Go Pro

Infleqtion (INFQ) Competitors

Infleqtion logo
$12.85 +0.67 (+5.48%)
Closing price 08/14/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$12.95 +0.10 (+0.79%)
As of 08/14/2026 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

INFQ vs. QBTS, XNDU, DBD, QUBT, and CRSR

Should you buy Infleqtion stock or one of its competitors? Infleqtion's main competitors and comparable companies include D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (XNDU), Diebold Nixdorf (DBD), Quantum Computing (QUBT), and Corsair Gaming (CRSR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology hardware, storage & peripherals" industry.

How does Infleqtion compare to D-Wave Quantum?

D-Wave Quantum (NASDAQ:QBTS) and Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation and dividends.

D-Wave Quantum currently has a consensus price target of $36.36, suggesting a potential upside of 71.74%. Infleqtion has a consensus price target of $20.60, suggesting a potential upside of 60.34%. Given D-Wave Quantum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe D-Wave Quantum is more favorable than Infleqtion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
D-Wave Quantum
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

42.5% of D-Wave Quantum shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of D-Wave Quantum shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Infleqtion had 4 more articles in the media than D-Wave Quantum. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Infleqtion and 25 mentions for D-Wave Quantum. D-Wave Quantum's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.26 indicating that D-Wave Quantum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
D-Wave Quantum
11 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Infleqtion
11 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Infleqtion has lower revenue, but higher earnings than D-Wave Quantum. Infleqtion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than D-Wave Quantum, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
D-Wave Quantum$24.59M318.46-$355.06M-$0.71N/A
InfleqtionN/AN/A-$66.93M-$0.09N/A

Infleqtion has a net margin of 0.00% compared to D-Wave Quantum's net margin of -2,001.59%. D-Wave Quantum's return on equity of -26.67% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
D-Wave Quantum-2,001.59% -26.67% -24.03%
Infleqtion N/A -54.04%-17.40%

Summary

D-Wave Quantum beats Infleqtion on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Infleqtion compare to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares?

Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) and Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (NASDAQ:XNDU) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Infleqtion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
InfleqtionN/AN/A-$66.93M-$0.09N/A
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/AN/AN/A-$0.42N/A

Infleqtion currently has a consensus target price of $20.60, suggesting a potential upside of 60.34%. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a consensus target price of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 186.21%. Given Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is more favorable than Infleqtion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' return on equity of 0.00% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
InfleqtionN/A -54.04% -17.40%
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Infleqtion had 24 more articles in the media than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Infleqtion and 5 mentions for Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.26 indicating that Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Infleqtion
11 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares beats Infleqtion on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Infleqtion compare to Diebold Nixdorf?

Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) and Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Infleqtion's net margin of 0.00%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
InfleqtionN/A -54.04% -17.40%
Diebold Nixdorf 2.87%21.16%5.90%

Infleqtion currently has a consensus target price of $20.60, indicating a potential upside of 60.34%. Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus target price of $100.00, indicating a potential upside of 36.75%. Given Infleqtion's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Infleqtion is more favorable than Diebold Nixdorf.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

In the previous week, Infleqtion had 27 more articles in the media than Diebold Nixdorf. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Infleqtion and 2 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf. Diebold Nixdorf's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.26 indicating that Diebold Nixdorf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Infleqtion
11 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Diebold Nixdorf
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than Infleqtion. Infleqtion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diebold Nixdorf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
InfleqtionN/AN/A-$66.93M-$0.09N/A
Diebold Nixdorf$3.87B0.64$94.60M$3.0623.90

97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf beats Infleqtion on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Infleqtion compare to Quantum Computing?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, Quantum Computing and Quantum Computing both had 29 articles in the media. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.26 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
8 Very Positive mention(s)
5 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Infleqtion
11 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Quantum Computing presently has a consensus price target of $18.33, indicating a potential upside of 103.48%. Infleqtion has a consensus price target of $20.60, indicating a potential upside of 60.34%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Infleqtion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Quantum Computing has higher revenue and earnings than Infleqtion. Infleqtion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quantum Computing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$9.82M207.59-$15.84M-$0.07N/A
InfleqtionN/AN/A-$66.93M-$0.09N/A

Quantum Computing's return on equity of 0.00% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
Infleqtion N/A -54.04%-17.40%

Summary

Quantum Computing beats Infleqtion on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Infleqtion compare to Corsair Gaming?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Infleqtion's net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Infleqtion N/A -54.04%-17.40%

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Corsair Gaming currently has a consensus target price of $12.14, indicating a potential downside of 6.52%. Infleqtion has a consensus target price of $20.60, indicating a potential upside of 60.34%. Given Infleqtion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Infleqtion is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

In the previous week, Infleqtion had 22 more articles in the media than Corsair Gaming. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Infleqtion and 7 mentions for Corsair Gaming. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.26 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Infleqtion
11 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Infleqtion. Infleqtion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.95-$12.47M$0.3043.30
InfleqtionN/AN/A-$66.93M-$0.09N/A

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Infleqtion on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Infleqtion News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for INFQ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding INFQ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

INFQ vs. The Competition

MetricInfleqtionTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals IndustryTechnology SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.66B$113.97B$30.69B$24.33B
Dividend YieldN/A1.67%2.73%3.68%
P/E Ratio-142.7632.0675.5330.78
Price / SalesN/A49.96602.1720.39
Price / Cash48.8821.7353.7232.80
Price / Book-1.768.569.576.82
Net Income-$66.93M$3.54B$681.19M$1.06B
7 Day Performance8.08%5.77%1.42%0.54%
1 Month Performance30.85%10.11%2.75%2.88%
1 Year PerformanceN/A112.30%199.68%19.08%

Infleqtion Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
INFQ
Infleqtion
3.7881 of 5 stars
$12.85
+5.5%
$20.60
+60.3%
N/A$2.66BN/AN/A2
QBTS
D-Wave Quantum
N/A$20.30
+4.6%
$35.73
+76.0%
N/A$7.35B$12.44MN/A3
XNDU
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
3.5352 of 5 stars
$10.65
+2.5%
$33.00
+209.9%
N/A$3.18BN/AN/AN/A
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
4.7296 of 5 stars
$75.58
+1.4%
$100.00
+32.3%
+17.1%$2.55B$3.81B24.5220,000
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.7078 of 5 stars
$9.03
+3.0%
$18.33
+103.0%
-41.4%$2.01B$680KN/A30

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:INFQ) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners