Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Competitors

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment (NYSE:CHMI) and Chatham Lodging Trust (NYSE:CLDT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment and Chatham Lodging Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

45.7% of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Chatham Lodging Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Chatham Lodging Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment and Chatham Lodging Trust's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Chatham Lodging Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chatham Lodging Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment and Chatham Lodging Trust, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment presently has a consensus target price of $11.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 16.74%. Chatham Lodging Trust has a consensus target price of $12.6250, suggesting a potential downside of 2.66%. Given Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment is more favorable than Chatham Lodging Trust.

Risk & Volatility

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Chatham Lodging Trust has a beta of 2.05, indicating that its share price is 105% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment beats Chatham Lodging Trust on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Capstead Mortgage (NYSE:CMO) and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment (NYSE:CHMI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Dividends

Capstead Mortgage pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.3%. Capstead Mortgage pays out 120.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment pays out 53.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capstead Mortgage has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

77.6% of Capstead Mortgage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.7% of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.9% of Capstead Mortgage shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Capstead Mortgage and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Capstead Mortgage has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has a beta of 1.14, suggesting that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Capstead Mortgage and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has a consensus target price of $11.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 16.74%. Given Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment is more favorable than Capstead Mortgage.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Capstead Mortgage and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Capstead Mortgage has higher revenue and earnings than Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capstead Mortgage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment beats Capstead Mortgage on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

CorePoint Lodging (NYSE:CPLG) and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment (NYSE:CHMI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for CorePoint Lodging and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment, as reported by MarketBeat.

CorePoint Lodging presently has a consensus price target of $8.00, indicating a potential downside of 23.30%. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has a consensus price target of $11.1250, indicating a potential upside of 16.74%. Given Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment is more favorable than CorePoint Lodging.

Profitability

This table compares CorePoint Lodging and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

81.2% of CorePoint Lodging shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.7% of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of CorePoint Lodging shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CorePoint Lodging and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CorePoint Lodging. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CorePoint Lodging, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

CorePoint Lodging has a beta of 1.94, meaning that its stock price is 94% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Ares Commercial Real Estate (NYSE:ACRE) and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment (NYSE:CHMI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ares Commercial Real Estate and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Ares Commercial Real Estate has higher revenue and earnings than Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ares Commercial Real Estate, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

Ares Commercial Real Estate has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its share price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Ares Commercial Real Estate pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.9%. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.3%. Ares Commercial Real Estate pays out 98.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment pays out 53.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ares Commercial Real Estate has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Ares Commercial Real Estate and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment, as reported by MarketBeat.

Ares Commercial Real Estate presently has a consensus price target of $14.20, indicating a potential downside of 4.31%. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has a consensus price target of $11.1250, indicating a potential upside of 16.74%. Given Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment is more favorable than Ares Commercial Real Estate.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

55.8% of Ares Commercial Real Estate shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.7% of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Ares Commercial Real Estate shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Ares Commercial Real Estate and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Ares Commercial Real Estate beats Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Urstadt Biddle Properties (NYSE:UBP) and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment (NYSE:CHMI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Urstadt Biddle Properties and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Urstadt Biddle Properties and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment, as reported by MarketBeat.

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has a consensus target price of $11.1250, suggesting a potential upside of 16.74%. Given Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment is more favorable than Urstadt Biddle Properties.

Volatility & Risk

Urstadt Biddle Properties has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Urstadt Biddle Properties and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Urstadt Biddle Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment.

Dividends

Urstadt Biddle Properties pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.3%. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment pays out 53.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Urstadt Biddle Properties has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

1.6% of Urstadt Biddle Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.7% of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.3% of Urstadt Biddle Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Urstadt Biddle Properties beats Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment (NYSE:CHMI) and CatchMark Timber Trust (NYSE:CTT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends and profitability.

Dividends

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.3%. CatchMark Timber Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment pays out 53.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CatchMark Timber Trust pays out -26.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and CatchMark Timber Trust has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Risk & Volatility

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CatchMark Timber Trust has a beta of 1.32, indicating that its stock price is 32% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment and CatchMark Timber Trust, as reported by MarketBeat.

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment presently has a consensus price target of $11.1250, indicating a potential upside of 16.74%. CatchMark Timber Trust has a consensus price target of $11.8750, indicating a potential downside of 2.74%. Given Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment is more favorable than CatchMark Timber Trust.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment and CatchMark Timber Trust's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CatchMark Timber Trust. CatchMark Timber Trust is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

45.7% of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.9% of CatchMark Timber Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of CatchMark Timber Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment and CatchMark Timber Trust's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment beats CatchMark Timber Trust on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.