ASGN (EFOR) Competitors

$19.18 +2.12 (+12.43%)
As of 06/26/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

EFOR vs. RHI, FOUR, RNG, FA, and CARG

Should you buy ASGN stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares ASGN with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with ASGN include Robert Half (RHI), Shift4 Payments (FOUR), RingCentral (RNG), First Advantage (FA), and CarGurus (CARG).

How does ASGN compare to Robert Half?

Robert Half (NYSE:RHI) and ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) are both business services companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Robert Half has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its share price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASGN has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Robert Half has higher revenue and earnings than ASGN. ASGN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Robert Half, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Robert Half$5.38B0.62$132.99M$1.3025.20
ASGN$3.98B0.20$113.50M$2.268.49

ASGN has a net margin of 2.46% compared to Robert Half's net margin of 2.43%. ASGN's return on equity of 10.30% beat Robert Half's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Robert Half2.43% 10.14% 4.61%
ASGN 2.46%10.30%4.94%

92.4% of Robert Half shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.4% of ASGN shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.5% of Robert Half shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of ASGN shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Robert Half presently has a consensus price target of $31.75, indicating a potential downside of 3.07%. ASGN has a consensus price target of $29.33, indicating a potential upside of 52.94%. Given ASGN's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ASGN is more favorable than Robert Half.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Robert Half
5 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.70
ASGN
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

In the previous week, Robert Half had 1 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Robert Half and 2 mentions for ASGN. ASGN's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Robert Half's score of 0.00 indicating that ASGN is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Robert Half
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
ASGN
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

ASGN beats Robert Half on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASGN compare to Shift4 Payments?

ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) and Shift4 Payments (NYSE:FOUR) are both business services companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

ASGN has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Shift4 Payments has a beta of 1.43, indicating that its stock price is 43% more volatile than the broader market.

Shift4 Payments has higher revenue and earnings than ASGN. ASGN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shift4 Payments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ASGN$3.98B0.20$113.50M$2.268.49
Shift4 Payments$4.18B0.90$119M$0.8456.69

Shift4 Payments has a net margin of 2.63% compared to ASGN's net margin of 2.46%. Shift4 Payments' return on equity of 33.55% beat ASGN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ASGN2.46% 10.30% 4.94%
Shift4 Payments 2.63%33.55%5.01%

ASGN currently has a consensus target price of $29.33, suggesting a potential upside of 52.94%. Shift4 Payments has a consensus target price of $68.29, suggesting a potential upside of 43.40%. Given ASGN's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ASGN is more favorable than Shift4 Payments.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ASGN
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Shift4 Payments
1 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.39

95.4% of ASGN shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Shift4 Payments shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.3% of ASGN shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Shift4 Payments shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, ASGN had 1 more articles in the media than Shift4 Payments. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for ASGN and 1 mentions for Shift4 Payments. ASGN's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat Shift4 Payments' score of 1.48 indicating that ASGN is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ASGN
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Shift4 Payments
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Shift4 Payments beats ASGN on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASGN compare to RingCentral?

RingCentral (NYSE:RNG) and ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings and profitability.

RingCentral has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its share price is 14% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASGN has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

98.6% of RingCentral shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.4% of ASGN shares are held by institutional investors. 7.3% of RingCentral shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of ASGN shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ASGN has higher revenue and earnings than RingCentral. ASGN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than RingCentral, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
RingCentral$2.52B1.23$43.39M$0.9439.32
ASGN$3.98B0.20$113.50M$2.268.49

RingCentral has a net margin of 3.31% compared to ASGN's net margin of 2.46%. ASGN's return on equity of 10.30% beat RingCentral's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
RingCentral3.31% -33.75% 12.40%
ASGN 2.46%10.30%4.94%

RingCentral presently has a consensus price target of $43.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.34%. ASGN has a consensus price target of $29.33, indicating a potential upside of 52.94%. Given ASGN's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe ASGN is more favorable than RingCentral.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
RingCentral
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
ASGN
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

In the previous week, RingCentral had 4 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for RingCentral and 2 mentions for ASGN. ASGN's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat RingCentral's score of 0.91 indicating that ASGN is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
RingCentral
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ASGN
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Summary

RingCentral beats ASGN on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASGN compare to First Advantage?

First Advantage (NYSE:FA) and ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, ASGN had 2 more articles in the media than First Advantage. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for ASGN and 0 mentions for First Advantage. ASGN's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat First Advantage's score of 0.00 indicating that ASGN is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
First Advantage Neutral
ASGN Very Positive

First Advantage presently has a consensus price target of $18.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.99%. ASGN has a consensus price target of $29.33, suggesting a potential upside of 52.94%. Given ASGN's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe ASGN is more favorable than First Advantage.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
First Advantage
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
ASGN
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

ASGN has higher revenue and earnings than First Advantage. ASGN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than First Advantage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
First Advantage$1.61B1.90$37.29M$0.04444.78
ASGN$3.98B0.20$113.50M$2.268.49

94.9% of First Advantage shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.4% of ASGN shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.4% of First Advantage shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of ASGN shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

ASGN has a net margin of 2.46% compared to First Advantage's net margin of 0.65%. First Advantage's return on equity of 13.16% beat ASGN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
First Advantage0.65% 13.16% 7.33%
ASGN 2.46%10.30%4.94%

First Advantage has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASGN has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

ASGN beats First Advantage on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASGN compare to CarGurus?

ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) and CarGurus (NASDAQ:CARG) are both business services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and profitability.

CarGurus has a net margin of 15.57% compared to ASGN's net margin of 2.46%. CarGurus' return on equity of 54.42% beat ASGN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ASGN2.46% 10.30% 4.94%
CarGurus 15.57%54.42%30.14%

In the previous week, CarGurus had 6 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for CarGurus and 2 mentions for ASGN. ASGN's average media sentiment score of 1.51 beat CarGurus' score of 0.17 indicating that ASGN is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ASGN
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
CarGurus
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

ASGN currently has a consensus price target of $29.33, suggesting a potential upside of 52.94%. CarGurus has a consensus price target of $37.79, suggesting a potential upside of 14.42%. Given ASGN's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe ASGN is more favorable than CarGurus.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ASGN
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
CarGurus
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

CarGurus has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ASGN. ASGN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CarGurus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ASGN$3.98B0.20$113.50M$2.268.49
CarGurus$906.98M3.28$155.90M$1.5221.73

ASGN has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CarGurus has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

95.4% of ASGN shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.9% of CarGurus shares are held by institutional investors. 14.3% of ASGN shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.0% of CarGurus shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CarGurus beats ASGN on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ASGN News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EFOR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EFOR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EFOR vs. The Competition

MetricASGNStaffing & Employment Services IndustryBusiness SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$701.17M$471.73M$6.77B$23.23B
Dividend YieldN/A8.98%3.21%4.10%
P/E Ratio8.497.7828.3831.64
Price / Sales0.208.28376.9016.02
Price / Cash2.3313.6122.9524.58
Price / Book0.457.805.734.74
Net Income$113.50M$18.92M$205.77M$1.07B
7 Day Performance0.37%1.45%-0.16%0.99%
1 Month Performance-4.24%-2.61%-1.05%0.86%
1 Year PerformanceN/A-14.15%26.71%25.19%

ASGN Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EFOR
ASGN
4.9247 of 5 stars
$19.18
+12.4%
$29.33
+52.9%
N/A$701.17M$3.98B8.492,800
RHI
Robert Half
2.0432 of 5 stars
$31.50
-0.3%
$31.75
+0.8%
-20.9%$3.23B$5.33B24.2314,500
FOUR
Shift4 Payments
4.7747 of 5 stars
$39.50
+0.2%
$70.19
+77.7%
-51.5%$3.13B$4.18B47.026,300
RNG
RingCentral
4.5745 of 5 stars
$35.03
+0.0%
$43.00
+22.8%
+33.5%$2.94B$2.52B37.267,378
FA
First Advantage
1.2546 of 5 stars
$16.07
flat
$18.50
+15.1%
+8.3%$2.76B$1.61B535.675,500

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:EFOR) was last updated on 6/27/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners