Go Pro

Corsair Gaming (CRSR) Competitors

Corsair Gaming logo
$13.38 -0.13 (-0.96%)
Closing price 09/18/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$13.44 +0.05 (+0.41%)
As of 09/18/2026 07:42 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CRSR vs. XNDU, INFQ, DBD, QUBT, and QMCO

Should you buy Corsair Gaming stock or one of its competitors? Corsair Gaming's main competitors and comparable companies include Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (XNDU), Infleqtion (INFQ), Diebold Nixdorf (DBD), Quantum Computing (QUBT), and Quantum (QMCO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology hardware, storage & peripherals" industry.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares?

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (NASDAQ:XNDU) and Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Corsair Gaming. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/AN/AN/A-$0.42N/A
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.98-$12.47M$0.3044.60

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares currently has a consensus price target of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 344.74%. Corsair Gaming has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 10.31%. Given Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/A N/A N/A
Corsair Gaming 2.36%13.10%6.88%

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a beta of 14.82, suggesting that its stock price is 1,382% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.88, suggesting that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming had 3 more articles in the media than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Corsair Gaming and 2 mentions for Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' score of 0.50 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Corsair Gaming
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Infleqtion?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Infleqtion's net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Infleqtion N/A -28.14%-13.99%

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.88, meaning that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Infleqtion has a beta of 4.33, meaning that its share price is 333% more volatile than the broader market.

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Infleqtion. Infleqtion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.98-$12.47M$0.3044.60
InfleqtionN/AN/A-$66.93M-$0.15N/A

Corsair Gaming presently has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 10.31%. Infleqtion has a consensus target price of $21.33, suggesting a potential upside of 60.69%. Given Infleqtion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Infleqtion is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

In the previous week, Infleqtion had 5 more articles in the media than Corsair Gaming. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Infleqtion and 5 mentions for Corsair Gaming. Infleqtion's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Corsair Gaming's score of 0.60 indicating that Infleqtion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Infleqtion
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Infleqtion on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Diebold Nixdorf?

Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) and Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and institutional ownership.

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than Corsair Gaming. Diebold Nixdorf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diebold Nixdorf$3.81B0.56$94.60M$3.0620.67
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.98-$12.47M$0.3044.60

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming had 3 more articles in the media than Diebold Nixdorf. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Corsair Gaming and 2 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Diebold Nixdorf's score of 0.35 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diebold Nixdorf
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Corsair Gaming
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Diebold Nixdorf presently has a consensus target price of $100.00, suggesting a potential upside of 58.14%. Corsair Gaming has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 10.31%. Given Diebold Nixdorf's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Diebold Nixdorf is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.88, meaning that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Corsair Gaming's net margin of 2.36%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat Corsair Gaming's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diebold Nixdorf2.87% 21.16% 5.90%
Corsair Gaming 2.36%13.10%6.88%

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf and Corsair Gaming tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Quantum Computing?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Corsair Gaming presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 10.31%. Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.67, suggesting a potential upside of 114.56%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.88, indicating that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, indicating that its share price is 278% more volatile than the broader market.

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.98-$12.47M$0.3044.60
Quantum Computing$680K2,895.95-$15.84M-$0.07N/A

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 6 more articles in the media than Corsair Gaming. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Quantum Computing and 5 mentions for Corsair Gaming. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Corsair Gaming's score of 0.60 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
7 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Quantum Computing on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Quantum?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Quantum (NASDAQ:QMCO) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Corsair Gaming currently has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 10.31%. Quantum has a consensus target price of $26.50, suggesting a potential upside of 5.62%. Given Quantum's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Quantum is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Quantum
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Quantum's net margin of -80.76%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Quantum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Quantum -80.76%N/A -7.28%

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.7% of Quantum shares are held by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 41.0% of Quantum shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum. Quantum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.98-$12.47M$0.3044.60
Quantum$279.58M3.54-$101.05M-$13.24N/A

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.88, suggesting that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum has a beta of 3.14, suggesting that its share price is 214% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming had 2 more articles in the media than Quantum. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Corsair Gaming and 3 mentions for Quantum. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Quantum's score of 0.37 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Quantum on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Corsair Gaming News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRSR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRSR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRSR vs. The Competition

MetricCorsair GamingTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.45B$121.35B$30.35B$13.19B
Dividend YieldN/A1.62%2.75%12.81%
P/E Ratio44.6028.7877.4125.40
Price / Sales0.9888.48590.2189.45
Price / Cash15.5821.4448.1751.42
Price / Book2.257.997.826.33
Net Income-$12.47M$3.49B$702.35M$358.33M
7 Day Performance-1.18%-2.08%-0.52%1.12%
1 Month Performance22.64%-1.77%-2.28%-2.39%
1 Year Performance56.13%61.17%176.56%5.35%

Corsair Gaming Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRSR
Corsair Gaming
1.8097 of 5 stars
$13.38
-1.0%
$12.00
-10.3%
+56.1%$1.45B$1.47B44.602,355
XNDU
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
3.2094 of 5 stars
$9.72
flat
$33.00
+239.5%
N/A$2.90BN/AN/AN/A
INFQ
Infleqtion
3.5671 of 5 stars
$12.92
+0.5%
$21.33
+65.1%
N/A$2.90BN/AN/A2
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
3.9539 of 5 stars
$68.49
-0.3%
$100.00
+46.0%
+11.3%$2.33B$3.81B22.3820,000
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.5122 of 5 stars
$8.01
flat
$18.67
+133.0%
-62.6%$1.81B$680KN/A30

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CRSR) was last updated on 9/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners