Chimera Investment (CIM) Competitors

In the previous week, ARMOUR Residential REIT had 1 more articles in the media than Chimera Investment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for ARMOUR Residential REIT and 1 mentions for Chimera Investment. ARMOUR Residential REIT's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Chimera Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that ARMOUR Residential REIT is being referred to more favorably in the media.

ARMOUR Residential REIT currently has a consensus price target of $18.50, suggesting a potential upside of 12.39%. Chimera Investment has a consensus price target of $14.75, suggesting a potential upside of 18.33%. Given Chimera Investment's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Chimera Investment is more favorable than ARMOUR Residential REIT.

ARMOUR Residential REIT has a net margin of 44.90% compared to Chimera Investment's net margin of 2.27%. ARMOUR Residential REIT's return on equity of 15.10% beat Chimera Investment's return on equity.

54.2% of ARMOUR Residential REIT shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.4% of Chimera Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of ARMOUR Residential REIT shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Chimera Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ARMOUR Residential REIT has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chimera Investment. Chimera Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ARMOUR Residential REIT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ARMOUR Residential REIT has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chimera Investment has a beta of 1.67, meaning that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

ARMOUR Residential REIT pays an annual dividend of $2.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.5%. Chimera Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. ARMOUR Residential REIT pays out 77.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chimera Investment pays out -225.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chimera Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Dynex Capital has a net margin of 49.18% compared to Chimera Investment's net margin of 2.27%. Chimera Investment's return on equity of 9.36% beat Dynex Capital's return on equity.

Dynex Capital presently has a consensus price target of $14.56, suggesting a potential upside of 14.62%. Chimera Investment has a consensus price target of $14.75, suggesting a potential upside of 18.33%. Given Chimera Investment's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Chimera Investment is more favorable than Dynex Capital.

Dynex Capital pays an annual dividend of $2.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.1%. Chimera Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Dynex Capital pays out 77.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chimera Investment pays out -225.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dynex Capital has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Chimera Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Dynex Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

38.3% of Dynex Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.4% of Chimera Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Dynex Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Chimera Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Dynex Capital has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chimera Investment has a beta of 1.67, meaning that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Dynex Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Chimera Investment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Dynex Capital and 1 mentions for Chimera Investment. Dynex Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Chimera Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Dynex Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Dynex Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Chimera Investment. Chimera Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dynex Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

55.6% of Ellington Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.4% of Chimera Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of Ellington Financial shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Chimera Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ellington Financial presently has a consensus price target of $13.88, suggesting a potential upside of 4.44%. Chimera Investment has a consensus price target of $14.75, suggesting a potential upside of 18.33%. Given Chimera Investment's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Chimera Investment is more favorable than Ellington Financial.

In the previous week, Ellington Financial had 6 more articles in the media than Chimera Investment. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Ellington Financial and 1 mentions for Chimera Investment. Ellington Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Chimera Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Ellington Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Chimera Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Ellington Financial. Chimera Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ellington Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ellington Financial has a beta of 0.94, meaning that its share price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chimera Investment has a beta of 1.67, meaning that its share price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

Ellington Financial has a net margin of 72.08% compared to Chimera Investment's net margin of 2.27%. Ellington Financial's return on equity of 15.81% beat Chimera Investment's return on equity.

Ellington Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.7%. Chimera Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Ellington Financial pays out 94.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chimera Investment pays out -225.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chimera Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Chimera Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Ladder Capital has a net margin of 12.62% compared to Chimera Investment's net margin of 2.27%. Chimera Investment's return on equity of 9.36% beat Ladder Capital's return on equity.

62.3% of Ladder Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.4% of Chimera Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.6% of Ladder Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Chimera Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ladder Capital has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chimera Investment has a beta of 1.67, suggesting that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

Ladder Capital currently has a consensus price target of $12.36, indicating a potential upside of 29.46%. Chimera Investment has a consensus price target of $14.75, indicating a potential upside of 18.33%. Given Ladder Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Ladder Capital is more favorable than Chimera Investment.

Chimera Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Ladder Capital. Chimera Investment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ladder Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ladder Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. Chimera Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Ladder Capital pays out 219.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Chimera Investment pays out -225.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chimera Investment has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Chimera Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Ladder Capital had 5 more articles in the media than Chimera Investment. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Ladder Capital and 1 mentions for Chimera Investment. Ladder Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.24 beat Chimera Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that Ladder Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.