Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) Competitors

$33.02 -1.06 (-3.10%)

As of 12:00 PM Eastern

BWMN vs. CTOS, FA, ATHM, TIC, and DXC

Should you be buying Bowman Consulting Group stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Bowman Consulting Group include Custom Truck One Source (CTOS), First Advantage (FA), Autohome (ATHM), TIC Solutions (TIC), and DXC Technology (DXC). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Custom Truck One Source?

Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) and Custom Truck One Source (NYSE:CTOS) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group had 16 more articles in the media than Custom Truck One Source. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group and 1 mentions for Custom Truck One Source. Custom Truck One Source's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 0.22 indicating that Custom Truck One Source is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bowman Consulting Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Custom Truck One Source	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Custom Truck One Source has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.1% of Custom Truck One Source shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.5% of Custom Truck One Source shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Bowman Consulting Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Custom Truck One Source. Custom Truck One Source is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.18	$12.85M	$0.60	55.03
Custom Truck One Source	$1.98B	1.12	-$31.05M	-$0.09	N/A

Bowman Consulting Group currently has a consensus target price of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 43.87%. Custom Truck One Source has a consensus target price of $9.33, indicating a potential downside of 5.00%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than Custom Truck One Source.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Custom Truck One Source	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Custom Truck One Source's net margin of -0.88%. Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity of 3.98% beat Custom Truck One Source's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%
Custom Truck One Source	-0.88%	-2.18%	-0.49%

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats Custom Truck One Source on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to First Advantage?

Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) and First Advantage (NYSE:FA) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Bowman Consulting Group currently has a consensus target price of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 43.87%. First Advantage has a consensus target price of $18.50, indicating a potential upside of 17.16%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than First Advantage.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
First Advantage	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, First Advantage has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, First Advantage had 4 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for First Advantage and 17 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. First Advantage's average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 0.22 indicating that First Advantage is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bowman Consulting Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
First Advantage	5 Very Positive mention(s)	10 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

First Advantage has higher revenue and earnings than Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Advantage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.18	$12.85M	$0.60	55.03
First Advantage	$1.61B	1.70	$37.29M	$0.04	394.75

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.9% of First Advantage shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.4% of First Advantage shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to First Advantage's net margin of 0.65%. First Advantage's return on equity of 13.16% beat Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%
First Advantage	0.65%	13.16%	7.33%

Summary

First Advantage beats Bowman Consulting Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Autohome?

Autohome (NYSE:ATHM) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends and earnings.

Autohome has higher revenue and earnings than Bowman Consulting Group. Autohome is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Autohome	$922.63M	2.34	$225.19M	$1.64	11.43
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.18	$12.85M	$0.60	55.03

Autohome has a net margin of 21.43% compared to Bowman Consulting Group's net margin of 2.02%. Autohome's return on equity of 5.94% beat Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Autohome	21.43%	5.94%	4.75%
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%

Autohome has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Autohome presently has a consensus target price of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 49.33%. Bowman Consulting Group has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 43.87%. Given Autohome's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Autohome is more favorable than Bowman Consulting Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Autohome	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

63.1% of Autohome shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of Autohome shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group had 12 more articles in the media than Autohome. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group and 5 mentions for Autohome. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat Autohome's score of 0.22 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Autohome	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Bowman Consulting Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Autohome and Bowman Consulting Group tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to TIC Solutions?

TIC Solutions (NYSE:TIC) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) are both business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and valuation.

In the previous week, TIC Solutions and TIC Solutions both had 17 articles in the media. TIC Solutions' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 0.22 indicating that TIC Solutions is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TIC Solutions	2 Very Positive mention(s)	9 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Bowman Consulting Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Bowman Consulting Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TIC Solutions. TIC Solutions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TIC Solutions	$1.53B	1.33	-$87.12M	-$0.52	N/A
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.18	$12.85M	$0.60	55.03

TIC Solutions has a beta of 3.21, meaning that its stock price is 221% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to TIC Solutions' net margin of -5.77%. Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity of 3.98% beat TIC Solutions' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TIC Solutions	-5.77%	-3.82%	-1.87%
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%

TIC Solutions presently has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 24.62%. Bowman Consulting Group has a consensus target price of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 43.87%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than TIC Solutions.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TIC Solutions	3 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.86
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats TIC Solutions on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to DXC Technology?

DXC Technology (NYSE:DXC) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, media sentiment, earnings and valuation.

DXC Technology presently has a consensus target price of $13.50, indicating a potential upside of 48.60%. Bowman Consulting Group has a consensus target price of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 43.87%. Given DXC Technology's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe DXC Technology is more favorable than Bowman Consulting Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
DXC Technology	3 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.70
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

In the previous week, DXC Technology had 12 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for DXC Technology and 17 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. DXC Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 0.22 indicating that DXC Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
DXC Technology	5 Very Positive mention(s)	7 Positive mention(s)	9 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Bowman Consulting Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	4 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

96.2% of DXC Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of DXC Technology shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

DXC Technology has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

DXC Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than DXC Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
DXC Technology	$12.64B	0.12	$18M	$0.06	151.42
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.18	$12.85M	$0.60	55.03

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to DXC Technology's net margin of 0.14%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 17.24% beat Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
DXC Technology	0.14%	17.24%	4.35%
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%

Summary

DXC Technology beats Bowman Consulting Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Bowman Consulting Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BWMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BWMN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Bowman Consulting Group	BUSINESS SVCS Industry	Business Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$578.09M	$5.34B	$6.34B	$12.08B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.08%	3.07%	5.23%
P/E Ratio	55.03	12.12	29.89	25.20
Price / Sales	1.18	1.40	440.57	74.80
Price / Cash	14.78	11.77	22.61	36.29
Price / Book	2.20	4.81	6.10	6.62
Net Income	$12.85M	$155.84M	$200.03M	$333.30M
7 Day Performance	-2.90%	1.91%	-1.53%	-0.89%
1 Month Performance	7.16%	0.22%	4.60%	7.27%
1 Year Performance	31.38%	-5.33%	39.37%	34.59%

Bowman Consulting Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group	3.9855 of 5 stars	$33.02 -3.1%	$47.50 +43.9%	+37.3%	$578.09M	$490.02M	55.03	2,300	Earnings Report Analyst Downgrade Gap Down
CTOS Custom Truck One Source	2.8864 of 5 stars	$9.95 +4.2%	$9.33 -6.2%	+129.4%	$2.25B	$1.94B	N/A	2,500
FA First Advantage	2.5799 of 5 stars	$12.64 -0.2%	$16.75 +32.5%	-9.2%	$2.18B	$1.57B	421.33	5,500	Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
ATHM Autohome	4.1214 of 5 stars	$18.36 -0.3%	$28.00 +52.5%	-23.6%	$2.11B	$6.45B	11.19	4,242	News Coverage Upcoming Earnings Short Interest Increase
TIC TIC Solutions	3.7375 of 5 stars	$9.54 +2.8%	$11.00 +15.3%	N/A	$2.11B	$1.53B	N/A	12,760	Positive News Earnings Report

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:BWMN) was last updated on 5/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) Competitors

BWMN vs. CTOS, FA, ATHM, TIC, and DXC

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Custom Truck One Source?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to First Advantage?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Autohome?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to TIC Solutions?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to DXC Technology?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BWMN vs. The Competition

Bowman Consulting Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) Competitors

BWMN vs. CTOS, FA, ATHM, TIC, and DXC

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Custom Truck One Source?

Does the media favor BWMN or CTOS?

Which has more volatility & risk, BWMN or CTOS?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of BWMN or CTOS?

Which has better valuation and earnings, BWMN or CTOS?

Do analysts prefer BWMN or CTOS?

Is BWMN or CTOS more profitable?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to First Advantage?

Do analysts prefer BWMN or FA?

Which has more volatility & risk, BWMN or FA?

Does the media favor BWMN or FA?

Which has better valuation and earnings, BWMN or FA?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of BWMN or FA?

Is BWMN or FA more profitable?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Autohome?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ATHM or BWMN?

Is ATHM or BWMN more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, ATHM or BWMN?

Do analysts prefer ATHM or BWMN?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in ATHM or BWMN?

Does the media refer more to ATHM or BWMN?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to TIC Solutions?

Does the media refer more to TIC or BWMN?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, TIC or BWMN?

Which has more risk & volatility, TIC or BWMN?

Is TIC or BWMN more profitable?

Do analysts prefer TIC or BWMN?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in TIC or BWMN?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to DXC Technology?

Do analysts prefer DXC or BWMN?

Does the media refer more to DXC or BWMN?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in DXC or BWMN?

Which has more risk & volatility, DXC or BWMN?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, DXC or BWMN?

Is DXC or BWMN more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BWMN vs. The Competition

Bowman Consulting Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools