Does the media prefer CTOS or BWMN?

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group had 1 more articles in the media than Custom Truck One Source. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group and 3 mentions for Custom Truck One Source. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Custom Truck One Source's score of 0.40 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Custom Truck One Source 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Bowman Consulting Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to BWMN or ASTH?

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group and Bowman Consulting Group both had 4 articles in the media. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Astrana Health's score of 0.97 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bowman Consulting Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Astrana Health 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor FLYW or BWMN?

In the previous week, Flywire had 3 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Flywire and 4 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Flywire's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 1.00 indicating that Flywire is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Flywire 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Bowman Consulting Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor TNET or BWMN?

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group had 1 more articles in the media than TriNet Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group and 3 mentions for TriNet Group. TriNet Group's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 1.00 indicating that TriNet Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment TriNet Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Bowman Consulting Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor ATHM or BWMN?

In the previous week, Autohome had 7 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Autohome and 4 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Autohome's score of -0.04 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Autohome 1 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Bowman Consulting Group 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) Competitors

$31.76 +0.23 (+0.73%)

Closing price 06/1/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$31.76 -0.01 (-0.02%)

As of 06/1/2026 04:10 PM Eastern

Compare

BWMN vs. CTOS, ASTH, FLYW, TNET, and ATHM

Should you buy Bowman Consulting Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Bowman Consulting Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Bowman Consulting Group include Custom Truck One Source (CTOS), Astrana Health (ASTH), Flywire (FLYW), TriNet Group (TNET), and Autohome (ATHM). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Custom Truck One Source?

Custom Truck One Source (NYSE:CTOS) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Custom Truck One Source's net margin of -0.88%. Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity of 3.98% beat Custom Truck One Source's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Custom Truck One Source	-0.88%	-2.18%	-0.49%
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%

Custom Truck One Source has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.33, indicating that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

90.1% of Custom Truck One Source shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Custom Truck One Source shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Custom Truck One Source presently has a consensus target price of $10.14, suggesting a potential upside of 7.14%. Bowman Consulting Group has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 49.56%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than Custom Truck One Source.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Custom Truck One Source	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Bowman Consulting Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Custom Truck One Source. Custom Truck One Source is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Custom Truck One Source	$1.94B	1.10	-$31.05M	-$0.09	N/A
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.13	$12.85M	$0.60	52.93

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group had 1 more articles in the media than Custom Truck One Source. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group and 3 mentions for Custom Truck One Source. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Custom Truck One Source's score of 0.40 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Custom Truck One Source	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats Custom Truck One Source on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Astrana Health?

Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) and Astrana Health (NASDAQ:ASTH) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.8% of Astrana Health shares are held by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.3% of Astrana Health shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Bowman Consulting Group currently has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 49.56%. Astrana Health has a consensus target price of $45.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.17%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than Astrana Health.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Astrana Health	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78

Astrana Health has higher revenue and earnings than Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Astrana Health, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.13	$12.85M	$0.60	52.93
Astrana Health	$3.53B	0.60	$22.49M	$0.61	61.90

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group and Bowman Consulting Group both had 4 articles in the media. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Astrana Health's score of 0.97 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Astrana Health	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Astrana Health's net margin of 0.86%. Astrana Health's return on equity of 9.22% beat Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%
Astrana Health	0.86%	9.22%	3.54%

Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Astrana Health has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Astrana Health beats Bowman Consulting Group on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Flywire?

Flywire (NASDAQ:FLYW) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Flywire presently has a consensus price target of $18.07, indicating a potential upside of 8.80%. Bowman Consulting Group has a consensus price target of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 49.56%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than Flywire.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Flywire	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.73
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Flywire has higher revenue and earnings than Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flywire, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Flywire	$623.03M	3.29	$13.50M	$0.23	72.22
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.13	$12.85M	$0.60	52.93

95.9% of Flywire shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.0% of Flywire shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Flywire had 3 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Flywire and 4 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Flywire's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 1.00 indicating that Flywire is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Flywire	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Flywire has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Flywire has a net margin of 4.45% compared to Bowman Consulting Group's net margin of 2.02%. Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity of 3.98% beat Flywire's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Flywire	4.45%	3.78%	2.61%
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%

Summary

Flywire beats Bowman Consulting Group on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to TriNet Group?

TriNet Group (NYSE:TNET) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) are both business services companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

TriNet Group has higher revenue and earnings than Bowman Consulting Group. TriNet Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
TriNet Group	$5.01B	0.45	$155M	$3.35	14.62
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.13	$12.85M	$0.60	52.93

TriNet Group has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group had 1 more articles in the media than TriNet Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group and 3 mentions for TriNet Group. TriNet Group's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 1.00 indicating that TriNet Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
TriNet Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

TriNet Group currently has a consensus price target of $55.20, indicating a potential upside of 12.71%. Bowman Consulting Group has a consensus price target of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 49.56%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than TriNet Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
TriNet Group	2 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.14
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

TriNet Group has a net margin of 3.22% compared to Bowman Consulting Group's net margin of 2.02%. TriNet Group's return on equity of 219.54% beat Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
TriNet Group	3.22%	219.54%	5.42%
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%

96.8% of TriNet Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. 40.0% of TriNet Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

TriNet Group beats Bowman Consulting Group on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Autohome?

Autohome (NYSE:ATHM) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, earnings, dividends, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Autohome has higher revenue and earnings than Bowman Consulting Group. Autohome is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Autohome	$6.05B	0.34	$225.19M	$1.31	13.65
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.13	$12.85M	$0.60	52.93

In the previous week, Autohome had 7 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Autohome and 4 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Autohome's score of -0.04 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Autohome	1 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Autohome has a net margin of 17.91% compared to Bowman Consulting Group's net margin of 2.02%. Autohome's return on equity of 5.01% beat Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Autohome	17.91%	5.01%	4.01%
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%

Autohome has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its stock price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

Autohome presently has a consensus target price of $22.65, indicating a potential upside of 26.64%. Bowman Consulting Group has a consensus target price of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 49.56%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than Autohome.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Autohome	1 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.80
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

63.1% of Autohome shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of Autohome shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats Autohome on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Bowman Consulting Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BWMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BWMN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Bowman Consulting Group	BUSINESS SVCS Industry	Business Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$552.02M	$5.47B	$6.72B	$12.56B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.37%	3.01%	5.30%
P/E Ratio	52.93	12.38	30.04	26.63
Price / Sales	1.13	1.47	424.41	111.59
Price / Cash	13.40	11.76	23.12	37.60
Price / Book	2.11	4.97	6.04	6.88
Net Income	$12.85M	$154.98M	$204.03M	$336.73M
7 Day Performance	-2.61%	5.66%	5.45%	3.07%
1 Month Performance	-3.05%	23.58%	5.12%	7.13%
1 Year Performance	25.04%	-2.93%	40.65%	38.42%

Bowman Consulting Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group	4.1527 of 5 stars	$31.76 +0.7%	$47.50 +49.6%	+26.4%	$552.02M	$490.02M	52.93	2,300
CTOS Custom Truck One Source	2.7396 of 5 stars	$9.73 +5.4%	$10.14 +4.2%	+119.7%	$2.21B	$1.94B	N/A	2,500	Gap Up
ASTH Astrana Health	3.9584 of 5 stars	$38.54 +1.8%	$45.00 +16.8%	+50.4%	$2.15B	$3.18B	63.18	3,000	Positive News Gap Up
FLYW Flywire	3.8596 of 5 stars	$16.00 -0.7%	$18.00 +12.5%	+53.8%	$1.97B	$623.03M	69.57	1,400	Positive News High Trading Volume
TNET TriNet Group	4.7975 of 5 stars	$42.38 -0.9%	$55.20 +30.3%	-41.3%	$1.95B	$5.01B	12.65	3,400	Positive News

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:BWMN) was last updated on 6/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) Competitors

BWMN vs. CTOS, ASTH, FLYW, TNET, and ATHM

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Custom Truck One Source?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Astrana Health?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Flywire?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to TriNet Group?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Autohome?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BWMN vs. The Competition

Bowman Consulting Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) Competitors

BWMN vs. CTOS, ASTH, FLYW, TNET, and ATHM

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Custom Truck One Source?

Is CTOS or BWMN more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, CTOS or BWMN?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of CTOS or BWMN?

Do analysts recommend CTOS or BWMN?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CTOS or BWMN?

Does the media prefer CTOS or BWMN?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Astrana Health?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of BWMN or ASTH?

Do analysts prefer BWMN or ASTH?

Which has better earnings & valuation, BWMN or ASTH?

Does the media refer more to BWMN or ASTH?

Is BWMN or ASTH more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, BWMN or ASTH?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Flywire?

Do analysts prefer FLYW or BWMN?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, FLYW or BWMN?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in FLYW or BWMN?

Does the media favor FLYW or BWMN?

Which has more risk and volatility, FLYW or BWMN?

Is FLYW or BWMN more profitable?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to TriNet Group?

Which has better valuation and earnings, TNET or BWMN?

Which has more volatility & risk, TNET or BWMN?

Does the media favor TNET or BWMN?

Do analysts rate TNET or BWMN?

Is TNET or BWMN more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in TNET or BWMN?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Autohome?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, ATHM or BWMN?

Does the media favor ATHM or BWMN?

Is ATHM or BWMN more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, ATHM or BWMN?

Do analysts recommend ATHM or BWMN?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ATHM or BWMN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BWMN vs. The Competition

Bowman Consulting Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools