Does the media prefer EPAC or FELE?

In the previous week, Enerpac Tool Group and Enerpac Tool Group both had 1 articles in the media. Enerpac Tool Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Franklin Electric'saverage media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Enerpac Tool Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Franklin Electric 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media prefer EPAC or MSA?

In the previous week, MSA Safety Incorporporated had 2 more articles in the media than Enerpac Tool Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MSA Safety Incorporporated and 1 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group. MSA Safety Incorporporated's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 0.00 indicating that MSA Safety Incorporporated is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Enerpac Tool Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral MSA Safety Incorporporated 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor EPAC or ESE?

In the previous week, ESCO Technologies had 6 more articles in the media than Enerpac Tool Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for ESCO Technologies and 1 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group. ESCO Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 0.00 indicating that ESCO Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Enerpac Tool Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral ESCO Technologies 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor EPAC or GTES?

In the previous week, Gates Industrial had 3 more articles in the media than Enerpac Tool Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gates Industrial and 1 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group. Gates Industrial's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Gates Industrial is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Enerpac Tool Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Gates Industrial 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better valuation and earnings, NPO or EPAC?

Enerpac Tool Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Enpro. Enerpac Tool Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enpro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Enpro $1.14B 6.17 $40.50M $2.05 162.43 Enerpac Tool Group $616.90M 2.95 $92.75M $1.77 20.14

Is NPO or EPAC more profitable?

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 14.72% compared to Enpro's net margin of 3.60%. Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 23.21% beat Enpro's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Enpro 3.60% 11.83% 7.10% Enerpac Tool Group 14.72% 23.21% 12.10%

Does the media refer more to NPO or EPAC?

In the previous week, Enpro had 1 more articles in the media than Enerpac Tool Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Enpro and 1 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group. Enpro's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Enpro is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Enpro 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Enerpac Tool Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC) Competitors

$35.64 +0.67 (+1.92%)

Closing price 10/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$35.64 0.00 (0.00%)

As of 10/2/2026 07:30 PM Eastern

Compare

EPAC vs. FELE, MSA, ESE, GTES, and NPO

Should you buy Enerpac Tool Group stock or one of its competitors? Enerpac Tool Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Franklin Electric (FELE), MSA Safety Incorporporated (MSA), ESCO Technologies (ESE), Gates Industrial (GTES), and Enpro (NPO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "industrial machinery & supplies & components" industry.

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to Franklin Electric?

Enerpac Tool Group (NYSE:EPAC) and Franklin Electric (NASDAQ:FELE) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Enerpac Tool Group and Enerpac Tool Group both had 1 articles in the media. Enerpac Tool Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Franklin Electric'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Franklin Electric	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Enerpac Tool Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Franklin Electric pays an annual dividend of $1.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Franklin Electric pays out 32.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Franklin Electric has raised its dividend for 33 consecutive years. Franklin Electric is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 14.72% compared to Franklin Electric's net margin of 7.06%. Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 23.21% beat Franklin Electric's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerpac Tool Group	14.72%	23.21%	12.10%
Franklin Electric	7.06%	15.18%	10.13%

Enerpac Tool Group currently has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.29%. Franklin Electric has a consensus price target of $114.50, indicating a potential upside of 16.07%. Given Enerpac Tool Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enerpac Tool Group is more favorable than Franklin Electric.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Franklin Electric	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Franklin Electric has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its share price is 3% more volatile than the broader market.

97.7% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.0% of Franklin Electric shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Franklin Electric shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Franklin Electric has higher revenue and earnings than Enerpac Tool Group. Enerpac Tool Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Franklin Electric, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerpac Tool Group	$616.90M	2.95	$92.75M	$1.77	20.14
Franklin Electric	$2.13B	2.05	$147.09M	$3.47	28.43

Summary

Enerpac Tool Group beats Franklin Electric on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to MSA Safety Incorporporated?

Enerpac Tool Group (NYSE:EPAC) and MSA Safety Incorporporated (NYSE:MSA) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, MSA Safety Incorporporated had 2 more articles in the media than Enerpac Tool Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for MSA Safety Incorporporated and 1 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group. MSA Safety Incorporporated's average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 0.00 indicating that MSA Safety Incorporporated is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
MSA Safety Incorporporated	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MSA Safety Incorporporated has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

MSA Safety Incorporporated has higher revenue and earnings than Enerpac Tool Group. Enerpac Tool Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MSA Safety Incorporporated, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerpac Tool Group	$616.90M	2.95	$92.75M	$1.77	20.14
MSA Safety Incorporporated	$1.87B	3.73	$278.92M	$8.04	22.55

Enerpac Tool Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. MSA Safety Incorporporated pays an annual dividend of $2.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MSA Safety Incorporporated pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MSA Safety Incorporporated has increased its dividend for 56 consecutive years. MSA Safety Incorporporated is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

MSA Safety Incorporporated has a net margin of 16.13% compared to Enerpac Tool Group's net margin of 14.72%. MSA Safety Incorporporated's return on equity of 25.13% beat Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerpac Tool Group	14.72%	23.21%	12.10%
MSA Safety Incorporporated	16.13%	25.13%	13.24%

97.7% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.5% of MSA Safety Incorporporated shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of MSA Safety Incorporporated shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Enerpac Tool Group currently has a consensus target price of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 40.29%. MSA Safety Incorporporated has a consensus target price of $211.33, suggesting a potential upside of 16.54%. Given Enerpac Tool Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Enerpac Tool Group is more favorable than MSA Safety Incorporporated.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
MSA Safety Incorporporated	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

MSA Safety Incorporporated beats Enerpac Tool Group on 15 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to ESCO Technologies?

Enerpac Tool Group (NYSE:EPAC) and ESCO Technologies (NYSE:ESE) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and earnings.

ESCO Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Enerpac Tool Group. Enerpac Tool Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESCO Technologies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerpac Tool Group	$616.90M	2.95	$92.75M	$1.77	20.14
ESCO Technologies	$1.29B	5.52	$299.22M	$12.14	22.66

Enerpac Tool Group presently has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.29%. ESCO Technologies has a consensus price target of $416.50, indicating a potential upside of 51.41%. Given ESCO Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ESCO Technologies is more favorable than Enerpac Tool Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
ESCO Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

ESCO Technologies has a net margin of 24.39% compared to Enerpac Tool Group's net margin of 14.72%. Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 23.21% beat ESCO Technologies' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerpac Tool Group	14.72%	23.21%	12.10%
ESCO Technologies	24.39%	13.28%	8.69%

Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ESCO Technologies has a beta of 1.05, suggesting that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

97.7% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of ESCO Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of ESCO Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Enerpac Tool Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. ESCO Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. ESCO Technologies pays out 2.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, ESCO Technologies had 6 more articles in the media than Enerpac Tool Group. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for ESCO Technologies and 1 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group. ESCO Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.19 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 0.00 indicating that ESCO Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
ESCO Technologies	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

ESCO Technologies beats Enerpac Tool Group on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to Gates Industrial?

Enerpac Tool Group (NYSE:EPAC) and Gates Industrial (NYSE:GTES) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and earnings.

97.7% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.5% of Gates Industrial shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Gates Industrial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Enerpac Tool Group currently has a consensus target price of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.29%. Gates Industrial has a consensus target price of $32.45, indicating a potential upside of 17.40%. Given Enerpac Tool Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Enerpac Tool Group is more favorable than Gates Industrial.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Gates Industrial	0 Sell rating(s)	4 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.69

Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gates Industrial has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gates Industrial had 3 more articles in the media than Enerpac Tool Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gates Industrial and 1 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group. Gates Industrial's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Gates Industrial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Gates Industrial	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Gates Industrial has higher revenue and earnings than Enerpac Tool Group. Gates Industrial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enerpac Tool Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enerpac Tool Group	$616.90M	2.95	$92.75M	$1.77	20.14
Gates Industrial	$3.44B	2.03	$251.40M	$1.41	19.61

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 14.72% compared to Gates Industrial's net margin of 10.37%. Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 23.21% beat Gates Industrial's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enerpac Tool Group	14.72%	23.21%	12.10%
Gates Industrial	10.37%	10.11%	5.27%

Summary

Gates Industrial beats Enerpac Tool Group on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to Enpro?

Enpro (NYSE:NPO) and Enerpac Tool Group (NYSE:EPAC) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

Enerpac Tool Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Enpro. Enerpac Tool Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Enpro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Enpro	$1.14B	6.17	$40.50M	$2.05	162.43
Enerpac Tool Group	$616.90M	2.95	$92.75M	$1.77	20.14

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 14.72% compared to Enpro's net margin of 3.60%. Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 23.21% beat Enpro's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Enpro	3.60%	11.83%	7.10%
Enerpac Tool Group	14.72%	23.21%	12.10%

Enpro currently has a consensus price target of $358.33, indicating a potential upside of 7.61%. Enerpac Tool Group has a consensus price target of $50.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.29%. Given Enerpac Tool Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Enerpac Tool Group is more favorable than Enpro.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Enpro	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

98.3% of Enpro shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.7% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Enpro shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Enerpac Tool Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Enpro pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Enerpac Tool Group pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.1%. Enpro pays out 62.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Enpro has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Enpro is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Enpro has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Enpro had 1 more articles in the media than Enerpac Tool Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Enpro and 1 mentions for Enerpac Tool Group. Enpro's average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Enerpac Tool Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Enpro is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Enpro	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Enerpac Tool Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Enpro beats Enerpac Tool Group on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Enerpac Tool Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding EPAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

EPAC vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Enerpac Tool Group	Machinery Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$1.82B	$11.26B	$10.18B	$22.78B
Dividend Yield	0.11%	2.31%	96.95%	3.73%
P/E Ratio	20.14	21.46	25.51	27.75
Price / Sales	2.95	62.34	270.01	21.29
Price / Cash	16.78	23.30	24.09	38.23
Price / Book	4.44	4.30	4.80	4.64
Net Income	$92.75M	$380.78M	$616.94M	$1.08B
7 Day Performance	-0.32%	-0.42%	-0.58%	-1.06%
1 Month Performance	-4.52%	-2.83%	-2.51%	-5.60%
1 Year Performance	-13.76%	5.98%	2.71%	5.09%

Enerpac Tool Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
EPAC Enerpac Tool Group	3.5713 of 5 stars	$35.64 +1.9%	$50.00 +40.3%	-13.8%	$1.82B	$616.90M	20.14	2,100
FELE Franklin Electric	3.9225 of 5 stars	$96.42 -1.2%	$114.50 +18.8%	+2.4%	$4.26B	$2.13B	27.78	6,500
MSA MSA Safety Incorporporated	4.6601 of 5 stars	$180.69 -0.9%	$211.33 +17.0%	+4.3%	$6.98B	$1.87B	22.52	5,300	Positive News
ESE ESCO Technologies	4.2413 of 5 stars	$264.98 -0.4%	$416.50 +57.2%	+31.8%	$6.86B	$1.10B	21.82	3,425	News Coverage
GTES Gates Industrial	3.753 of 5 stars	$26.68 +0.0%	$32.45 +21.6%	+7.3%	$6.76B	$3.44B	18.93	13,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:EPAC) was last updated on 10/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC) Competitors

EPAC vs. FELE, MSA, ESE, GTES, and NPO

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to Franklin Electric?

Summary

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to MSA Safety Incorporporated?

Summary

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to ESCO Technologies?

Summary

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to Gates Industrial?

Summary

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to Enpro?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

EPAC vs. The Competition

Enerpac Tool Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Enerpac Tool Group (EPAC) Competitors

EPAC vs. FELE, MSA, ESE, GTES, and NPO

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to Franklin Electric?

Does the media prefer EPAC or FELE?

Is EPAC or FELE a better dividend stock?

Is EPAC or FELE more profitable?

Do analysts rate EPAC or FELE?

Which has more volatility and risk, EPAC or FELE?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in EPAC or FELE?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, EPAC or FELE?

Summary

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to MSA Safety Incorporporated?

Does the media prefer EPAC or MSA?

Which has more volatility & risk, EPAC or MSA?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, EPAC or MSA?

Is EPAC or MSA a better dividend stock?

Is EPAC or MSA more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in EPAC or MSA?

Do analysts prefer EPAC or MSA?

Summary

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to ESCO Technologies?

Which has higher earnings & valuation, EPAC or ESE?

Do analysts prefer EPAC or ESE?

Is EPAC or ESE more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, EPAC or ESE?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in EPAC or ESE?

Is EPAC or ESE a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor EPAC or ESE?

Summary

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to Gates Industrial?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in EPAC or GTES?

Do analysts rate EPAC or GTES?

Which has more volatility and risk, EPAC or GTES?

Does the media favor EPAC or GTES?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, EPAC or GTES?

Is EPAC or GTES more profitable?

Summary

How does Enerpac Tool Group compare to Enpro?

Which has better valuation and earnings, NPO or EPAC?

Is NPO or EPAC more profitable?

Do analysts rate NPO or EPAC?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of NPO or EPAC?

Is NPO or EPAC a better dividend stock?

Which has more volatility & risk, NPO or EPAC?

Does the media refer more to NPO or EPAC?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

EPAC vs. The Competition

Enerpac Tool Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools