A10 Networks Competitors

Cisco Systems (NASDAQ:CSCO) and A10 Networks (NYSE:ATEN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

70.6% of Cisco Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.2% of A10 Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Cisco Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.7% of A10 Networks shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Cisco Systems and A10 Networks' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Cisco Systems has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its share price is 5% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, A10 Networks has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for Cisco Systems and A10 Networks, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Cisco Systems currently has a consensus price target of $52.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.70%. A10 Networks has a consensus price target of $14.25, suggesting a potential upside of 54.89%. Given A10 Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe A10 Networks is more favorable than Cisco Systems.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Cisco Systems and A10 Networks' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Cisco Systems has higher revenue and earnings than A10 Networks. A10 Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cisco Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Cisco Systems beats A10 Networks on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

International Business Machines (NYSE:IBM) and A10 Networks (NYSE:ATEN) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares International Business Machines and A10 Networks' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

International Business Machines has higher revenue and earnings than A10 Networks. A10 Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International Business Machines, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for International Business Machines and A10 Networks, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

International Business Machines currently has a consensus price target of $148.4444, suggesting a potential upside of 2.60%. A10 Networks has a consensus price target of $14.25, suggesting a potential upside of 54.89%. Given A10 Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe A10 Networks is more favorable than International Business Machines.

Risk & Volatility

International Business Machines has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, A10 Networks has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its share price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares International Business Machines and A10 Networks' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

55.7% of International Business Machines shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 78.2% of A10 Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of International Business Machines shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.7% of A10 Networks shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

International Business Machines beats A10 Networks on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

A10 Networks (NYSE:ATEN) and HP (NYSE:HPQ) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and profitability.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares A10 Networks and HP's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

HP has higher revenue and earnings than A10 Networks. A10 Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HP, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for A10 Networks and HP, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

A10 Networks presently has a consensus price target of $14.25, suggesting a potential upside of 54.89%. HP has a consensus price target of $24.4643, suggesting a potential downside of 25.69%. Given A10 Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe A10 Networks is more favorable than HP.

Volatility & Risk

A10 Networks has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, HP has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares A10 Networks and HP's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

78.2% of A10 Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of HP shares are held by institutional investors. 23.7% of A10 Networks shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of HP shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

HP beats A10 Networks on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

A10 Networks (NYSE:ATEN) and Arista Networks (NYSE:ANET) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and profitability.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares A10 Networks and Arista Networks' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Arista Networks has higher revenue and earnings than A10 Networks. A10 Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Arista Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for A10 Networks and Arista Networks, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

A10 Networks presently has a consensus price target of $14.25, suggesting a potential upside of 54.89%. Arista Networks has a consensus price target of $338.5263, suggesting a potential upside of 3.72%. Given A10 Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe A10 Networks is more favorable than Arista Networks.

Volatility & Risk

A10 Networks has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Arista Networks has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares A10 Networks and Arista Networks' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

78.2% of A10 Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.8% of Arista Networks shares are held by institutional investors. 23.7% of A10 Networks shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.8% of Arista Networks shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Arista Networks beats A10 Networks on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

A10 Networks (NYSE:ATEN) and F5 Networks (NASDAQ:FFIV) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and profitability.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares A10 Networks and F5 Networks' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

F5 Networks has higher revenue and earnings than A10 Networks. A10 Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than F5 Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for A10 Networks and F5 Networks, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

A10 Networks presently has a consensus price target of $14.25, suggesting a potential upside of 54.89%. F5 Networks has a consensus price target of $203.8571, suggesting a potential upside of 12.46%. Given A10 Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe A10 Networks is more favorable than F5 Networks.

Volatility & Risk

A10 Networks has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, F5 Networks has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares A10 Networks and F5 Networks' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

78.2% of A10 Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.7% of F5 Networks shares are held by institutional investors. 23.7% of A10 Networks shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of F5 Networks shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

F5 Networks beats A10 Networks on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

A10 Networks (NYSE:ATEN) and Juniper Networks (NYSE:JNPR) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk and profitability.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares A10 Networks and Juniper Networks' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Juniper Networks has higher revenue and earnings than A10 Networks. A10 Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Juniper Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for A10 Networks and Juniper Networks, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

A10 Networks presently has a consensus price target of $14.25, suggesting a potential upside of 54.89%. Juniper Networks has a consensus price target of $25.50, suggesting a potential downside of 4.06%. Given A10 Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe A10 Networks is more favorable than Juniper Networks.

Volatility & Risk

A10 Networks has a beta of 0.96, suggesting that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Juniper Networks has a beta of 0.9, suggesting that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares A10 Networks and Juniper Networks' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

78.2% of A10 Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.3% of Juniper Networks shares are held by institutional investors. 23.7% of A10 Networks shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Juniper Networks shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

A10 Networks beats Juniper Networks on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.