Free Trial
Your Portfolio Deserves Better! MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Upgrade Now
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Venus Concept (VERO) Competitors

Venus Concept logo
$0.31 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 05/21/2026

VERO vs. GCTK, LYRA, SSKN, DYNT, and XAGE

Should you buy Venus Concept stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Venus Concept with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Venus Concept include GlucoTrack (GCTK), Lyra Therapeutics (LYRA), Strata Skin Sciences (SSKN), Dynatronics (DYNT), and Longevity Health (XAGE). These companies are all part of the "medical equipment" industry.

How does Venus Concept compare to GlucoTrack?

Venus Concept (NASDAQ:VERO) and GlucoTrack (NASDAQ:GCTK) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Venus Concept's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled GlucoTrack'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Venus Concept Neutral
GlucoTrack Neutral

Venus Concept has a beta of -0.06, meaning that its share price is 106% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GlucoTrack has a beta of 0.78, meaning that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Venus Concept
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
GlucoTrack
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

GlucoTrack has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Venus Concept. GlucoTrack is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Venus Concept, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Venus Concept$58.88M0.01-$47M-$48.84N/A
GlucoTrackN/AN/A-$19.39M-$18.04N/A

87.4% of Venus Concept shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of GlucoTrack shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.0% of Venus Concept shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of GlucoTrack shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

GlucoTrack has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Venus Concept's net margin of -92.76%. GlucoTrack's return on equity of -581.98% beat Venus Concept's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Venus Concept-92.76% -1,904.25% -85.22%
GlucoTrack N/A -581.98%-220.10%

Summary

Venus Concept and GlucoTrack tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Venus Concept compare to Lyra Therapeutics?

Lyra Therapeutics (NASDAQ:LYRA) and Venus Concept (NASDAQ:VERO) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and valuation.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lyra Therapeutics
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Venus Concept
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Lyra Therapeutics has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Venus Concept has a beta of -0.06, meaning that its stock price is 106% less volatile than the broader market.

Venus Concept has a net margin of -92.76% compared to Lyra Therapeutics' net margin of -5,491.17%. Lyra Therapeutics' return on equity of -1,010.91% beat Venus Concept's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lyra Therapeutics-5,491.17% -1,010.91% -58.92%
Venus Concept -92.76%-1,904.25%-85.22%

Venus Concept has higher revenue and earnings than Lyra Therapeutics. Lyra Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Venus Concept, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lyra Therapeutics$600K2.22-$93.43M-$19.15N/A
Venus Concept$58.88M0.01-$47M-$48.84N/A

In the previous week, Lyra Therapeutics' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Venus Concept'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lyra Therapeutics Neutral
Venus Concept Neutral

95.6% of Lyra Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Venus Concept shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Lyra Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 28.0% of Venus Concept shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Lyra Therapeutics beats Venus Concept on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Venus Concept compare to Strata Skin Sciences?

Venus Concept (NASDAQ:VERO) and Strata Skin Sciences (NASDAQ:SSKN) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Strata Skin Sciences had 1 more articles in the media than Venus Concept. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Strata Skin Sciences and 0 mentions for Venus Concept. Venus Concept's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Strata Skin Sciences'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Venus Concept Neutral
Strata Skin Sciences Neutral

Venus Concept has a beta of -0.06, suggesting that its stock price is 106% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Strata Skin Sciences has a beta of -0.05, suggesting that its stock price is 105% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Venus Concept
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Strata Skin Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

87.4% of Venus Concept shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.4% of Strata Skin Sciences shares are owned by institutional investors. 28.0% of Venus Concept shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.9% of Strata Skin Sciences shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Strata Skin Sciences has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Venus Concept. Strata Skin Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Venus Concept, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Venus Concept$58.88M0.01-$47M-$48.84N/A
Strata Skin Sciences$30.98M0.03-$10.09M-$1.41N/A

Strata Skin Sciences has a net margin of -35.64% compared to Venus Concept's net margin of -92.76%. Strata Skin Sciences' return on equity of -476.73% beat Venus Concept's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Venus Concept-92.76% -1,904.25% -85.22%
Strata Skin Sciences -35.64%-476.73%-33.49%

Summary

Strata Skin Sciences beats Venus Concept on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Venus Concept compare to Dynatronics?

Venus Concept (NASDAQ:VERO) and Dynatronics (NASDAQ:DYNT) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and earnings.

87.4% of Venus Concept shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.2% of Dynatronics shares are held by institutional investors. 28.0% of Venus Concept shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Dynatronics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dynatronics has a net margin of -8.35% compared to Venus Concept's net margin of -92.76%. Dynatronics' return on equity of -41.81% beat Venus Concept's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Venus Concept-92.76% -1,904.25% -85.22%
Dynatronics -8.35%-41.81%-9.56%

Venus Concept has a beta of -0.06, meaning that its stock price is 106% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Dynatronics has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Venus Concept's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Dynatronics'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Venus Concept Neutral
Dynatronics Neutral

Given Dynatronics' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Dynatronics is more favorable than Venus Concept.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Venus Concept
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Dynatronics
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Dynatronics has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Venus Concept. Venus Concept is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dynatronics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Venus Concept$58.88M0.01-$47M-$48.84N/A
Dynatronics$33.60M0.00-$2.70M-$1.35N/A

Summary

Dynatronics beats Venus Concept on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Venus Concept compare to Longevity Health?

Longevity Health (NASDAQ:XAGE) and Venus Concept (NASDAQ:VERO) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Longevity Health
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Venus Concept
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Longevity Health has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Venus Concept. Longevity Health is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Venus Concept, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Longevity Health$1.05M0.54-$10.37M-$4.29N/A
Venus Concept$58.88M0.01-$47M-$48.84N/A

In the previous week, Longevity Health's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Venus Concept'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Longevity Health Neutral
Venus Concept Neutral

Venus Concept has a net margin of -92.76% compared to Longevity Health's net margin of -682.67%. Longevity Health's return on equity of 0.00% beat Venus Concept's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Longevity Health-682.67% N/A -261.90%
Venus Concept -92.76%-1,904.25%-85.22%

Longevity Health has a beta of 0.37, meaning that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Venus Concept has a beta of -0.06, meaning that its stock price is 106% less volatile than the broader market.

24.2% of Longevity Health shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.4% of Venus Concept shares are held by institutional investors. 29.0% of Longevity Health shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 28.0% of Venus Concept shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Longevity Health and Venus Concept tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Venus Concept News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for VERO and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding VERO and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

VERO vs. The Competition

MetricVenus ConceptMED INSTRUMENTS IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$442K$6.97B$6.38B$12.34B
Dividend YieldN/A1.67%2.79%5.33%
P/E Ratio-0.0149.7220.9125.65
Price / Sales0.0184.92543.8085.61
Price / CashN/A25.0044.1356.16
Price / Book0.076.4710.097.06
Net Income-$47M$158.81M$3.55B$335.04M
7 Day PerformanceN/A3.55%4.71%2.60%
1 Month PerformanceN/A-1.84%1.43%1.42%
1 Year Performance-86.01%2.24%36.72%35.67%

Venus Concept Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
VERO
Venus Concept
N/A$0.31
flat
N/AN/A$442K$58.88MN/A410
GCTK
GlucoTrack
0.0801 of 5 stars
$0.74
-4.3%
N/A-94.5%$1.50MN/AN/A5
LYRA
Lyra Therapeutics
N/A$0.73
-1.2%
N/A-85.1%$1.30M$600KN/A50
SSKN
Strata Skin Sciences
0.2023 of 5 stars
$0.16
+24.3%
N/A-94.0%$758K$30.98MN/A120
DYNT
Dynatronics
N/AN/AN/AN/A$653K$33.60MN/A200

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:VERO) was last updated on 5/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners