solar presently has a consensus target price of $8.90, indicating a potential upside of 361.14%. Orion Energy Systems has a consensus target price of $36.50, indicating a potential upside of 41.31%. Given FTC Solar's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe FTC Solar is more favorable than Orion Energy Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FTC Solar
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Orion Energy Systems
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Orion Energy Systems has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FTC Solar. Orion Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTC Solar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTC Solar$99.69M0.35-$79.58M-$6.25N/A
Orion Energy Systems$86.31M1.22-$3.16M-$0.05N/A

Summary

Orion Energy Systems beats FTC Solar on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTC Solar compare to China BAK Battery?

China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) and FTC Solar (NASDAQ:FTCI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

FTC Solar has a consensus target price of $8.90, suggesting a potential upside of 361.14%. Given FTC Solar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FTC Solar is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
China BAK Battery
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
FTC Solar
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, FTC Solar had 4 more articles in the media than China BAK Battery. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for FTC Solar and 2 mentions for China BAK Battery. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 1.80 beat FTC Solar's score of 0.65 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
China BAK Battery
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
FTC Solar
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

China BAK Battery has higher revenue and earnings than FTC Solar. China BAK Battery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTC Solar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
China BAK Battery$195.19M0.48-$9.38M-$0.18N/A
FTC Solar$99.69M0.35-$79.58M-$6.25N/A

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of -51.02%. FTC Solar's return on equity of 0.00% beat China BAK Battery's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
China BAK Battery-7.43% -15.32% -4.23%
FTC Solar -51.02%N/A -37.99%

2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.4% of FTC Solar shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.0% of FTC Solar shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTC Solar has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

FTC Solar beats China BAK Battery on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTC Solar compare to Ultralife?

Ultralife (NASDAQ:ULBI) and FTC Solar (NASDAQ:FTCI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Ultralife has higher revenue and earnings than FTC Solar. Ultralife is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTC Solar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ultralife$191.16M0.55-$5.90M-$0.40N/A
FTC Solar$99.69M0.35-$79.58M-$6.25N/A

In the previous week, FTC Solar had 4 more articles in the media than Ultralife. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for FTC Solar and 2 mentions for Ultralife. Ultralife's average media sentiment score of 1.23 beat FTC Solar's score of 0.65 indicating that Ultralife is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ultralife
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FTC Solar
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ultralife has a net margin of -3.50% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of -51.02%. Ultralife's return on equity of 2.75% beat FTC Solar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ultralife-3.50% 2.75% 1.66%
FTC Solar -51.02%N/A -37.99%

30.7% of Ultralife shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.4% of FTC Solar shares are owned by institutional investors. 42.9% of Ultralife shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.0% of FTC Solar shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FTC Solar has a consensus price target of $8.90, indicating a potential upside of 361.14%. Given FTC Solar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FTC Solar is more favorable than Ultralife.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ultralife
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
FTC Solar
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Ultralife has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTC Solar has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ultralife beats FTC Solar on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTC Solar compare to Blink Charging?

Blink Charging (NASDAQ:BLNK) and FTC Solar (NASDAQ:FTCI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

FTC Solar has a net margin of -51.02% compared to Blink Charging's net margin of -52.24%. FTC Solar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Blink Charging's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blink Charging-52.24% -57.97% -25.95%
FTC Solar -51.02%N/A -37.99%

Blink Charging has a beta of 2.07, indicating that its stock price is 107% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTC Solar has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market.

Blink Charging currently has a consensus target price of $2.50, indicating a potential upside of 437.52%. FTC Solar has a consensus target price of $8.90, indicating a potential upside of 361.14%. Given Blink Charging's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Blink Charging is more favorable than FTC Solar.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Blink Charging
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
FTC Solar
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

44.6% of Blink Charging shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.4% of FTC Solar shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Blink Charging shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.0% of FTC Solar shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

FTC Solar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Blink Charging. Blink Charging is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTC Solar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blink Charging$103.52M0.65-$83.39M-$0.40N/A
FTC Solar$99.69M0.35-$79.58M-$6.25N/A

In the previous week, FTC Solar had 2 more articles in the media than Blink Charging. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for FTC Solar and 4 mentions for Blink Charging. FTC Solar's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Blink Charging's score of 0.59 indicating that FTC Solar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Blink Charging
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FTC Solar
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

FTC Solar beats Blink Charging on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTC Solar compare to Tigo Energy?

Tigo Energy (NASDAQ:TYGO) and FTC Solar (NASDAQ:FTCI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Tigo Energy has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTC Solar has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the broader market.

Tigo Energy has higher revenue and earnings than FTC Solar. FTC Solar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tigo Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tigo Energy$103.54M0.65-$1.88M$0.146.35
FTC Solar$99.69M0.35-$79.58M-$6.25N/A

Tigo Energy presently has a consensus price target of $3.73, indicating a potential upside of 319.85%. FTC Solar has a consensus price target of $8.90, indicating a potential upside of 361.14%. Given FTC Solar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe FTC Solar is more favorable than Tigo Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tigo Energy
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
FTC Solar
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

15.7% of Tigo Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.4% of FTC Solar shares are held by institutional investors. 26.6% of Tigo Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.0% of FTC Solar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tigo Energy has a net margin of 8.97% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of -51.02%. FTC Solar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Tigo Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tigo Energy8.97% -1.74% -0.64%
FTC Solar -51.02%N/A -37.99%

In the previous week, Tigo Energy had 12 more articles in the media than FTC Solar. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Tigo Energy and 6 mentions for FTC Solar. FTC Solar's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Tigo Energy's score of 0.28 indicating that FTC Solar is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tigo Energy
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
FTC Solar
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Tigo Energy beats FTC Solar on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FTC Solar News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FTCI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FTCI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FTCI vs. The Competition

MetricFTC SolarElectrical Equipment IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$32.89M$10.63B$10.19B$13.22B
Dividend YieldN/A2.35%96.64%22.58%
P/E Ratio-0.2948.5126.7225.87
Price / Sales0.331,508.80269.6279.65
Price / CashN/A33.5523.9236.12
Price / Book-0.636.714.756.11
Net Income-$79.58M$141.73M$614.62M$380.72M
7 Day Performance-7.22%-4.86%-1.27%-2.16%
1 Month Performance-21.74%-7.72%-2.87%-4.09%
1 Year Performance-75.41%-6.59%3.60%0.67%

FTC Solar Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FTCI
FTC Solar
4.0424 of 5 stars
$1.80
-6.7%
$8.90
+394.4%
-73.6%$32.89M$99.69MN/A232
OESX
Orion Energy Systems
4.8132 of 5 stars
$28.40
-5.5%
$36.50
+28.5%
+224.5%$122.88M$86.31MN/A174
CBAT
China BAK Battery
1.354 of 5 stars
$1.19
-9.2%
N/A+17.6%$116.13M$195.19MN/A1,739
ULBI
Ultralife
1.1647 of 5 stars
$6.54
+1.7%
N/A-2.3%$107.14M$187.24MN/A678
BLNK
Blink Charging
1.4419 of 5 stars
$0.51
-6.9%
$2.50
+388.4%
-77.0%$79.72M$103.52MN/A320

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FTCI) was last updated on 10/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners