Crawford & Company (CRD.A) Competitors

SPS Commerce has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crawford & Company. SPS Commerce is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crawford & Company, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

SPS Commerce has a net margin of 11.92% compared to Crawford & Company's net margin of 1.37%. Crawford & Company's return on equity of 24.11% beat SPS Commerce's return on equity.

22.6% of Crawford & Company shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.0% of SPS Commerce shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.3% of Crawford & Company shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of SPS Commerce shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, SPS Commerce had 25 more articles in the media than Crawford & Company. MarketBeat recorded 32 mentions for SPS Commerce and 7 mentions for Crawford & Company. SPS Commerce's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Crawford & Company's score of 0.62 indicating that SPS Commerce is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SPS Commerce has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Crawford & Company currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 44.37%. SPS Commerce has a consensus target price of $76.45, indicating a potential upside of 30.92%. Given Crawford & Company's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Crawford & Company is more favorable than SPS Commerce.

Crawford & Company pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Concentrix pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Crawford & Company pays out 76.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Concentrix pays out -6.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Concentrix has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Concentrix is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Concentrix had 2 more articles in the media than Crawford & Company. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Concentrix and 7 mentions for Crawford & Company. Crawford & Company's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Concentrix's score of 0.42 indicating that Crawford & Company is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Concentrix has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the S&P 500.

22.6% of Crawford & Company shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.3% of Concentrix shares are held by institutional investors. 54.3% of Crawford & Company shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Concentrix shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Crawford & Company presently has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 44.37%. Concentrix has a consensus target price of $48.50, indicating a potential upside of 103.35%. Given Concentrix's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Concentrix is more favorable than Crawford & Company.

Crawford & Company has a net margin of 1.37% compared to Concentrix's net margin of -13.35%. Crawford & Company's return on equity of 24.11% beat Concentrix's return on equity.

Crawford & Company has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Concentrix. Concentrix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crawford & Company, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Healthcare Services Group has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Crawford & Company currently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 44.37%. Healthcare Services Group has a consensus price target of $24.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.45%. Given Crawford & Company's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Crawford & Company is more favorable than Healthcare Services Group.

Healthcare Services Group has higher revenue and earnings than Crawford & Company. Healthcare Services Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crawford & Company, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Healthcare Services Group has a net margin of 3.67% compared to Crawford & Company's net margin of 1.37%. Crawford & Company's return on equity of 24.11% beat Healthcare Services Group's return on equity.

22.6% of Crawford & Company shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.0% of Healthcare Services Group shares are held by institutional investors. 54.3% of Crawford & Company shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Healthcare Services Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Crawford & Company had 4 more articles in the media than Healthcare Services Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Crawford & Company and 3 mentions for Healthcare Services Group. Healthcare Services Group's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Crawford & Company's score of 0.62 indicating that Healthcare Services Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

BrightView has higher revenue and earnings than Crawford & Company. BrightView is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crawford & Company, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

BrightView has a net margin of 1.90% compared to Crawford & Company's net margin of 1.37%. Crawford & Company's return on equity of 24.11% beat BrightView's return on equity.

Crawford & Company currently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 44.37%. BrightView has a consensus price target of $14.68, suggesting a potential upside of 24.96%. Given Crawford & Company's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Crawford & Company is more favorable than BrightView.

22.6% of Crawford & Company shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.4% of BrightView shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.3% of Crawford & Company shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of BrightView shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, BrightView has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, BrightView had 1 more articles in the media than Crawford & Company. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for BrightView and 7 mentions for Crawford & Company. Crawford & Company's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat BrightView's score of 0.42 indicating that Crawford & Company is being referred to more favorably in the media.