Which has higher valuation and earnings, EPAM or EFOR?

EPAM Systems has higher revenue and earnings than ASGN. EPAM Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASGN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio EPAM Systems $5.46B 1.03 $377.68M $7.38 14.81 ASGN $3.98B 0.37 $113.50M $1.94 18.52

Is EPAM or EFOR more profitable?

EPAM Systems has a net margin of 7.15% compared to ASGN's net margin of 2.09%. EPAM Systems' return on equity of 15.84% beat ASGN's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets EPAM Systems 7.15% 15.84% 11.95% ASGN 2.09% 9.54% 4.47%

Does the media favor EPAM or EFOR?

In the previous week, EPAM Systems had 8 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for EPAM Systems and 2 mentions for ASGN. EPAM Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.28 beat ASGN's score of -0.95 indicating that EPAM Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment EPAM Systems 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral ASGN 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

Which has better valuation & earnings, KD or EFOR?

Kyndryl has higher revenue and earnings than ASGN. ASGN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kyndryl, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Kyndryl $15.09B 0.17 $199M $0.37 31.09 ASGN $3.98B 0.37 $113.50M $1.94 18.52

Is KD or EFOR more profitable?

ASGN has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Kyndryl's net margin of 0.58%. Kyndryl's return on equity of 12.24% beat ASGN's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Kyndryl 0.58% 12.24% 1.33% ASGN 2.09% 9.54% 4.47%

Does the media refer more to KD or EFOR?

In the previous week, Kyndryl had 7 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Kyndryl and 2 mentions for ASGN. Kyndryl's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat ASGN's score of -0.95 indicating that Kyndryl is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Kyndryl 2 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 2 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral ASGN 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, EFOR or DXC?

ASGN has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DXC Technology. DXC Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASGN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio ASGN $3.98B 0.37 $113.50M $1.94 18.52 DXC Technology $12.64B 0.15 $18M $0.70 16.97

Is EFOR or DXC more profitable?

ASGN has a net margin of 2.09% compared to DXC Technology's net margin of 0.99%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 15.60% beat ASGN's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets ASGN 2.09% 9.54% 4.47% DXC Technology 0.99% 15.60% 3.94%

Does the media refer more to EFOR or DXC?

In the previous week, DXC Technology had 3 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for DXC Technology and 2 mentions for ASGN. DXC Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat ASGN's score of -0.95 indicating that DXC Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment ASGN 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative DXC Technology 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate FORTY or EFOR?

ASGN has a consensus price target of $28.67, indicating a potential downside of 20.19%. Given ASGN's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ASGN is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985). Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Formula Systems (1985) 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 ASGN 2 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.88

Does the media favor FORTY or EFOR?

In the previous week, Formula Systems (1985) and Formula Systems (1985) both had 2 articles in the media. Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat ASGN's score of -0.95 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Formula Systems (1985) 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive ASGN 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

Which has higher earnings and valuation, GLOB or EFOR?

ASGN has higher revenue and earnings than Globant. Globant is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASGN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Globant $2.45B 0.63 $102.92M $2.55 13.93 ASGN $3.98B 0.37 $113.50M $1.94 18.52

Is GLOB or EFOR more profitable?

Globant has a net margin of 4.63% compared to ASGN's net margin of 2.09%. ASGN's return on equity of 9.54% beat Globant's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Globant 4.63% 9.28% 6.18% ASGN 2.09% 9.54% 4.47%

Does the media favor GLOB or EFOR?

In the previous week, Globant had 8 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Globant and 2 mentions for ASGN. Globant's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat ASGN's score of -0.95 indicating that Globant is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Globant 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral ASGN 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Negative

ASGN (EFOR) Competitors

$35.92 -0.22 (-0.61%)

As of 10/6/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Compare

EFOR vs. EPAM, KD, DXC, FORTY, and GLOB

Should you buy ASGN stock or one of its competitors? ASGN's main competitors and comparable companies include EPAM Systems (EPAM), Kyndryl (KD), DXC Technology (DXC), Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY), and Globant (GLOB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "it consulting & other services" industry.

How does ASGN compare to EPAM Systems?

EPAM Systems (NYSE:EPAM) and ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

EPAM Systems has a net margin of 7.15% compared to ASGN's net margin of 2.09%. EPAM Systems' return on equity of 15.84% beat ASGN's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
EPAM Systems	7.15%	15.84%	11.95%
ASGN	2.09%	9.54%	4.47%

EPAM Systems currently has a consensus target price of $116.47, suggesting a potential upside of 6.59%. ASGN has a consensus target price of $28.67, suggesting a potential downside of 20.19%. Given EPAM Systems' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe EPAM Systems is more favorable than ASGN.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
EPAM Systems	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.29
ASGN	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88

EPAM Systems has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASGN has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, EPAM Systems had 8 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for EPAM Systems and 2 mentions for ASGN. EPAM Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.28 beat ASGN's score of -0.95 indicating that EPAM Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
EPAM Systems	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
ASGN	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

91.6% of EPAM Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.4% of ASGN shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.8% of EPAM Systems shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of ASGN shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

EPAM Systems has higher revenue and earnings than ASGN. EPAM Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASGN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
EPAM Systems	$5.46B	1.03	$377.68M	$7.38	14.81
ASGN	$3.98B	0.37	$113.50M	$1.94	18.52

Summary

EPAM Systems beats ASGN on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASGN compare to Kyndryl?

Kyndryl (NYSE:KD) and ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership and valuation.

Kyndryl presently has a consensus target price of $16.50, indicating a potential upside of 43.42%. ASGN has a consensus target price of $28.67, indicating a potential downside of 20.19%. Given Kyndryl's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kyndryl is more favorable than ASGN.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Kyndryl	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.78
ASGN	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88

In the previous week, Kyndryl had 7 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Kyndryl and 2 mentions for ASGN. Kyndryl's average media sentiment score of 0.25 beat ASGN's score of -0.95 indicating that Kyndryl is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Kyndryl	2 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	2 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
ASGN	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Kyndryl has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its stock price is 66% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASGN has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Kyndryl has higher revenue and earnings than ASGN. ASGN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kyndryl, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Kyndryl	$15.09B	0.17	$199M	$0.37	31.09
ASGN	$3.98B	0.37	$113.50M	$1.94	18.52

ASGN has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Kyndryl's net margin of 0.58%. Kyndryl's return on equity of 12.24% beat ASGN's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Kyndryl	0.58%	12.24%	1.33%
ASGN	2.09%	9.54%	4.47%

71.5% of Kyndryl shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.4% of ASGN shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Kyndryl shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of ASGN shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Kyndryl and ASGN tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASGN compare to DXC Technology?

ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) and DXC Technology (NYSE:DXC) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

ASGN has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DXC Technology. DXC Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASGN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
ASGN	$3.98B	0.37	$113.50M	$1.94	18.52
DXC Technology	$12.64B	0.15	$18M	$0.70	16.97

In the previous week, DXC Technology had 3 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for DXC Technology and 2 mentions for ASGN. DXC Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat ASGN's score of -0.95 indicating that DXC Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
ASGN	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
DXC Technology	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

95.4% of ASGN shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of DXC Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.3% of ASGN shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of DXC Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ASGN has a net margin of 2.09% compared to DXC Technology's net margin of 0.99%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 15.60% beat ASGN's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
ASGN	2.09%	9.54%	4.47%
DXC Technology	0.99%	15.60%	3.94%

ASGN currently has a consensus target price of $28.67, indicating a potential downside of 20.19%. DXC Technology has a consensus target price of $12.21, indicating a potential upside of 2.85%. Given DXC Technology's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe DXC Technology is more favorable than ASGN.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
ASGN	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88
DXC Technology	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.78

ASGN has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DXC Technology has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

ASGN beats DXC Technology on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASGN compare to Formula Systems (1985)?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.57% compared to ASGN's net margin of 2.09%. ASGN's return on equity of 9.54% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)	21.57%	4.38%	2.13%
ASGN	2.09%	9.54%	4.47%

Formula Systems (1985) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ASGN. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASGN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)	$2.63B	0.69	$606.48M	$39.83	2.97
ASGN	$3.98B	0.37	$113.50M	$1.94	18.52

In the previous week, Formula Systems (1985) and Formula Systems (1985) both had 2 articles in the media. Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat ASGN's score of -0.95 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985)	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
ASGN	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.4% of ASGN shares are held by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of ASGN shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASGN has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

ASGN has a consensus price target of $28.67, indicating a potential downside of 20.19%. Given ASGN's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ASGN is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
ASGN	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88

Summary

Formula Systems (1985) beats ASGN on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASGN compare to Globant?

Globant (NYSE:GLOB) and ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, risk, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

ASGN has higher revenue and earnings than Globant. Globant is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASGN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Globant	$2.45B	0.63	$102.92M	$2.55	13.93
ASGN	$3.98B	0.37	$113.50M	$1.94	18.52

In the previous week, Globant had 8 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Globant and 2 mentions for ASGN. Globant's average media sentiment score of 0.22 beat ASGN's score of -0.95 indicating that Globant is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Globant	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
ASGN	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Globant currently has a consensus target price of $44.81, indicating a potential upside of 26.16%. ASGN has a consensus target price of $28.67, indicating a potential downside of 20.19%. Given Globant's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Globant is more favorable than ASGN.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Globant	2 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.17
ASGN	2 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.88

Globant has a beta of 0.98, suggesting that its stock price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASGN has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

91.6% of Globant shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.4% of ASGN shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Globant shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of ASGN shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Globant has a net margin of 4.63% compared to ASGN's net margin of 2.09%. ASGN's return on equity of 9.54% beat Globant's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Globant	4.63%	9.28%	6.18%
ASGN	2.09%	9.54%	4.47%

Summary

Globant beats ASGN on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ASGN News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EFOR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

EFOR vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	ASGN	IT Services Industry	Technology Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.48B	$11.49B	$32.07B	$22.91B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.86%	2.75%	3.72%
P/E Ratio	18.52	13.84	82.11	28.18
Price / Sales	0.37	62.86	585.00	15.01
Price / Cash	4.95	43.52	51.56	36.95
Price / Book	0.85	9.29	8.24	4.72
Net Income	$113.50M	$280.14M	$766.70M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	9.05%	0.61%	1.50%	1.31%
1 Month Performance	10.42%	-3.32%	0.25%	-4.97%
1 Year Performance	N/A	16.18%	169.22%	6.66%

ASGN Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
EFOR ASGN	2.8398 of 5 stars	$35.92 -0.6%	$28.67 -20.2%	N/A	$1.48B	$3.97B	18.52	2,800
EPAM EPAM Systems	2.8767 of 5 stars	$108.09 -5.5%	$116.47 +7.7%	-28.4%	$5.90B	$5.46B	14.65	62,850
KD Kyndryl	3.5274 of 5 stars	$11.56 -4.6%	$16.50 +42.8%	-62.5%	$2.52B	$14.97B	31.24	72,000
DXC DXC Technology	3.3427 of 5 stars	$11.10 -4.7%	$12.21 +10.1%	-13.0%	$1.86B	$12.48B	15.85	115,000
FORTY Formula Systems (1985)	1.715 of 5 stars	$113.50 flat	N/A	-15.0%	$1.74B	$2.63B	2.85	19,337	News Coverage High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:EFOR) was last updated on 10/7/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

ASGN (EFOR) Competitors