Does the media favor CG or ZBRA?

In the previous week, Zebra Technologies had 7 more articles in the media than Carlyle Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Zebra Technologies and 4 mentions for Carlyle Group. Zebra Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Carlyle Group's score of 0.65 indicating that Zebra Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Carlyle Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Zebra Technologies 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CGNX or ZBRA?

Zebra Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Cognex. Zebra Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cognex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cognex $994.36M 11.31 $114.44M $0.84 80.48 Zebra Technologies $5.40B 2.17 $419M $8.27 29.71

Does the media favor CGNX or ZBRA?

In the previous week, Zebra Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Cognex. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Zebra Technologies and 7 mentions for Cognex. Cognex's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Zebra Technologies' score of 0.99 indicating that Cognex is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cognex 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Zebra Technologies 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate ZBRA or CSQ?

Zebra Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $319.09, suggesting a potential upside of 29.88%. Given Zebra Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Zebra Technologies is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Zebra Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 8 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.62 Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ZBRA or CSQ?

Zebra Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Zebra Technologies $5.40B 2.17 $419M $8.27 29.71 Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund $723.74M N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is ZBRA or MKSI more profitable?

MKS has a net margin of 8.06% compared to Zebra Technologies' net margin of 7.49%. MKS's return on equity of 21.49% beat Zebra Technologies' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Zebra Technologies 7.49% 18.91% 8.30% MKS 8.06% 21.49% 6.54%

Does the media prefer ZBRA or MKSI?

In the previous week, MKS had 3 more articles in the media than Zebra Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for MKS and 11 mentions for Zebra Technologies. MKS's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Zebra Technologies' score of 0.99 indicating that MKS is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Zebra Technologies 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MKS 9 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor TRMB or ZBRA?

In the previous week, Zebra Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Trimble. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Zebra Technologies and 10 mentions for Trimble. Zebra Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Trimble's score of 0.84 indicating that Zebra Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Trimble 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Zebra Technologies 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) Competitors

$245.69 +9.71 (+4.11%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$245.16 -0.53 (-0.22%)

As of 07:50 PM Eastern

Compare

ZBRA vs. CG, CGNX, CSQ, MKSI, and TRMB

Should you buy Zebra Technologies stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Zebra Technologies with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Zebra Technologies include Carlyle Group (CG), Cognex (CGNX), Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ), MKS (MKSI), and Trimble (TRMB).

How does Zebra Technologies compare to Carlyle Group?

Carlyle Group (NASDAQ:CG) and Zebra Technologies (NASDAQ:ZBRA) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

In the previous week, Zebra Technologies had 7 more articles in the media than Carlyle Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Zebra Technologies and 4 mentions for Carlyle Group. Zebra Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Carlyle Group's score of 0.65 indicating that Zebra Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Carlyle Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Zebra Technologies	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Carlyle Group has a net margin of 13.46% compared to Zebra Technologies' net margin of 7.49%. Carlyle Group's return on equity of 20.95% beat Zebra Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Carlyle Group	13.46%	20.95%	5.28%
Zebra Technologies	7.49%	18.91%	8.30%

Carlyle Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Zebra Technologies. Zebra Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carlyle Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Carlyle Group	$4.78B	3.36	$808.70M	$1.46	30.53
Zebra Technologies	$5.40B	2.17	$419M	$8.27	29.71

Carlyle Group has a beta of 1.84, meaning that its stock price is 84% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.63, meaning that its stock price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Carlyle Group presently has a consensus target price of $62.00, suggesting a potential upside of 39.11%. Zebra Technologies has a consensus target price of $319.09, suggesting a potential upside of 29.88%. Given Carlyle Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Carlyle Group is more favorable than Zebra Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Carlyle Group	2 Sell rating(s)	8 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
Zebra Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.62

55.9% of Carlyle Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.0% of Zebra Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 25.4% of Carlyle Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Zebra Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Carlyle Group and Zebra Technologies tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zebra Technologies compare to Cognex?

Cognex (NASDAQ:CGNX) and Zebra Technologies (NASDAQ:ZBRA) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and risk.

Cognex currently has a consensus price target of $70.43, suggesting a potential upside of 4.18%. Zebra Technologies has a consensus price target of $319.09, suggesting a potential upside of 29.88%. Given Zebra Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Zebra Technologies is more favorable than Cognex.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cognex	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	11 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.88
Zebra Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.62

In the previous week, Zebra Technologies had 4 more articles in the media than Cognex. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Zebra Technologies and 7 mentions for Cognex. Cognex's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Zebra Technologies' score of 0.99 indicating that Cognex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cognex	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Zebra Technologies	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cognex has a net margin of 13.62% compared to Zebra Technologies' net margin of 7.49%. Zebra Technologies' return on equity of 18.91% beat Cognex's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cognex	13.62%	10.89%	8.09%
Zebra Technologies	7.49%	18.91%	8.30%

Cognex has a beta of 1.52, indicating that its share price is 52% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.63, indicating that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Zebra Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Cognex. Zebra Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cognex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cognex	$994.36M	11.31	$114.44M	$0.84	80.48
Zebra Technologies	$5.40B	2.17	$419M	$8.27	29.71

88.1% of Cognex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.0% of Zebra Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Cognex shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Zebra Technologies shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Zebra Technologies beats Cognex on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zebra Technologies compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Zebra Technologies (NASDAQ:ZBRA) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (NASDAQ:CSQ) are related companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

91.0% of Zebra Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Zebra Technologies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Zebra Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $319.09, suggesting a potential upside of 29.88%. Given Zebra Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Zebra Technologies is more favorable than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Zebra Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.62
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Zebra Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Zebra Technologies	$5.40B	2.17	$419M	$8.27	29.71
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	$723.74M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Zebra Technologies had 11 more articles in the media than Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Zebra Technologies and 0 mentions for Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund. Zebra Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Zebra Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Zebra Technologies	Positive
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	Neutral

Zebra Technologies has a net margin of 7.49% compared to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Zebra Technologies' return on equity of 18.91% beat Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Zebra Technologies	7.49%	18.91%	8.30%
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Zebra Technologies beats Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund on 11 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zebra Technologies compare to MKS?

Zebra Technologies (NASDAQ:ZBRA) and MKS (NASDAQ:MKSI) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Zebra Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than MKS. Zebra Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MKS, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Zebra Technologies	$5.40B	2.17	$419M	$8.27	29.71
MKS	$3.93B	7.23	$295M	$4.78	87.98

Zebra Technologies presently has a consensus price target of $319.09, indicating a potential upside of 29.88%. MKS has a consensus price target of $324.92, indicating a potential downside of 22.74%. Given Zebra Technologies' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Zebra Technologies is more favorable than MKS.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Zebra Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.62
MKS	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.87

In the previous week, MKS had 3 more articles in the media than Zebra Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for MKS and 11 mentions for Zebra Technologies. MKS's average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Zebra Technologies' score of 0.99 indicating that MKS is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Zebra Technologies	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MKS	9 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.63, meaning that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MKS has a beta of 1.99, meaning that its share price is 99% more volatile than the broader market.

MKS has a net margin of 8.06% compared to Zebra Technologies' net margin of 7.49%. MKS's return on equity of 21.49% beat Zebra Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Zebra Technologies	7.49%	18.91%	8.30%
MKS	8.06%	21.49%	6.54%

91.0% of Zebra Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.8% of MKS shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Zebra Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of MKS shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

MKS beats Zebra Technologies on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Zebra Technologies compare to Trimble?

Trimble (NASDAQ:TRMB) and Zebra Technologies (NASDAQ:ZBRA) are both large-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

In the previous week, Zebra Technologies had 1 more articles in the media than Trimble. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Zebra Technologies and 10 mentions for Trimble. Zebra Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Trimble's score of 0.84 indicating that Zebra Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Trimble	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Zebra Technologies	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

93.2% of Trimble shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.0% of Zebra Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Trimble shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Zebra Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trimble has a net margin of 12.38% compared to Zebra Technologies' net margin of 7.49%. Zebra Technologies' return on equity of 18.91% beat Trimble's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Trimble	12.38%	11.61%	7.32%
Zebra Technologies	7.49%	18.91%	8.30%

Trimble has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Zebra Technologies. Trimble is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zebra Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Trimble	$3.59B	3.20	$424M	$1.90	25.91
Zebra Technologies	$5.40B	2.17	$419M	$8.27	29.71

Trimble presently has a consensus target price of $87.33, indicating a potential upside of 77.40%. Zebra Technologies has a consensus target price of $319.09, indicating a potential upside of 29.88%. Given Trimble's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Trimble is more favorable than Zebra Technologies.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Trimble	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83
Zebra Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.62

Trimble has a beta of 1.38, suggesting that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zebra Technologies has a beta of 1.63, suggesting that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Zebra Technologies beats Trimble on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Zebra Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ZBRA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

ZBRA vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Zebra Technologies	MACH Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$11.24B	$6.47B	$9.72B	$12.54B
Dividend Yield	N/A	N/A	3.55%	5.81%
P/E Ratio	29.71	14.85	25.92	24.33
Price / Sales	2.17	1.97	4,960.74	114.75
Price / Cash	13.28	10.69	27.85	37.84
Price / Book	3.40	2.70	4.69	6.58
Net Income	$419M	$245.70M	$792.16M	$336.75M
7 Day Performance	2.35%	1.17%	0.69%	-0.49%
1 Month Performance	-3.86%	-1.82%	0.90%	1.56%
1 Year Performance	-16.44%	11.74%	26.56%	33.78%

Zebra Technologies Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
ZBRA Zebra Technologies	4.3658 of 5 stars	$245.69 +4.1%	$319.09 +29.9%	-19.7%	$11.24B	$5.40B	29.71	10,700	Analyst Downgrade
CG Carlyle Group	4.5987 of 5 stars	$46.24 +1.1%	$62.00 +34.1%	-4.4%	$16.47B	$4.78B	31.67	2,500	Gap Up
CGNX Cognex	4.4888 of 5 stars	$65.90 +3.6%	$70.43 +6.9%	+123.2%	$10.59B	$994.36M	78.45	2,745	Positive News Gap Up
CSQ Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund	N/A	$20.43 +1.6%	N/A	+18.4%	$0.00	$723.74M	N/A	N/A
MKSI MKS	3.8807 of 5 stars	$375.32 +5.5%	$324.92 -13.4%	+348.0%	$24.02B	$3.93B	78.52	10,300	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:ZBRA) was last updated on 6/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) Competitors

ZBRA vs. CG, CGNX, CSQ, MKSI, and TRMB

How does Zebra Technologies compare to Carlyle Group?

Summary

How does Zebra Technologies compare to Cognex?

Summary

How does Zebra Technologies compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Summary

How does Zebra Technologies compare to MKS?

Summary

How does Zebra Technologies compare to Trimble?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ZBRA vs. The Competition

Zebra Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) Competitors

ZBRA vs. CG, CGNX, CSQ, MKSI, and TRMB

How does Zebra Technologies compare to Carlyle Group?

Does the media favor CG or ZBRA?

Is CG or ZBRA more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, CG or ZBRA?

Which has more volatility and risk, CG or ZBRA?

Do analysts rate CG or ZBRA?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in CG or ZBRA?

Summary

How does Zebra Technologies compare to Cognex?

Do analysts recommend CGNX or ZBRA?

Does the media favor CGNX or ZBRA?

Is CGNX or ZBRA more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, CGNX or ZBRA?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, CGNX or ZBRA?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CGNX or ZBRA?

Summary

How does Zebra Technologies compare to Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in ZBRA or CSQ?

Do analysts rate ZBRA or CSQ?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ZBRA or CSQ?

Does the media refer more to ZBRA or CSQ?

Is ZBRA or CSQ more profitable?

Summary

How does Zebra Technologies compare to MKS?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ZBRA or MKSI?

Do analysts prefer ZBRA or MKSI?

Does the media prefer ZBRA or MKSI?

Which has more volatility & risk, ZBRA or MKSI?

Is ZBRA or MKSI more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in ZBRA or MKSI?

Summary

How does Zebra Technologies compare to Trimble?

Does the media favor TRMB or ZBRA?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in TRMB or ZBRA?

Is TRMB or ZBRA more profitable?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, TRMB or ZBRA?

Do analysts rate TRMB or ZBRA?

Which has more risk & volatility, TRMB or ZBRA?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

ZBRA vs. The Competition

Zebra Technologies Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools