CubeSmart (CUBE) Competitors

In the previous week, CubeSmart had 11 more articles in the media than EastGroup Properties. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for CubeSmart and 13 mentions for EastGroup Properties. EastGroup Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat CubeSmart's score of 0.51 indicating that EastGroup Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

CubeSmart has higher revenue and earnings than EastGroup Properties. CubeSmart is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EastGroup Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CubeSmart has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, EastGroup Properties has a beta of 1.02, suggesting that its stock price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

CubeSmart pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. EastGroup Properties pays an annual dividend of $6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. CubeSmart pays out 149.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. EastGroup Properties pays out 108.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CubeSmart has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years and EastGroup Properties has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. CubeSmart is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

97.6% of CubeSmart shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of EastGroup Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of CubeSmart shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of EastGroup Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

EastGroup Properties has a net margin of 40.47% compared to CubeSmart's net margin of 29.41%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 12.35% beat EastGroup Properties' return on equity.

CubeSmart currently has a consensus price target of $43.42, indicating a potential upside of 4.46%. EastGroup Properties has a consensus price target of $220.47, indicating a potential upside of 5.46%. Given EastGroup Properties' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe EastGroup Properties is more favorable than CubeSmart.

In the previous week, Extra Space Storage had 4 more articles in the media than CubeSmart. MarketBeat recorded 28 mentions for Extra Space Storage and 24 mentions for CubeSmart. Extra Space Storage's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat CubeSmart's score of 0.51 indicating that Extra Space Storage is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

CubeSmart has a beta of 1.07, suggesting that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Extra Space Storage has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Extra Space Storage has higher revenue and earnings than CubeSmart. CubeSmart is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Extra Space Storage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

97.6% of CubeSmart shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.1% of Extra Space Storage shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of CubeSmart shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Extra Space Storage shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CubeSmart currently has a consensus price target of $43.42, indicating a potential upside of 4.46%. Extra Space Storage has a consensus price target of $147.73, indicating a potential downside of 0.51%. Given CubeSmart's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe CubeSmart is more favorable than Extra Space Storage.

CubeSmart has a net margin of 29.41% compared to Extra Space Storage's net margin of 27.80%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 12.35% beat Extra Space Storage's return on equity.

CubeSmart pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Extra Space Storage pays an annual dividend of $6.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. CubeSmart pays out 149.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Extra Space Storage pays out 143.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CubeSmart has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Extra Space Storage has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CubeSmart is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CubeSmart has higher revenue and earnings than First Industrial Realty Trust. First Industrial Realty Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CubeSmart, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

First Industrial Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. CubeSmart pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. First Industrial Realty Trust pays out 73.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CubeSmart pays out 149.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. First Industrial Realty Trust has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and CubeSmart has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. CubeSmart is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

First Industrial Realty Trust currently has a consensus price target of $66.21, indicating a potential upside of 0.34%. CubeSmart has a consensus price target of $43.42, indicating a potential upside of 4.46%. Given CubeSmart's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CubeSmart is more favorable than First Industrial Realty Trust.

First Industrial Realty Trust has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CubeSmart has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.

99.9% of First Industrial Realty Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.6% of CubeSmart shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of First Industrial Realty Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of CubeSmart shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

First Industrial Realty Trust has a net margin of 47.97% compared to CubeSmart's net margin of 29.41%. First Industrial Realty Trust's return on equity of 12.99% beat CubeSmart's return on equity.

In the previous week, CubeSmart had 11 more articles in the media than First Industrial Realty Trust. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for CubeSmart and 13 mentions for First Industrial Realty Trust. First Industrial Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.75 beat CubeSmart's score of 0.51 indicating that First Industrial Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

CubeSmart has a net margin of 29.41% compared to Kimco Realty's net margin of 28.54%. CubeSmart's return on equity of 12.35% beat Kimco Realty's return on equity.

In the previous week, CubeSmart had 12 more articles in the media than Kimco Realty. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for CubeSmart and 12 mentions for Kimco Realty. Kimco Realty's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat CubeSmart's score of 0.51 indicating that Kimco Realty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Kimco Realty pays an annual dividend of $1.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. CubeSmart pays an annual dividend of $2.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Kimco Realty pays out 120.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CubeSmart pays out 149.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Kimco Realty has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and CubeSmart has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. CubeSmart is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Kimco Realty currently has a consensus target price of $26.12, suggesting a potential upside of 2.52%. CubeSmart has a consensus target price of $43.42, suggesting a potential upside of 4.46%. Given CubeSmart's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CubeSmart is more favorable than Kimco Realty.

Kimco Realty has higher revenue and earnings than CubeSmart. CubeSmart is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kimco Realty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

89.3% of Kimco Realty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.6% of CubeSmart shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.2% of Kimco Realty shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of CubeSmart shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kimco Realty has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CubeSmart has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its share price is 7% more volatile than the broader market.