Go Pro

ASGN (EFOR) Competitors

$31.57 -0.07 (-0.22%)
As of 03:58 PM Eastern

EFOR vs. KD, DXC, FORTY, GLOB, and BBAI

Should you buy ASGN stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares ASGN with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with ASGN include Kyndryl (KD), DXC Technology (DXC), Formula Systems (1985) (FORTY), Globant (GLOB), and BigBear.ai (BBAI). These companies are all part of the "it consulting & other services" industry.

How does ASGN compare to Kyndryl?

Kyndryl (NYSE:KD) and ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Kyndryl presently has a consensus price target of $16.83, suggesting a potential upside of 20.32%. ASGN has a consensus price target of $28.67, suggesting a potential downside of 9.20%. Given Kyndryl's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Kyndryl is more favorable than ASGN.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kyndryl
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.78
ASGN
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

ASGN has a net margin of 2.09% compared to Kyndryl's net margin of 0.58%. Kyndryl's return on equity of 11.90% beat ASGN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kyndryl0.58% 11.90% 1.34%
ASGN 2.09%9.54%4.47%

Kyndryl has higher revenue and earnings than ASGN. ASGN is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kyndryl, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kyndryl$15.09B0.20$199M$0.8516.46
ASGN$3.98B0.33$113.50M$1.9416.27

In the previous week, Kyndryl had 11 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Kyndryl and 6 mentions for ASGN. ASGN's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Kyndryl's score of 0.55 indicating that ASGN is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kyndryl
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
ASGN
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Kyndryl has a beta of 1.65, indicating that its share price is 65% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASGN has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

71.5% of Kyndryl shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.4% of ASGN shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Kyndryl shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of ASGN shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

ASGN beats Kyndryl on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASGN compare to DXC Technology?

ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) and DXC Technology (NYSE:DXC) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and dividends.

ASGN currently has a consensus price target of $28.67, indicating a potential downside of 9.20%. DXC Technology has a consensus price target of $12.44, indicating a potential upside of 12.85%. Given DXC Technology's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe DXC Technology is more favorable than ASGN.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ASGN
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
DXC Technology
3 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.70

ASGN has higher earnings, but lower revenue than DXC Technology. DXC Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASGN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ASGN$3.98B0.33$113.50M$1.9416.27
DXC Technology$12.64B0.14$18M$0.7015.74

In the previous week, DXC Technology had 14 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for DXC Technology and 6 mentions for ASGN. ASGN's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat DXC Technology's score of 0.20 indicating that ASGN is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ASGN
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
DXC Technology
8 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

95.4% of ASGN shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.2% of DXC Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.3% of ASGN shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of DXC Technology shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ASGN has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DXC Technology has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its share price is 21% less volatile than the broader market.

ASGN has a net margin of 2.09% compared to DXC Technology's net margin of 0.99%. DXC Technology's return on equity of 15.60% beat ASGN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ASGN2.09% 9.54% 4.47%
DXC Technology 0.99%15.60%3.94%

Summary

ASGN beats DXC Technology on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASGN compare to Formula Systems (1985)?

Formula Systems (1985) (NASDAQ:FORTY) and ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, dividends and profitability.

ASGN has a consensus price target of $28.67, suggesting a potential downside of 9.20%. Given ASGN's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ASGN is more favorable than Formula Systems (1985).

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Formula Systems (1985)
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
ASGN
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13

Formula Systems (1985) has a net margin of 21.58% compared to ASGN's net margin of 2.09%. ASGN's return on equity of 9.54% beat Formula Systems (1985)'s return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Formula Systems (1985)21.58% 4.01% 1.94%
ASGN 2.09%9.54%4.47%

In the previous week, ASGN had 6 more articles in the media than Formula Systems (1985). MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for ASGN and 0 mentions for Formula Systems (1985). Formula Systems (1985)'s average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat ASGN's score of 0.79 indicating that Formula Systems (1985) is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Formula Systems (1985) Positive
ASGN Positive

Formula Systems (1985) has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ASGN has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Formula Systems (1985) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than ASGN. Formula Systems (1985) is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASGN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Formula Systems (1985)$2.63B0.63$606.48M$39.312.77
ASGN$3.98B0.33$113.50M$1.9416.27

34.8% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.4% of ASGN shares are held by institutional investors. 23.3% of Formula Systems (1985) shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.3% of ASGN shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

ASGN beats Formula Systems (1985) on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASGN compare to Globant?

ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) and Globant (NYSE:GLOB) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

ASGN has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Globant has a beta of 1.02, indicating that its share price is 2% more volatile than the broader market.

Globant has a net margin of 4.46% compared to ASGN's net margin of 2.09%. Globant's return on equity of 9.87% beat ASGN's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ASGN2.09% 9.54% 4.47%
Globant 4.46%9.87%6.51%

95.4% of ASGN shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.6% of Globant shares are held by institutional investors. 14.3% of ASGN shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Globant shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Globant had 1 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Globant and 6 mentions for ASGN. Globant's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat ASGN's score of 0.79 indicating that Globant is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ASGN
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Globant
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

ASGN presently has a consensus target price of $28.67, suggesting a potential downside of 9.20%. Globant has a consensus target price of $52.75, suggesting a potential upside of 41.70%. Given Globant's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Globant is more favorable than ASGN.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ASGN
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
Globant
1 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

ASGN has higher revenue and earnings than Globant. Globant is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASGN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ASGN$3.98B0.33$113.50M$1.9416.27
Globant$2.45B0.66$102.92M$2.4615.13

Summary

Globant beats ASGN on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does ASGN compare to BigBear.ai?

ASGN (NYSE:EFOR) and BigBear.ai (NYSE:BBAI) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, BigBear.ai had 21 more articles in the media than ASGN. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for BigBear.ai and 6 mentions for ASGN. ASGN's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat BigBear.ai's score of 0.43 indicating that ASGN is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ASGN
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BigBear.ai
7 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

ASGN currently has a consensus price target of $28.67, suggesting a potential downside of 9.20%. BigBear.ai has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 66.39%. Given BigBear.ai's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe BigBear.ai is more favorable than ASGN.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ASGN
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.13
BigBear.ai
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

95.4% of ASGN shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.6% of BigBear.ai shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.3% of ASGN shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of BigBear.ai shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

ASGN has higher revenue and earnings than BigBear.ai. BigBear.ai is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ASGN, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ASGN$3.98B0.33$113.50M$1.9416.27
BigBear.ai$127.67M11.29-$293.91M-$0.21N/A

ASGN has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BigBear.ai has a beta of 3.35, meaning that its share price is 235% more volatile than the broader market.

ASGN has a net margin of 2.09% compared to BigBear.ai's net margin of -65.20%. ASGN's return on equity of 9.54% beat BigBear.ai's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ASGN2.09% 9.54% 4.47%
BigBear.ai -65.20%-13.44%-10.63%

Summary

ASGN beats BigBear.ai on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get ASGN News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for EFOR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EFOR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

EFOR vs. The Competition

MetricASGNIT Services IndustryTechnology SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.30B$11.01B$29.71B$24.13B
Dividend YieldN/A2.87%2.74%3.71%
P/E Ratio16.2714.8073.5626.06
Price / Sales0.3359.50598.0718.72
Price / Cash4.3342.3250.0833.25
Price / Book0.7224.279.166.84
Net Income$113.50M$273.10M$660.31M$1.06B
7 Day Performance14.84%3.08%3.86%1.75%
1 Month Performance79.27%2.57%-1.90%1.35%
1 Year PerformanceN/A26.76%149.99%19.16%

ASGN Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
EFOR
ASGN
3.2459 of 5 stars
$31.57
-0.2%
$28.67
-9.2%
N/A$1.30B$3.98B16.272,800
KD
Kyndryl
3.7866 of 5 stars
$13.60
+0.7%
$16.67
+22.5%
-52.2%$2.98B$15.09B16.0072,000
DXC
DXC Technology
4.574 of 5 stars
$11.30
+0.5%
$11.81
+4.5%
-16.0%$1.84B$12.64B16.14115,000
FORTY
Formula Systems (1985)
2.0693 of 5 stars
$108.02
+1.8%
N/A-1.8%$1.63B$2.63B2.7519,337
GLOB
Globant
4.1912 of 5 stars
$36.53
+0.4%
$52.75
+44.4%
-51.8%$1.60B$2.45B14.8528,773

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:EFOR) was last updated on 8/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners