Go Pro

Crawford & Company (CRD.A) Competitors

Crawford & Company logo
$12.69 -0.05 (-0.37%)
As of 02:12 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

CRD.A vs. CRD.B, GSHD, LIFE, TWFG, and YB

Should you buy Crawford & Company stock or one of its competitors? Crawford & Company's main competitors and comparable companies include Crawford & Company (CRD.B), Goosehead Insurance (GSHD), Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock (LIFE), TWFG (TWFG), and Yuanbao (YB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "insurance brokers" industry.

How does Crawford & Company compare to Crawford & Company?

Crawford & Company (NYSE:CRD.A) and Crawford & Company (NYSE:CRD.B) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

22.5% of Crawford & Company shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.0% of Crawford & Company shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.3% of Crawford & Company shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 51.0% of Crawford & Company shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Crawford & Company is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crawford & Company, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crawford & Company$1.30B0.48$19.63M$0.4727.17
Crawford & Company$1.31B0.43$19.63M$0.4824.35

Crawford & Company presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.63%. Given Crawford & Company's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Crawford & Company is more favorable than Crawford & Company.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crawford & Company
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Crawford & Company
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crawford & Company1.81% 28.15% 6.51%
Crawford & Company 1.81%28.15%6.51%

In the previous week, Crawford & Company and Crawford & Company both had 1 articles in the media. Crawford & Company's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Crawford & Company's score of 0.00 indicating that Crawford & Company is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Crawford & Company
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Crawford & Company
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Crawford & Company pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Crawford & Company pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Crawford & Company pays out 68.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crawford & Company pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Crawford & Company is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Crawford & Company beats Crawford & Company on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crawford & Company compare to Goosehead Insurance?

Crawford & Company (NYSE:CRD.A) and Goosehead Insurance (NASDAQ:GSHD) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Goosehead Insurance has a net margin of 8.78% compared to Crawford & Company's net margin of 1.81%. Crawford & Company's return on equity of 28.15% beat Goosehead Insurance's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crawford & Company1.81% 28.15% 6.51%
Goosehead Insurance 8.78%-21.00%9.43%

Crawford & Company presently has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.63%. Goosehead Insurance has a consensus target price of $68.45, indicating a potential upside of 20.47%. Given Goosehead Insurance's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Goosehead Insurance is more favorable than Crawford & Company.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crawford & Company
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Goosehead Insurance
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Goosehead Insurance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crawford & Company. Crawford & Company is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goosehead Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crawford & Company$1.30B0.48$19.63M$0.4727.17
Goosehead Insurance$365.30M5.53$27.83M$1.3741.48

22.5% of Crawford & Company shares are held by institutional investors. 54.3% of Crawford & Company shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.1% of Goosehead Insurance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Goosehead Insurance had 3 more articles in the media than Crawford & Company. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Goosehead Insurance and 1 mentions for Crawford & Company. Goosehead Insurance's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat Crawford & Company's score of 1.16 indicating that Goosehead Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Crawford & Company
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Goosehead Insurance
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

Goosehead Insurance beats Crawford & Company on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crawford & Company compare to Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock?

Crawford & Company (NYSE:CRD.A) and Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock (NASDAQ:LIFE) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Crawford & Company presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.63%. Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock has a consensus price target of $32.29, indicating a potential downside of 18.10%. Given Crawford & Company's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Crawford & Company is more favorable than Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crawford & Company
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crawford & Company. Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crawford & Company, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crawford & Company$1.30B0.48$19.63M$0.4727.17
Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock$586.53M4.29$71.15M-$2.85N/A

In the previous week, Crawford & Company and Crawford & Company both had 1 articles in the media. Crawford & Company's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock's score of 0.59 indicating that Crawford & Company is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Crawford & Company
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Crawford & Company has a net margin of 1.81% compared to Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock's net margin of 0.00%. Crawford & Company's return on equity of 28.15% beat Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crawford & Company1.81% 28.15% 6.51%
Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock N/A N/A N/A

22.5% of Crawford & Company shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.7% of Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.3% of Crawford & Company shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Crawford & Company beats Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crawford & Company compare to TWFG?

Crawford & Company (NYSE:CRD.A) and TWFG (NASDAQ:TWFG) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

TWFG has a net margin of 2.90% compared to Crawford & Company's net margin of 1.81%. Crawford & Company's return on equity of 28.15% beat TWFG's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crawford & Company1.81% 28.15% 6.51%
TWFG 2.90%19.49%15.20%

Crawford & Company currently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.63%. TWFG has a consensus target price of $29.57, suggesting a potential upside of 8.30%. Given Crawford & Company's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Crawford & Company is more favorable than TWFG.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crawford & Company
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
TWFG
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, TWFG had 1 more articles in the media than Crawford & Company. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for TWFG and 1 mentions for Crawford & Company. Crawford & Company's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat TWFG's score of 1.03 indicating that Crawford & Company is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Crawford & Company
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TWFG
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TWFG has a beta of 0.18, indicating that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

Crawford & Company has higher revenue and earnings than TWFG. Crawford & Company is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TWFG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crawford & Company$1.30B0.48$19.63M$0.4727.17
TWFG$247.08M5.97$7.96M$0.5946.28

22.5% of Crawford & Company shares are held by institutional investors. 54.3% of Crawford & Company shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 68.4% of TWFG shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Crawford & Company and TWFG tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Crawford & Company compare to Yuanbao?

Yuanbao (NASDAQ:YB) and Crawford & Company (NYSE:CRD.A) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

Yuanbao has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Crawford & Company has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Yuanbao has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Crawford & Company. Yuanbao is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Crawford & Company, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Yuanbao$625.35M0.97$181.88M$4.143.27
Crawford & Company$1.30B0.48$19.63M$0.4727.17

22.5% of Crawford & Company shares are held by institutional investors. 54.3% of Crawford & Company shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Yuanbao and Yuanbao both had 1 articles in the media. Crawford & Company's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Yuanbao's score of 0.00 indicating that Crawford & Company is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Yuanbao
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Crawford & Company
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Yuanbao has a net margin of 29.67% compared to Crawford & Company's net margin of 1.81%. Yuanbao's return on equity of 44.37% beat Crawford & Company's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Yuanbao29.67% 44.37% 30.82%
Crawford & Company 1.81%28.15%6.51%

Yuanbao pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Crawford & Company pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Yuanbao pays out 30.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crawford & Company pays out 68.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Yuanbao is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Yuanbao currently has a consensus price target of $21.80, indicating a potential upside of 61.18%. Crawford & Company has a consensus price target of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.63%. Given Yuanbao's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Yuanbao is more favorable than Crawford & Company.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Yuanbao
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Crawford & Company
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Yuanbao beats Crawford & Company on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Crawford & Company News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for CRD.A and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding CRD.A and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

CRD.A vs. The Competition

MetricCrawford & CompanyInsurance IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$620.70M$18.96B$13.96B$23.31B
Dividend Yield2.41%3.18%5.89%3.73%
P/E Ratio27.1716.5025.8328.78
Price / Sales0.4822.78506.7096.26
Price / Cash7.6012.6539.9433.53
Price / Book3.642.052.764.76
Net Income$19.63M$1.80B$1.32B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.77%-1.43%3.29%-0.84%
1 Month Performance-6.80%-0.78%0.55%-2.18%
1 Year Performance22.75%9.51%10.52%11.80%

Crawford & Company Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
CRD.A
Crawford & Company
1.8428 of 5 stars
$12.69
-0.4%
$14.00
+10.3%
+15.5%$614.62M$1.30B26.909,000
CRD.B
Crawford & Company
1.0888 of 5 stars
$12.37
+2.7%
N/A+11.7%$585.70M$1.31B25.779,943
GSHD
Goosehead Insurance
3.5937 of 5 stars
$67.08
-2.5%
$68.45
+2.0%
-26.1%$2.44B$365.30M48.961,600
LIFE
Ethos Technologies Inc. Class A Common Stock
2.2493 of 5 stars
$37.71
+2.5%
$32.29
-14.4%
N/A$2.35B$387.61MN/A614
TWFG
TWFG
1.9494 of 5 stars
$29.28
-2.6%
$29.57
+1.0%
+7.5%$1.63B$247.08M49.63N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:CRD.A) was last updated on 9/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners