Two Harbors Investments (TWO) Competitors

64.2% of Two Harbors Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.2% of ARMOUR Residential REIT shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Two Harbors Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of ARMOUR Residential REIT shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ARMOUR Residential REIT has a net margin of 44.90% compared to Two Harbors Investments' net margin of -6.09%. ARMOUR Residential REIT's return on equity of 15.10% beat Two Harbors Investments' return on equity.

ARMOUR Residential REIT has higher revenue and earnings than Two Harbors Investments. Two Harbors Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ARMOUR Residential REIT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Two Harbors Investments pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. ARMOUR Residential REIT pays an annual dividend of $2.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 17.5%. Two Harbors Investments pays out -64.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ARMOUR Residential REIT pays out 77.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Two Harbors Investments has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Two Harbors Investments has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ARMOUR Residential REIT has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Two Harbors Investments had 4 more articles in the media than ARMOUR Residential REIT. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Two Harbors Investments and 1 mentions for ARMOUR Residential REIT. ARMOUR Residential REIT's average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Two Harbors Investments' score of -0.07 indicating that ARMOUR Residential REIT is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Two Harbors Investments currently has a consensus price target of $12.75, suggesting a potential upside of 5.50%. ARMOUR Residential REIT has a consensus price target of $18.50, suggesting a potential upside of 12.49%. Given ARMOUR Residential REIT's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ARMOUR Residential REIT is more favorable than Two Harbors Investments.

Two Harbors Investments pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Chimera Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.5%. Two Harbors Investments pays out -64.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chimera Investment pays out -176.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Two Harbors Investments has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Chimera Investment has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Chimera Investment is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

64.2% of Two Harbors Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.4% of Chimera Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Two Harbors Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Chimera Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Chimera Investment had 12 more articles in the media than Two Harbors Investments. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Chimera Investment and 5 mentions for Two Harbors Investments. Chimera Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.28 beat Two Harbors Investments' score of -0.07 indicating that Chimera Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Two Harbors Investments currently has a consensus price target of $12.75, indicating a potential upside of 5.50%. Chimera Investment has a consensus price target of $14.50, indicating a potential upside of 24.56%. Given Chimera Investment's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Chimera Investment is more favorable than Two Harbors Investments.

Chimera Investment has a net margin of 0.14% compared to Two Harbors Investments' net margin of -6.09%. Two Harbors Investments' return on equity of 12.79% beat Chimera Investment's return on equity.

Two Harbors Investments has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chimera Investment has a beta of 1.67, indicating that its stock price is 67% more volatile than the broader market.

Chimera Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Two Harbors Investments. Two Harbors Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chimera Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dynex Capital presently has a consensus price target of $14.56, suggesting a potential upside of 14.07%. Two Harbors Investments has a consensus price target of $12.75, suggesting a potential upside of 5.50%. Given Dynex Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Dynex Capital is more favorable than Two Harbors Investments.

Dynex Capital has a net margin of 49.18% compared to Two Harbors Investments' net margin of -6.09%. Two Harbors Investments' return on equity of 12.79% beat Dynex Capital's return on equity.

Dynex Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Two Harbors Investments. Two Harbors Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dynex Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dynex Capital has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its share price is 4% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Two Harbors Investments has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Dynex Capital pays an annual dividend of $2.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.0%. Two Harbors Investments pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Dynex Capital pays out 77.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Two Harbors Investments pays out -64.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Dynex Capital has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Two Harbors Investments has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Dynex Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

38.3% of Dynex Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.2% of Two Harbors Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Dynex Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Two Harbors Investments shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Two Harbors Investments had 4 more articles in the media than Dynex Capital. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Two Harbors Investments and 1 mentions for Dynex Capital. Dynex Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.74 beat Two Harbors Investments' score of -0.07 indicating that Dynex Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

64.2% of Two Harbors Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.6% of Ellington Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Two Harbors Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Ellington Financial shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ellington Financial has a net margin of 52.43% compared to Two Harbors Investments' net margin of -6.09%. Ellington Financial's return on equity of 16.61% beat Two Harbors Investments' return on equity.

Ellington Financial has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Two Harbors Investments. Two Harbors Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ellington Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Two Harbors Investments presently has a consensus price target of $12.75, indicating a potential upside of 5.50%. Ellington Financial has a consensus price target of $13.88, indicating a potential upside of 3.26%. Given Two Harbors Investments' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Two Harbors Investments is more favorable than Ellington Financial.

Two Harbors Investments pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Ellington Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.6%. Two Harbors Investments pays out -64.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ellington Financial pays out 95.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Two Harbors Investments has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Two Harbors Investments has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ellington Financial has a beta of 0.94, indicating that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ellington Financial had 5 more articles in the media than Two Harbors Investments. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Ellington Financial and 5 mentions for Two Harbors Investments. Ellington Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Two Harbors Investments' score of -0.07 indicating that Ellington Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.