Log in

NYSE:DDD3D Systems Competitors & Alternatives

$6.52
-0.11 (-1.66 %)
(As of 07/13/2020 04:00 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$6.50
Now: $6.52
$6.82
50-Day Range
$6.45
MA: $7.21
$8.25
52-Week Range
$5.20
Now: $6.52
$12.56
Volume1.70 million shs
Average Volume1.97 million shs
Market Capitalization$775.03 million
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.58

Competitors

3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) Vs. TENB, BOX, ACIW, BLKB, RPD, and LPSN

Should you be buying DDD stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "prepackaged software" are considered alternatives and competitors to 3D Systems, including Tenable (TENB), BOX (BOX), ACI Worldwide (ACIW), Blackbaud (BLKB), Rapid7 (RPD), and LivePerson (LPSN).

3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) and Tenable (NASDAQ:TENB) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares 3D Systems and Tenable's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3D Systems$629.09 million1.23$-69,880,000.00($0.39)-16.72
Tenable$354.59 million8.80$-99,010,000.00($0.87)-35.83

3D Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Tenable. Tenable is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3D Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for 3D Systems and Tenable, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
3D Systems33101.71
Tenable03802.73

3D Systems presently has a consensus price target of $8.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 27.81%. Tenable has a consensus price target of $33.3636, suggesting a potential upside of 7.04%. Given 3D Systems' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe 3D Systems is more favorable than Tenable.

Profitability

This table compares 3D Systems and Tenable's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
3D Systems-10.53%-8.77%-5.43%
Tenable-26.68%-76.21%-15.93%

Volatility and Risk

3D Systems has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Tenable has a beta of 1.87, indicating that its share price is 87% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

69.7% of 3D Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.0% of Tenable shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of 3D Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.4% of Tenable shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

3D Systems beats Tenable on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) and BOX (NYSE:BOX) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for 3D Systems and BOX, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
3D Systems33101.71
BOX14802.54

3D Systems currently has a consensus price target of $8.3333, indicating a potential upside of 27.81%. BOX has a consensus price target of $20.40, indicating a potential upside of 6.42%. Given 3D Systems' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe 3D Systems is more favorable than BOX.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

69.7% of 3D Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.2% of BOX shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of 3D Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.2% of BOX shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares 3D Systems and BOX's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3D Systems$629.09 million1.23$-69,880,000.00($0.39)-16.72
BOX$696.26 million4.15$-144,350,000.00($0.96)-19.97

3D Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BOX. BOX is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3D Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares 3D Systems and BOX's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
3D Systems-10.53%-8.77%-5.43%
BOX-18.56%-485.15%-14.40%

Volatility and Risk

3D Systems has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BOX has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

3D Systems beats BOX on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) and ACI Worldwide (NASDAQ:ACIW) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares 3D Systems and ACI Worldwide's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
3D Systems-10.53%-8.77%-5.43%
ACI Worldwide5.10%6.37%2.09%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

69.7% of 3D Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of 3D Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of ACI Worldwide shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

3D Systems has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ACI Worldwide has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for 3D Systems and ACI Worldwide, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
3D Systems33101.71
ACI Worldwide01302.75

3D Systems presently has a consensus price target of $8.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 27.81%. ACI Worldwide has a consensus price target of $35.50, suggesting a potential upside of 39.60%. Given ACI Worldwide's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ACI Worldwide is more favorable than 3D Systems.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares 3D Systems and ACI Worldwide's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3D Systems$629.09 million1.23$-69,880,000.00($0.39)-16.72
ACI Worldwide$1.26 billion2.34$67.06 millionN/AN/A

ACI Worldwide has higher revenue and earnings than 3D Systems.

Summary

ACI Worldwide beats 3D Systems on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) and Blackbaud (NASDAQ:BLKB) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Volatility & Risk

3D Systems has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its share price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Blackbaud has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares 3D Systems and Blackbaud's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
3D Systems-10.53%-8.77%-5.43%
Blackbaud1.95%15.99%3.38%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

69.7% of 3D Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of 3D Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Blackbaud shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for 3D Systems and Blackbaud, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
3D Systems33101.71
Blackbaud14001.80

3D Systems currently has a consensus target price of $8.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 27.81%. Blackbaud has a consensus target price of $74.00, suggesting a potential upside of 28.63%. Given Blackbaud's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Blackbaud is more favorable than 3D Systems.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares 3D Systems and Blackbaud's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3D Systems$629.09 million1.23$-69,880,000.00($0.39)-16.72
Blackbaud$900.42 million3.17$11.91 million$1.2745.30

Blackbaud has higher revenue and earnings than 3D Systems. 3D Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Blackbaud, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Blackbaud beats 3D Systems on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Rapid7 (NASDAQ:RPD) and 3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and valuation.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

91.7% of Rapid7 shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 69.7% of 3D Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.6% of Rapid7 shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of 3D Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Rapid7 has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, 3D Systems has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Rapid7 and 3D Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Rapid7-18.70%-55.85%-7.27%
3D Systems-10.53%-8.77%-5.43%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Rapid7 and 3D Systems' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rapid7$326.95 million8.25$-53,850,000.00($0.74)-72.18
3D Systems$629.09 million1.23$-69,880,000.00($0.39)-16.72

Rapid7 has higher earnings, but lower revenue than 3D Systems. Rapid7 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3D Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Rapid7 and 3D Systems, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Rapid7011113.00
3D Systems33101.71

Rapid7 presently has a consensus price target of $61.3077, suggesting a potential upside of 14.79%. 3D Systems has a consensus price target of $8.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 27.81%. Given 3D Systems' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe 3D Systems is more favorable than Rapid7.

Summary

3D Systems beats Rapid7 on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

3D Systems (NYSE:DDD) and LivePerson (NASDAQ:LPSN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for 3D Systems and LivePerson, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
3D Systems33101.71
LivePerson021102.85

3D Systems currently has a consensus target price of $8.3333, suggesting a potential upside of 27.81%. LivePerson has a consensus target price of $42.0833, suggesting a potential upside of 8.10%. Given 3D Systems' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe 3D Systems is more favorable than LivePerson.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares 3D Systems and LivePerson's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
3D Systems$629.09 million1.23$-69,880,000.00($0.39)-16.72
LivePerson$291.61 million8.84$-96,070,000.00($1.29)-30.18

3D Systems has higher revenue and earnings than LivePerson. LivePerson is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than 3D Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

3D Systems has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, LivePerson has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares 3D Systems and LivePerson's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
3D Systems-10.53%-8.77%-5.43%
LivePerson-37.65%-57.59%-18.39%

Insider & Institutional Ownership

69.7% of 3D Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.5% of LivePerson shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of 3D Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.7% of LivePerson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

3D Systems beats LivePerson on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Tenable logo
TENB
Tenable
1.2$31.17-0.8%$3.12 billion$354.59 million-30.26Insider Selling
BOX logo
BOX
BOX
1.3$19.17-7.3%$3.10 billion$696.26 million-21.30
ACI Worldwide logo
ACIW
ACI Worldwide
1.1$25.43-1.1%$2.98 billion$1.26 billion43.85Analyst Report
Heavy News Reporting
Blackbaud logo
BLKB
Blackbaud
1.5$57.53-0.6%$2.85 billion$900.42 million155.49
Rapid7 logo
RPD
Rapid7
1.3$53.41-4.8%$2.83 billion$326.95 million-40.46
LivePerson logo
LPSN
LivePerson
1.3$38.93-9.2%$2.81 billion$291.61 million-21.75Insider Selling
Altair Engineering logo
ALTR
Altair Engineering
0.9$37.02-4.1%$2.81 billion$458.92 million-185.10
SINA logo
SINA
SINA
1.9$40.40-0.5%$2.77 billion$2.16 billion-130.32
PING
Ping Identity
1.7$33.99-1.9%$2.73 billion$242.90 million91.86Analyst Report
Mimecast logo
MIME
Mimecast
2.2$40.91-6.5%$2.72 billion$426.96 million-1,022.75Insider Selling
Heavy News Reporting
BlackBerry logo
BB
BlackBerry
1.3$4.73-1.7%$2.63 billion$1.04 billion-3.43
SPS Commerce logo
SPSC
SPS Commerce
1.2$71.10-4.8%$2.60 billion$279.12 million70.75
Workiva logo
WK
Workiva
1.1$53.48-3.0%$2.60 billion$297.89 million-49.06
Sailpoint Technologies logo
SAIL
Sailpoint Technologies
1.3$28.09-2.2%$2.59 billion$288.52 million-312.08Insider Selling
2U logo
TWOU
2U
1.2$40.30-0.3%$2.57 billion$574.67 million-9.31
Cornerstone OnDemand logo
CSOD
Cornerstone OnDemand
1.8$35.51-4.4%$2.36 billion$576.52 million-147.96
PD
Pagerduty
1.1$25.67-9.9%$2.22 billion$166.35 million-38.89
Bottomline Technologies logo
EPAY
Bottomline Technologies
1.4$46.10-4.1%$2.11 billion$421.96 million-768.21
CommVault Systems logo
CVLT
CommVault Systems
1.7$37.23-1.9%$1.76 billion$670.89 million-286.36
Progress Software logo
PRGS
Progress Software
2.1$35.18-2.3%$1.61 billion$413.30 million34.49
Zuora logo
ZUO
Zuora
1.4$12.43-3.3%$1.44 billion$276.06 million-17.51
Micro Focus International logo
MFGP
Micro Focus International
2.2$4.28-2.8%$1.43 billion$3.35 billion2.18Analyst Downgrade
High Trading Volume
CRNC
Cerence
1.6$38.82-4.2%$1.42 billion$303.32 million14.07
Sapiens International logo
SPNS
Sapiens International
1.2$26.89-2.2%$1.38 billion$325.67 million48.89Heavy News Reporting
Materialise logo
MTLS
Materialise
0.8$23.54-0.4%$1.23 billion$220.31 million-1,177.00
MicroStrategy logo
MSTR
MicroStrategy
1.2$117.66-0.2%$1.19 billion$486.33 million28.22
OPRA
Opera
1.1$10.77-10.0%$1.18 billion$334.86 million37.14
Talend logo
TLND
Talend
2.2$35.56-0.8%$1.10 billion$247.98 million-17.69
Domo logo
DOMO
Domo
1.4$33.33-6.9%$1.03 billion$173.40 million-8.07
Secureworks logo
SCWX
Secureworks
0.8$11.35-3.2%$961.85 million$552.77 million-29.87
Upland Software logo
UPLD
Upland Software
1.6$33.14-5.1%$888.38 million$222.64 million-14.10
WIMI
Kura Sushi USA
0.0$24.74-40.9%$864.05 millionN/A0.00Analyst Downgrade
Heavy News Reporting
QAD logo
QADA
QAD
1.8$39.67-0.8%$817.40 million$310.77 million-58.34
CANG
Cango
2.1$5.34-4.9%$808.48 million$206.85 million21.36
Mobileiron logo
MOBL
Mobileiron
1.5$4.69-10.2%$595.31 million$205.24 million-12.01
Endurance International Group logo
EIGI
Endurance International Group
1.6$3.94-6.6%$589.89 million$1.11 billion-49.24
QAD logo
QADB
QAD
0.7$28.11-7.5%$574.43 million$310.77 million-41.34
Magic Software Enterprises logo
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises
1.2$10.86-0.4%$531.48 million$325.63 million40.22
American Software logo
AMSWA
American Software
2.0$15.69-1.1%$501.33 million$115.47 million74.71
ChannelAdvisor logo
ECOM
ChannelAdvisor
1.3$14.98-16.7%$495.83 million$129.96 million55.48
Cheetah Mobile logo
CMCM
Cheetah Mobile
0.7$2.76-16.7%$395.59 million$515.34 million-5.75High Trading Volume
Rosetta Stone logo
RST
Rosetta Stone
1.5$15.78-1.0%$391.75 million$182.70 million-20.23Heavy News Reporting
Benefitfocus logo
BNFT
Benefitfocus
1.5$10.25-3.5%$340.65 million$295.69 million-7.88
GDYN
Grid Dynamics
1.6$6.57-0.6%$335.93 millionN/A0.00
eGain logo
EGAN
eGain
1.4$10.14-6.3%$330.26 million$67.23 million59.65
Iclick Interactive Asia Group logo
ICLK
Iclick Interactive Asia Group
1.3$5.71-4.6%$326.42 million$199.41 million-19.03
Avid Technology logo
AVID
Avid Technology
2.3$7.10-1.7%$315.50 million$411.79 million236.50Analyst Upgrade
Insider Buying
Xunlei logo
XNET
Xunlei
0.6$4.06-0.2%$275.36 million$180.66 million-5.49
Shotspotter logo
SSTI
Shotspotter
2.0$23.70-1.3%$270.16 million$40.75 million131.67
MiX Telematics logo
MIXT
MiX Telematics
2.0$8.66-0.6%$195.54 million$145.65 million19.68
This page was last updated on 7/14/2020 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.