Quantum Computing (QUBT) Competitors

Quantum Computing logo
$9.09 -0.61 (-6.29%)
Closing price 06/25/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$9.01 -0.08 (-0.86%)
As of 05:42 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QUBT vs. NVDA, FIG, TTD, BSY, and YMM

Should you buy Quantum Computing stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Quantum Computing with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Quantum Computing include NVIDIA (NVDA), Figma (FIG), Trade Desk (TTD), Bentley Systems (BSY), and Full Truck Alliance (YMM).

How does Quantum Computing compare to NVIDIA?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Quantum Computing presently has a consensus price target of $18.33, indicating a potential upside of 101.69%. NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $303.84, indicating a potential upside of 55.23%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than NVIDIA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
NVIDIA
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
48 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.72, suggesting that its stock price is 272% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market.

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 62.97% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.94% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
NVIDIA 62.97%96.94%72.16%

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 322 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 334 mentions for NVIDIA and 12 mentions for Quantum Computing. NVIDIA's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.89 indicating that NVIDIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NVIDIA
221 Very Positive mention(s)
39 Positive mention(s)
45 Neutral mention(s)
21 Negative mention(s)
5 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NVIDIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K3,014.94-$63.15M-$0.28N/A
NVIDIA$215.94B21.94$120.07B$6.5329.98

Summary

NVIDIA beats Quantum Computing on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Figma?

Figma (NYSE:FIG) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both mid-cap computer software companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and dividends.

Quantum Computing has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Figma's net margin of -123.83%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of 0.00% beat Figma's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Figma-123.83% -98.51% -61.42%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Figma currently has a consensus target price of $37.67, indicating a potential upside of 123.57%. Quantum Computing has a consensus target price of $18.33, indicating a potential upside of 101.69%. Given Figma's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Figma is more favorable than Quantum Computing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Figma
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. 45.2% of Figma shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 4 more articles in the media than Figma. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Quantum Computing and 8 mentions for Figma. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Figma's score of 0.41 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Figma
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quantum Computing
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Quantum Computing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Figma. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Figma, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Figma$1.06B7.11-$1.25B-$3.43N/A
Quantum Computing$680K3,014.94-$63.15M-$0.28N/A

Summary

Quantum Computing beats Figma on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Trade Desk?

Trade Desk (NASDAQ:TTD) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

67.8% of Trade Desk shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.4% of Trade Desk shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trade Desk presently has a consensus price target of $33.91, indicating a potential upside of 95.68%. Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.33, indicating a potential upside of 101.69%. Given Quantum Computing's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Trade Desk.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trade Desk
5 Sell rating(s)
21 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.21
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Trade Desk has a net margin of 14.57% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Trade Desk's return on equity of 16.91% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trade Desk14.57% 16.91% 7.28%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Trade Desk had 2 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Trade Desk and 12 mentions for Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Trade Desk's score of 0.42 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Trade Desk
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quantum Computing
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Trade Desk has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.72, suggesting that its stock price is 272% more volatile than the broader market.

Trade Desk has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trade Desk, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trade Desk$2.97B2.74$443.30M$0.8819.69
Quantum Computing$680K3,014.94-$63.15M-$0.28N/A

Summary

Trade Desk beats Quantum Computing on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Bentley Systems?

Bentley Systems (NASDAQ:BSY) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Bentley Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bentley Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bentley Systems$1.50B5.59$277.86M$0.8832.63
Quantum Computing$680K3,014.94-$63.15M-$0.28N/A

Bentley Systems has a net margin of 18.12% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Bentley Systems' return on equity of 28.65% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bentley Systems18.12% 28.65% 9.79%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 9 more articles in the media than Bentley Systems. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Quantum Computing and 3 mentions for Bentley Systems. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Bentley Systems' score of 0.72 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bentley Systems
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Bentley Systems has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.72, meaning that its stock price is 272% more volatile than the broader market.

Bentley Systems presently has a consensus price target of $46.50, suggesting a potential upside of 61.96%. Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.33, suggesting a potential upside of 101.69%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Bentley Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bentley Systems
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

44.2% of Bentley Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 20.3% of Bentley Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Bentley Systems beats Quantum Computing on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Full Truck Alliance?

Full Truck Alliance (NYSE:YMM) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both mid-cap computer software companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and media sentiment.

Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.72, meaning that its stock price is 272% more volatile than the broader market.

Full Truck Alliance currently has a consensus target price of $10.79, suggesting a potential upside of 42.96%. Quantum Computing has a consensus target price of $18.33, suggesting a potential upside of 101.69%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Full Truck Alliance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Full Truck Alliance
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Full Truck Alliance has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Full Truck Alliance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Full Truck Alliance$1.79B4.41$630.36M$0.5713.24
Quantum Computing$680K3,014.94-$63.15M-$0.28N/A

39.0% of Full Truck Alliance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 16.5% of Full Truck Alliance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 10 more articles in the media than Full Truck Alliance. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Quantum Computing and 2 mentions for Full Truck Alliance. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Full Truck Alliance's score of 0.33 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Full Truck Alliance
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quantum Computing
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Full Truck Alliance has a net margin of 32.68% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 10.52% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Full Truck Alliance32.68% 10.52% 9.56%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Full Truck Alliance beats Quantum Computing on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quantum Computing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QUBT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QUBT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QUBT vs. The Competition

MetricQuantum ComputingINTERNET SOFTWARE IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$2.19B$15.96B$38.14B$12.27B
Dividend YieldN/A3.54%3.30%5.89%
P/E Ratio-32.4658.87170.6923.97
Price / Sales3,014.9439.00621.7099.70
Price / CashN/A67.7246.3353.91
Price / BookN/A6.139.556.32
Net Income-$63.15M$384.51M$1.07B$337.22M
7 Day Performance-15.52%-2.16%-1.98%-1.24%
1 Month Performance-22.17%-5.35%-0.81%-0.63%
1 Year Performance-45.86%-11.88%155.16%27.95%

Quantum Computing Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.9566 of 5 stars
$9.09
-6.3%
$18.33
+101.7%
-45.7%$2.19B$680KN/A30
NVDA
NVIDIA
4.9947 of 5 stars
$206.80
-0.3%
$305.67
+47.8%
+26.8%$5.01T$253.49B31.7142,000
FIG
Figma
2.8488 of 5 stars
$19.76
+9.9%
$38.33
+94.0%
N/A$8.79B$1.06BN/A1,886
TTD
Trade Desk
4.8905 of 5 stars
$18.58
-2.0%
$33.91
+82.5%
-75.2%$8.71B$2.97B21.053,843
BSY
Bentley Systems
4.32 of 5 stars
$29.74
-1.4%
$47.00
+58.0%
-45.2%$8.70B$1.56B33.847,900

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:QUBT) was last updated on 6/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners