WhiteHorse Finance (WHF) Competitors

WhiteHorse Finance logo
$6.45 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 06/18/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$6.50 +0.04 (+0.70%)
As of 06/18/2026 06:47 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

WHF vs. GLAD, HRZN, TCPC, SCM, and PNNT

Should you buy WhiteHorse Finance stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares WhiteHorse Finance with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with WhiteHorse Finance include Gladstone Capital (GLAD), Horizon Technology Finance (HRZN), Blackrock Tcp Capital (TCPC), Stellus Capital Investment (SCM), and PennantPark Investment (PNNT). These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does WhiteHorse Finance compare to Gladstone Capital?

Gladstone Capital (NASDAQ:GLAD) and WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Gladstone Capital currently has a consensus target price of $21.67, suggesting a potential upside of 15.93%. WhiteHorse Finance has a consensus target price of $7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 20.16%. Given WhiteHorse Finance's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe WhiteHorse Finance is more favorable than Gladstone Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gladstone Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.60

In the previous week, WhiteHorse Finance had 3 more articles in the media than Gladstone Capital. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WhiteHorse Finance and 2 mentions for Gladstone Capital. WhiteHorse Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Gladstone Capital's score of 0.22 indicating that WhiteHorse Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gladstone Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Gladstone Capital has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WhiteHorse Finance has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

Gladstone Capital has higher revenue and earnings than WhiteHorse Finance. Gladstone Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WhiteHorse Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Capital$89.12M4.74$58.11M$1.8310.21
WhiteHorse Finance$72.67M1.92$14.34M$0.4115.73

Gladstone Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. WhiteHorse Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.5%. Gladstone Capital pays out 98.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. WhiteHorse Finance pays out 243.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Capital has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and WhiteHorse Finance has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 45.15% compared to WhiteHorse Finance's net margin of 13.46%. Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 9.79% beat WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gladstone Capital45.15% 9.79% 5.31%
WhiteHorse Finance 13.46%9.47%3.95%

10.7% of Gladstone Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Gladstone Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Gladstone Capital beats WhiteHorse Finance on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHorse Finance compare to Horizon Technology Finance?

WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) and Horizon Technology Finance (NASDAQ:HRZN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

Horizon Technology Finance has a net margin of 22.55% compared to WhiteHorse Finance's net margin of 13.46%. Horizon Technology Finance's return on equity of 13.63% beat WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WhiteHorse Finance13.46% 9.47% 3.95%
Horizon Technology Finance 22.55%13.63%5.53%

13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.9% of Horizon Technology Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Horizon Technology Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

WhiteHorse Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.5%. Horizon Technology Finance pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.1%. WhiteHorse Finance pays out 243.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Horizon Technology Finance pays out 167.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. WhiteHorse Finance has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Horizon Technology Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

WhiteHorse Finance has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Horizon Technology Finance has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

In the previous week, WhiteHorse Finance had 3 more articles in the media than Horizon Technology Finance. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WhiteHorse Finance and 2 mentions for Horizon Technology Finance. WhiteHorse Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Horizon Technology Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that WhiteHorse Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Horizon Technology Finance
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

WhiteHorse Finance currently has a consensus target price of $7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 20.16%. Horizon Technology Finance has a consensus target price of $5.65, suggesting a potential upside of 33.89%. Given Horizon Technology Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Horizon Technology Finance is more favorable than WhiteHorse Finance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.60
Horizon Technology Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

WhiteHorse Finance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Horizon Technology Finance. Horizon Technology Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WhiteHorse Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WhiteHorse Finance$72.67M1.92$14.34M$0.4115.73
Horizon Technology Finance$96.02M3.00-$2.66M$0.439.81

Summary

Horizon Technology Finance beats WhiteHorse Finance on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHorse Finance compare to Blackrock Tcp Capital?

Blackrock Tcp Capital (NASDAQ:TCPC) and WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

Blackrock Tcp Capital has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WhiteHorse Finance has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Blackrock Tcp Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

WhiteHorse Finance has a net margin of 13.46% compared to Blackrock Tcp Capital's net margin of -66.92%. Blackrock Tcp Capital's return on equity of 14.30% beat WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Blackrock Tcp Capital-66.92% 14.30% 5.47%
WhiteHorse Finance 13.46%9.47%3.95%

WhiteHorse Finance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Blackrock Tcp Capital. Blackrock Tcp Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WhiteHorse Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Blackrock Tcp Capital$201.79M1.42-$88.93M-$1.49N/A
WhiteHorse Finance$72.67M1.92$14.34M$0.4115.73

In the previous week, WhiteHorse Finance had 4 more articles in the media than Blackrock Tcp Capital. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WhiteHorse Finance and 1 mentions for Blackrock Tcp Capital. WhiteHorse Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Blackrock Tcp Capital's score of 0.84 indicating that WhiteHorse Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Blackrock Tcp Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Blackrock Tcp Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 19.9%. WhiteHorse Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.5%. Blackrock Tcp Capital pays out -45.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WhiteHorse Finance pays out 243.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. WhiteHorse Finance has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Blackrock Tcp Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Blackrock Tcp Capital currently has a consensus target price of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 2.64%. WhiteHorse Finance has a consensus target price of $7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 20.16%. Given WhiteHorse Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe WhiteHorse Finance is more favorable than Blackrock Tcp Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Blackrock Tcp Capital
3 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.25
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.60

Summary

WhiteHorse Finance beats Blackrock Tcp Capital on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHorse Finance compare to Stellus Capital Investment?

Stellus Capital Investment (NYSE:SCM) and WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Stellus Capital Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.2%. WhiteHorse Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.5%. Stellus Capital Investment pays out 165.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. WhiteHorse Finance pays out 243.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. WhiteHorse Finance has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Stellus Capital Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Stellus Capital Investment has a net margin of 23.59% compared to WhiteHorse Finance's net margin of 13.46%. Stellus Capital Investment's return on equity of 9.69% beat WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Stellus Capital Investment23.59% 9.69% 3.51%
WhiteHorse Finance 13.46%9.47%3.95%

Stellus Capital Investment has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, WhiteHorse Finance has a beta of 0.37, suggesting that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, WhiteHorse Finance had 4 more articles in the media than Stellus Capital Investment. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WhiteHorse Finance and 1 mentions for Stellus Capital Investment. WhiteHorse Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat Stellus Capital Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that WhiteHorse Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Stellus Capital Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Stellus Capital Investment presently has a consensus target price of $10.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.06%. WhiteHorse Finance has a consensus target price of $7.75, indicating a potential upside of 20.16%. Given WhiteHorse Finance's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe WhiteHorse Finance is more favorable than Stellus Capital Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Stellus Capital Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.60

Stellus Capital Investment has higher revenue and earnings than WhiteHorse Finance. Stellus Capital Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WhiteHorse Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Stellus Capital Investment$102.14M2.38$27.05M$0.8210.24
WhiteHorse Finance$72.67M1.92$14.34M$0.4115.73

13.2% of Stellus Capital Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 4.2% of Stellus Capital Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Stellus Capital Investment beats WhiteHorse Finance on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHorse Finance compare to PennantPark Investment?

WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) and PennantPark Investment (NASDAQ:PNNT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, WhiteHorse Finance had 5 more articles in the media than PennantPark Investment. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WhiteHorse Finance and 0 mentions for PennantPark Investment. WhiteHorse Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.72 beat PennantPark Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that WhiteHorse Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
WhiteHorse Finance Very Positive
PennantPark Investment Neutral

WhiteHorse Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.5%. PennantPark Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.8%. WhiteHorse Finance pays out 243.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. PennantPark Investment pays out 228.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. WhiteHorse Finance has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and PennantPark Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. WhiteHorse Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 26.6% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of PennantPark Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

WhiteHorse Finance has a beta of 0.37, meaning that its share price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Investment has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its share price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

WhiteHorse Finance currently has a consensus price target of $7.75, suggesting a potential upside of 20.16%. PennantPark Investment has a consensus price target of $5.10, suggesting a potential upside of 47.06%. Given PennantPark Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Investment is more favorable than WhiteHorse Finance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.60
PennantPark Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

PennantPark Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than WhiteHorse Finance. WhiteHorse Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PennantPark Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WhiteHorse Finance$72.67M1.92$14.34M$0.4115.73
PennantPark Investment$25.64M8.83$48.85M$0.2116.51

WhiteHorse Finance has a net margin of 13.46% compared to PennantPark Investment's net margin of 11.33%. PennantPark Investment's return on equity of 11.59% beat WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WhiteHorse Finance13.46% 9.47% 3.95%
PennantPark Investment 11.33%11.59%4.23%

Summary

PennantPark Investment beats WhiteHorse Finance on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get WhiteHorse Finance News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WHF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WHF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WHF vs. The Competition

MetricWhiteHorse FinanceFIN IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$139.39M$1.27B$13.97B$12.60B
Dividend Yield15.50%13.38%5.74%5.81%
P/E Ratio15.7310.7520.2024.42
Price / Sales1.9214.51144.09111.09
Price / Cash6.296.8719.5437.84
Price / Book0.580.752.256.60
Net Income$14.34M$121.13M$1.14B$337.10M
7 Day Performance-2.86%-3.17%-0.37%0.83%
1 Month Performance-2.42%-2.75%0.85%2.25%
1 Year Performance-25.78%-21.80%22.83%36.14%

WhiteHorse Finance Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WHF
WhiteHorse Finance
4.3199 of 5 stars
$6.45
flat
$7.75
+20.2%
-25.8%$139.39M$72.67M15.73N/A
GLAD
Gladstone Capital
2.6144 of 5 stars
$19.22
+0.6%
$21.67
+12.7%
-29.6%$434.41M$89.12M10.5170
HRZN
Horizon Technology Finance
4.9261 of 5 stars
$4.45
-1.0%
$5.65
+27.1%
-42.7%$304.10M$96.02M10.36N/A
TCPC
Blackrock Tcp Capital
1.1673 of 5 stars
$3.47
-3.8%
$3.50
+1.0%
-55.0%$290.71M$201.79MN/A24,900
SCM
Stellus Capital Investment
2.7518 of 5 stars
$8.88
-0.2%
$10.00
+12.7%
-38.9%$256.90M$102.14M10.82599

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:WHF) was last updated on 6/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners