Free Trial

Quantum Computing (QUBT) Competitors

Quantum Computing logo
$7.94 -0.24 (-2.93%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$8.00 +0.06 (+0.76%)
As of 07:59 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QUBT vs. NVDA, RGTI, INFQ, DBD, and XNDU

Should you buy Quantum Computing stock or one of its competitors? Quantum Computing's main competitors and comparable companies include NVIDIA (NVDA), Rigetti Computing (RGTI), Infleqtion (INFQ), Diebold Nixdorf (DBD), and Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (XNDU). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology" sector.

How does Quantum Computing compare to NVIDIA?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NVIDIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,722.86-$15.84M-$0.07N/A
NVIDIA$215.94B26.11$120.07B$7.9129.58

NVIDIA has a net margin of 63.66% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.04% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
NVIDIA 63.66%96.04%71.00%

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of NVIDIA shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Quantum Computing currently has a consensus target price of $18.67, indicating a potential upside of 128.20%. NVIDIA has a consensus target price of $320.71, indicating a potential upside of 37.09%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than NVIDIA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
NVIDIA
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
50 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.05

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 396 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 404 mentions for NVIDIA and 8 mentions for Quantum Computing. NVIDIA's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.45 indicating that NVIDIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
NVIDIA
226 Very Positive mention(s)
62 Positive mention(s)
67 Neutral mention(s)
40 Negative mention(s)
6 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.75, suggesting that its share price is 275% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its share price is 122% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

NVIDIA beats Quantum Computing on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Rigetti Computing?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and Rigetti Computing (NASDAQ:RGTI) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.4% of Rigetti Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Rigetti Computing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Quantum Computing has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Rigetti Computing's net margin of -2,189.54%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of 0.00% beat Rigetti Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
Rigetti Computing -2,189.54%-17.50%-13.75%

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.75, meaning that its stock price is 275% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rigetti Computing has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the broader market.

Quantum Computing currently has a consensus price target of $18.67, suggesting a potential upside of 128.20%. Rigetti Computing has a consensus price target of $30.67, suggesting a potential upside of 101.09%. Given Quantum Computing's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Rigetti Computing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Rigetti Computing
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

Quantum Computing has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Rigetti Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rigetti Computing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,722.86-$15.84M-$0.07N/A
Rigetti Computing$7.09M717.91-$216.21M-$0.90N/A

In the previous week, Rigetti Computing had 5 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Rigetti Computing and 8 mentions for Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Rigetti Computing's score of 0.40 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Rigetti Computing
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Quantum Computing beats Rigetti Computing on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Infleqtion?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Quantum Computing currently has a consensus target price of $18.67, indicating a potential upside of 128.20%. Infleqtion has a consensus target price of $21.83, indicating a potential upside of 66.30%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Infleqtion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.78

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.75, meaning that its share price is 275% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Infleqtion has a beta of 4.26, meaning that its share price is 326% more volatile than the broader market.

Quantum Computing has higher revenue and earnings than Infleqtion. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Infleqtion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,722.86-$15.84M-$0.07N/A
InfleqtionN/AN/A-$66.93M-$0.15N/A

Quantum Computing's return on equity of 0.00% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
Infleqtion N/A -28.14%-13.99%

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 2 more articles in the media than Infleqtion. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Quantum Computing and 6 mentions for Infleqtion. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Infleqtion's score of -0.16 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Infleqtion
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Quantum Computing beats Infleqtion on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Diebold Nixdorf?

Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Diebold Nixdorf currently has a consensus price target of $100.00, indicating a potential upside of 57.27%. Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.67, indicating a potential upside of 128.20%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Diebold Nixdorf.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diebold Nixdorf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diebold Nixdorf$3.81B0.57$94.60M$3.0620.78
Quantum Computing$680K2,722.86-$15.84M-$0.07N/A

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 7 more articles in the media than Diebold Nixdorf. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Quantum Computing and 1 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.45 beat Diebold Nixdorf's score of -0.33 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quantum Computing
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diebold Nixdorf2.87% 21.16% 5.90%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.75, suggesting that its share price is 275% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf beats Quantum Computing on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (NASDAQ:XNDU) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.75, suggesting that its stock price is 275% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a beta of 15.25, suggesting that its stock price is 1,425% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares N/A N/A N/A

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,722.86-$15.84M-$0.07N/A
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/AN/AN/A-$0.42N/A

Quantum Computing currently has a consensus target price of $18.67, suggesting a potential upside of 128.20%. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a consensus target price of $28.75, suggesting a potential upside of 568.60%. Given Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is more favorable than Quantum Computing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

In the previous week, Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares had 1 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares and 8 mentions for Quantum Computing. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' average media sentiment score of 0.56 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.45 indicating that Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares beats Quantum Computing on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quantum Computing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QUBT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QUBT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QUBT vs. The Competition

MetricQuantum ComputingTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.85B$118.37B$31.97B$13.38B
Dividend YieldN/A1.64%2.75%17.32%
P/E Ratio-113.4131.8982.0826.20
Price / Sales2,642.9782.71590.3491.20
Price / CashN/A22.9448.6034.70
Price / BookN/A8.508.226.40
Net IncomeN/A$3.49B$766.00M$381.07M
7 Day Performance-7.35%-1.36%1.82%-0.66%
1 Month Performance-0.87%-3.46%0.36%-4.51%
1 Year Performance-67.75%51.47%168.87%1.82%

Quantum Computing Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.0994 of 5 stars
$7.94
-2.9%
$18.67
+135.1%
-66.8%$1.85B$680KN/A77
NVDA
NVIDIA
4.9658 of 5 stars
$225.16
-1.6%
$324.34
+44.0%
+24.7%$5.43T$215.94B28.4942,000
RGTI
Rigetti Computing
3.1697 of 5 stars
$16.11
-2.5%
$30.67
+90.4%
-61.9%$5.40B$7.09MN/A164
INFQ
Infleqtion
3.6723 of 5 stars
$13.75
-2.2%
$21.33
+55.2%
N/A$3.10BN/AN/A205
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
4.2511 of 5 stars
$63.53
-1.3%
$100.00
+57.4%
+9.2%$2.16B$3.81B20.7720,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:QUBT) was last updated on 10/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners