Go Pro

WhiteHorse Finance (WHF) Competitors

WhiteHorse Finance logo
$7.16 +0.14 (+1.99%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

WHF vs. EVAC, BTGO, NOAH, MSIF, and AEXA

Should you buy WhiteHorse Finance stock or one of its competitors? WhiteHorse Finance's main competitors and comparable companies include EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II (EVAC), BTGO (BTGO), Noah (NOAH), MSC Income Fund (MSIF), and American Exceptionalism Acquisition (AEXA). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does WhiteHorse Finance compare to EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II?

EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II (NYSE:EVAC) and WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, WhiteHorse Finance had 5 more articles in the media than EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WhiteHorse Finance and 0 mentions for EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II. WhiteHorse Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II's score of 0.00 indicating that WhiteHorse Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II Neutral
WhiteHorse Finance Positive

WhiteHorse Finance has a net margin of 26.88% compared to EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II's net margin of 0.00%. WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity of 8.94% beat EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. IIN/A -102.94% 3.57%
WhiteHorse Finance 26.88%8.94%3.75%

WhiteHorse Finance has a consensus target price of $7.25, suggesting a potential upside of 1.26%. Given WhiteHorse Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe WhiteHorse Finance is more favorable than EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

WhiteHorse Finance has higher revenue and earnings than EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. IIN/AN/A$8.92MN/AN/A
WhiteHorse Finance$72.67M2.12$14.34M$0.799.06

Summary

WhiteHorse Finance beats EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHorse Finance compare to BTGO?

WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) and BTGO (NYSE:BTGO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and media sentiment.

In the previous week, BTGO had 13 more articles in the media than WhiteHorse Finance. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for BTGO and 5 mentions for WhiteHorse Finance. WhiteHorse Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat BTGO's score of -0.11 indicating that WhiteHorse Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WhiteHorse Finance
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BTGO
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
6 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

WhiteHorse Finance has a net margin of 26.88% compared to BTGO's net margin of 0.00%. WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity of 8.94% beat BTGO's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WhiteHorse Finance26.88% 8.94% 3.75%
BTGO N/A N/A N/A

WhiteHorse Finance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than BTGO. BTGO is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WhiteHorse Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WhiteHorse Finance$72.67M2.12$14.34M$0.799.06
BTGO$16.15B0.05-$14.78M-$1.45N/A

13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

WhiteHorse Finance presently has a consensus price target of $7.25, suggesting a potential upside of 1.26%. BTGO has a consensus price target of $12.77, suggesting a potential upside of 85.92%. Given BTGO's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe BTGO is more favorable than WhiteHorse Finance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
BTGO
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

Summary

WhiteHorse Finance beats BTGO on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHorse Finance compare to Noah?

WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) and Noah (NYSE:NOAH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

WhiteHorse Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.0%. Noah pays an annual dividend of $0.63 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. WhiteHorse Finance pays out 126.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Noah pays out 58.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. WhiteHorse Finance has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. WhiteHorse Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

WhiteHorse Finance currently has a consensus target price of $7.25, indicating a potential upside of 1.26%. Noah has a consensus target price of $10.75, indicating a potential upside of 21.74%. Given Noah's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Noah is more favorable than WhiteHorse Finance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
Noah
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.7% of Noah shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.2% of Noah shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, WhiteHorse Finance had 4 more articles in the media than Noah. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WhiteHorse Finance and 1 mentions for Noah. Noah's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat WhiteHorse Finance's score of 0.54 indicating that Noah is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
WhiteHorse Finance
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Noah
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

WhiteHorse Finance has a beta of 0.38, meaning that its share price is 62% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Noah has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

Noah has higher revenue and earnings than WhiteHorse Finance. Noah is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WhiteHorse Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WhiteHorse Finance$72.67M2.12$14.34M$0.799.06
Noah$373.26M1.60$79.92M$1.088.18

WhiteHorse Finance has a net margin of 26.88% compared to Noah's net margin of 20.28%. WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity of 8.94% beat Noah's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WhiteHorse Finance26.88% 8.94% 3.75%
Noah 20.28%5.80%4.91%

Summary

Noah beats WhiteHorse Finance on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHorse Finance compare to MSC Income Fund?

MSC Income Fund (NYSE:MSIF) and WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

WhiteHorse Finance has a net margin of 26.88% compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity of 8.94% beat MSC Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MSC Income FundN/A N/A N/A
WhiteHorse Finance 26.88%8.94%3.75%

MSC Income Fund presently has a consensus target price of $14.13, suggesting a potential upside of 10.44%. WhiteHorse Finance has a consensus target price of $7.25, suggesting a potential upside of 1.26%. Given MSC Income Fund's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe MSC Income Fund is more favorable than WhiteHorse Finance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MSC Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

WhiteHorse Finance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MSC Income Fund. MSC Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than WhiteHorse Finance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MSC Income Fund$110.26M5.47-$155.54K-$0.00N/A
WhiteHorse Finance$72.67M2.12$14.34M$0.799.06

13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, WhiteHorse Finance had 4 more articles in the media than MSC Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WhiteHorse Finance and 1 mentions for MSC Income Fund. MSC Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat WhiteHorse Finance's score of 0.54 indicating that MSC Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MSC Income Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
WhiteHorse Finance
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

WhiteHorse Finance beats MSC Income Fund on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does WhiteHorse Finance compare to American Exceptionalism Acquisition?

WhiteHorse Finance (NASDAQ:WHF) and American Exceptionalism Acquisition (NYSE:AEXA) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, WhiteHorse Finance had 5 more articles in the media than American Exceptionalism Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WhiteHorse Finance and 0 mentions for American Exceptionalism Acquisition. WhiteHorse Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat American Exceptionalism Acquisition's score of 0.00 indicating that WhiteHorse Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
WhiteHorse Finance Positive
American Exceptionalism Acquisition Neutral

WhiteHorse Finance has higher revenue and earnings than American Exceptionalism Acquisition. WhiteHorse Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than American Exceptionalism Acquisition, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
WhiteHorse Finance$72.67M2.12$14.34M$0.799.06
American Exceptionalism AcquisitionN/AN/A-$7.20M$0.06195.00

WhiteHorse Finance has a net margin of 26.88% compared to American Exceptionalism Acquisition's net margin of 0.00%. WhiteHorse Finance's return on equity of 8.94% beat American Exceptionalism Acquisition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WhiteHorse Finance26.88% 8.94% 3.75%
American Exceptionalism Acquisition N/A N/A N/A

WhiteHorse Finance presently has a consensus target price of $7.25, suggesting a potential upside of 1.26%. Given WhiteHorse Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe WhiteHorse Finance is more favorable than American Exceptionalism Acquisition.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
WhiteHorse Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50
American Exceptionalism Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

13.2% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of WhiteHorse Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

WhiteHorse Finance beats American Exceptionalism Acquisition on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get WhiteHorse Finance News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WHF and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WHF and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WHF vs. The Competition

MetricWhiteHorse FinanceCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$150.76M$5.58B$13.81B$12.76B
Dividend Yield14.24%7.39%5.89%11.09%
P/E Ratio9.0637.4527.8921.07
Price / Sales2.121,278.70523.2095.12
Price / Cash6.8548.2238.3153.23
Price / Book0.612.132.186.37
Net Income$14.34M$416.48M$1.31B$347.74M
7 Day Performance1.27%-0.21%-0.30%0.08%
1 Month Performance12.05%1.20%1.55%2.13%
1 Year Performance-15.86%8.30%11.88%20.64%

WhiteHorse Finance Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WHF
WhiteHorse Finance
2.7243 of 5 stars
$7.16
+2.0%
$7.25
+1.3%
-17.1%$150.76M$72.67M9.06N/A
EVAC
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II
N/A$10.26
+0.0%
N/AN/A$599.41MN/AN/AN/A
BTGO
BTGO
3.4171 of 5 stars
$5.02
-0.2%
$15.14
+201.6%
N/A$583.86M$16.15BN/AN/A
NOAH
Noah
4.7314 of 5 stars
$8.62
-2.3%
$10.75
+24.7%
-25.6%$582.07M$2.62B7.991,778
MSIF
MSC Income Fund
3.1331 of 5 stars
$12.26
-0.9%
$14.13
+15.3%
N/A$578.28M$110.26MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:WHF) was last updated on 8/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners