Go Pro

FTC Solar (FTCI) Competitors

FTC Solar logo
$2.21 -0.09 (-3.91%)
Closing price 09/14/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.26 +0.06 (+2.49%)
As of 09/14/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FTCI vs. EAF, OESX, ULBI, CBAT, and BLNK

Should you buy FTC Solar stock or one of its competitors? FTC Solar's main competitors and comparable companies include GrafTech International (EAF), Orion Energy Systems (OESX), Ultralife (ULBI), China BAK Battery (CBAT), and Blink Charging (BLNK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "electrical components & equipment" industry.

How does FTC Solar compare to GrafTech International?

GrafTech International (NYSE:EAF) and FTC Solar (NASDAQ:FTCI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

FTC Solar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than GrafTech International. GrafTech International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTC Solar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
GrafTech International$504.13M0.34-$219.84M-$6.80N/A
FTC Solar$102.31M0.36-$79.58M-$6.25N/A

92.8% of GrafTech International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.4% of FTC Solar shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of GrafTech International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.0% of FTC Solar shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

GrafTech International has a net margin of -34.58% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of -51.02%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
GrafTech International-34.58% N/A -17.50%
FTC Solar -51.02%N/A -37.99%

GrafTech International currently has a consensus price target of $10.67, indicating a potential upside of 60.62%. FTC Solar has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 375.11%. Given FTC Solar's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe FTC Solar is more favorable than GrafTech International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
GrafTech International
3 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
FTC Solar
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

GrafTech International has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTC Solar has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FTC Solar had 1 more articles in the media than GrafTech International. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for FTC Solar and 4 mentions for GrafTech International. GrafTech International's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat FTC Solar's score of 0.31 indicating that GrafTech International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
GrafTech International
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
FTC Solar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

FTC Solar beats GrafTech International on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTC Solar compare to Orion Energy Systems?

Orion Energy Systems (NASDAQ:OESX) and FTC Solar (NASDAQ:FTCI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

Orion Energy Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than FTC Solar. Orion Energy Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTC Solar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Orion Energy Systems$86.31M1.20-$3.16M-$0.05N/A
FTC Solar$102.31M0.36-$79.58M-$6.25N/A

52.6% of Orion Energy Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.4% of FTC Solar shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of Orion Energy Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.0% of FTC Solar shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Orion Energy Systems has a net margin of 0.04% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of -51.02%. Orion Energy Systems' return on equity of 11.66% beat FTC Solar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Orion Energy Systems0.04% 11.66% 3.40%
FTC Solar -51.02%N/A -37.99%

In the previous week, Orion Energy Systems had 4 more articles in the media than FTC Solar. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Orion Energy Systems and 5 mentions for FTC Solar. Orion Energy Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat FTC Solar's score of 0.31 indicating that Orion Energy Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Orion Energy Systems
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FTC Solar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Orion Energy Systems has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTC Solar has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

Orion Energy Systems presently has a consensus target price of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.62%. FTC Solar has a consensus target price of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 375.11%. Given FTC Solar's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe FTC Solar is more favorable than Orion Energy Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Orion Energy Systems
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
FTC Solar
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Orion Energy Systems beats FTC Solar on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTC Solar compare to Ultralife?

Ultralife (NASDAQ:ULBI) and FTC Solar (NASDAQ:FTCI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership and dividends.

FTC Solar has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 375.11%. Given FTC Solar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FTC Solar is more favorable than Ultralife.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ultralife
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
FTC Solar
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, FTC Solar had 4 more articles in the media than Ultralife. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for FTC Solar and 1 mentions for Ultralife. Ultralife's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat FTC Solar's score of 0.31 indicating that Ultralife is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ultralife Very Positive
FTC Solar Neutral

Ultralife has higher revenue and earnings than FTC Solar. Ultralife is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTC Solar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ultralife$191.16M0.48-$5.90M-$0.40N/A
FTC Solar$102.31M0.36-$79.58M-$6.25N/A

Ultralife has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTC Solar has a beta of 1.84, indicating that its share price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

Ultralife has a net margin of -3.50% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of -51.02%. Ultralife's return on equity of 2.75% beat FTC Solar's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ultralife-3.50% 2.75% 1.66%
FTC Solar -51.02%N/A -37.99%

30.7% of Ultralife shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.4% of FTC Solar shares are owned by institutional investors. 42.9% of Ultralife shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.0% of FTC Solar shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Ultralife beats FTC Solar on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTC Solar compare to China BAK Battery?

FTC Solar (NASDAQ:FTCI) and China BAK Battery (NASDAQ:CBAT) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings and media sentiment.

45.4% of FTC Solar shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of China BAK Battery shares are held by institutional investors. 21.0% of FTC Solar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of China BAK Battery shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

China BAK Battery has higher revenue and earnings than FTC Solar. China BAK Battery is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTC Solar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FTC Solar$102.31M0.36-$79.58M-$6.25N/A
China BAK Battery$195.19M0.45-$9.38M-$0.18N/A

FTC Solar currently has a consensus target price of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 375.11%. Given FTC Solar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe FTC Solar is more favorable than China BAK Battery.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FTC Solar
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
China BAK Battery
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

China BAK Battery has a net margin of -7.43% compared to FTC Solar's net margin of -51.02%. FTC Solar's return on equity of 0.00% beat China BAK Battery's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FTC Solar-51.02% N/A -37.99%
China BAK Battery -7.43%-15.32%-4.23%

FTC Solar has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, China BAK Battery has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FTC Solar had 3 more articles in the media than China BAK Battery. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for FTC Solar and 2 mentions for China BAK Battery. China BAK Battery's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat FTC Solar's score of 0.31 indicating that China BAK Battery is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FTC Solar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
China BAK Battery
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

FTC Solar beats China BAK Battery on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FTC Solar compare to Blink Charging?

Blink Charging (NASDAQ:BLNK) and FTC Solar (NASDAQ:FTCI) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

44.6% of Blink Charging shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.4% of FTC Solar shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Blink Charging shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 21.0% of FTC Solar shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FTC Solar has a net margin of -51.02% compared to Blink Charging's net margin of -52.24%. FTC Solar's return on equity of 0.00% beat Blink Charging's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blink Charging-52.24% -57.97% -25.95%
FTC Solar -51.02%N/A -37.99%

In the previous week, Blink Charging had 1 more articles in the media than FTC Solar. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Blink Charging and 5 mentions for FTC Solar. Blink Charging's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat FTC Solar's score of 0.31 indicating that Blink Charging is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Blink Charging
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FTC Solar
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

FTC Solar has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Blink Charging. Blink Charging is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FTC Solar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blink Charging$103.52M0.75-$83.39M-$0.40N/A
FTC Solar$102.31M0.36-$79.58M-$6.25N/A

Blink Charging has a beta of 2.07, suggesting that its stock price is 107% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FTC Solar has a beta of 1.84, suggesting that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market.

Blink Charging currently has a consensus price target of $2.50, indicating a potential upside of 367.64%. FTC Solar has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 375.11%. Given FTC Solar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FTC Solar is more favorable than Blink Charging.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Blink Charging
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
FTC Solar
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

FTC Solar beats Blink Charging on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FTC Solar News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FTCI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FTCI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FTCI vs. The Competition

MetricFTC SolarElectrical Equipment IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$38.00M$10.29B$10.29B$14.30B
Dividend YieldN/A2.33%97.17%11.71%
P/E Ratio-0.3544.1625.5625.37
Price / Sales0.361,555.73433.3687.55
Price / CashN/A32.7123.8534.96
Price / Book-0.777.274.826.24
Net Income-$79.58M$139.36M$612.13M$358.08M
7 Day Performance-8.30%5.16%0.35%-0.70%
1 Month Performance-5.56%-0.29%-3.63%-2.76%
1 Year Performance-67.97%8.79%6.06%6.72%

FTC Solar Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FTCI
FTC Solar
2.9099 of 5 stars
$2.21
-3.9%
$10.50
+375.1%
-68.9%$38.00M$102.31MN/A220
EAF
GrafTech International
1.7661 of 5 stars
$6.30
+1.6%
$10.67
+69.3%
-34.3%$161.77M$504.13MN/A1,071
OESX
Orion Energy Systems
3.8837 of 5 stars
$30.52
+22.1%
$30.00
-1.7%
+183.8%$102.23M$86.31MN/A310
ULBI
Ultralife
1.0406 of 5 stars
$5.94
-3.1%
N/A-18.8%$102.15M$191.16MN/A560
CBAT
China BAK Battery
0.9628 of 5 stars
$1.00
+1.7%
N/A+13.5%$87.18M$195.19MN/A1,739

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:FTCI) was last updated on 9/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners