Go Pro

Gladstone Investment (GAIN) Competitors

Gladstone Investment logo
$15.68 -0.07 (-0.41%)
As of 03:03 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GAIN vs. ARCC, GLAD, TSLX, SHOT, and TRIN

Should you buy Gladstone Investment stock or one of its competitors? Gladstone Investment's main competitors and comparable companies include Ares Capital (ARCC), Gladstone Capital (GLAD), Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX), RMG ML Sports (SHOT), and Trinity Capital (TRIN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Gladstone Investment compare to Ares Capital?

Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) and Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.2%. Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Ares Capital pays out 142.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Investment pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 158.95% compared to Ares Capital's net margin of 30.91%. Ares Capital's return on equity of 9.80% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ares Capital30.91% 9.80% 4.50%
Gladstone Investment 158.95%5.90%2.88%

27.4% of Ares Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.9% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Investment. Gladstone Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ares Capital$3.05B4.43$1.30B$1.3513.94
Gladstone Investment$99.08M6.27$184.75M$4.183.73

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 6 more articles in the media than Gladstone Investment. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Ares Capital and 4 mentions for Gladstone Investment. Ares Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Gladstone Investment's score of 0.42 indicating that Ares Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Ares Capital
3 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gladstone Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Ares Capital currently has a consensus price target of $20.60, indicating a potential upside of 9.43%. Gladstone Investment has a consensus price target of $16.75, indicating a potential upside of 7.41%. Given Ares Capital's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than Gladstone Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Gladstone Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Ares Capital has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ares Capital beats Gladstone Investment on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gladstone Investment compare to Gladstone Capital?

Gladstone Capital (NASDAQ:GLAD) and Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Gladstone Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Gladstone Capital pays out 87.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Investment pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gladstone Capital has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Gladstone Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Gladstone Investment had 1 more articles in the media than Gladstone Capital. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gladstone Investment and 3 mentions for Gladstone Capital. Gladstone Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Gladstone Capital's score of 0.15 indicating that Gladstone Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gladstone Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gladstone Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Gladstone Capital has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Gladstone Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Capital. Gladstone Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gladstone Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Capital$89.12M4.86$58.11M$2.069.30
Gladstone Investment$99.08M6.27$184.75M$4.183.73

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 158.95% compared to Gladstone Capital's net margin of 50.48%. Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 9.67% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gladstone Capital50.48% 9.67% 5.00%
Gladstone Investment 158.95%5.90%2.88%

Gladstone Capital presently has a consensus target price of $21.67, indicating a potential upside of 13.08%. Gladstone Investment has a consensus target price of $16.75, indicating a potential upside of 7.41%. Given Gladstone Capital's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Gladstone Capital is more favorable than Gladstone Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gladstone Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Gladstone Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

10.7% of Gladstone Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.9% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Gladstone Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Gladstone Investment beats Gladstone Capital on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gladstone Investment compare to Sixth Street Specialty Lending?

Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) and Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 158.95% compared to Sixth Street Specialty Lending's net margin of 21.79%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.33% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sixth Street Specialty Lending21.79% 11.33% 5.16%
Gladstone Investment 158.95%5.90%2.88%

Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.4%. Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 176.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Investment pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Gladstone Investment had 2 more articles in the media than Sixth Street Specialty Lending. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gladstone Investment and 2 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending. Gladstone Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Sixth Street Specialty Lending's score of 0.35 indicating that Gladstone Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gladstone Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Sixth Street Specialty Lending currently has a consensus price target of $19.83, suggesting a potential upside of 11.44%. Gladstone Investment has a consensus price target of $16.75, suggesting a potential upside of 7.41%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than Gladstone Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Gladstone Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Investment. Gladstone Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$449.05M3.77$209.99M$0.9518.73
Gladstone Investment$99.08M6.27$184.75M$4.183.73

70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.9% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats Gladstone Investment on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gladstone Investment compare to RMG ML Sports?

Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) and RMG ML Sports (NASDAQ:SHOT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership and risk.

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, RMG ML Sports has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its share price is 57% more volatile than the broader market.

Gladstone Investment presently has a consensus target price of $16.75, indicating a potential upside of 7.41%. Given Gladstone Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Gladstone Investment is more favorable than RMG ML Sports.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gladstone Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
RMG ML Sports
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Gladstone Investment has higher revenue and earnings than RMG ML Sports. RMG ML Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gladstone Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Investment$99.08M6.27$184.75M$4.183.73
RMG ML Sports-$91.96K-18,382.90-$54.86M-$0.32N/A

11.9% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.6% of RMG ML Sports shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.1% of RMG ML Sports shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 158.95% compared to RMG ML Sports' net margin of 0.00%. Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 5.90% beat RMG ML Sports' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gladstone Investment158.95% 5.90% 2.88%
RMG ML Sports N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Gladstone Investment had 3 more articles in the media than RMG ML Sports. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gladstone Investment and 1 mentions for RMG ML Sports. Gladstone Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat RMG ML Sports' score of -1.00 indicating that Gladstone Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Gladstone Investment Neutral
RMG ML Sports Negative

Summary

Gladstone Investment beats RMG ML Sports on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gladstone Investment compare to Trinity Capital?

Trinity Capital (NASDAQ:TRIN) and Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 158.95% compared to Trinity Capital's net margin of 43.45%. Trinity Capital's return on equity of 14.94% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Trinity Capital43.45% 14.94% 6.69%
Gladstone Investment 158.95%5.90%2.88%

Trinity Capital currently has a consensus target price of $16.67, suggesting a potential downside of 4.73%. Gladstone Investment has a consensus target price of $16.75, suggesting a potential upside of 7.41%. Given Gladstone Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gladstone Investment is more favorable than Trinity Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Trinity Capital
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Gladstone Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

In the previous week, Trinity Capital and Trinity Capital both had 4 articles in the media. Gladstone Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Trinity Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Gladstone Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Trinity Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Gladstone Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Trinity Capital has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

24.6% of Trinity Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.9% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 4.3% of Trinity Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gladstone Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Trinity Capital. Gladstone Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trinity Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Trinity Capital$216.31M7.66$135.60M$1.7510.00
Gladstone Investment$99.08M6.27$184.75M$4.183.73

Trinity Capital pays an annual dividend of $2.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.7%. Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Trinity Capital pays out 116.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Investment pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trinity Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Trinity Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Trinity Capital beats Gladstone Investment on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gladstone Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GAIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GAIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GAIN vs. The Competition

MetricGladstone InvestmentCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$623.38M$5.16B$13.31B$13.25B
Dividend Yield6.15%7.55%6.03%15.88%
P/E Ratio3.7529.3424.4726.09
Price / Sales6.291,265.05507.1292.48
Price / CashN/A47.7747.4551.25
Price / Book0.933.492.706.32
Net Income$184.75M$417.69M$1.32B$361.55M
7 Day Performance-0.95%-0.66%-0.99%-1.59%
1 Month Performance-4.51%5.30%1.04%-3.86%
1 Year Performance12.10%3.37%8.17%2.89%

Gladstone Investment Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
4.1416 of 5 stars
$15.68
-0.4%
$16.75
+6.9%
+13.0%$623.90M$99.08M3.7570
ARCC
Ares Capital
3.1008 of 5 stars
$19.08
-0.3%
$20.60
+8.0%
-4.8%$13.70B$3.05B14.134,250
GLAD
Gladstone Capital
2.4448 of 5 stars
$19.22
flat
$21.67
+12.7%
-10.1%$434.32M$89.12M9.3365
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
2.426 of 5 stars
$18.13
-0.1%
$19.83
+9.4%
-18.3%$1.72B$449.05M19.07N/A
SHOT
RMG ML Sports
0.3799 of 5 stars
$9.86
+0.1%
N/A+3,421.4%$1.69B-$91.96KN/A8

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GAIN) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners