Free Trial

Corsair Gaming (CRSR) Competitors

Corsair Gaming logo
$13.01 -0.17 (-1.26%)
As of 01:15 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CRSR vs. INFQ, DBD, QUBT, QMCO, and XNDU

Should you buy Corsair Gaming stock or one of its competitors? Corsair Gaming's main competitors and comparable companies include Infleqtion (INFQ), Diebold Nixdorf (DBD), Quantum Computing (QUBT), Quantum (QMCO), and Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (XNDU). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology hardware, storage & peripherals" industry.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Infleqtion?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Corsair Gaming currently has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.95%. Infleqtion has a consensus target price of $21.83, indicating a potential upside of 139.53%. Given Infleqtion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Infleqtion is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Infleqtion. Infleqtion is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.97-$12.47M$0.3043.93
InfleqtionN/AN/A-$66.93M-$0.15N/A

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming had 6 more articles in the media than Infleqtion. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Corsair Gaming and 4 mentions for Infleqtion. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.25 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Infleqtion
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Infleqtion's net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Infleqtion N/A -28.14%-13.99%

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Infleqtion has a beta of 4.26, meaning that its stock price is 326% more volatile than the broader market.

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Infleqtion on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Diebold Nixdorf?

Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) and Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming had 8 more articles in the media than Diebold Nixdorf. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Corsair Gaming and 2 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Diebold Nixdorf's score of 0.31 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Corsair Gaming
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Diebold Nixdorf presently has a consensus target price of $100.00, indicating a potential upside of 55.80%. Corsair Gaming has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.95%. Given Diebold Nixdorf's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Diebold Nixdorf is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Corsair Gaming's net margin of 2.36%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat Corsair Gaming's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diebold Nixdorf2.87% 21.16% 5.90%
Corsair Gaming 2.36%13.10%6.88%

97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market.

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than Corsair Gaming. Diebold Nixdorf is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diebold Nixdorf$3.81B0.57$94.60M$3.0620.98
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.97-$12.47M$0.3043.93

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf beats Corsair Gaming on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Quantum Computing?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming and Corsair Gaming both had 10 articles in the media. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Corsair Gaming's score of 0.41 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quantum Computing
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.97-$12.47M$0.3043.93
Quantum Computing$9.82M145.38-$15.84M-$0.07N/A

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.86, indicating that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.75, indicating that its share price is 275% more volatile than the broader market.

Corsair Gaming currently has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.95%. Quantum Computing has a consensus target price of $18.67, suggesting a potential upside of 195.83%. Given Quantum Computing's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Quantum Computing on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Quantum?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Quantum (NASDAQ:QMCO) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming had 2 more articles in the media than Quantum. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Corsair Gaming and 8 mentions for Quantum. Quantum's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Corsair Gaming's score of 0.41 indicating that Quantum is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quantum
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.7% of Quantum shares are held by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 41.0% of Quantum shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Corsair Gaming presently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.95%. Quantum has a consensus price target of $26.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.06%. Given Quantum's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Quantum
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum. Quantum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.97-$12.47M$0.3043.93
Quantum$279.58M3.36-$101.05M-$13.24N/A

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Quantum's net margin of -80.76%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Quantum's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Quantum -80.76%N/A -7.28%

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.86, suggesting that its stock price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum has a beta of 3.08, suggesting that its stock price is 208% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Quantum on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Corsair Gaming compare to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares?

Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) and Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (NASDAQ:XNDU) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and risk.

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Corsair Gaming. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.97-$12.47M$0.3043.93
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/AN/AN/A-$0.42N/A

Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.86, meaning that its share price is 86% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a beta of 15.25, meaning that its share price is 1,425% more volatile than the broader market.

Corsair Gaming presently has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.95%. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a consensus target price of $28.75, suggesting a potential upside of 801.25%. Given Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Corsair Gaming had 6 more articles in the media than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Corsair Gaming and 4 mentions for Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Corsair Gaming's score of 0.41 indicating that Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Corsair Gaming
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Corsair Gaming2.36% 13.10% 6.88%
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Corsair Gaming News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRSR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRSR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRSR vs. The Competition

MetricCorsair GamingTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.41B$116.92B$29.75B$12.86B
Dividend YieldN/A1.67%2.76%19.59%
P/E Ratio43.3328.1478.2425.24
Price / Sales0.9737.40576.5475.12
Price / Cash16.6722.6349.0152.75
Price / Book2.197.457.685.99
Net Income-$12.47M$3.49B$767.06M$380.69M
7 Day Performance-0.46%-6.55%-3.86%-3.48%
1 Month Performance-2.47%-6.14%-3.11%-6.02%
1 Year Performance59.29%33.12%160.65%-5.75%

Corsair Gaming Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRSR
Corsair Gaming
1.0422 of 5 stars
$13.03
-1.1%
$12.00
-7.9%
+64.8%$1.41B$1.45B43.332,355
INFQ
Infleqtion
3.006 of 5 stars
$12.70
-3.5%
$21.83
+72.0%
N/A$2.96BN/AN/A205
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
4.2698 of 5 stars
$65.69
+3.0%
$100.00
+52.2%
+12.2%$2.16B$3.81B21.4720,000
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.3825 of 5 stars
$7.94
-2.9%
$18.67
+135.1%
-71.0%$1.85B$9.82MN/A77
QMCO
Quantum
2.9421 of 5 stars
$34.01
-1.4%
$26.50
-22.1%
+88.0%$1.36B$279.58MN/A490

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:CRSR) was last updated on 10/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners