Go Pro

Quantum Computing (QUBT) Competitors

Quantum Computing logo
$7.90 -0.08 (-0.94%)
As of 11:55 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QUBT vs. NVDA, XNDU, INFQ, DBD, and CRSR

Should you buy Quantum Computing stock or one of its competitors? Quantum Computing's main competitors and comparable companies include NVIDIA (NVDA), Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (XNDU), Infleqtion (INFQ), Diebold Nixdorf (DBD), and Corsair Gaming (CRSR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology" sector.

How does Quantum Computing compare to NVIDIA?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Quantum Computing currently has a consensus price target of $18.67, suggesting a potential upside of 136.44%. NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $324.34, suggesting a potential upside of 52.80%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than NVIDIA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
NVIDIA
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
50 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.02

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 328 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 334 mentions for NVIDIA and 6 mentions for Quantum Computing. NVIDIA's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.67 indicating that NVIDIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NVIDIA
165 Very Positive mention(s)
53 Positive mention(s)
61 Neutral mention(s)
42 Negative mention(s)
7 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NVIDIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,627.99-$15.84M-$0.07N/A
NVIDIA$302.97B16.89$120.07B$7.9126.84

NVIDIA has a net margin of 63.66% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.04% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
NVIDIA 63.66%96.04%71.00%

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, indicating that its share price is 278% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market.

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

NVIDIA beats Quantum Computing on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares?

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (NASDAQ:XNDU) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a beta of 14.82, indicating that its stock price is 1,382% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, indicating that its stock price is 278% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 4 more articles in the media than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Quantum Computing and 2 mentions for Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.67 indicating that Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares currently has a consensus price target of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 326.36%. Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.67, suggesting a potential upside of 136.44%. Given Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is more favorable than Quantum Computing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Quantum Computing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares$5.96M387.73-$125.37M-$0.42N/A
Quantum Computing$680K2,627.99-$15.84M-$0.07N/A

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/A N/A N/A
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares and Quantum Computing tied by winning 7 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Infleqtion?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability, risk, valuation and analyst recommendations.

Quantum Computing presently has a consensus target price of $18.67, indicating a potential upside of 136.44%. Infleqtion has a consensus target price of $21.33, indicating a potential upside of 73.23%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Infleqtion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Quantum Computing has higher revenue and earnings than Infleqtion. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Infleqtion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,627.99-$15.84M-$0.07N/A
InfleqtionN/AN/A-$66.93M-$0.15N/A

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, meaning that its stock price is 278% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Infleqtion has a beta of 4.33, meaning that its stock price is 333% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Infleqtion had 2 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Infleqtion and 6 mentions for Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.61 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Infleqtion
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Quantum Computing's return on equity of 0.00% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
Infleqtion N/A -28.14%-13.99%

Summary

Quantum Computing beats Infleqtion on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Diebold Nixdorf?

Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diebold Nixdorf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diebold Nixdorf$3.81B0.58$94.60M$3.0621.08
Quantum Computing$680K2,627.99-$15.84M-$0.07N/A

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 5 more articles in the media than Diebold Nixdorf. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Quantum Computing and 1 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf. Diebold Nixdorf's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.67 indicating that Diebold Nixdorf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diebold Nixdorf
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, suggesting that its stock price is 278% more volatile than the broader market.

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diebold Nixdorf2.87% 21.16% 5.90%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Diebold Nixdorf currently has a consensus target price of $100.00, indicating a potential upside of 55.06%. Quantum Computing has a consensus target price of $18.67, indicating a potential upside of 136.44%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Diebold Nixdorf.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf beats Quantum Computing on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Corsair Gaming?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, suggesting that its share price is 278% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.88, suggesting that its share price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
Corsair Gaming 2.36%13.10%6.88%

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,627.99-$15.84M-$0.07N/A
Corsair Gaming$1.45B1.02-$12.47M$0.3045.72

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Quantum Computing currently has a consensus target price of $18.67, indicating a potential upside of 136.44%. Corsair Gaming has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 12.50%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 1 more articles in the media than Corsair Gaming. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Quantum Computing and 5 mentions for Corsair Gaming. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.67 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Corsair Gaming
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Quantum Computing on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quantum Computing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QUBT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QUBT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QUBT vs. The Competition

MetricQuantum ComputingTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.79B$115.46B$29.21B$14.35B
Dividend YieldN/A1.63%2.73%11.71%
P/E Ratio-112.7727.6376.0725.23
Price / Sales2,627.9995.71585.7797.69
Price / CashN/A21.0446.5934.96
Price / BookN/A7.607.666.17
Net Income-$15.84M$3.49B$705.00M$358.05M
7 Day Performance-3.95%-6.17%-1.89%-1.70%
1 Month Performance-12.38%-8.42%-4.76%-3.68%
1 Year Performance-53.09%61.83%176.44%5.68%

Quantum Computing Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.082 of 5 stars
$7.90
-0.9%
$18.67
+136.4%
-53.1%$1.79B$680KN/A77
NVDA
NVIDIA
4.8866 of 5 stars
$224.25
+3.1%
$324.23
+44.6%
+18.6%$5.41T$302.97B28.3842,000
XNDU
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
3.0262 of 5 stars
$9.75
-1.8%
$33.00
+238.5%
N/A$2.91BN/AN/AN/A
INFQ
Infleqtion
3.1852 of 5 stars
$12.44
-2.0%
$21.00
+68.9%
N/A$2.81BN/AN/A2
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
4.0594 of 5 stars
$68.06
+2.1%
$100.00
+46.9%
+10.0%$2.31B$3.87B22.2320,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:QUBT) was last updated on 9/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners