Go Pro

Corsair Gaming (CRSR) Competitors

Corsair Gaming logo
$14.35 +3.74 (+35.25%)
Closing price 08/7/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$14.29 -0.06 (-0.44%)
As of 08/7/2026 07:58 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CRSR vs. XNDU, DBD, INFQ, QUBT, and KODK

Should you buy Corsair Gaming stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Corsair Gaming with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Corsair Gaming include Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (XNDU), Diebold Nixdorf (DBD), Infleqtion (INFQ), Quantum Computing (QUBT), and Eastman Kodak (KODK). These companies are all part of the "technology hardware, storage & peripherals" industry.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (NASDAQ:XNDU) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a beta of 14.92, suggesting that its share price is 1,392% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming had 14 more articles in the media than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Corsair Gaming and 4 mentions for Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' score of 0.08 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Corsair Gaming. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.47B1.04-$12.47M$0.3047.83
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/AN/AN/A-$0.28N/A

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares N/A N/A N/A

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Corsair Gaming presently has a consensus target price of $11.29, indicating a potential downside of 21.35%. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a consensus target price of $33.00, indicating a potential upside of 200.00%. Given Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Diebold Nixdorf?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Corsair Gaming presently has a consensus target price of $11.29, indicating a potential downside of 21.35%. Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus target price of $100.00, indicating a potential upside of 33.01%. Given Diebold Nixdorf's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Diebold Nixdorf is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Corsair Gaming's net margin of 2.36%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat Corsair Gaming's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Diebold Nixdorf 2.87%21.16%5.90%

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than Corsair Gaming. Diebold Nixdorf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.47B1.04-$12.47M$0.3047.83
Diebold Nixdorf$3.81B0.67$94.60M$3.0624.57

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming had 13 more articles in the media than Diebold Nixdorf. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Corsair Gaming and 5 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf. Diebold Nixdorf's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Corsair Gaming's score of 0.72 indicating that Diebold Nixdorf is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Diebold Nixdorf
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf beats Corsair Gaming on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Infleqtion?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming had 12 more articles in the media than Infleqtion. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Corsair Gaming and 6 mentions for Infleqtion. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.40 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Infleqtion
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Corsair Gaming presently has a consensus price target of $11.29, indicating a potential downside of 21.35%. Infleqtion has a consensus price target of $20.60, indicating a potential upside of 73.30%. Given Infleqtion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Infleqtion is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Infleqtion. Infleqtion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.47B1.04-$12.47M$0.3047.83
InfleqtionN/AN/A-$66.93M-$0.09N/A

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Infleqtion's net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Infleqtion N/A -60.34%-15.09%

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Infleqtion on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Quantum Computing?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Quantum Computing currently has a consensus price target of $18.33, suggesting a potential upside of 99.71%. Corsair Gaming has a consensus price target of $11.29, suggesting a potential downside of 21.35%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
Corsair Gaming 2.36%13.10%6.88%

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K3,044.79-$63.15M-$0.28N/A
Corsair Gaming$1.47B1.04-$12.47M$0.3047.83

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming had 8 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Corsair Gaming and 10 mentions for Quantum Computing. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.57 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Corsair Gaming
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.74, indicating that its stock price is 274% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Quantum Computing on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Eastman Kodak?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Eastman Kodak (NYSE:KODK) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming had 7 more articles in the media than Eastman Kodak. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Corsair Gaming and 11 mentions for Eastman Kodak. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Eastman Kodak's score of 0.58 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Eastman Kodak
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of Eastman Kodak shares are held by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.3% of Eastman Kodak shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Corsair Gaming presently has a consensus price target of $11.29, suggesting a potential downside of 21.35%. Given Corsair Gaming's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Corsair Gaming is more favorable than Eastman Kodak.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Eastman Kodak
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eastman Kodak has a beta of 1.56, suggesting that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market.

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Eastman Kodak's net margin of -8.28%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Eastman Kodak's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Eastman Kodak -8.28%-14.47%-5.55%

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Eastman Kodak. Eastman Kodak is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.47B1.04-$12.47M$0.3047.83
Eastman Kodak$1.07B0.92-$128M-$1.39N/A

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Eastman Kodak on 16 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Corsair Gaming News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRSR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRSR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRSR vs. The Competition

MetricCorsair GamingTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.53B$109.06B$30.06B$13.01B
Dividend YieldN/A1.71%2.73%10.20%
P/E Ratio47.8328.7575.9325.03
Price / Sales1.04102.84598.5984.81
Price / Cash16.7120.0250.5137.44
Price / Book2.428.048.176.43
Net Income-$12.47M$3.46B$680.39M$348.10M
7 Day Performance35.25%7.80%4.84%4.41%
1 Month Performance50.26%0.73%-0.13%-1.11%
1 Year Performance58.91%83.41%203.19%23.99%

Corsair Gaming Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRSR
Corsair Gaming
2.3409 of 5 stars
$14.35
+35.2%
$11.29
-21.4%
+58.9%$1.53B$1.47B47.832,355
XNDU
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
3.7999 of 5 stars
$11.31
+5.1%
$36.67
+224.2%
N/A$3.21BN/AN/AN/A
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
4.8259 of 5 stars
$77.71
+5.6%
$100.00
+28.7%
+25.1%$2.50B$3.81B25.4020,000
INFQ
Infleqtion
2.9347 of 5 stars
$10.96
+11.5%
$20.60
+87.9%
N/A$2.14BN/AN/A2
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.251 of 5 stars
$8.74
+7.9%
$18.33
+109.8%
-43.1%$1.83B$680KN/A30

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CRSR) was last updated on 8/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners