S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
pixel
S&P 500   3,841.94
DOW   31,496.30
QQQ   308.68
pixel
pixel
pixel
Log in
NYSE:NSA

National Storage Affiliates Trust Competitors

$38.05
+0.35 (+0.93 %)
(As of 03/5/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$37.36
Now: $38.05
$38.24
50-Day Range
$36.13
MA: $37.51
$39.84
52-Week Range
$19.34
Now: $38.05
$40.73
Volume339,316 shs
Average Volume368,745 shs
Market Capitalization$2.72 billion
P/E Ratio86.48
Dividend Yield3.69%
Beta0.38

Competitors

National Storage Affiliates Trust (NYSE:NSA) Vs. IRM, GLPI, CPT, REG, AMH, and LAMR

Should you be buying NSA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "real estate investment trusts" are considered alternatives and competitors to National Storage Affiliates Trust, including Iron Mountain (IRM), Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI), Camden Property Trust (CPT), Regency Centers (REG), American Homes 4 Rent (AMH), and Lamar Advertising (LAMR).

Iron Mountain (NYSE:IRM) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NYSE:NSA) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

82.9% of Iron Mountain shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of National Storage Affiliates Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Iron Mountain shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.2% of National Storage Affiliates Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Iron Mountain and National Storage Affiliates Trust, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Iron Mountain10102.00
National Storage Affiliates Trust04402.50

Iron Mountain currently has a consensus target price of $28.00, indicating a potential downside of 21.77%. National Storage Affiliates Trust has a consensus target price of $34.2222, indicating a potential downside of 10.06%. Given National Storage Affiliates Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe National Storage Affiliates Trust is more favorable than Iron Mountain.

Profitability

This table compares Iron Mountain and National Storage Affiliates Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Iron Mountain3.19%23.61%1.94%
National Storage Affiliates Trust10.42%3.72%1.35%

Volatility and Risk

Iron Mountain has a beta of 0.79, indicating that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, National Storage Affiliates Trust has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Iron Mountain and National Storage Affiliates Trust's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Iron Mountain$4.26 billion2.42$267.38 million$2.2915.63
National Storage Affiliates Trust$387.90 million7.00$3.98 million$1.5424.71

Iron Mountain has higher revenue and earnings than National Storage Affiliates Trust. Iron Mountain is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than National Storage Affiliates Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Iron Mountain pays an annual dividend of $2.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. National Storage Affiliates Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Iron Mountain pays out 107.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. National Storage Affiliates Trust pays out 90.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Iron Mountain has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and National Storage Affiliates Trust has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Summary

National Storage Affiliates Trust beats Iron Mountain on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

National Storage Affiliates Trust (NYSE:NSA) and Gaming and Leisure Properties (NASDAQ:GLPI) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

86.3% of National Storage Affiliates Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.8% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.2% of National Storage Affiliates Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.8% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares National Storage Affiliates Trust and Gaming and Leisure Properties' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
National Storage Affiliates Trust10.42%3.72%1.35%
Gaming and Leisure Properties39.46%21.46%5.20%

Risk and Volatility

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for National Storage Affiliates Trust and Gaming and Leisure Properties, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
National Storage Affiliates Trust04402.50
Gaming and Leisure Properties001013.09

National Storage Affiliates Trust presently has a consensus price target of $34.2222, indicating a potential downside of 10.06%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus price target of $43.6250, indicating a potential upside of 1.08%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than National Storage Affiliates Trust.

Dividends

National Storage Affiliates Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. National Storage Affiliates Trust pays out 90.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 69.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. National Storage Affiliates Trust has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares National Storage Affiliates Trust and Gaming and Leisure Properties' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
National Storage Affiliates Trust$387.90 million7.00$3.98 million$1.5424.71
Gaming and Leisure Properties$1.15 billion8.71$390.88 million$3.4412.55

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than National Storage Affiliates Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than National Storage Affiliates Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Gaming and Leisure Properties beats National Storage Affiliates Trust on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

National Storage Affiliates Trust (NYSE:NSA) and Camden Property Trust (NYSE:CPT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares National Storage Affiliates Trust and Camden Property Trust's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
National Storage Affiliates Trust$387.90 million7.00$3.98 million$1.5424.71
Camden Property Trust$1.03 billion9.74$219.62 million$5.0420.38

Camden Property Trust has higher revenue and earnings than National Storage Affiliates Trust. Camden Property Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than National Storage Affiliates Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

National Storage Affiliates Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Camden Property Trust pays an annual dividend of $3.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. National Storage Affiliates Trust pays out 90.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Camden Property Trust pays out 65.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. National Storage Affiliates Trust has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Camden Property Trust has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. National Storage Affiliates Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk & Volatility

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its stock price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Camden Property Trust has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares National Storage Affiliates Trust and Camden Property Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
National Storage Affiliates Trust10.42%3.72%1.35%
Camden Property Trust18.14%5.22%2.70%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

86.3% of National Storage Affiliates Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of Camden Property Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 12.2% of National Storage Affiliates Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Camden Property Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for National Storage Affiliates Trust and Camden Property Trust, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
National Storage Affiliates Trust04402.50
Camden Property Trust08802.50

National Storage Affiliates Trust presently has a consensus price target of $34.2222, indicating a potential downside of 10.06%. Camden Property Trust has a consensus price target of $102.3571, indicating a potential downside of 0.32%. Given Camden Property Trust's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Camden Property Trust is more favorable than National Storage Affiliates Trust.

Summary

Camden Property Trust beats National Storage Affiliates Trust on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

National Storage Affiliates Trust (NYSE:NSA) and Regency Centers (NASDAQ:REG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and earnings.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares National Storage Affiliates Trust and Regency Centers' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
National Storage Affiliates Trust$387.90 million7.00$3.98 million$1.5424.71
Regency Centers$1.13 billion8.64$239.43 million$3.8914.83

Regency Centers has higher revenue and earnings than National Storage Affiliates Trust. Regency Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than National Storage Affiliates Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

National Storage Affiliates Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Regency Centers pays an annual dividend of $2.38 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. National Storage Affiliates Trust pays out 90.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Regency Centers pays out 61.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. National Storage Affiliates Trust has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Regency Centers has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Regency Centers is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Volatility & Risk

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Regency Centers has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its share price is 3% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares National Storage Affiliates Trust and Regency Centers' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
National Storage Affiliates Trust10.42%3.72%1.35%
Regency Centers4.51%1.01%0.56%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.3% of National Storage Affiliates Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.2% of Regency Centers shares are held by institutional investors. 12.2% of National Storage Affiliates Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Regency Centers shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for National Storage Affiliates Trust and Regency Centers, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
National Storage Affiliates Trust04402.50
Regency Centers16602.38

National Storage Affiliates Trust currently has a consensus price target of $34.2222, indicating a potential downside of 10.06%. Regency Centers has a consensus price target of $48.6250, indicating a potential downside of 15.70%. Given National Storage Affiliates Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe National Storage Affiliates Trust is more favorable than Regency Centers.

Summary

Regency Centers beats National Storage Affiliates Trust on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

American Homes 4 Rent (NYSE:AMH) and National Storage Affiliates Trust (NYSE:NSA) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

89.8% of American Homes 4 Rent shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.3% of National Storage Affiliates Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 21.9% of American Homes 4 Rent shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.2% of National Storage Affiliates Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares American Homes 4 Rent and National Storage Affiliates Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
American Homes 4 Rent11.72%2.23%1.47%
National Storage Affiliates Trust10.42%3.72%1.35%

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares American Homes 4 Rent and National Storage Affiliates Trust's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
American Homes 4 Rent$1.14 billion8.24$141.04 million$1.1126.83
National Storage Affiliates Trust$387.90 million7.00$3.98 million$1.5424.71

American Homes 4 Rent has higher revenue and earnings than National Storage Affiliates Trust. National Storage Affiliates Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than American Homes 4 Rent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

American Homes 4 Rent has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, National Storage Affiliates Trust has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

American Homes 4 Rent pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. National Storage Affiliates Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. American Homes 4 Rent pays out 18.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. National Storage Affiliates Trust pays out 90.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. American Homes 4 Rent has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and National Storage Affiliates Trust has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. National Storage Affiliates Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for American Homes 4 Rent and National Storage Affiliates Trust, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
American Homes 4 Rent06602.50
National Storage Affiliates Trust04402.50

American Homes 4 Rent currently has a consensus target price of $29.6923, indicating a potential downside of 0.29%. National Storage Affiliates Trust has a consensus target price of $34.2222, indicating a potential downside of 10.06%. Given American Homes 4 Rent's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe American Homes 4 Rent is more favorable than National Storage Affiliates Trust.

Summary

American Homes 4 Rent beats National Storage Affiliates Trust on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

National Storage Affiliates Trust (NYSE:NSA) and Lamar Advertising (NASDAQ:LAMR) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent recommendations for National Storage Affiliates Trust and Lamar Advertising, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
National Storage Affiliates Trust04402.50
Lamar Advertising03202.40

National Storage Affiliates Trust presently has a consensus target price of $34.2222, indicating a potential downside of 10.06%. Lamar Advertising has a consensus target price of $74.8333, indicating a potential downside of 19.64%. Given National Storage Affiliates Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe National Storage Affiliates Trust is more favorable than Lamar Advertising.

Dividends

National Storage Affiliates Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Lamar Advertising pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. National Storage Affiliates Trust pays out 90.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Lamar Advertising pays out 34.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. National Storage Affiliates Trust has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Lamar Advertising has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. National Storage Affiliates Trust is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.3% of National Storage Affiliates Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.6% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by institutional investors. 12.2% of National Storage Affiliates Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Lamar Advertising shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

National Storage Affiliates Trust has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lamar Advertising has a beta of 1.46, meaning that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares National Storage Affiliates Trust and Lamar Advertising's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
National Storage Affiliates Trust10.42%3.72%1.35%
Lamar Advertising14.81%20.73%3.94%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares National Storage Affiliates Trust and Lamar Advertising's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
National Storage Affiliates Trust$387.90 million7.00$3.98 million$1.5424.71
Lamar Advertising$1.75 billion5.36$372.11 million$5.8016.06

Lamar Advertising has higher revenue and earnings than National Storage Affiliates Trust. Lamar Advertising is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than National Storage Affiliates Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Lamar Advertising beats National Storage Affiliates Trust on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.


National Storage Affiliates Trust Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Iron Mountain logo
IRM
Iron Mountain
1.6$35.79+2.4%$10.31 billion$4.26 billion77.81Analyst Report
Gap Up
Gaming and Leisure Properties logo
GLPI
Gaming and Leisure Properties
2.0$43.16+0.6%$10.05 billion$1.15 billion20.75Decrease in Short Interest
Camden Property Trust logo
CPT
Camden Property Trust
1.7$102.69+2.2%$10.02 billion$1.03 billion54.05Analyst Downgrade
Regency Centers logo
REG
Regency Centers
1.9$57.68+2.4%$9.80 billion$1.13 billion213.64Analyst Report
News Coverage
American Homes 4 Rent logo
AMH
American Homes 4 Rent
1.7$29.78+1.3%$9.42 billion$1.14 billion110.30Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Lamar Advertising logo
LAMR
Lamar Advertising
1.9$93.12+1.3%$9.39 billion$1.75 billion39.63Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Omega Healthcare Investors logo
OHI
Omega Healthcare Investors
1.5$37.52+1.0%$8.70 billion$928.83 million54.38
VEREIT logo
VER
VEREIT
1.6$37.81+0.4%$8.66 billion$1.24 billion31.51Analyst Downgrade
Americold Realty Trust logo
COLD
Americold Realty Trust
1.7$34.26+0.6%$8.65 billion$1.78 billion79.68
STORE Capital logo
STOR
STORE Capital
2.1$32.20+0.3%$8.58 billion$665.71 million36.59Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Vornado Realty Trust logo
VNO
Vornado Realty Trust
1.8$44.80+0.8%$8.57 billion$1.92 billion154.49
AGNC Investment logo
AGNC
AGNC Investment
1.7$15.90+0.1%$8.55 billion$693 million-31.18
Kimco Realty logo
KIM
Kimco Realty
2.3$19.02+2.1%$8.23 billion$1.16 billion9.42Analyst Report
Increase in Short Interest
News Coverage
Federal Realty Investment Trust logo
FRT
Federal Realty Investment Trust
2.3$105.76+2.0%$8.12 billion$935.79 million45.59
CyrusOne logo
CONE
CyrusOne
2.7$65.48+2.6%$7.89 billion$981.30 million-251.84Unusual Options Activity
Gap Up
Kilroy Realty logo
KRC
Kilroy Realty
2.2$64.52+0.4%$7.51 billion$837.45 million39.58
National Retail Properties logo
NNN
National Retail Properties
2.1$42.60+0.7%$7.47 billion$670.49 million34.63
CubeSmart logo
CUBE
CubeSmart
1.4$36.46+2.9%$7.28 billion$643.91 million42.40Gap Up
Starwood Property Trust logo
STWD
Starwood Property Trust
1.7$22.95+1.0%$6.55 billion$1.20 billion16.75Analyst Report
News Coverage
Rexford Industrial Realty logo
REXR
Rexford Industrial Realty
1.9$47.59+2.1%$6.25 billion$267.21 million82.05Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Life Storage logo
LSI
Life Storage
2.0$82.26+0.7%$6.21 billion$574.74 million25.16Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Brixmor Property Group logo
BRX
Brixmor Property Group
1.9$20.17+2.0%$5.99 billion$1.17 billion38.06Analyst Report
Healthcare Trust of America logo
HTA
Healthcare Trust of America
2.2$26.52+0.6%$5.80 billion$692.04 million176.80Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Douglas Emmett logo
DEI
Douglas Emmett
1.9$33.00+0.9%$5.79 billion$936.68 million18.75News Coverage
American Campus Communities logo
ACC
American Campus Communities
1.7$41.85+2.1%$5.76 billion$943.04 million82.06Analyst Upgrade
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
First Industrial Realty Trust logo
FR
First Industrial Realty Trust
2.0$42.87+1.1%$5.54 billion$425.98 million26.14Increase in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
EastGroup Properties logo
EGP
EastGroup Properties
1.8$135.79+2.4%$5.39 billion$331.39 million43.80Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Cousins Properties logo
CUZ
Cousins Properties
1.9$34.88+0.4%$5.18 billion$657.52 million14.97
STAG Industrial logo
STAG
STAG Industrial
1.9$32.14+1.7%$5.09 billion$405.95 million39.68Analyst Revision
News Coverage
The Howard Hughes logo
HHC
The Howard Hughes
2.2$92.29+0.7%$5.09 billion$1.30 billion-91.38Analyst Revision
SL Green Realty logo
SLG
SL Green Realty
1.8$72.54+1.5%$5.03 billion$1.24 billion27.69News Coverage
CoreSite Realty logo
COR
CoreSite Realty
1.8$111.49+2.0%$4.77 billion$572.73 million55.47Dividend Announcement
Insider Selling
News Coverage
Rayonier logo
RYN
Rayonier
1.5$32.97+2.0%$4.54 billion$711.60 million103.03
Blackstone Mortgage Trust logo
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust
1.4$30.75+2.0%$4.52 billion$424.18 million32.71
Ryman Hospitality Properties logo
RHP
Ryman Hospitality Properties
1.1$80.32+1.5%$4.42 billion$1.60 billion-15.15Earnings Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Highwoods Properties logo
HIW
Highwoods Properties
2.0$42.39+1.3%$4.41 billion$735.98 million13.59News Coverage
MGM Growth Properties logo
MGP
MGM Growth Properties
1.8$33.16+0.7%$4.36 billion$881.08 million67.67
New Residential Investment logo
NRZ
New Residential Investment
1.9$10.40+0.8%$4.31 billion$1.77 billion-3.27Increase in Short Interest
JBG SMITH Properties logo
JBGS
JBG SMITH Properties
1.8$32.37+0.5%$4.26 billion$647.77 million294.30News Coverage
Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital logo
HASI
Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital
1.7$53.08+0.3%$4.15 billion$141.58 million37.12Analyst Revision
Agree Realty logo
ADC
Agree Realty
2.0$64.47+2.2%$4.09 billion$187.48 million35.04Analyst Downgrade
Insider Buying
High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
News Coverage
Healthcare Realty Trust logo
HR
Healthcare Realty Trust
1.6$29.14+0.3%$4.07 billion$470.30 million34.28
PS Business Parks logo
PSB
PS Business Parks
1.6$146.93+2.3%$4.04 billion$429.85 million32.29
Sabra Health Care REIT logo
SBRA
Sabra Health Care REIT
2.0$18.11+2.9%$3.82 billion$661.74 million26.25Gap Up
QTS Realty Trust logo
QTS
QTS Realty Trust
1.8$59.06+3.3%$3.81 billion$480.82 million-159.62Gap Up
Physicians Realty Trust logo
DOC
Physicians Realty Trust
1.8$17.21+0.5%$3.62 billion$415.28 million39.11Analyst Revision
Equity Commonwealth logo
EQC
Equity Commonwealth
1.4$28.71+0.6%$3.49 billion$127.85 million7.84News Coverage
PotlatchDeltic logo
PCH
PotlatchDeltic
1.2$52.15+2.9%$3.49 billion$827.10 million44.96
EPR Properties logo
EPR
EPR Properties
1.0$45.60+2.5%$3.41 billion$651.97 million-34.03Analyst Upgrade
Insider Selling
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Weingarten Realty Investors logo
WRI
Weingarten Realty Investors
2.0$26.59+2.1%$3.40 billion$486.63 million13.99Analyst Report
This page was last updated on 3/7/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.