Do analysts recommend CRD.A or CRD.B?

Crawford & Company currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.15%. Given Crawford & Company's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Crawford & Company is more favorable than Crawford & Company. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Crawford & Company 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Crawford & Company 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CRD.A or CRD.B?

Crawford & Company is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crawford & Company, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Crawford & Company $1.31B 0.43 $19.63M $0.53 22.55 Crawford & Company $1.31B 0.42 $19.63M $0.54 21.28

Is CRD.A or CRD.B more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Crawford & Company 2.01% 29.17% 6.80% Crawford & Company 2.01% 29.17% 6.80%

Does the media favor CRD.A or CRD.B?

In the previous week, Crawford & Company and Crawford & Company both had 5 articles in the media. Crawford & Company's average media sentiment score of -0.04 beat Crawford & Company's score of -0.05 indicating that Crawford & Company is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Crawford & Company 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Crawford & Company 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor CRD.A or GSHD?

In the previous week, Goosehead Insurance had 17 more articles in the media than Crawford & Company. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Goosehead Insurance and 5 mentions for Crawford & Company. Goosehead Insurance's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Crawford & Company's score of -0.04 indicating that Goosehead Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Crawford & Company 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Goosehead Insurance 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 14 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has better valuation and earnings, CRD.A or TWFG?

Crawford & Company has higher revenue and earnings than TWFG. Crawford & Company is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TWFG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Crawford & Company $1.31B 0.43 $19.63M $0.53 22.55 TWFG $247.08M 5.64 $7.96M $0.57 45.25

Is CRD.A or TWFG more profitable?

TWFG has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Crawford & Company's net margin of 2.01%. Crawford & Company's return on equity of 29.17% beat TWFG's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Crawford & Company 2.01% 29.17% 6.80% TWFG 2.57% 23.41% 17.86%

Does the media refer more to CRD.A or TWFG?

In the previous week, TWFG had 6 more articles in the media than Crawford & Company. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for TWFG and 5 mentions for Crawford & Company. TWFG's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Crawford & Company's score of -0.04 indicating that TWFG is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Crawford & Company 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral TWFG 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate CRD.A or WDH?

Crawford & Company presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.15%. Given Crawford & Company's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Crawford & Company is more favorable than Waterdrop. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Crawford & Company 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00 Waterdrop 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Crawford & Company (CRD.A) Competitors

$11.95 -0.05 (-0.41%)

Closing price 03:58 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$11.94 -0.02 (-0.13%)

As of 04:10 PM Eastern

Compare

CRD.A vs. CRD.B, GSHD, TWFG, YB, and WDH

Should you buy Crawford & Company stock or one of its competitors? Crawford & Company's main competitors and comparable companies include Crawford & Company (CRD.B), Goosehead Insurance (GSHD), TWFG (TWFG), Yuanbao (YB), and Waterdrop (WDH). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "insurance brokers" industry.

How does Crawford & Company compare to Crawford & Company?

Crawford & Company (NYSE:CRD.A) and Crawford & Company (NYSE:CRD.B) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

22.6% of Crawford & Company shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.0% of Crawford & Company shares are held by institutional investors. 54.3% of Crawford & Company shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.0% of Crawford & Company shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Crawford & Company currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.15%. Given Crawford & Company's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Crawford & Company is more favorable than Crawford & Company.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Crawford & Company	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Crawford & Company	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Crawford & Company and Crawford & Company both had 5 articles in the media. Crawford & Company's average media sentiment score of -0.04 beat Crawford & Company's score of -0.05 indicating that Crawford & Company is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Crawford & Company	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Crawford & Company	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Crawford & Company	2.01%	29.17%	6.80%
Crawford & Company	2.01%	29.17%	6.80%

Crawford & Company is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crawford & Company, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Crawford & Company	$1.31B	0.43	$19.63M	$0.53	22.55
Crawford & Company	$1.31B	0.42	$19.63M	$0.54	21.28

Crawford & Company pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Crawford & Company pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Crawford & Company pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crawford & Company pays out 59.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crawford & Company is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Crawford & Company beats Crawford & Company on 9 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crawford & Company compare to Goosehead Insurance?

Crawford & Company (NYSE:CRD.A) and Goosehead Insurance (NASDAQ:GSHD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

22.6% of Crawford & Company shares are held by institutional investors. 54.3% of Crawford & Company shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 38.1% of Goosehead Insurance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Goosehead Insurance had 17 more articles in the media than Crawford & Company. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Goosehead Insurance and 5 mentions for Crawford & Company. Goosehead Insurance's average media sentiment score of 0.55 beat Crawford & Company's score of -0.04 indicating that Goosehead Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Crawford & Company	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Goosehead Insurance	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	14 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Goosehead Insurance has a net margin of 8.78% compared to Crawford & Company's net margin of 2.01%. Crawford & Company's return on equity of 29.17% beat Goosehead Insurance's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Crawford & Company	2.01%	29.17%	6.80%
Goosehead Insurance	8.78%	-21.00%	9.43%

Crawford & Company presently has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.15%. Goosehead Insurance has a consensus target price of $65.08, indicating a potential upside of 41.45%. Given Goosehead Insurance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Goosehead Insurance is more favorable than Crawford & Company.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Crawford & Company	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Goosehead Insurance	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.51, meaning that its share price is 51% more volatile than the broader market.

Goosehead Insurance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crawford & Company. Crawford & Company is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goosehead Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Crawford & Company	$1.31B	0.43	$19.63M	$0.53	22.55
Goosehead Insurance	$365.30M	4.47	$27.83M	$1.37	33.58

Summary

Goosehead Insurance beats Crawford & Company on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crawford & Company compare to TWFG?

Crawford & Company (NYSE:CRD.A) and TWFG (NASDAQ:TWFG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, valuation and profitability.

22.6% of Crawford & Company shares are held by institutional investors. 54.3% of Crawford & Company shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 68.4% of TWFG shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, TWFG had 6 more articles in the media than Crawford & Company. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for TWFG and 5 mentions for Crawford & Company. TWFG's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Crawford & Company's score of -0.04 indicating that TWFG is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Crawford & Company	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
TWFG	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TWFG has a net margin of 2.57% compared to Crawford & Company's net margin of 2.01%. Crawford & Company's return on equity of 29.17% beat TWFG's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Crawford & Company	2.01%	29.17%	6.80%
TWFG	2.57%	23.41%	17.86%

Crawford & Company has higher revenue and earnings than TWFG. Crawford & Company is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TWFG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Crawford & Company	$1.31B	0.43	$19.63M	$0.53	22.55
TWFG	$247.08M	5.64	$7.96M	$0.57	45.25

Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TWFG has a beta of 0.2, meaning that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

Crawford & Company currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.15%. TWFG has a consensus target price of $30.57, suggesting a potential upside of 18.54%. Given TWFG's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe TWFG is more favorable than Crawford & Company.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Crawford & Company	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
TWFG	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

TWFG beats Crawford & Company on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crawford & Company compare to Yuanbao?

Crawford & Company (NYSE:CRD.A) and Yuanbao (NASDAQ:YB) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, dividends and valuation.

Yuanbao has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crawford & Company. Yuanbao is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crawford & Company, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Crawford & Company	$1.31B	0.43	$19.63M	$0.53	22.55
Yuanbao	$625.35M	0.85	$181.88M	$4.50	2.61

In the previous week, Crawford & Company had 3 more articles in the media than Yuanbao. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Crawford & Company and 2 mentions for Yuanbao. Yuanbao's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Crawford & Company's score of -0.04 indicating that Yuanbao is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Crawford & Company	Neutral
Yuanbao	Positive

Crawford & Company pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Yuanbao pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Crawford & Company pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Yuanbao pays out 27.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Yuanbao is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Yuanbao has a net margin of 29.91% compared to Crawford & Company's net margin of 2.01%. Yuanbao's return on equity of 43.75% beat Crawford & Company's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Crawford & Company	2.01%	29.17%	6.80%
Yuanbao	29.91%	43.75%	29.78%

22.6% of Crawford & Company shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.3% of Crawford & Company shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Yuanbao has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Crawford & Company presently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.15%. Yuanbao has a consensus target price of $21.80, suggesting a potential upside of 85.69%. Given Yuanbao's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Yuanbao is more favorable than Crawford & Company.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Crawford & Company	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Yuanbao	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Summary

Yuanbao beats Crawford & Company on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crawford & Company compare to Waterdrop?

Crawford & Company (NYSE:CRD.A) and Waterdrop (NYSE:WDH) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Crawford & Company pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Waterdrop pays an annual dividend of $0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Crawford & Company pays out 60.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Waterdrop pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Waterdrop is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Waterdrop has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crawford & Company. Waterdrop is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crawford & Company, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Crawford & Company	$1.31B	0.43	$19.63M	$0.53	22.55
Waterdrop	$568.81M	0.64	$81.36M	$0.21	4.79

22.6% of Crawford & Company shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of Waterdrop shares are held by institutional investors. 54.3% of Crawford & Company shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.6% of Waterdrop shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Waterdrop has a net margin of 10.69% compared to Crawford & Company's net margin of 2.01%. Crawford & Company's return on equity of 29.17% beat Waterdrop's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Crawford & Company	2.01%	29.17%	6.80%
Waterdrop	10.69%	10.47%	7.40%

Crawford & Company presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.15%. Given Crawford & Company's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Crawford & Company is more favorable than Waterdrop.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Crawford & Company	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Waterdrop	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waterdrop has a beta of -0.17, meaning that its stock price is 117% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Crawford & Company had 5 more articles in the media than Waterdrop. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Crawford & Company and 0 mentions for Waterdrop. Waterdrop's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Crawford & Company's score of -0.04 indicating that Waterdrop is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Crawford & Company	Neutral
Waterdrop	Neutral

Summary

Crawford & Company beats Waterdrop on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Crawford & Company News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRD.A and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

CRD.A vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Crawford & Company	Insurance Industry	Finance Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$569.59M	$20.07B	$14.16B	$23.55B
Dividend Yield	2.68%	3.18%	4.88%	3.74%
P/E Ratio	22.55	21.20	20.53	29.91
Price / Sales	0.43	1.89	4.83	3.42
Price / Cash	6.84	12.67	20.32	15.68
Price / Book	3.10	2.18	1.82	3.72
Net Income	$19.63M	$1.80B	$1.33B	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	2.67%	1.18%	0.10%	0.61%
1 Month Performance	-5.43%	4.26%	-0.60%	-0.29%
1 Year Performance	6.52%	7.96%	4.81%	6.82%

Crawford & Company Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
CRD.A Crawford & Company	1.9793 of 5 stars	$11.95 -0.4%	$14.00 +17.1%	+4.4%	$569.59M	$1.31B	22.55	8,730	News Coverage
CRD.B Crawford & Company	1.2749 of 5 stars	$11.26 -1.0%	N/A	+6.3%	$552.65M	$1.31B	10.73	9,943	News Coverage
GSHD Goosehead Insurance	4.3002 of 5 stars	$56.88 +0.9%	$64.42 +13.3%	-34.7%	$2.00B	$365.30M	41.52	1,600	Analyst Forecast
TWFG TWFG	2.3921 of 5 stars	$28.96 -2.1%	$30.14 +4.1%	+0.6%	$1.60B	$247.08M	26.65	400	Analyst Forecast High Trading Volume
YB Yuanbao	4.3545 of 5 stars	$10.52 -7.3%	$21.80 +107.2%	-49.4%	$511.66M	$625.35M	2.52	613	Positive News Short Interest Decrease

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:CRD.A) was last updated on 11/13/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Crawford & Company (CRD.A) Competitors

CRD.A vs. CRD.B, GSHD, TWFG, YB, and WDH

How does Crawford & Company compare to Crawford & Company?

Summary

How does Crawford & Company compare to Goosehead Insurance?

Summary

How does Crawford & Company compare to TWFG?

Summary

How does Crawford & Company compare to Yuanbao?

Summary

How does Crawford & Company compare to Waterdrop?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRD.A vs. The Competition

Crawford & Company Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Crawford & Company (CRD.A) Competitors

CRD.A vs. CRD.B, GSHD, TWFG, YB, and WDH

How does Crawford & Company compare to Crawford & Company?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in CRD.A or CRD.B?

Which has more volatility & risk, CRD.A or CRD.B?

Do analysts recommend CRD.A or CRD.B?

Does the media favor CRD.A or CRD.B?

Is CRD.A or CRD.B more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, CRD.A or CRD.B?

Is CRD.A or CRD.B a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does Crawford & Company compare to Goosehead Insurance?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of CRD.A or GSHD?

Does the media favor CRD.A or GSHD?

Is CRD.A or GSHD more profitable?

Do analysts rate CRD.A or GSHD?

Which has more volatility & risk, CRD.A or GSHD?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CRD.A or GSHD?

Summary

How does Crawford & Company compare to TWFG?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in CRD.A or TWFG?

Does the media refer more to CRD.A or TWFG?

Is CRD.A or TWFG more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, CRD.A or TWFG?

Which has more volatility & risk, CRD.A or TWFG?

Do analysts recommend CRD.A or TWFG?

Summary

How does Crawford & Company compare to Yuanbao?

Which has better earnings and valuation, CRD.A or YB?

Does the media favor CRD.A or YB?

Is CRD.A or YB a better dividend stock?

Is CRD.A or YB more profitable?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CRD.A or YB?

Which has more risk & volatility, CRD.A or YB?

Do analysts prefer CRD.A or YB?

Summary

How does Crawford & Company compare to Waterdrop?

Is CRD.A or WDH a better dividend stock?

Which has better earnings & valuation, CRD.A or WDH?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of CRD.A or WDH?

Is CRD.A or WDH more profitable?

Do analysts rate CRD.A or WDH?

Which has more risk and volatility, CRD.A or WDH?

Does the media prefer CRD.A or WDH?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

CRD.A vs. The Competition

Crawford & Company Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools