Which has better valuation and earnings, BWMN or HAWK?

Bowman Consulting Group has higher revenue and earnings than HawkEye 360. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Bowman Consulting Group $490.02M 1.00 $12.85M $0.60 46.53 HawkEye 360 $204.21M 9.64 N/A N/A N/A

Does the media favor BWMN or HAWK?

In the previous week, HawkEye 360 had 1 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for HawkEye 360 and 2 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat HawkEye 360's score of 0.40 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bowman Consulting Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive HawkEye 360 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer BWMN or FIVN?

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group and Bowman Consulting Group both had 2 articles in the media. Five9's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 0.96 indicating that Five9 is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bowman Consulting Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Five9 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media refer more to STGW or BWMN?

In the previous week, Stagwell had 4 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Stagwell and 2 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Stagwell's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 0.96 indicating that Stagwell is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Stagwell 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Bowman Consulting Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media prefer BWMN or NEO?

In the previous week, NeoGenomics had 4 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for NeoGenomics and 2 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat NeoGenomics' score of 0.70 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bowman Consulting Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive NeoGenomics 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation and earnings, BWMN or ABSI?

Bowman Consulting Group has higher revenue and earnings than Absci. Absci is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Bowman Consulting Group $490.02M 1.00 $12.85M $0.60 46.53 Absci $2.80M 590.19 -$115.18M -$0.83 N/A

Does the media prefer BWMN or ABSI?

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group and Bowman Consulting Group both had 2 articles in the media. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Absci's score of 0.93 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Bowman Consulting Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Absci 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) Competitors

$27.92 +0.01 (+0.04%)

Closing price 07/10/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$27.96 +0.04 (+0.14%)

As of 07/10/2026 04:10 PM Eastern

Compare

BWMN vs. HAWK, FIVN, STGW, NEO, and ABSI

Should you buy Bowman Consulting Group stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Bowman Consulting Group with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Bowman Consulting Group include HawkEye 360 (HAWK), Five9 (FIVN), Stagwell (STGW), NeoGenomics (NEO), and Absci (ABSI). These companies are all part of the "business services" industry.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to HawkEye 360?

Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) and HawkEye 360 (NYSE:HAWK) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.7% of HawkEye 360 shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.8% of HawkEye 360 shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, HawkEye 360 had 1 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for HawkEye 360 and 2 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat HawkEye 360's score of 0.40 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bowman Consulting Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
HawkEye 360	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to HawkEye 360's net margin of 0.00%. Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity of 3.98% beat HawkEye 360's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%
HawkEye 360	N/A	N/A	N/A

Bowman Consulting Group has higher revenue and earnings than HawkEye 360.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.00	$12.85M	$0.60	46.53
HawkEye 360	$204.21M	9.64	N/A	N/A	N/A

Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HawkEye 360 has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

Bowman Consulting Group currently has a consensus target price of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 70.13%. HawkEye 360 has a consensus target price of $38.38, indicating a potential upside of 91.02%. Given HawkEye 360's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe HawkEye 360 is more favorable than Bowman Consulting Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
HawkEye 360	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.89

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats HawkEye 360 on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Five9?

Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) and Five9 (NASDAQ:FIVN) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends and earnings.

Five9 has a net margin of 4.87% compared to Bowman Consulting Group's net margin of 2.02%. Five9's return on equity of 12.66% beat Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%
Five9	4.87%	12.66%	5.52%

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.6% of Five9 shares are held by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Five9 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Five9 has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

Bowman Consulting Group presently has a consensus price target of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 70.13%. Five9 has a consensus price target of $25.93, suggesting a potential upside of 2.00%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than Five9.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Five9	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	10 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.61

Five9 has higher revenue and earnings than Bowman Consulting Group. Five9 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.00	$12.85M	$0.60	46.53
Five9	$1.15B	1.69	$39.42M	$0.66	38.52

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group and Bowman Consulting Group both had 2 articles in the media. Five9's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 0.96 indicating that Five9 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bowman Consulting Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Five9	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Five9 beats Bowman Consulting Group on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Stagwell?

Stagwell (NASDAQ:STGW) and Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings and valuation.

Stagwell has higher revenue and earnings than Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Stagwell, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Stagwell	$2.91B	0.67	$29.10M	$0.07	111.57
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.00	$12.85M	$0.60	46.53

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Stagwell's net margin of 0.64%. Stagwell's return on equity of 24.12% beat Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Stagwell	0.64%	24.12%	4.31%
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%

35.6% of Stagwell shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. 11.2% of Stagwell shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Stagwell presently has a consensus price target of $7.80, indicating a potential downside of 0.13%. Bowman Consulting Group has a consensus price target of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 70.13%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than Stagwell.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Stagwell	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Stagwell has a beta of 1.26, meaning that its share price is 26% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Stagwell had 4 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Stagwell and 2 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Stagwell's average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Bowman Consulting Group's score of 0.96 indicating that Stagwell is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Stagwell	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Bowman Consulting Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Stagwell beats Bowman Consulting Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to NeoGenomics?

Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) and NeoGenomics (NASDAQ:NEO) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to NeoGenomics' net margin of -13.30%. Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity of 3.98% beat NeoGenomics' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%
NeoGenomics	-13.30%	-2.80%	-1.72%

Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.34, meaning that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NeoGenomics has a beta of 1.74, meaning that its share price is 74% more volatile than the broader market.

Bowman Consulting Group presently has a consensus target price of $47.50, indicating a potential upside of 70.13%. NeoGenomics has a consensus target price of $13.86, indicating a potential downside of 1.79%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than NeoGenomics.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
NeoGenomics	1 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.42

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.5% of NeoGenomics shares are held by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of NeoGenomics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Bowman Consulting Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than NeoGenomics. NeoGenomics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.00	$12.85M	$0.60	46.53
NeoGenomics	$727.33M	2.53	-$108.03M	-$0.77	N/A

In the previous week, NeoGenomics had 4 more articles in the media than Bowman Consulting Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for NeoGenomics and 2 mentions for Bowman Consulting Group. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat NeoGenomics' score of 0.70 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bowman Consulting Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
NeoGenomics	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats NeoGenomics on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Absci?

Bowman Consulting Group (NASDAQ:BWMN) and Absci (NASDAQ:ABSI) are both small-cap business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Bowman Consulting Group has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Absci has a beta of 2.32, indicating that its share price is 132% more volatile than the broader market.

Bowman Consulting Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Absci's net margin of -6,450.76%. Bowman Consulting Group's return on equity of 3.98% beat Absci's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bowman Consulting Group	2.02%	3.98%	1.84%
Absci	-6,450.76%	-66.32%	-57.01%

Bowman Consulting Group presently has a consensus target price of $47.50, suggesting a potential upside of 70.13%. Absci has a consensus target price of $13.43, suggesting a potential upside of 26.68%. Given Bowman Consulting Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Bowman Consulting Group is more favorable than Absci.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bowman Consulting Group	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Absci	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	8 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.78

63.2% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.1% of Absci shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.5% of Bowman Consulting Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.5% of Absci shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Bowman Consulting Group and Bowman Consulting Group both had 2 articles in the media. Bowman Consulting Group's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Absci's score of 0.93 indicating that Bowman Consulting Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Bowman Consulting Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Absci	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Bowman Consulting Group has higher revenue and earnings than Absci. Absci is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowman Consulting Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bowman Consulting Group	$490.02M	1.00	$12.85M	$0.60	46.53
Absci	$2.80M	590.19	-$115.18M	-$0.83	N/A

Summary

Bowman Consulting Group beats Absci on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Bowman Consulting Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BWMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

BWMN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Bowman Consulting Group	BUSINESS SVCS Industry	Business Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$488.82M	$5.54B	$6.91B	$12.66B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.98%	3.13%	8.00%
P/E Ratio	46.53	12.20	29.27	24.53
Price / Sales	1.00	1.41	347.49	97.42
Price / Cash	11.87	11.48	23.47	60.03
Price / Book	1.86	5.12	5.74	6.38
Net Income	$12.85M	$154.43M	$204.80M	$331.87M
7 Day Performance	-2.65%	-1.06%	-1.41%	0.35%
1 Month Performance	-10.14%	-2.64%	1.46%	0.57%
1 Year Performance	-8.34%	-6.33%	16.36%	22.26%

Bowman Consulting Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
BWMN Bowman Consulting Group	4.0368 of 5 stars	$27.92 +0.0%	$47.50 +70.1%	-8.3%	$488.82M	$490.02M	46.53	2,300	Analyst Upgrade
HAWK HawkEye 360	3.8793 of 5 stars	$19.63 -1.7%	$38.38 +95.5%	N/A	$1.92B	$204.21M	N/A	403	News Coverage
FIVN Five9	3.1563 of 5 stars	$24.99 +3.7%	$25.93 +3.8%	-4.4%	$1.91B	$1.15B	37.86	2,910	Gap Up
STGW Stagwell	2.5431 of 5 stars	$7.70 +1.6%	$7.80 +1.3%	+68.0%	$1.91B	$2.91B	110.00	12,629	News Coverage Positive News
NEO NeoGenomics	1.626 of 5 stars	$14.50 -4.4%	$13.86 -4.4%	+94.4%	$1.89B	$727.33M	N/A	2,500	News Coverage

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:BWMN) was last updated on 7/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) Competitors

BWMN vs. HAWK, FIVN, STGW, NEO, and ABSI

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to HawkEye 360?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Five9?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Stagwell?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to NeoGenomics?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Absci?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BWMN vs. The Competition

Bowman Consulting Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Bowman Consulting Group (BWMN) Competitors

BWMN vs. HAWK, FIVN, STGW, NEO, and ABSI

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to HawkEye 360?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in BWMN or HAWK?

Does the media favor BWMN or HAWK?

Is BWMN or HAWK more profitable?

Which has better valuation and earnings, BWMN or HAWK?

Which has more risk & volatility, BWMN or HAWK?

Do analysts rate BWMN or HAWK?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Five9?

Is BWMN or FIVN more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of BWMN or FIVN?

Which has more volatility and risk, BWMN or FIVN?

Do analysts rate BWMN or FIVN?

Which has better valuation & earnings, BWMN or FIVN?

Does the media prefer BWMN or FIVN?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Stagwell?

Which has better earnings & valuation, STGW or BWMN?

Is STGW or BWMN more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in STGW or BWMN?

Do analysts recommend STGW or BWMN?

Which has more volatility & risk, STGW or BWMN?

Does the media refer more to STGW or BWMN?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to NeoGenomics?

Is BWMN or NEO more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, BWMN or NEO?

Do analysts prefer BWMN or NEO?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in BWMN or NEO?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, BWMN or NEO?

Does the media prefer BWMN or NEO?

Summary

How does Bowman Consulting Group compare to Absci?

Which has more volatility and risk, BWMN or ABSI?

Is BWMN or ABSI more profitable?

Do analysts recommend BWMN or ABSI?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of BWMN or ABSI?

Does the media prefer BWMN or ABSI?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, BWMN or ABSI?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

BWMN vs. The Competition

Bowman Consulting Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools