Go Pro

Gladstone Investment (GAIN) Competitors

Gladstone Investment logo
$16.36 +0.01 (+0.06%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

GAIN vs. ARCC, GLAD, TSLX, TRIN, and SHOT

Should you buy Gladstone Investment stock or one of its competitors? Gladstone Investment's main competitors and comparable companies include Ares Capital (ARCC), Gladstone Capital (GLAD), Sixth Street Specialty Lending (TSLX), Trinity Capital (TRIN), and RMG ML Sports (SHOT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Gladstone Investment compare to Ares Capital?

Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) and Ares Capital (NASDAQ:ARCC) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 158.95% compared to Ares Capital's net margin of 30.91%. Ares Capital's return on equity of 9.80% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gladstone Investment158.95% 5.90% 2.88%
Ares Capital 30.91%9.80%4.50%

11.9% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 27.4% of Ares Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Ares Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Ares Capital had 14 more articles in the media than Gladstone Investment. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Ares Capital and 3 mentions for Gladstone Investment. Gladstone Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Ares Capital's score of 0.97 indicating that Gladstone Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gladstone Investment
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ares Capital
10 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Ares Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Investment. Gladstone Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Investment$158.12M4.12$184.75M$4.183.91
Ares Capital$3.05B4.69$1.30B$1.3514.76

Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Ares Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. Gladstone Investment pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ares Capital pays out 142.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Gladstone Investment presently has a consensus price target of $16.75, suggesting a potential upside of 2.38%. Ares Capital has a consensus price target of $20.40, suggesting a potential upside of 2.41%. Given Ares Capital's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Ares Capital is more favorable than Gladstone Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gladstone Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Ares Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ares Capital has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Ares Capital beats Gladstone Investment on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gladstone Investment compare to Gladstone Capital?

Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) and Gladstone Capital (NASDAQ:GLAD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Gladstone Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Capital. Gladstone Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gladstone Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Investment$158.12M4.12$184.75M$4.183.91
Gladstone Capital$89.12M4.99$58.11M$2.069.55

Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Gladstone Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Gladstone Investment pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Gladstone Capital pays out 87.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gladstone Capital has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Gladstone Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

11.9% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.7% of Gladstone Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Gladstone Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 158.95% compared to Gladstone Capital's net margin of 50.48%. Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 9.67% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gladstone Investment158.95% 5.90% 2.88%
Gladstone Capital 50.48%9.67%5.00%

In the previous week, Gladstone Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Gladstone Investment. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gladstone Capital and 3 mentions for Gladstone Investment. Gladstone Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Gladstone Capital's score of 0.55 indicating that Gladstone Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gladstone Investment
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gladstone Capital
0 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Gladstone Investment presently has a consensus price target of $16.75, indicating a potential upside of 2.38%. Gladstone Capital has a consensus price target of $21.67, indicating a potential upside of 10.15%. Given Gladstone Capital's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gladstone Capital is more favorable than Gladstone Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gladstone Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Gladstone Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Capital has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Gladstone Investment and Gladstone Capital tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gladstone Investment compare to Sixth Street Specialty Lending?

Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) and Sixth Street Specialty Lending (NYSE:TSLX) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and media sentiment.

Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Gladstone Investment pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 176.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Gladstone Investment. Gladstone Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sixth Street Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Investment$158.12M4.12$184.75M$4.183.91
Sixth Street Specialty Lending$449.05M3.98$209.99M$0.9519.79

Gladstone Investment presently has a consensus price target of $16.75, suggesting a potential upside of 2.38%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a consensus price target of $19.83, suggesting a potential upside of 5.50%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than Gladstone Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gladstone Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

11.9% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Gladstone Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Sixth Street Specialty Lending had 4 more articles in the media than Gladstone Investment. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending and 3 mentions for Gladstone Investment. Gladstone Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Sixth Street Specialty Lending's score of 1.17 indicating that Gladstone Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gladstone Investment
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 158.95% compared to Sixth Street Specialty Lending's net margin of 21.79%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.33% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gladstone Investment158.95% 5.90% 2.88%
Sixth Street Specialty Lending 21.79%11.33%5.16%

Summary

Sixth Street Specialty Lending beats Gladstone Investment on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gladstone Investment compare to Trinity Capital?

Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) and Trinity Capital (NASDAQ:TRIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

11.9% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.6% of Trinity Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.3% of Trinity Capital shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Trinity Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Gladstone Investment. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Trinity Capital and 3 mentions for Gladstone Investment. Gladstone Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat Trinity Capital's score of 1.17 indicating that Gladstone Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gladstone Investment
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Trinity Capital
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 158.95% compared to Trinity Capital's net margin of 43.45%. Trinity Capital's return on equity of 14.94% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gladstone Investment158.95% 5.90% 2.88%
Trinity Capital 43.45%14.94%6.69%

Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Trinity Capital pays an annual dividend of $2.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.1%. Gladstone Investment pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trinity Capital pays out 116.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Trinity Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Trinity Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Gladstone Investment currently has a consensus target price of $16.75, suggesting a potential upside of 2.38%. Trinity Capital has a consensus target price of $16.67, suggesting a potential downside of 9.22%. Given Gladstone Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gladstone Investment is more favorable than Trinity Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gladstone Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Trinity Capital
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.77, suggesting that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trinity Capital has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its share price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Gladstone Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Trinity Capital. Gladstone Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trinity Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Investment$158.12M4.12$184.75M$4.183.91
Trinity Capital$216.31M8.04$135.60M$1.7510.49

Summary

Trinity Capital beats Gladstone Investment on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gladstone Investment compare to RMG ML Sports?

RMG ML Sports (NASDAQ:SHOT) and Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

RMG ML Sports has a beta of 1.57, indicating that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Gladstone Investment has higher revenue and earnings than RMG ML Sports. RMG ML Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gladstone Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RMG ML Sports-$91.96K-18,326.97-$54.86M-$0.32N/A
Gladstone Investment$158.12M4.12$184.75M$4.183.91

12.6% of RMG ML Sports shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.9% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.1% of RMG ML Sports shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Gladstone Investment had 3 more articles in the media than RMG ML Sports. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Gladstone Investment and 0 mentions for RMG ML Sports. Gladstone Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.36 beat RMG ML Sports' score of 0.00 indicating that Gladstone Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
RMG ML Sports Neutral
Gladstone Investment Positive

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 158.95% compared to RMG ML Sports' net margin of 0.00%. Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 5.90% beat RMG ML Sports' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RMG ML SportsN/A N/A N/A
Gladstone Investment 158.95%5.90%2.88%

Gladstone Investment has a consensus price target of $16.75, indicating a potential upside of 2.38%. Given Gladstone Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gladstone Investment is more favorable than RMG ML Sports.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RMG ML Sports
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Gladstone Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25

Summary

Gladstone Investment beats RMG ML Sports on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gladstone Investment News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GAIN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GAIN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GAIN vs. The Competition

MetricGladstone InvestmentCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$651.09M$5.58B$13.81B$12.76B
Dividend Yield5.90%7.39%5.89%11.09%
P/E Ratio3.9139.0929.6024.19
Price / Sales4.121,280.92523.5396.20
Price / CashN/A48.2238.3153.23
Price / Book1.012.132.186.37
Net Income$184.75M$416.48M$1.31B$347.74M
7 Day Performance0.31%-0.21%-0.30%0.08%
1 Month Performance-1.09%1.20%1.55%2.13%
1 Year Performance16.28%8.30%11.88%20.64%

Gladstone Investment Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
3.9755 of 5 stars
$16.36
+0.1%
$16.75
+2.4%
+16.5%$651.09M$158.12M3.9170
ARCC
Ares Capital
3.2284 of 5 stars
$19.96
-1.2%
$20.40
+2.2%
-11.3%$14.34B$3.05B14.792,550
GLAD
Gladstone Capital
2.3172 of 5 stars
$19.82
-0.9%
$21.67
+9.3%
-25.7%$447.73M$89.12M9.6270
TSLX
Sixth Street Specialty Lending
3.122 of 5 stars
$18.80
-1.9%
$19.83
+5.5%
-22.5%$1.79B$132.14M19.79N/A
TRIN
Trinity Capital
3.053 of 5 stars
$18.19
-1.3%
$16.67
-8.4%
+15.2%$1.72B$216.31M9.6340

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:GAIN) was last updated on 8/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners