Does the media favor AB or TIGR?

In the previous week, AllianceBernstein had 12 more articles in the media than UP Fintech. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for AllianceBernstein and 5 mentions for UP Fintech. UP Fintech's average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat AllianceBernstein's score of 0.15 indicating that UP Fintech is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment AllianceBernstein 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral UP Fintech 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to TIGR or NSA?

In the previous week, UP Fintech had 3 more articles in the media than National Storage Affiliates Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for UP Fintech and 2 mentions for National Storage Affiliates Trust. National Storage Affiliates Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat UP Fintech's score of 0.26 indicating that National Storage Affiliates Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment UP Fintech 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral National Storage Affiliates Trust 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to TIGR or APAM?

In the previous week, Artisan Partners Asset Management had 20 more articles in the media than UP Fintech. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Artisan Partners Asset Management and 5 mentions for UP Fintech. Artisan Partners Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat UP Fintech's score of 0.26 indicating that Artisan Partners Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment UP Fintech 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Artisan Partners Asset Management 15 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, USAR or TIGR?

UP Fintech has higher revenue and earnings than USA Rare Earth. USA Rare Earth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UP Fintech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio USA Rare Earth $1.64M 2,156.96 -$297.56M -$3.92 N/A UP Fintech $644.33M 1.43 $170.90M $0.60 8.10

Does the media prefer USAR or TIGR?

In the previous week, USA Rare Earth had 9 more articles in the media than UP Fintech. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for USA Rare Earth and 5 mentions for UP Fintech. USA Rare Earth's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat UP Fintech's score of 0.26 indicating that USA Rare Earth is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment USA Rare Earth 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive UP Fintech 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings & valuation, ETOR or TIGR?

eToro Group has higher revenue and earnings than UP Fintech. UP Fintech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than eToro Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio eToro Group $13.84B 0.22 $215.70M $2.39 15.24 UP Fintech $644.33M 1.43 $170.90M $0.60 8.10

Is ETOR or TIGR more profitable?

UP Fintech has a net margin of 17.64% compared to eToro Group's net margin of 1.90%. eToro Group's return on equity of 19.79% beat UP Fintech's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets eToro Group 1.90% 19.79% 15.03% UP Fintech 17.64% 13.90% 1.30%

Does the media prefer ETOR or TIGR?

In the previous week, eToro Group and eToro Group both had 5 articles in the media. eToro Group's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat UP Fintech's score of 0.26 indicating that eToro Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment eToro Group 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive UP Fintech 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

UP Fintech (TIGR) Competitors

$4.86 -0.04 (-0.82%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$4.88 +0.02 (+0.51%)

As of 07:03 PM Eastern

Compare

TIGR vs. AB, NSA, APAM, USAR, and ETOR

Should you buy UP Fintech stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares UP Fintech with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with UP Fintech include AllianceBernstein (AB), National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA), Artisan Partners Asset Management (APAM), USA Rare Earth (USAR), and eToro Group (ETOR).

How does UP Fintech compare to AllianceBernstein?

AllianceBernstein (NYSE:AB) and UP Fintech (NASDAQ:TIGR) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

19.3% of AllianceBernstein shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.0% of UP Fintech shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of AllianceBernstein shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 50.9% of UP Fintech shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

AllianceBernstein has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UP Fintech has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

AllianceBernstein has higher earnings, but lower revenue than UP Fintech. UP Fintech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AllianceBernstein, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
AllianceBernstein	$343.43M	10.06	$299.84M	$3.38	10.94
UP Fintech	$644.33M	1.43	$170.90M	$0.60	8.10

In the previous week, AllianceBernstein had 12 more articles in the media than UP Fintech. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for AllianceBernstein and 5 mentions for UP Fintech. UP Fintech's average media sentiment score of 0.26 beat AllianceBernstein's score of 0.15 indicating that UP Fintech is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
AllianceBernstein	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
UP Fintech	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

UP Fintech has a net margin of 17.64% compared to AllianceBernstein's net margin of 6.60%. AllianceBernstein's return on equity of 26.05% beat UP Fintech's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
AllianceBernstein	6.60%	26.05%	26.02%
UP Fintech	17.64%	13.90%	1.30%

AllianceBernstein currently has a consensus target price of $39.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.83%. UP Fintech has a consensus target price of $9.23, suggesting a potential upside of 89.97%. Given UP Fintech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe UP Fintech is more favorable than AllianceBernstein.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
AllianceBernstein	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
UP Fintech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

Summary

AllianceBernstein beats UP Fintech on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UP Fintech compare to National Storage Affiliates Trust?

UP Fintech (NASDAQ:TIGR) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NYSE:NSA) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

UP Fintech has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, National Storage Affiliates Trust has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, UP Fintech had 3 more articles in the media than National Storage Affiliates Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for UP Fintech and 2 mentions for National Storage Affiliates Trust. National Storage Affiliates Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat UP Fintech's score of 0.26 indicating that National Storage Affiliates Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
UP Fintech	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
National Storage Affiliates Trust	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

UP Fintech presently has a consensus price target of $9.23, indicating a potential upside of 89.97%. National Storage Affiliates Trust has a consensus price target of $38.60, indicating a potential downside of 11.08%. Given UP Fintech's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe UP Fintech is more favorable than National Storage Affiliates Trust.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
UP Fintech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
National Storage Affiliates Trust	2 Sell rating(s)	12 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.86

UP Fintech has a net margin of 17.64% compared to National Storage Affiliates Trust's net margin of 10.48%. UP Fintech's return on equity of 13.90% beat National Storage Affiliates Trust's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UP Fintech	17.64%	13.90%	1.30%
National Storage Affiliates Trust	10.48%	6.46%	1.54%

UP Fintech has higher earnings, but lower revenue than National Storage Affiliates Trust. UP Fintech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than National Storage Affiliates Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UP Fintech	$644.33M	1.43	$170.90M	$0.60	8.10
National Storage Affiliates Trust	$752.93M	4.45	$73.78M	$0.75	57.88

9.0% of UP Fintech shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 100.0% of National Storage Affiliates Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.9% of UP Fintech shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.7% of National Storage Affiliates Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

UP Fintech and National Storage Affiliates Trust tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UP Fintech compare to Artisan Partners Asset Management?

UP Fintech (NASDAQ:TIGR) and Artisan Partners Asset Management (NYSE:APAM) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

UP Fintech currently has a consensus price target of $9.23, suggesting a potential upside of 89.97%. Artisan Partners Asset Management has a consensus price target of $38.00, suggesting a potential downside of 9.88%. Given UP Fintech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe UP Fintech is more favorable than Artisan Partners Asset Management.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
UP Fintech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Artisan Partners Asset Management	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.83

Artisan Partners Asset Management has higher revenue and earnings than UP Fintech. UP Fintech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Artisan Partners Asset Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UP Fintech	$644.33M	1.43	$170.90M	$0.60	8.10
Artisan Partners Asset Management	$1.20B	2.84	$290.32M	$4.12	10.23

In the previous week, Artisan Partners Asset Management had 20 more articles in the media than UP Fintech. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Artisan Partners Asset Management and 5 mentions for UP Fintech. Artisan Partners Asset Management's average media sentiment score of 1.32 beat UP Fintech's score of 0.26 indicating that Artisan Partners Asset Management is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
UP Fintech	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Artisan Partners Asset Management	15 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

UP Fintech has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Artisan Partners Asset Management has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

9.0% of UP Fintech shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.5% of Artisan Partners Asset Management shares are held by institutional investors. 50.9% of UP Fintech shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.3% of Artisan Partners Asset Management shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Artisan Partners Asset Management has a net margin of 24.08% compared to UP Fintech's net margin of 17.64%. Artisan Partners Asset Management's return on equity of 73.11% beat UP Fintech's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UP Fintech	17.64%	13.90%	1.30%
Artisan Partners Asset Management	24.08%	73.11%	21.93%

Summary

Artisan Partners Asset Management beats UP Fintech on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UP Fintech compare to USA Rare Earth?

USA Rare Earth (NASDAQ:USAR) and UP Fintech (NASDAQ:TIGR) are related companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

USA Rare Earth has a beta of 2.55, meaning that its stock price is 155% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UP Fintech has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

UP Fintech has a net margin of 17.64% compared to USA Rare Earth's net margin of 0.00%. UP Fintech's return on equity of 13.90% beat USA Rare Earth's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
USA Rare Earth	N/A	-15.39%	-10.08%
UP Fintech	17.64%	13.90%	1.30%

UP Fintech has higher revenue and earnings than USA Rare Earth. USA Rare Earth is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UP Fintech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
USA Rare Earth	$1.64M	2,156.96	-$297.56M	-$3.92	N/A
UP Fintech	$644.33M	1.43	$170.90M	$0.60	8.10

USA Rare Earth presently has a consensus price target of $35.83, suggesting a potential upside of 125.94%. UP Fintech has a consensus price target of $9.23, suggesting a potential upside of 89.97%. Given USA Rare Earth's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe USA Rare Earth is more favorable than UP Fintech.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
USA Rare Earth	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
UP Fintech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

9.0% of UP Fintech shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.1% of USA Rare Earth shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 50.9% of UP Fintech shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, USA Rare Earth had 9 more articles in the media than UP Fintech. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for USA Rare Earth and 5 mentions for UP Fintech. USA Rare Earth's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat UP Fintech's score of 0.26 indicating that USA Rare Earth is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
USA Rare Earth	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
UP Fintech	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

UP Fintech beats USA Rare Earth on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does UP Fintech compare to eToro Group?

eToro Group (NASDAQ:ETOR) and UP Fintech (NASDAQ:TIGR) are both finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, eToro Group and eToro Group both had 5 articles in the media. eToro Group's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat UP Fintech's score of 0.26 indicating that eToro Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
eToro Group	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
UP Fintech	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

UP Fintech has a net margin of 17.64% compared to eToro Group's net margin of 1.90%. eToro Group's return on equity of 19.79% beat UP Fintech's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
eToro Group	1.90%	19.79%	15.03%
UP Fintech	17.64%	13.90%	1.30%

eToro Group currently has a consensus target price of $55.80, indicating a potential upside of 53.21%. UP Fintech has a consensus target price of $9.23, indicating a potential upside of 89.97%. Given UP Fintech's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe UP Fintech is more favorable than eToro Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
eToro Group	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.63
UP Fintech	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

eToro Group has higher revenue and earnings than UP Fintech. UP Fintech is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than eToro Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
eToro Group	$13.84B	0.22	$215.70M	$2.39	15.24
UP Fintech	$644.33M	1.43	$170.90M	$0.60	8.10

9.0% of UP Fintech shares are owned by institutional investors. 50.9% of UP Fintech shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

eToro Group has a beta of 1.68, meaning that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UP Fintech has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

eToro Group beats UP Fintech on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get UP Fintech News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TIGR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

TIGR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	UP Fintech	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$921.94M	$5.52B	$13.97B	$12.68B
Dividend Yield	N/A	7.51%	5.96%	10.03%
P/E Ratio	8.10	36.89	28.78	25.13
Price / Sales	1.43	1,122.20	465.32	94.35
Price / Cash	5.35	48.04	29.95	34.82
Price / Book	1.07	3.72	3.71	6.21
Net Income	$170.90M	$417.17M	$1.31B	$347.49M
7 Day Performance	-1.02%	0.65%	0.81%	0.89%
1 Month Performance	6.11%	-0.61%	0.80%	-3.60%
1 Year Performance	-48.30%	6.37%	13.79%	20.46%

UP Fintech Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
TIGR UP Fintech	3.2636 of 5 stars	$4.86 -0.8%	$9.23 +90.0%	-47.9%	$921.94M	$644.33M	8.10	1,346
AB AllianceBernstein	3.3779 of 5 stars	$37.88 +1.8%	$39.50 +4.3%	-9.6%	$3.47B	$342.26M	11.65	4,468	Earnings Report Dividend Cut
NSA National Storage Affiliates Trust	1.3668 of 5 stars	$43.41 flat	$38.60 -11.1%	N/A	$3.35B	$752.93M	57.88	1,458	Positive News
APAM Artisan Partners Asset Management	2.4171 of 5 stars	$40.20 +2.2%	$39.25 -2.4%	-12.3%	$3.17B	$1.20B	10.18	500	Positive News Earnings Report Dividend Increase
USAR USA Rare Earth	3.6847 of 5 stars	$14.93 +5.5%	$35.83 +140.0%	+7.2%	$3.16B	$1.64M	N/A	N/A	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:TIGR) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

UP Fintech (TIGR) Competitors

TIGR vs. AB, NSA, APAM, USAR, and ETOR

How does UP Fintech compare to AllianceBernstein?

Summary

How does UP Fintech compare to National Storage Affiliates Trust?

Summary

How does UP Fintech compare to Artisan Partners Asset Management?

Summary

How does UP Fintech compare to USA Rare Earth?

Summary

How does UP Fintech compare to eToro Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TIGR vs. The Competition

UP Fintech Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

UP Fintech (TIGR) Competitors

TIGR vs. AB, NSA, APAM, USAR, and ETOR

How does UP Fintech compare to AllianceBernstein?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of AB or TIGR?

Which has more volatility & risk, AB or TIGR?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, AB or TIGR?

Does the media favor AB or TIGR?

Is AB or TIGR more profitable?

Do analysts rate AB or TIGR?

Summary

How does UP Fintech compare to National Storage Affiliates Trust?

Which has more risk and volatility, TIGR or NSA?

Does the media refer more to TIGR or NSA?

Do analysts prefer TIGR or NSA?

Is TIGR or NSA more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TIGR or NSA?

Do insiders and institutionals have more ownership in TIGR or NSA?

Summary

How does UP Fintech compare to Artisan Partners Asset Management?

Do analysts rate TIGR or APAM?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, TIGR or APAM?

Does the media refer more to TIGR or APAM?

Which has more volatility & risk, TIGR or APAM?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in TIGR or APAM?

Is TIGR or APAM more profitable?

Summary

How does UP Fintech compare to USA Rare Earth?

Which has more risk & volatility, USAR or TIGR?

Is USAR or TIGR more profitable?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, USAR or TIGR?

Do analysts rate USAR or TIGR?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in USAR or TIGR?

Does the media prefer USAR or TIGR?

Summary

How does UP Fintech compare to eToro Group?

Does the media prefer ETOR or TIGR?

Is ETOR or TIGR more profitable?

Do analysts rate ETOR or TIGR?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, ETOR or TIGR?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in ETOR or TIGR?

Which has more risk and volatility, ETOR or TIGR?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

TIGR vs. The Competition

UP Fintech Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools