Go Pro

Diebold Nixdorf (DBD) Competitors

Diebold Nixdorf logo
$78.11 +1.28 (+1.66%)
As of 03:51 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

DBD vs. QBTS, XNDU, INFQ, QUBT, and CRSR

Should you buy Diebold Nixdorf stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Diebold Nixdorf with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Diebold Nixdorf include D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (XNDU), Infleqtion (INFQ), Quantum Computing (QUBT), and Corsair Gaming (CRSR). These companies are all part of the "technology hardware, storage & peripherals" industry.

How does Diebold Nixdorf compare to D-Wave Quantum?

D-Wave Quantum (NYSE:QBTS) and Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, D-Wave Quantum had 13 more articles in the media than Diebold Nixdorf. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for D-Wave Quantum and 17 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf. Diebold Nixdorf's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat D-Wave Quantum's score of 0.46 indicating that Diebold Nixdorf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
D-Wave Quantum
8 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Diebold Nixdorf
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

D-Wave Quantum presently has a consensus target price of $36.80, indicating a potential upside of 72.36%. Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus target price of $100.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.37%. Given D-Wave Quantum's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe D-Wave Quantum is more favorable than Diebold Nixdorf.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
D-Wave Quantum
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than D-Wave Quantum. D-Wave Quantum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diebold Nixdorf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
D-Wave Quantum$12.44M634.69-$355.06M-$1.13N/A
Diebold Nixdorf$3.81B0.70$94.60M$3.0625.66

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to D-Wave Quantum's net margin of -2,957.23%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat D-Wave Quantum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
D-Wave Quantum-2,957.23% -44.06% -38.48%
Diebold Nixdorf 2.87%21.16%5.90%

D-Wave Quantum has a beta of 2.11, meaning that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

42.5% of D-Wave Quantum shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of D-Wave Quantum shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf beats D-Wave Quantum on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Diebold Nixdorf compare to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares?

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (NASDAQ:XNDU) and Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares currently has a consensus price target of $36.67, suggesting a potential upside of 219.95%. Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus price target of $100.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.37%. Given Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is more favorable than Diebold Nixdorf.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Diebold Nixdorf had 14 more articles in the media than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf and 3 mentions for Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Diebold Nixdorf's score of 0.74 indicating that Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Diebold Nixdorf
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diebold Nixdorf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/AN/AN/A-$0.28N/A
Diebold Nixdorf$3.81B0.70$94.60M$3.0625.66

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a beta of 14.94, indicating that its share price is 1,394% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' net margin of 0.00%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/A N/A N/A
Diebold Nixdorf 2.87%21.16%5.90%

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf beats Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Diebold Nixdorf compare to Infleqtion?

Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) and Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Diebold Nixdorf had 11 more articles in the media than Infleqtion. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf and 6 mentions for Infleqtion. Diebold Nixdorf's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.59 indicating that Diebold Nixdorf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Infleqtion
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Diebold Nixdorf
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than Infleqtion. Infleqtion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diebold Nixdorf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Infleqtion$30.93M77.18-$66.93M-$0.09N/A
Diebold Nixdorf$3.81B0.70$94.60M$3.0625.66

Infleqtion presently has a consensus target price of $20.60, suggesting a potential upside of 88.30%. Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus target price of $100.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.37%. Given Infleqtion's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Infleqtion is more favorable than Diebold Nixdorf.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Infleqtion's net margin of 0.00%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
InfleqtionN/A -60.34% -15.09%
Diebold Nixdorf 2.87%21.16%5.90%

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf beats Infleqtion on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Diebold Nixdorf compare to Quantum Computing?

Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and dividends.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.74, indicating that its share price is 274% more volatile than the broader market.

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diebold Nixdorf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diebold Nixdorf$3.81B0.70$94.60M$3.0625.66
Quantum Computing$680K2,973.48-$63.15M-$0.28N/A

In the previous week, Diebold Nixdorf had 9 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf and 8 mentions for Quantum Computing. Diebold Nixdorf's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.72 indicating that Diebold Nixdorf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diebold Nixdorf
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diebold Nixdorf2.87% 21.16% 5.90%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Diebold Nixdorf presently has a consensus price target of $100.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.37%. Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.33, indicating a potential upside of 104.50%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Diebold Nixdorf.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf beats Quantum Computing on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Diebold Nixdorf compare to Corsair Gaming?

Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) and Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Diebold Nixdorf had 9 more articles in the media than Corsair Gaming. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf and 8 mentions for Corsair Gaming. Diebold Nixdorf's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat Corsair Gaming's score of 0.18 indicating that Diebold Nixdorf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diebold Nixdorf
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Corsair Gaming
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than Corsair Gaming. Diebold Nixdorf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diebold Nixdorf$3.81B0.70$94.60M$3.0625.66
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.81-$12.47M$0.08140.31

97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Diebold Nixdorf currently has a consensus target price of $100.00, indicating a potential upside of 27.37%. Corsair Gaming has a consensus target price of $10.29, indicating a potential downside of 8.37%. Given Diebold Nixdorf's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Diebold Nixdorf is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Corsair Gaming's net margin of 0.71%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat Corsair Gaming's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diebold Nixdorf2.87% 21.16% 5.90%
Corsair Gaming 0.71%9.71%4.97%

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 1.18, indicating that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf beats Corsair Gaming on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Diebold Nixdorf News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for DBD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding DBD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

DBD vs. The Competition

MetricDiebold NixdorfTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals IndustryTechnology SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.67B$107.45B$29.73B$24.12B
Dividend YieldN/A1.71%2.76%3.71%
P/E Ratio25.6937.7881.7531.95
Price / Sales0.70123.75598.2920.31
Price / Cash7.9723.5447.9031.77
Price / Book2.738.189.236.92
Net Income$94.60M$3.10B$662.76M$1.07B
7 Day Performance4.65%9.61%6.97%2.71%
1 Month Performance-5.68%0.18%-1.07%1.63%
1 Year Performance39.32%99.24%152.25%19.69%

Diebold Nixdorf Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
4.6931 of 5 stars
$78.51
+2.2%
$100.00
+27.4%
+39.7%$2.67B$3.81B25.6920,000
QBTS
D-Wave Quantum
3.6007 of 5 stars
$19.98
+10.5%
$36.80
+84.2%
+26.8%$7.39B$12.44MN/A3
XNDU
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
3.8244 of 5 stars
$11.31
+5.1%
$36.67
+224.2%
N/A$3.21BN/AN/AN/A
INFQ
Infleqtion
2.6127 of 5 stars
$10.96
+11.5%
$20.60
+87.9%
N/A$2.14BN/AN/A2
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.501 of 5 stars
$8.74
+7.9%
$18.33
+109.8%
-40.8%$1.83B$680KN/A30

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:DBD) was last updated on 8/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners