Do analysts recommend PFLT or WHG?

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital presently has a consensus price target of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 37.54%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Westwood Holdings Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Westwood Holdings Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts recommend NMFC or WHG?

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus target price of $8.60, suggesting a potential upside of 18.78%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Westwood Holdings Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score New Mountain Finance 2 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.67 Westwood Holdings Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts rate SLRC or WHG?

SLR Investment presently has a consensus target price of $14.10, indicating a potential upside of 16.72%. Given SLR Investment's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe SLR Investment is more favorable than Westwood Holdings Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score SLR Investment 2 Sell rating(s) 4 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Westwood Holdings Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Do analysts prefer VINP or WHG?

Vinci Compass Investments currently has a consensus price target of $13.50, suggesting a potential upside of 43.01%. Given Vinci Compass Investments' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Vinci Compass Investments is more favorable than Westwood Holdings Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Vinci Compass Investments 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50 Westwood Holdings Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

Westwood Holdings Group (WHG) Competitors

$18.79 +0.12 (+0.62%)

Closing price 09/11/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$18.75 -0.04 (-0.19%)

As of 09/11/2026 04:15 PM Eastern

Compare

WHG vs. PFLT, NMFC, SLRC, GAIN, and VINP

Should you buy Westwood Holdings Group stock or one of its competitors? Westwood Holdings Group's main competitors and comparable companies include PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), SLR Investment (SLRC), Gladstone Investment (GAIN), and Vinci Compass Investments (VINP). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) and Westwood Holdings Group (NYSE:WHG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 18.53% compared to Westwood Holdings Group's net margin of 7.73%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 10.24% beat Westwood Holdings Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	18.53%	10.24%	3.88%
Westwood Holdings Group	7.73%	8.10%	6.59%

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of Westwood Holdings Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of Westwood Holdings Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Westwood Holdings Group. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Westwood Holdings Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	$61.93M	11.42	$66.36M	$0.51	13.97
Westwood Holdings Group	$101.70M	1.75	$7.06M	$0.88	21.35

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Westwood Holdings Group has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.5%. Westwood Holdings Group pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 188.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Westwood Holdings Group pays out 68.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Westwood Holdings Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and 0 mentions for Westwood Holdings Group. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat Westwood Holdings Group's score of 1.76 indicating that PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	Very Positive
Westwood Holdings Group	Very Positive

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital presently has a consensus price target of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 37.54%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than Westwood Holdings Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Westwood Holdings Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats Westwood Holdings Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to New Mountain Finance?

New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) and Westwood Holdings Group (NYSE:WHG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

New Mountain Finance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Westwood Holdings Group. New Mountain Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Westwood Holdings Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
New Mountain Finance	-$53.58M	-12.76	$16.49M	-$0.47	N/A
Westwood Holdings Group	$101.70M	1.75	$7.06M	$0.88	21.35

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 1 more articles in the media than Westwood Holdings Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 0 mentions for Westwood Holdings Group. New Mountain Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.87 beat Westwood Holdings Group's score of 1.76 indicating that New Mountain Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
New Mountain Finance	Very Positive
Westwood Holdings Group	Very Positive

New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.57, meaning that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Westwood Holdings Group has a beta of 0.56, meaning that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.8%. Westwood Holdings Group pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. New Mountain Finance pays out -212.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Westwood Holdings Group pays out 68.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. New Mountain Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Westwood Holdings Group has a net margin of 7.73% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -16.78%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 10.94% beat Westwood Holdings Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
New Mountain Finance	-16.78%	10.94%	4.58%
Westwood Holdings Group	7.73%	8.10%	6.59%

32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of Westwood Holdings Group shares are held by institutional investors. 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of Westwood Holdings Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

New Mountain Finance currently has a consensus target price of $8.60, suggesting a potential upside of 18.78%. Given New Mountain Finance's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than Westwood Holdings Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
New Mountain Finance	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
Westwood Holdings Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Westwood Holdings Group beats New Mountain Finance on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to SLR Investment?

SLR Investment (NASDAQ:SLRC) and Westwood Holdings Group (NYSE:WHG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

SLR Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Westwood Holdings Group. SLR Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Westwood Holdings Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SLR Investment	$218.54M	3.02	$92.54M	$1.35	8.95
Westwood Holdings Group	$101.70M	1.75	$7.06M	$0.88	21.35

In the previous week, SLR Investment had 8 more articles in the media than Westwood Holdings Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for SLR Investment and 0 mentions for Westwood Holdings Group. Westwood Holdings Group's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat SLR Investment's score of 1.08 indicating that Westwood Holdings Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
SLR Investment	Positive
Westwood Holdings Group	Very Positive

SLR Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.3%. Westwood Holdings Group pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. SLR Investment pays out 91.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Westwood Holdings Group pays out 68.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

35.3% of SLR Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of Westwood Holdings Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.8% of SLR Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of Westwood Holdings Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

SLR Investment has a net margin of 35.20% compared to Westwood Holdings Group's net margin of 7.73%. Westwood Holdings Group's return on equity of 8.10% beat SLR Investment's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SLR Investment	35.20%	7.96%	3.09%
Westwood Holdings Group	7.73%	8.10%	6.59%

SLR Investment presently has a consensus target price of $14.10, indicating a potential upside of 16.72%. Given SLR Investment's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe SLR Investment is more favorable than Westwood Holdings Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SLR Investment	2 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Westwood Holdings Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

SLR Investment has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Westwood Holdings Group has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

SLR Investment beats Westwood Holdings Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to Gladstone Investment?

Gladstone Investment (NASDAQ:GAIN) and Westwood Holdings Group (NYSE:WHG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 158.95% compared to Westwood Holdings Group's net margin of 7.73%. Westwood Holdings Group's return on equity of 8.10% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Gladstone Investment	158.95%	5.90%	2.88%
Westwood Holdings Group	7.73%	8.10%	6.59%

Gladstone Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Westwood Holdings Group. Gladstone Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Westwood Holdings Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Gladstone Investment	$99.08M	6.39	$184.75M	$4.18	3.80
Westwood Holdings Group	$101.70M	1.75	$7.06M	$0.88	21.35

Gladstone Investment pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Westwood Holdings Group pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Gladstone Investment pays out 23.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Westwood Holdings Group pays out 68.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Gladstone Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Gladstone Investment had 9 more articles in the media than Westwood Holdings Group. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Gladstone Investment and 0 mentions for Westwood Holdings Group. Westwood Holdings Group's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Gladstone Investment's score of 0.56 indicating that Westwood Holdings Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Gladstone Investment	Positive
Westwood Holdings Group	Very Positive

Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Westwood Holdings Group has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

11.9% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of Westwood Holdings Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Gladstone Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of Westwood Holdings Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gladstone Investment presently has a consensus target price of $16.75, indicating a potential upside of 5.35%. Given Gladstone Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Gladstone Investment is more favorable than Westwood Holdings Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Gladstone Investment	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.25
Westwood Holdings Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

Gladstone Investment beats Westwood Holdings Group on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to Vinci Compass Investments?

Vinci Compass Investments (NASDAQ:VINP) and Westwood Holdings Group (NYSE:WHG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

Vinci Compass Investments currently has a consensus price target of $13.50, suggesting a potential upside of 43.01%. Given Vinci Compass Investments' higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Vinci Compass Investments is more favorable than Westwood Holdings Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Vinci Compass Investments	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Westwood Holdings Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Vinci Compass Investments has higher revenue and earnings than Westwood Holdings Group. Vinci Compass Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Westwood Holdings Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Vinci Compass Investments	$1.06B	0.58	$38.97M	$0.70	13.49
Westwood Holdings Group	$101.70M	1.75	$7.06M	$0.88	21.35

In the previous week, Vinci Compass Investments had 6 more articles in the media than Westwood Holdings Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Vinci Compass Investments and 0 mentions for Westwood Holdings Group. Westwood Holdings Group's average media sentiment score of 1.76 beat Vinci Compass Investments' score of 0.46 indicating that Westwood Holdings Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Vinci Compass Investments	Neutral
Westwood Holdings Group	Very Positive

Vinci Compass Investments pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Westwood Holdings Group pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Vinci Compass Investments pays out 97.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Westwood Holdings Group pays out 68.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Vinci Compass Investments has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Westwood Holdings Group has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its share price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Vinci Compass Investments has a net margin of 23.77% compared to Westwood Holdings Group's net margin of 7.73%. Vinci Compass Investments' return on equity of 12.65% beat Westwood Holdings Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Vinci Compass Investments	23.77%	12.65%	6.67%
Westwood Holdings Group	7.73%	8.10%	6.59%

34.1% of Vinci Compass Investments shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.6% of Westwood Holdings Group shares are held by institutional investors. 49.3% of Vinci Compass Investments shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.4% of Westwood Holdings Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Vinci Compass Investments beats Westwood Holdings Group on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Westwood Holdings Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WHG and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WHG vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Westwood Holdings Group	Capital Markets Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$177.14M	$5.50B	$14.01B	$23.19B
Dividend Yield	3.23%	7.47%	5.94%	3.56%
P/E Ratio	21.35	30.54	25.67	28.69
Price / Sales	1.75	1,230.81	509.92	99.85
Price / Cash	11.75	47.89	40.16	33.82
Price / Book	1.39	3.53	2.75	4.74
Net Income	$7.06M	$418.04M	$1.32B	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	0.19%	-1.39%	-1.17%	-1.99%
1 Month Performance	-2.46%	-1.45%	0.26%	-2.68%
1 Year Performance	10.31%	4.82%	9.27%	10.45%

Westwood Holdings Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WHG Westwood Holdings Group	2.1858 of 5 stars	$18.79 +0.6%	N/A	+8.2%	$177.14M	$101.70M	21.35	130
PFLT PennantPark Floating Rate Capital	4.3084 of 5 stars	$7.39 +0.0%	$9.80 +32.6%	N/A	$733.93M	$261.43M	14.50	658	Positive News
NMFC New Mountain Finance	2.6063 of 5 stars	$7.47 -0.1%	$8.60 +15.1%	-31.1%	$710.85M	-$53.58M	N/A	N/A	Positive News
SLRC SLR Investment	4.4495 of 5 stars	$12.69 +0.3%	$14.10 +11.1%	-27.8%	$693.73M	$218.54M	9.42	N/A	News Coverage Positive News Insider Trade
GAIN Gladstone Investment	3.6529 of 5 stars	$16.37 0.0%	$16.75 +2.4%	+11.2%	$656.23M	$99.08M	3.94	70	News Coverage Dividend Announcement Analyst Downgrade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:WHG) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Westwood Holdings Group (WHG) Competitors

WHG vs. PFLT, NMFC, SLRC, GAIN, and VINP

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Summary

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to New Mountain Finance?

Summary

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to SLR Investment?

Summary

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to Gladstone Investment?

Summary

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to Vinci Compass Investments?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WHG vs. The Competition

Westwood Holdings Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Westwood Holdings Group (WHG) Competitors

WHG vs. PFLT, NMFC, SLRC, GAIN, and VINP

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

Is PFLT or WHG more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in PFLT or WHG?

Which has better valuation and earnings, PFLT or WHG?

Which has more risk & volatility, PFLT or WHG?

Is PFLT or WHG a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer PFLT or WHG?

Do analysts recommend PFLT or WHG?

Summary

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to New Mountain Finance?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, NMFC or WHG?

Does the media favor NMFC or WHG?

Which has more risk and volatility, NMFC or WHG?

Is NMFC or WHG a better dividend stock?

Is NMFC or WHG more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of NMFC or WHG?

Do analysts recommend NMFC or WHG?

Summary

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to SLR Investment?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, SLRC or WHG?

Does the media favor SLRC or WHG?

Is SLRC or WHG a better dividend stock?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of SLRC or WHG?

Is SLRC or WHG more profitable?

Do analysts rate SLRC or WHG?

Which has more volatility and risk, SLRC or WHG?

Summary

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to Gladstone Investment?

Is GAIN or WHG more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, GAIN or WHG?

Is GAIN or WHG a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer GAIN or WHG?

Which has more risk and volatility, GAIN or WHG?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in GAIN or WHG?

Do analysts prefer GAIN or WHG?

Summary

How does Westwood Holdings Group compare to Vinci Compass Investments?

Do analysts prefer VINP or WHG?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, VINP or WHG?

Does the media favor VINP or WHG?

Is VINP or WHG a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, VINP or WHG?

Is VINP or WHG more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of VINP or WHG?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WHG vs. The Competition

Westwood Holdings Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools