Go Pro

Quantum Computing (QUBT) Competitors

Quantum Computing logo
$7.64 -0.40 (-4.98%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$7.68 +0.04 (+0.52%)
As of 05:51 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QUBT vs. NVDA, SNAP, MBLY, TTAN, and YOU

Should you buy Quantum Computing stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Quantum Computing with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Quantum Computing include NVIDIA (NVDA), Snap (SNAP), Mobileye Global (MBLY), ServiceTitan (TTAN), and CLEAR Secure (YOU).

How does Quantum Computing compare to NVIDIA?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends and risk.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NVIDIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,534.01-$63.15M-$0.28N/A
NVIDIA$253.49B19.80$120.07B$6.5331.76

NVIDIA has a net margin of 62.97% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.94% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
NVIDIA 62.97%96.94%72.16%

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 309 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 326 mentions for NVIDIA and 17 mentions for Quantum Computing. NVIDIA's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.71 indicating that NVIDIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NVIDIA
177 Very Positive mention(s)
38 Positive mention(s)
68 Neutral mention(s)
30 Negative mention(s)
7 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of NVIDIA shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, suggesting that its share price is 278% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 2.21, suggesting that its share price is 121% more volatile than the broader market.

Quantum Computing currently has a consensus target price of $18.33, indicating a potential upside of 139.97%. NVIDIA has a consensus target price of $304.26, indicating a potential upside of 46.70%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than NVIDIA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
NVIDIA
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
48 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.98

Summary

NVIDIA beats Quantum Computing on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Snap?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and Snap (NYSE:SNAP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings and dividends.

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.5% of Snap shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 22.7% of Snap shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Quantum Computing currently has a consensus price target of $18.33, indicating a potential upside of 139.97%. Snap has a consensus price target of $7.48, indicating a potential upside of 59.53%. Given Quantum Computing's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Snap.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Snap
2 Sell rating(s)
25 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 15 more articles in the media than Snap. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Quantum Computing and 2 mentions for Snap. Snap's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.71 indicating that Snap is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Snap
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Quantum Computing has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Snap's net margin of -6.72%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of 0.00% beat Snap's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
Snap -6.72%-18.92%-5.44%

Quantum Computing has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Snap. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Snap, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,534.01-$63.15M-$0.28N/A
Snap$5.93B1.34-$460.49M-$0.24N/A

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, meaning that its stock price is 278% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Snap has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Quantum Computing beats Snap on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Mobileye Global?

Mobileye Global (NASDAQ:MBLY) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both computer software companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

13.3% of Mobileye Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 10.0% of Mobileye Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 8 more articles in the media than Mobileye Global. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Quantum Computing and 9 mentions for Mobileye Global. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Mobileye Global's score of 0.60 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mobileye Global
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Mobileye Global presently has a consensus target price of $13.70, indicating a potential upside of 52.78%. Quantum Computing has a consensus target price of $18.33, indicating a potential upside of 139.97%. Given Quantum Computing's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Mobileye Global.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mobileye Global
2 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Quantum Computing has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Mobileye Global's net margin of -203.97%. Mobileye Global's return on equity of 0.33% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mobileye Global-203.97% 0.33% 0.32%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Quantum Computing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mobileye Global. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mobileye Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mobileye Global$2.01B3.75-$392M-$5.04N/A
Quantum Computing$680K2,534.01-$63.15M-$0.28N/A

Mobileye Global has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, suggesting that its stock price is 278% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Quantum Computing beats Mobileye Global on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to ServiceTitan?

ServiceTitan (NASDAQ:TTAN) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and institutional ownership.

Quantum Computing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ServiceTitan. ServiceTitan is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Quantum Computing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ServiceTitan$1.01B7.10-$159.85M-$1.45N/A
Quantum Computing$680K2,534.01-$63.15M-$0.28N/A

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 39.9% of ServiceTitan shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ServiceTitan presently has a consensus target price of $110.53, suggesting a potential upside of 46.40%. Quantum Computing has a consensus target price of $18.33, suggesting a potential upside of 139.97%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than ServiceTitan.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ServiceTitan
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
15 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.74
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 1 more articles in the media than ServiceTitan. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Quantum Computing and 16 mentions for ServiceTitan. ServiceTitan's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.71 indicating that ServiceTitan is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ServiceTitan
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ServiceTitan has a beta of 0.13, meaning that its share price is 87% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, meaning that its share price is 278% more volatile than the broader market.

Quantum Computing has a net margin of 0.00% compared to ServiceTitan's net margin of -13.44%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of 0.00% beat ServiceTitan's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ServiceTitan-13.44% -5.59% -4.79%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Quantum Computing beats ServiceTitan on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to CLEAR Secure?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and CLEAR Secure (NYSE:YOU) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and risk.

CLEAR Secure has a net margin of 13.01% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. CLEAR Secure's return on equity of 68.98% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
CLEAR Secure 13.01%68.98%9.74%

CLEAR Secure has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CLEAR Secure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,534.01-$63.15M-$0.28N/A
CLEAR Secure$942.41M7.70$109.17M$1.2443.88

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.8% of CLEAR Secure shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 29.7% of CLEAR Secure shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Quantum Computing presently has a consensus price target of $18.33, suggesting a potential upside of 139.97%. CLEAR Secure has a consensus price target of $60.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.28%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than CLEAR Secure.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
CLEAR Secure
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, meaning that its stock price is 278% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CLEAR Secure has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 14 more articles in the media than CLEAR Secure. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Quantum Computing and 3 mentions for CLEAR Secure. CLEAR Secure's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.71 indicating that CLEAR Secure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CLEAR Secure
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

CLEAR Secure beats Quantum Computing on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quantum Computing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QUBT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QUBT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QUBT vs. The Competition

MetricQuantum ComputingINTERNET SOFTWARE IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.72B$17.93B$38.04B$12.45B
Dividend YieldN/A3.41%3.21%9.44%
P/E Ratio-27.2868.5677.4024.25
Price / Sales2,534.0132.73591.0587.37
Price / CashN/A83.8547.0360.03
Price / BookN/A6.709.386.23
Net Income-$63.15M$385.08M$1.07B$331.94M
7 Day Performance-16.50%-1.67%-2.29%-1.93%
1 Month Performance-24.51%5.01%-2.45%-0.97%
1 Year Performance-58.48%-12.58%137.19%18.24%

Quantum Computing Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.5886 of 5 stars
$7.64
-5.0%
$18.33
+140.0%
-54.5%$1.72B$680KN/A30
NVDA
NVIDIA
4.9778 of 5 stars
$203.31
+3.2%
$303.84
+49.4%
+24.5%$4.92T$215.94B31.1342,000
SNAP
Snap
3.1889 of 5 stars
$4.58
-1.6%
$7.48
+63.5%
-49.9%$7.74B$5.93BN/A5,261
MBLY
Mobileye Global
3.5389 of 5 stars
$9.02
-5.0%
$13.77
+52.7%
-41.5%$7.59B$1.89BN/A4,200
TTAN
ServiceTitan
3.3425 of 5 stars
$78.33
-1.7%
$110.53
+41.1%
-30.0%$7.48B$960.97MN/A3,414

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:QUBT) was last updated on 7/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners