Go Pro

Infleqtion (INFQ) Competitors

Infleqtion logo
$12.78 +0.12 (+0.92%)
As of 09:52 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

INFQ vs. XNDU, DBD, QUBT, CRSR, and KODK

Should you buy Infleqtion stock or one of its competitors? Infleqtion's main competitors and comparable companies include Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (XNDU), Diebold Nixdorf (DBD), Quantum Computing (QUBT), Corsair Gaming (CRSR), and Eastman Kodak (KODK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology hardware, storage & peripherals" industry.

How does Infleqtion compare to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares?

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (NASDAQ:XNDU) and Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends and media sentiment.

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Infleqtion. Infleqtion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/AN/AN/A-$0.42N/A
Infleqtion$30.93M92.17-$66.93M-$0.15N/A

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' return on equity of 0.00% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/A N/A N/A
Infleqtion N/A -28.14%-13.99%

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a beta of 14.82, indicating that its share price is 1,382% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Infleqtion has a beta of 4.33, indicating that its share price is 333% more volatile than the broader market.

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares currently has a consensus target price of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 229.34%. Infleqtion has a consensus target price of $21.33, suggesting a potential upside of 68.64%. Given Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is more favorable than Infleqtion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

In the previous week, Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares and Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares both had 7 articles in the media. Infleqtion's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' score of 0.07 indicating that Infleqtion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Infleqtion
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares and Infleqtion tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Infleqtion compare to Diebold Nixdorf?

Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) and Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, risk, earnings and dividends.

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Infleqtion's net margin of 0.00%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
InfleqtionN/A -28.14% -13.99%
Diebold Nixdorf 2.87%21.16%5.90%

97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than Infleqtion. Infleqtion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diebold Nixdorf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Infleqtion$30.93M92.17-$66.93M-$0.15N/A
Diebold Nixdorf$3.81B0.61$94.60M$3.0622.20

In the previous week, Infleqtion had 5 more articles in the media than Diebold Nixdorf. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Infleqtion and 2 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf. Diebold Nixdorf's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.78 indicating that Diebold Nixdorf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Infleqtion
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Diebold Nixdorf
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Infleqtion presently has a consensus target price of $21.33, indicating a potential upside of 68.64%. Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus target price of $100.00, indicating a potential upside of 47.21%. Given Infleqtion's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Infleqtion is more favorable than Diebold Nixdorf.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

Infleqtion has a beta of 4.33, suggesting that its stock price is 333% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf beats Infleqtion on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Infleqtion compare to Quantum Computing?

Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and dividends.

Quantum Computing's return on equity of 0.00% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
InfleqtionN/A -28.14% -13.99%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Quantum Computing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Infleqtion. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Infleqtion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Infleqtion$30.93M92.17-$66.93M-$0.15N/A
Quantum Computing$680K2,649.63-$15.84M-$0.07N/A

Infleqtion has a beta of 4.33, meaning that its share price is 333% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, meaning that its share price is 278% more volatile than the broader market.

Infleqtion currently has a consensus price target of $21.33, suggesting a potential upside of 68.64%. Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.67, suggesting a potential upside of 134.51%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Infleqtion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 14 more articles in the media than Infleqtion. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Quantum Computing and 7 mentions for Infleqtion. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.78 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Infleqtion
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Quantum Computing beats Infleqtion on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Infleqtion compare to Corsair Gaming?

Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) and Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk and dividends.

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Infleqtion. Infleqtion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Infleqtion$30.93M92.17-$66.93M-$0.15N/A
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.94-$12.47M$0.3042.57

Infleqtion has a beta of 4.33, indicating that its share price is 333% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.88, indicating that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

Infleqtion currently has a consensus price target of $21.33, indicating a potential upside of 68.64%. Corsair Gaming has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 6.03%. Given Infleqtion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Infleqtion is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Infleqtion's net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
InfleqtionN/A -28.14% -13.99%
Corsair Gaming 2.36%13.10%6.88%

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Infleqtion had 5 more articles in the media than Corsair Gaming. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Infleqtion and 2 mentions for Corsair Gaming. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.78 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Infleqtion
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Corsair Gaming
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Infleqtion on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Infleqtion compare to Eastman Kodak?

Eastman Kodak (NYSE:KODK) and Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and dividends.

In the previous week, Infleqtion had 4 more articles in the media than Eastman Kodak. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Infleqtion and 3 mentions for Eastman Kodak. Infleqtion's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Eastman Kodak's score of 0.76 indicating that Infleqtion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Eastman Kodak
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Infleqtion
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Eastman Kodak has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Infleqtion has a beta of 4.33, indicating that its stock price is 333% more volatile than the broader market.

Infleqtion has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Eastman Kodak. Infleqtion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Eastman Kodak, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Eastman Kodak$1.07B0.84-$128M-$1.39N/A
Infleqtion$30.93M92.17-$66.93M-$0.15N/A

33.7% of Eastman Kodak shares are owned by institutional investors. 21.3% of Eastman Kodak shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Infleqtion has a consensus target price of $21.33, indicating a potential upside of 68.64%. Given Infleqtion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Infleqtion is more favorable than Eastman Kodak.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Eastman Kodak
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Infleqtion has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Eastman Kodak's net margin of -8.28%. Eastman Kodak's return on equity of -14.47% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Eastman Kodak-8.28% -14.47% -5.55%
Infleqtion N/A -28.14%-13.99%

Summary

Infleqtion beats Eastman Kodak on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Infleqtion News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for INFQ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding INFQ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

INFQ vs. The Competition

MetricInfleqtionTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals IndustryTechnology SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.85B$118.05B$29.51B$23.50B
Dividend YieldN/A1.68%2.73%3.73%
P/E Ratio-84.3328.5175.7829.39
Price / Sales92.1787.36593.1420.99
Price / Cash50.7620.1347.3232.15
Price / Book4.967.639.297.63
Net Income-$66.93M$3.57B$678.51M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.02%-0.02%-0.80%-0.16%
1 Month Performance10.39%3.87%-0.99%-0.46%
1 Year PerformanceN/A90.76%185.95%13.09%

Infleqtion Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
INFQ
Infleqtion
3.8408 of 5 stars
$12.78
+0.9%
$21.33
+67.0%
N/A$2.90B$30.93MN/A2
XNDU
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
3.7398 of 5 stars
$10.49
+1.1%
$33.00
+214.6%
N/A$3.13B$5.96MN/AN/A
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
4.1279 of 5 stars
$67.68
-0.1%
$100.00
+47.8%
+13.5%$2.30B$3.81B22.1220,000
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.7998 of 5 stars
$8.55
-1.2%
$18.67
+118.3%
-45.3%$1.94B$680KN/A30
CRSR
Corsair Gaming
1.8291 of 5 stars
$11.98
+1.2%
$12.00
+0.2%
+46.4%$1.30B$1.47B39.932,355

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:INFQ) was last updated on 9/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners