Go Pro

Quantum Computing (QUBT) Competitors

Quantum Computing logo
$8.46 +0.22 (+2.67%)
Closing price 08/25/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$8.46 +0.00 (+0.06%)
As of 08/25/2026 05:43 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QUBT vs. NVDA, XNDU, INFQ, DBD, and CRSR

Should you buy Quantum Computing stock or one of its competitors? Quantum Computing's main competitors and comparable companies include NVIDIA (NVDA), Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (XNDU), Infleqtion (INFQ), Diebold Nixdorf (DBD), and Corsair Gaming (CRSR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology" sector.

How does Quantum Computing compare to NVIDIA?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NVIDIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,816.06-$15.84M-$0.07N/A
NVIDIA$215.94B23.88$120.07B$6.5332.63

NVIDIA has a net margin of 62.97% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.94% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
NVIDIA 62.97%96.94%72.16%

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.74, suggesting that its share price is 274% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 2.23, suggesting that its share price is 123% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 388 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 403 mentions for NVIDIA and 15 mentions for Quantum Computing. NVIDIA's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.46 indicating that NVIDIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
NVIDIA
171 Very Positive mention(s)
56 Positive mention(s)
97 Neutral mention(s)
57 Negative mention(s)
16 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of NVIDIA shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Quantum Computing presently has a consensus target price of $18.33, suggesting a potential upside of 116.71%. NVIDIA has a consensus target price of $308.46, suggesting a potential upside of 44.79%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than NVIDIA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
NVIDIA
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
49 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.98

Summary

NVIDIA beats Quantum Computing on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares?

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (NASDAQ:XNDU) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, earnings and risk.

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a beta of 14.94, suggesting that its share price is 1,394% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.74, suggesting that its share price is 274% more volatile than the broader market.

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/AN/AN/A-$0.42N/A
Quantum Computing$680K2,816.06-$15.84M-$0.07N/A

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares currently has a consensus target price of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 210.73%. Quantum Computing has a consensus target price of $18.33, suggesting a potential upside of 116.71%. Given Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is more favorable than Quantum Computing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/A N/A N/A
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 8 more articles in the media than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Quantum Computing and 7 mentions for Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.46 indicating that Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares and Quantum Computing tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Infleqtion?

Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability and media sentiment.

Quantum Computing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Infleqtion. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Infleqtion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Infleqtion$30.93M97.74-$66.93M-$0.15N/A
Quantum Computing$680K2,816.06-$15.84M-$0.07N/A

Quantum Computing's return on equity of 0.00% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
InfleqtionN/A -28.14% -13.99%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Infleqtion had 5 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Infleqtion and 15 mentions for Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.46 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Infleqtion
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quantum Computing
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Infleqtion presently has a consensus price target of $21.00, indicating a potential upside of 51.57%. Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.33, indicating a potential upside of 116.71%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Infleqtion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Quantum Computing beats Infleqtion on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Diebold Nixdorf?

Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability and valuation.

Diebold Nixdorf currently has a consensus target price of $100.00, indicating a potential upside of 47.08%. Quantum Computing has a consensus target price of $18.33, indicating a potential upside of 116.71%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Diebold Nixdorf.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Diebold Nixdorf2.87% 21.16% 5.90%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 14 more articles in the media than Diebold Nixdorf. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Quantum Computing and 1 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf. Diebold Nixdorf's average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.46 indicating that Diebold Nixdorf is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Diebold Nixdorf
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Quantum Computing
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diebold Nixdorf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Diebold Nixdorf$3.81B0.61$94.60M$3.0622.22
Quantum Computing$680K2,816.06-$15.84M-$0.07N/A

97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.74, meaning that its share price is 274% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf beats Quantum Computing on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Corsair Gaming?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.74, suggesting that its share price is 274% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 9 more articles in the media than Corsair Gaming. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Quantum Computing and 6 mentions for Corsair Gaming. Corsair Gaming's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.46 indicating that Corsair Gaming is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Corsair Gaming
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
Corsair Gaming 2.36%13.10%6.88%

Quantum Computing presently has a consensus target price of $18.33, suggesting a potential upside of 116.71%. Corsair Gaming has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.35%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,816.06-$15.84M-$0.07N/A
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.87-$12.47M$0.3039.47

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Quantum Computing on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quantum Computing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QUBT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QUBT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QUBT vs. The Competition

MetricQuantum ComputingTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.87B$112.76B$28.90B$12.72B
Dividend YieldN/A1.75%2.75%11.02%
P/E Ratio-120.8429.8171.9824.14
Price / Sales2,816.0690.08593.79101.59
Price / CashN/A20.0848.3953.12
Price / BookN/A7.749.356.25
Net Income-$15.84M$3.57B$676.63M$347.86M
7 Day Performance0.48%2.51%0.71%0.98%
1 Month Performance13.86%8.12%4.41%5.24%
1 Year Performance-44.45%95.97%188.16%17.04%

Quantum Computing Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.5989 of 5 stars
$8.46
+2.7%
$18.33
+116.7%
-44.4%$1.87B$680KN/A30
NVDA
NVIDIA
4.9804 of 5 stars
$219.67
0.0%
$305.94
+39.3%
+18.5%$5.31T$215.94B33.6342,000
XNDU
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
3.7624 of 5 stars
$10.39
-0.7%
$33.00
+217.6%
N/A$3.10B$5.96MN/AN/A
INFQ
Infleqtion
4.0177 of 5 stars
$12.47
-3.4%
$20.60
+65.3%
N/A$2.72BN/AN/A2
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
4.479 of 5 stars
$67.75
-1.2%
$100.00
+47.6%
+8.4%$2.30B$3.81B22.1420,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:QUBT) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners