Go Pro

Quantum Computing (QUBT) Competitors

Quantum Computing logo
$8.88 -0.35 (-3.79%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$8.82 -0.06 (-0.71%)
As of 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QUBT vs. NVDA, MBLY, NAVN, ESTC, and GLBE

Should you buy Quantum Computing stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Quantum Computing with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Quantum Computing include NVIDIA (NVDA), Mobileye Global (MBLY), Navan (NAVN), Elastic (ESTC), and Global-e Online (GLBE).

How does Quantum Computing compare to NVIDIA?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.74, indicating that its share price is 274% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 2.23, indicating that its share price is 123% more volatile than the broader market.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NVIDIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,945.29-$63.15M-$0.28N/A
NVIDIA$215.94B24.57$120.07B$6.5333.57

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 62.97% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.94% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
NVIDIA 62.97%96.94%72.16%

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 314 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 323 mentions for NVIDIA and 9 mentions for Quantum Computing. NVIDIA's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.72 indicating that NVIDIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NVIDIA
202 Very Positive mention(s)
39 Positive mention(s)
42 Neutral mention(s)
36 Negative mention(s)
4 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Quantum Computing currently has a consensus target price of $18.33, suggesting a potential upside of 106.46%. NVIDIA has a consensus target price of $304.26, suggesting a potential upside of 38.79%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than NVIDIA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
NVIDIA
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
48 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.02

Summary

NVIDIA beats Quantum Computing on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Mobileye Global?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and Mobileye Global (NASDAQ:MBLY) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.74, indicating that its share price is 274% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mobileye Global has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Quantum Computing has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of -201.49%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of 0.70% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
Mobileye Global -201.49%0.70%0.67%

In the previous week, Mobileye Global had 7 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Mobileye Global and 9 mentions for Quantum Computing. Mobileye Global's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.72 indicating that Mobileye Global is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mobileye Global
9 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.3% of Mobileye Global shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.0% of Mobileye Global shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Quantum Computing has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mobileye Global. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mobileye Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,945.29-$63.15M-$0.28N/A
Mobileye Global$1.89B3.75-$392M-$4.99N/A

Quantum Computing presently has a consensus price target of $18.33, suggesting a potential upside of 106.46%. Mobileye Global has a consensus price target of $12.64, suggesting a potential upside of 49.37%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Mobileye Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Mobileye Global
2 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.48

Summary

Mobileye Global beats Quantum Computing on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Navan?

Navan (NASDAQ:NAVN) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Quantum Computing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Navan. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Navan, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Navan$765.04M9.19-$398.03M-$2.15N/A
Quantum Computing$680K2,945.29-$63.15M-$0.28N/A

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. 63.4% of Navan shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Navan presently has a consensus price target of $29.07, suggesting a potential upside of 5.14%. Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.33, suggesting a potential upside of 106.46%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Navan.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Navan
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NavanN/A N/A N/A
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 4 more articles in the media than Navan. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Quantum Computing and 5 mentions for Navan. Navan's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.72 indicating that Navan is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Navan
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Navan beats Quantum Computing on 7 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Elastic?

Elastic (NYSE:ESTC) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both mid-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Elastic and Elastic both had 9 articles in the media. Elastic's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.72 indicating that Elastic is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Elastic
5 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Elastic has a net margin of 21.14% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of 0.00% beat Elastic's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Elastic21.14% -1.82% -0.67%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Elastic presently has a consensus target price of $78.78, suggesting a potential upside of 13.11%. Quantum Computing has a consensus target price of $18.33, suggesting a potential upside of 106.46%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Elastic.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Elastic
0 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

97.0% of Elastic shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Elastic shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Elastic has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Elastic, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Elastic$1.74B4.16$367.77M$3.5019.90
Quantum Computing$680K2,945.29-$63.15M-$0.28N/A

Elastic has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.74, meaning that its stock price is 274% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Elastic beats Quantum Computing on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Global-e Online?

Global-e Online (NASDAQ:GLBE) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Global-e Online currently has a consensus target price of $44.83, indicating a potential upside of 7.85%. Quantum Computing has a consensus target price of $18.33, indicating a potential upside of 106.46%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Global-e Online.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global-e Online
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

94.6% of Global-e Online shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 11.6% of Global-e Online shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Global-e Online had 8 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Global-e Online and 9 mentions for Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Global-e Online's score of 0.61 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Global-e Online
7 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Global-e Online has a net margin of 11.37% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Global-e Online's return on equity of 12.64% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global-e Online11.37% 12.64% 8.86%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Global-e Online has a beta of 1.03, suggesting that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.74, suggesting that its stock price is 274% more volatile than the broader market.

Global-e Online has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global-e Online, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global-e Online$962.20M7.33$68.27M$0.6563.95
Quantum Computing$680K2,945.29-$63.15M-$0.28N/A

Summary

Global-e Online beats Quantum Computing on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quantum Computing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QUBT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QUBT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QUBT vs. The Competition

MetricQuantum ComputingTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$2.08B$111.53B$29.80B$12.98B
Dividend YieldN/A1.68%2.74%9.79%
P/E Ratio-31.7127.6576.8921.93
Price / Sales2,945.29123.84596.4691.62
Price / CashN/A24.6550.7650.79
Price / BookN/A8.069.256.09
Net Income-$63.15M$3.10B$662.75M$347.95M
7 Day Performance21.64%9.16%6.85%4.71%
1 Month Performance-1.88%-0.21%-1.15%-2.11%
1 Year Performance-47.42%95.52%151.72%20.58%

Quantum Computing Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.4828 of 5 stars
$8.88
-3.8%
$18.33
+106.5%
-40.8%$2.08B$680KN/A30
NVDA
NVIDIA
4.9878 of 5 stars
$195.89
-0.6%
$304.26
+55.3%
+17.7%$4.74T$215.94B30.0042,000
MBLY
Mobileye Global
4.7017 of 5 stars
$8.28
-1.8%
$12.95
+56.6%
-38.7%$6.98B$1.89BN/A4,200
NAVN
Navan
2.4472 of 5 stars
$26.88
+2.0%
$29.07
+8.1%
N/A$6.84B$702.27MN/A3,700
ESTC
Elastic
4.0062 of 5 stars
$65.76
+5.9%
$78.78
+19.8%
-11.6%$6.84B$1.74B18.794,019

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:QUBT) was last updated on 8/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners