Go Pro

Venus Concept (VERO) Competitors

Venus Concept logo
$0.31 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 09/11/2026

VERO vs. PFSA, BBLG, AEMD, DYNT, and BIOL

Should you buy Venus Concept stock or one of its competitors? Venus Concept's main competitors and comparable companies include Profusa (PFSA), Bone Biologics (BBLG), Aethlon Medical (AEMD), Dynatronics (DYNT), and BIOLASE (BIOL). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "healthcare equipment" industry.

How does Venus Concept compare to Profusa?

Profusa (NASDAQ:PFSA) and Venus Concept (NASDAQ:VERO) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

9.8% of Profusa shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Venus Concept shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of Profusa shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.0% of Venus Concept shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profusa has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Venus Concept's net margin of -92.76%. Profusa's return on equity of 0.00% beat Venus Concept's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ProfusaN/A N/A -1,731.09%
Venus Concept -92.76%-1,904.25%-85.22%

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Profusa
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Venus Concept
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Profusa has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Venus Concept has a beta of -0.06, meaning that its stock price is 106% less volatile than the broader market.

Profusa has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Venus Concept. Venus Concept is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Profusa, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Profusa$100K15.16-$35.82M-$5.62 thousandN/A
Venus Concept$58.88M0.01-$47M-$48.84N/A

In the previous week, Profusa had 1 more articles in the media than Venus Concept. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Profusa and 0 mentions for Venus Concept. Profusa's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Venus Concept's score of 0.00 indicating that Profusa is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Profusa Very Positive
Venus Concept Neutral

Summary

Profusa beats Venus Concept on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Venus Concept compare to Bone Biologics?

Bone Biologics (NASDAQ:BBLG) and Venus Concept (NASDAQ:VERO) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Bone Biologics had 4 more articles in the media than Venus Concept. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Bone Biologics and 0 mentions for Venus Concept. Bone Biologics' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Venus Concept's score of 0.00 indicating that Bone Biologics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bone Biologics Positive
Venus Concept Neutral

Bone Biologics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Venus Concept. Bone Biologics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Venus Concept, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bone BiologicsN/AN/A-$3.11M-$1.37N/A
Venus Concept$58.88M0.01-$47M-$48.84N/A

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bone Biologics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Venus Concept
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Bone Biologics has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its share price is 11% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Venus Concept has a beta of -0.06, indicating that its share price is 106% less volatile than the broader market.

Bone Biologics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Venus Concept's net margin of -92.76%. Bone Biologics' return on equity of -57.87% beat Venus Concept's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bone BiologicsN/A -57.87% -53.65%
Venus Concept -92.76%-1,904.25%-85.22%

34.3% of Bone Biologics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Venus Concept shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of Bone Biologics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.0% of Venus Concept shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Bone Biologics beats Venus Concept on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Venus Concept compare to Aethlon Medical?

Aethlon Medical (NASDAQ:AEMD) and Venus Concept (NASDAQ:VERO) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Aethlon Medical has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Venus Concept. Aethlon Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Venus Concept, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aethlon MedicalN/AN/A-$7.15M-$34.97N/A
Venus Concept$58.88M0.01-$47M-$48.84N/A

Aethlon Medical has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Venus Concept's net margin of -92.76%. Aethlon Medical's return on equity of -123.08% beat Venus Concept's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aethlon MedicalN/A -123.08% -99.28%
Venus Concept -92.76%-1,904.25%-85.22%

2.0% of Aethlon Medical shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Venus Concept shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Aethlon Medical shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.0% of Venus Concept shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Aethlon Medical has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Venus Concept has a beta of -0.06, suggesting that its stock price is 106% less volatile than the broader market.

Aethlon Medical currently has a consensus price target of $1.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.96%. Given Aethlon Medical's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Aethlon Medical is more favorable than Venus Concept.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Aethlon Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Venus Concept
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Aethlon Medical had 2 more articles in the media than Venus Concept. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Aethlon Medical and 0 mentions for Venus Concept. Aethlon Medical's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Venus Concept's score of 0.00 indicating that Aethlon Medical is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aethlon Medical Neutral
Venus Concept Neutral

Summary

Aethlon Medical beats Venus Concept on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Venus Concept compare to Dynatronics?

Dynatronics (NASDAQ:DYNT) and Venus Concept (NASDAQ:VERO) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

In the previous week, Dynatronics had 1 more articles in the media than Venus Concept. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Dynatronics and 0 mentions for Venus Concept. Dynatronics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Venus Concept'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Dynatronics Neutral
Venus Concept Neutral

4.2% of Dynatronics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Venus Concept shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Dynatronics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 28.0% of Venus Concept shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dynatronics has a net margin of -8.35% compared to Venus Concept's net margin of -92.76%. Dynatronics' return on equity of -41.81% beat Venus Concept's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dynatronics-8.35% -41.81% -9.56%
Venus Concept -92.76%-1,904.25%-85.22%

Given Dynatronics' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Dynatronics is more favorable than Venus Concept.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dynatronics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Venus Concept
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Dynatronics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Venus Concept. Venus Concept is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dynatronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dynatronics$33.60M0.00-$2.70M-$1.35N/A
Venus Concept$58.88M0.01-$47M-$48.84N/A

Dynatronics has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its share price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Venus Concept has a beta of -0.06, meaning that its share price is 106% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Dynatronics beats Venus Concept on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Venus Concept compare to BIOLASE?

Venus Concept (NASDAQ:VERO) and BIOLASE (NASDAQ:BIOL) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

BIOLASE has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Venus Concept. Venus Concept is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BIOLASE, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Venus Concept$58.88M0.01-$47M-$48.84N/A
BIOLASE$48.83M0.00-$20.63M-$14.94N/A

Venus Concept has a beta of -0.06, suggesting that its stock price is 106% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BIOLASE has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Venus Concept's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled BIOLASE'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Venus Concept Neutral
BIOLASE Neutral

87.4% of Venus Concept shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 8.8% of BIOLASE shares are held by institutional investors. 28.0% of Venus Concept shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of BIOLASE shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Given BIOLASE's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe BIOLASE is more favorable than Venus Concept.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Venus Concept
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
BIOLASE
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

BIOLASE has a net margin of -41.65% compared to Venus Concept's net margin of -92.76%. BIOLASE's return on equity of -1,782.73% beat Venus Concept's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Venus Concept-92.76% -1,904.25% -85.22%
BIOLASE -41.65%-1,782.73%-55.31%

Summary

BIOLASE beats Venus Concept on 8 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Venus Concept News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for VERO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding VERO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

VERO vs. The Competition

MetricVenus ConceptHealthcare Equipment & Supplies IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$442K$5.46B$7.20B$12.67B
Dividend YieldN/A1.80%2.57%11.71%
P/E Ratio-0.0125.19275.0225.43
Price / Sales0.0144.29638.0888.25
Price / CashN/A33.0328.4234.96
Price / Book0.076.0110.326.23
Net Income-$47M$150.75M$3.50B$358.31M
7 Day PerformanceN/A-2.57%-2.41%-1.59%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-3.13%0.22%-2.89%
1 Year Performance-86.67%9.57%24.17%8.22%

Venus Concept Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
VERO
Venus Concept
0.1093 of 5 stars
$0.31
flat
N/AN/A$442K$58.88MN/A410
PFSA
Profusa
1.0708 of 5 stars
$2.80
-2.8%
N/AN/A$1.71M$100KN/A2
BBLG
Bone Biologics
1.2571 of 5 stars
$0.59
+4.8%
N/A-74.1%$1.62MN/AN/A2
AEMD
Aethlon Medical
0.8359 of 5 stars
$1.74
-3.9%
$1.50
-13.8%
-96.0%$1.25MN/AN/A10
DYNT
Dynatronics
N/AN/AN/AN/A$653K$33.60MN/A200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:VERO) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners