Which has stronger earnings and valuation, PRG or BWMN?

PROG has higher revenue and earnings than Bowman Consulting Group. PROG is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio PROG $2.41B 0.73 $146.79M $3.62 12.12 Bowman Consulting Group $490.02M 0.96 $12.85M $0.60 44.75

Does the media prefer PRG or BWMN?

In the previous week, PROG had 32 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for PROG and 1 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat PROG's score of 0.73 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment PROG 9 Very Positive mention(s) 5 Positive mention(s) 11 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Bowman Consulting Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to BWMN or NEO?

In the previous week, NeoGenomics had 29 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for NeoGenomics and 1 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat NeoGenomics' score of 0.63 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bowman Consulting Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive NeoGenomics 8 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 15 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to DXC or BWMN?

In the previous week, DXC Technology had 25 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for DXC Technology and 1 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat DXC Technology's score of 0.10 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment DXC Technology 8 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 13 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Bowman Consulting Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor BWMN or TIC?

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group and Bowman Consulting Group both had 1 articles in the media. TIC Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 0.74 indicating that TIC Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bowman Consulting Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive TIC Solutions 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor BWMN or CNXC?

In the previous week, Concentrix had 12 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Concentrix and 1 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Concentrix's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 0.74 indicating that Concentrix is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bowman Consulting Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Concentrix 10 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) Competitors

$26.85 +1.00 (+3.87%)

Closing price 07/31/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$26.77 -0.08 (-0.30%)

As of 07/31/2026 07:34 PM Eastern

Compare

BWMN vs. PRG, NEO, DXC, TIC, and CNXC

Should you buy Bowman Consulting Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Bowman Consulting Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Bowman Consulting Group include PROG (PRG), NeoGenomics (NEO), DXC Technology (DXC), TIC Solutions (TIC), and Concentrix (CNXC).

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to PROG?

PROG (NYSE:PRG) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

97.9% of PROG shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of PROG shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

PROG has a net margin of 5.57% compared to Bowman Consulting Group's net margin of 2.02%. PROG's return on equity of 21.88% beat Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
PROG	5.57%	21.88%	9.15%
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%

In the previous week, PROG had 32 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for PROG and 1 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat PROG's score of 0.73 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
PROG	9 Very Positive mention(s)	5 Positive mention(s)	11 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

PROG has higher revenue and earnings than Bowman Consulting Group. PROG is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
PROG	$2.41B	0.73	$146.79M	$3.62	12.12
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	0.96	$12.85M	$0.60	44.75

PROG presently has a consensus target price of $49.44, suggesting a potential upside of 12.67%. Bowman Consulting Group has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 76.91%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than PROG.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
PROG	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

PROG has a beta of 1.78, meaning that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

PROG beats Bowman Consulting Group on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to NeoGenomics?

Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) and NeoGenomics (NASDAQ:NEO) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NeoGenomics has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its share price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

Bowman Consulting Group presently has a consensus price target of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 76.91%. NeoGenomics has a consensus price target of $16.71, indicating a potential upside of 9.32%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than NeoGenomics.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
NeoGenomics	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.55

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.5% of NeoGenomics shares are held by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of NeoGenomics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, NeoGenomics had 29 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for NeoGenomics and 1 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat NeoGenomics' score of 0.63 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
NeoGenomics	8 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	15 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Bowman Consulting Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NeoGenomics. NeoGenomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	0.96	$12.85M	$0.60	44.75
NeoGenomics	$727.33M	2.70	-$108.03M	-$0.40	N/A

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to NeoGenomics' net margin of -6.77%. Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity of 3.98% beat NeoGenomics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%
NeoGenomics	-6.77%	-1.99%	-1.21%

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats NeoGenomics on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to DXC Technology?

DXC Technology (NYSE:DXC) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) are related small-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, DXC Technology had 25 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for DXC Technology and 1 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.74 beat DXC Technology's score of 0.10 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
DXC Technology	8 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	13 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

DXC Technology has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

DXC Technology presently has a consensus target price of $11.81, suggesting a potential upside of 4.54%. Bowman Consulting Group has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 76.91%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than DXC Technology.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
DXC Technology	3 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.70
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to DXC Technology's net margin of 0.99%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 15.61% beat Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
DXC Technology	0.99%	15.61%	3.92%
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%

DXC Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DXC Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
DXC Technology	$12.64B	0.15	$18M	$0.06	188.33
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	0.96	$12.85M	$0.60	44.75

96.2% of DXC Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of DXC Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats DXC Technology on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to TIC Solutions?

Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) and TIC Solutions (NYSE:TIC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group and Bowman Consulting Group both had 1 articles in the media. TIC Solutions' average media sentiment score of 1.34 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 0.74 indicating that TIC Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
TIC Solutions	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to TIC Solutions' net margin of -5.77%. Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity of 3.98% beat TIC Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%
TIC Solutions	-5.77%	-3.82%	-1.87%

Bowman Consulting Group presently has a consensus price target of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 76.91%. TIC Solutions has a consensus price target of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 57.49%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than TIC Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
TIC Solutions	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.4% of TIC Solutions shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Bowman Consulting Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TIC Solutions. TIC Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	0.96	$12.85M	$0.60	44.75
TIC Solutions	$1.53B	1.05	-$87.12M	-$0.52	N/A

Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TIC Solutions has a beta of 2.81, meaning that its stock price is 181% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats TIC Solutions on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Concentrix?

Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) and Concentrix (NASDAQ:CNXC) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Concentrix has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market.

Bowman Consulting Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Concentrix. Concentrix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	0.96	$12.85M	$0.60	44.75
Concentrix	$9.83B	0.15	-$1.28B	-$21.32	N/A

In the previous week, Concentrix had 12 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Concentrix and 1 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Concentrix's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 0.74 indicating that Concentrix is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Concentrix	10 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.3% of Concentrix shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Concentrix shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Concentrix's net margin of -13.16%. Concentrix's return on equity of 19.82% beat Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%
Concentrix	-13.16%	19.82%	5.62%

Bowman Consulting Group presently has a consensus price target of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 76.91%. Concentrix has a consensus price target of $32.75, indicating a potential upside of 33.13%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than Concentrix.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Concentrix	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats Concentrix on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Bowman Consulting Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BWMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BWMN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Bowman Consulting Group	Construction & Engineering Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$470.09M	$8.49B	$10.61B	$12.31B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.65%	120.66%	9.45%
P/E Ratio	44.75	25.66	27.57	24.65
Price / Sales	0.96	60.08	310.84	110.20
Price / Cash	11.41	18.64	24.14	59.62
Price / Book	1.79	4.96	4.47	5.90
Net Income	$12.85M	$487.44M	$610.22M	$336.31M
7 Day Performance	3.47%	-1.00%	0.25%	0.09%
1 Month Performance	-6.32%	-5.37%	-2.63%	-5.67%
1 Year Performance	-19.99%	28.84%	12.03%	18.79%

Bowman Consulting Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group	3.2708 of 5 stars	$26.85 +3.9%	$47.50 +76.9%	-22.6%	$470.09M	$490.02M	44.75	2,300
PRG PROG	4.1988 of 5 stars	$45.07 +4.1%	$47.36 +5.1%	+37.9%	$1.73B	$2.41B	11.10	1,151	News Coverage Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
NEO NeoGenomics	1.9846 of 5 stars	$13.40 +2.0%	$14.57 +8.7%	+215.9%	$1.71B	$727.33M	N/A	2,500	Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
DXC DXC Technology	4.1622 of 5 stars	$10.86 +4.8%	$12.25 +12.8%	-17.0%	$1.69B	$12.64B	3.19	115,000	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
TIC TIC Solutions	3.6592 of 5 stars	$7.24 -0.5%	$11.50 +58.9%	-34.2%	$1.61B	$1.53B	N/A	12,760	Positive News Upcoming Earnings

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:BWMN) was last updated on 8/1/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) Competitors

BWMN vs. PRG, NEO, DXC, TIC, and CNXC

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to PROG?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to NeoGenomics?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to DXC Technology?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to TIC Solutions?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Concentrix?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BWMN vs. The Competition

Bowman Consulting Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) Competitors

BWMN vs. PRG, NEO, DXC, TIC, and CNXC

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to PROG?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of PRG or BWMN?

Is PRG or BWMN more profitable?

Does the media prefer PRG or BWMN?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, PRG or BWMN?

Do analysts prefer PRG or BWMN?

Which has more risk & volatility, PRG or BWMN?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to NeoGenomics?

Which has more volatility and risk, BWMN or NEO?

Do analysts prefer BWMN or NEO?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in BWMN or NEO?

Does the media refer more to BWMN or NEO?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, BWMN or NEO?

Is BWMN or NEO more profitable?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to DXC Technology?

Does the media refer more to DXC or BWMN?

Which has more risk and volatility, DXC or BWMN?

Do analysts rate DXC or BWMN?

Is DXC or BWMN more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, DXC or BWMN?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in DXC or BWMN?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to TIC Solutions?

Does the media favor BWMN or TIC?

Is BWMN or TIC more profitable?

Do analysts recommend BWMN or TIC?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in BWMN or TIC?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, BWMN or TIC?

Which has more volatility and risk, BWMN or TIC?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Concentrix?

Which has more volatility and risk, BWMN or CNXC?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, BWMN or CNXC?

Does the media favor BWMN or CNXC?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in BWMN or CNXC?

Is BWMN or CNXC more profitable?

Do analysts rate BWMN or CNXC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BWMN vs. The Competition

Bowman Consulting Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools