Go Pro

Corsair Gaming (CRSR) Competitors

Corsair Gaming logo
$12.00 +0.02 (+0.17%)
As of 08/28/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

CRSR vs. XNDU, INFQ, DBD, QUBT, and KODK

Should you buy Corsair Gaming stock or one of its competitors? Corsair Gaming's main competitors and comparable companies include Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (XNDU), Infleqtion (INFQ), Diebold Nixdorf (DBD), Quantum Computing (QUBT), and Eastman Kodak (KODK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology hardware, storage & peripherals" industry.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (NASDAQ:XNDU) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares N/A N/A N/A

Corsair Gaming currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.00%. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a consensus price target of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 213.99%. Given Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Corsair Gaming. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.45B0.89-$12.47M$0.3040.00
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/AN/AN/A-$0.42N/A

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a beta of 14.94, meaning that its share price is 1,394% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming and Corsair Gaming both had 8 articles in the media. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' score of 0.65 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Infleqtion?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Infleqtion had 6 more articles in the media than Corsair Gaming. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Infleqtion and 8 mentions for Corsair Gaming. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.77 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Infleqtion
4 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Corsair Gaming presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Infleqtion has a consensus price target of $21.00, indicating a potential upside of 64.32%. Given Infleqtion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Infleqtion is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Infleqtion. Infleqtion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.45B0.89-$12.47M$0.3040.00
InfleqtionN/AN/A-$66.93M-$0.15N/A

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Infleqtion's net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Infleqtion N/A -28.14%-13.99%

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Infleqtion on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Diebold Nixdorf?

Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) and Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, profitability, valuation and risk.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market.

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Corsair Gaming's net margin of 2.36%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat Corsair Gaming's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diebold Nixdorf2.87% 21.16% 5.90%
Corsair Gaming 2.36%13.10%6.88%

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming had 5 more articles in the media than Diebold Nixdorf. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Corsair Gaming and 3 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf. Diebold Nixdorf's average media sentiment score of 1.74 beat Corsair Gaming's score of 0.95 indicating that Diebold Nixdorf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diebold Nixdorf
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Corsair Gaming
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Diebold Nixdorf presently has a consensus price target of $100.00, indicating a potential upside of 48.63%. Corsair Gaming has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Given Diebold Nixdorf's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Diebold Nixdorf is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than Corsair Gaming. Diebold Nixdorf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diebold Nixdorf$3.87B0.59$94.60M$3.0621.99
Corsair Gaming$1.45B0.89-$12.47M$0.3040.00

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf beats Corsair Gaming on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Quantum Computing?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 9 more articles in the media than Corsair Gaming. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Quantum Computing and 8 mentions for Corsair Gaming. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Corsair Gaming's score of 0.95 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
8 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.45B0.89-$12.47M$0.3040.00
Quantum Computing$9.82M187.78-$15.84M-$0.07N/A

Corsair Gaming presently has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.00%. Quantum Computing has a consensus target price of $18.67, suggesting a potential upside of 129.04%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.85, meaning that its stock price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.74, meaning that its stock price is 274% more volatile than the broader market.

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Quantum Computing on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Eastman Kodak?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Eastman Kodak (NYSE:KODK) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Eastman Kodak. Eastman Kodak is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.45B0.89-$12.47M$0.3040.00
Eastman Kodak$1.14B0.78-$128M-$1.39N/A

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming had 6 more articles in the media than Eastman Kodak. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Corsair Gaming and 2 mentions for Eastman Kodak. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Eastman Kodak's score of 0.37 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Eastman Kodak
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of Eastman Kodak shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 21.3% of Eastman Kodak shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Corsair Gaming presently has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.00%. Given Corsair Gaming's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Corsair Gaming is more favorable than Eastman Kodak.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Eastman Kodak
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Eastman Kodak has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market.

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Eastman Kodak's net margin of -8.28%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Eastman Kodak's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Eastman Kodak -8.28%-14.47%-5.55%

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Eastman Kodak on 16 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Corsair Gaming News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRSR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRSR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRSR vs. The Competition

MetricCorsair GamingTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.30B$116.03B$29.73B$12.90B
Dividend YieldN/A1.71%2.74%11.28%
P/E Ratio40.0029.0575.8225.45
Price / Sales0.8947.66591.1076.64
Price / Cash13.9720.1049.2953.00
Price / Book1.957.669.316.14
Net Income-$12.47M$3.57B$678.22M$348.86M
7 Day Performance9.79%-1.71%-0.07%-0.80%
1 Month Performance12.89%8.43%4.19%4.13%
1 Year Performance34.38%91.96%187.24%15.17%

Corsair Gaming Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRSR
Corsair Gaming
2.3381 of 5 stars
$12.00
+0.2%
$12.00
+34.4%$1.30B$1.45B40.002,355
XNDU
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
3.8581 of 5 stars
$10.45
-4.6%
$33.00
+215.8%
N/A$3.27B$5.96MN/AN/A
INFQ
Infleqtion
4.0055 of 5 stars
$13.08
-7.3%
$21.00
+60.5%
N/A$3.08BN/AN/A2
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
4.5598 of 5 stars
$68.91
-1.5%
$100.00
+45.1%
+10.2%$2.37B$3.81B22.5220,000
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.7502 of 5 stars
$8.24
-7.6%
$18.33
+122.5%
-48.4%$2.02B$680KN/A30

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CRSR) was last updated on 8/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners