Which has stronger earnings & valuation, HAYW or POOL?

Pool has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Pool is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hayward $1.12B 2.45 $151.57M $0.74 17.52 Pool $5.39B 1.16 $406.40M $10.87 15.87

Is HAYW or POOL more profitable?

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Pool's net margin of 7.40%. Pool's return on equity of 32.74% beat Hayward's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hayward 13.83% 11.61% 5.91% Pool 7.40% 32.74% 10.91%

Does the media refer more to HAYW or POOL?

In the previous week, Pool had 24 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Pool and 3 mentions for Hayward. Pool's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Hayward's score of 0.37 indicating that Pool is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hayward 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Pool 7 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 8 Neutral mention(s) 3 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, UFPI or HAYW?

UFP Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Hayward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UFP Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio UFP Industries $6.32B 0.71 $294.79M $4.36 18.74 Hayward $1.12B 2.45 $151.57M $0.74 17.52

Is UFPI or HAYW more profitable?

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to UFP Industries' net margin of 3.99%. Hayward's return on equity of 11.61% beat UFP Industries' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets UFP Industries 3.99% 8.00% 6.11% Hayward 13.83% 11.61% 5.91%

Does the media prefer UFPI or HAYW?

In the previous week, UFP Industries and UFP Industries both had 3 articles in the media. UFP Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Hayward's score of 0.37 indicating that UFP Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment UFP Industries 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hayward 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings & valuation, BC or HAYW?

Hayward has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Brunswick $5.36B 0.85 -$137.30M -$1.31 N/A Hayward $1.12B 2.45 $151.57M $0.74 17.52

Is BC or HAYW more profitable?

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Hayward's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Brunswick -1.53% 15.28% 4.60% Hayward 13.83% 11.61% 5.91%

Does the media prefer BC or HAYW?

In the previous week, Brunswick had 1 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Brunswick and 3 mentions for Hayward. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Hayward's score of 0.37 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Brunswick 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hayward 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media refer more to HAYW or FBIN?

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 2 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 3 mentions for Hayward. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Hayward's score of 0.37 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hayward 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Fortune Brands Innovations 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, MAS or HAYW?

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Masco $7.56B 1.82 $810M $4.35 16.02 Hayward $1.12B 2.45 $151.57M $0.74 17.52

Is MAS or HAYW more profitable?

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Masco's net margin of 11.61%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Hayward's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Masco 11.61% 2,379.08% 17.21% Hayward 13.83% 11.61% 5.91%

Does the media refer more to MAS or HAYW?

In the previous week, Masco had 3 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Masco and 3 mentions for Hayward. Masco's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Hayward's score of 0.37 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Masco 6 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hayward 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Hayward (HAYW) Competitors

$12.86 -0.25 (-1.88%)

As of 03:59 PM Eastern

Compare

HAYW vs. POOL, UFPI, BC, FBIN, and MAS

Should you buy Hayward stock or one of its competitors? Hayward's main competitors and comparable companies include Pool (POOL), UFP Industries (UFPI), Brunswick (BC), Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN), and Masco (MAS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Hayward compare to Pool?

Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) and Pool (NASDAQ:POOL) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Hayward presently has a consensus price target of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 34.98%. Pool has a consensus price target of $230.10, indicating a potential upside of 33.36%. Given Hayward's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Hayward is more favorable than Pool.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hayward	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Pool	2 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.21

Pool has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Pool is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hayward	$1.12B	2.45	$151.57M	$0.74	17.52
Pool	$5.39B	1.16	$406.40M	$10.87	15.87

In the previous week, Pool had 24 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Pool and 3 mentions for Hayward. Pool's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Hayward's score of 0.37 indicating that Pool is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hayward	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Pool	7 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	8 Neutral mention(s)	3 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

99.0% of Pool shares are held by institutional investors. 4.7% of Hayward shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Pool shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hayward has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pool has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Pool's net margin of 7.40%. Pool's return on equity of 32.74% beat Hayward's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hayward	13.83%	11.61%	5.91%
Pool	7.40%	32.74%	10.91%

Summary

Pool beats Hayward on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hayward compare to UFP Industries?

UFP Industries (NASDAQ:UFPI) and Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

UFP Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Hayward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UFP Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UFP Industries	$6.32B	0.71	$294.79M	$4.36	18.74
Hayward	$1.12B	2.45	$151.57M	$0.74	17.52

In the previous week, UFP Industries and UFP Industries both had 3 articles in the media. UFP Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Hayward's score of 0.37 indicating that UFP Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
UFP Industries	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hayward	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

UFP Industries has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hayward has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

UFP Industries presently has a consensus target price of $104.50, suggesting a potential upside of 27.87%. Hayward has a consensus target price of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 34.98%. Given Hayward's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hayward is more favorable than UFP Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
UFP Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Hayward	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

81.8% of UFP Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Hayward shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to UFP Industries' net margin of 3.99%. Hayward's return on equity of 11.61% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UFP Industries	3.99%	8.00%	6.11%
Hayward	13.83%	11.61%	5.91%

Summary

UFP Industries beats Hayward on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hayward compare to Brunswick?

Brunswick (NYSE:BC) and Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Hayward's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Brunswick	-1.53%	15.28%	4.60%
Hayward	13.83%	11.61%	5.91%

99.3% of Brunswick shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brunswick shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Hayward shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hayward has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Brunswick	$5.36B	0.85	-$137.30M	-$1.31	N/A
Hayward	$1.12B	2.45	$151.57M	$0.74	17.52

In the previous week, Brunswick had 1 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Brunswick and 3 mentions for Hayward. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Hayward's score of 0.37 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Brunswick	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hayward	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Brunswick presently has a consensus target price of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 24.95%. Hayward has a consensus target price of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 34.98%. Given Hayward's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hayward is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Brunswick	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Hayward	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Brunswick has a beta of 1.34, indicating that its stock price is 34% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hayward has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Brunswick beats Hayward on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hayward compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) and Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Hayward presently has a consensus price target of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 34.98%. Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $55.43, suggesting a potential upside of 35.03%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Hayward.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hayward	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Fortune Brands Innovations	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.41

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 3.39%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 19.50% beat Hayward's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hayward	13.83%	11.61%	5.91%
Fortune Brands Innovations	3.39%	19.50%	7.09%

Hayward has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Hayward shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fortune Brands Innovations has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Hayward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hayward	$1.12B	2.45	$151.57M	$0.74	17.52
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.46B	1.10	$298.80M	$1.23	33.37

In the previous week, Fortune Brands Innovations had 2 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations and 3 mentions for Hayward. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.05 beat Hayward's score of 0.37 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hayward	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Fortune Brands Innovations	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats Hayward on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hayward compare to Masco?

Masco (NYSE:MAS) and Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Masco has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hayward has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Masco's net margin of 11.61%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Hayward's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Masco	11.61%	2,379.08%	17.21%
Hayward	13.83%	11.61%	5.91%

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Masco	$7.56B	1.82	$810M	$4.35	16.02
Hayward	$1.12B	2.45	$151.57M	$0.74	17.52

In the previous week, Masco had 3 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Masco and 3 mentions for Hayward. Masco's average media sentiment score of 1.19 beat Hayward's score of 0.37 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Masco	6 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hayward	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Masco shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Hayward shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Masco presently has a consensus target price of $79.56, indicating a potential upside of 14.19%. Hayward has a consensus target price of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 34.98%. Given Hayward's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hayward is more favorable than Masco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Masco	1 Sell rating(s)	11 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.32
Hayward	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

Summary

Masco beats Hayward on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hayward News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HAYW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HAYW vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Hayward	Building Products Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.75B	$7.98B	$10.21B	$23.24B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.18%	97.17%	3.58%
P/E Ratio	17.52	46.89	25.65	28.62
Price / Sales	2.45	18.18	335.22	21.01
Price / Cash	12.28	14.62	23.85	19.47
Price / Book	1.76	7.13	4.85	4.75
Net Income	$151.57M	$4.88B	$612.64M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-6.93%	-3.39%	0.06%	-2.28%
1 Month Performance	-14.51%	-7.09%	-3.51%	-3.53%
1 Year Performance	-16.92%	-3.52%	5.87%	9.90%

Hayward Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HAYW Hayward	3.4733 of 5 stars	$12.86 -1.9%	$17.50 +36.0%	-15.9%	$2.73B	$1.12B	17.41	1,980
POOL Pool	4.8033 of 5 stars	$178.52 -3.6%	$233.10 +30.6%	-46.9%	$6.49B	$5.39B	16.43	6,000	Analyst Forecast
UFPI UFP Industries	4.657 of 5 stars	$83.68 -0.8%	$104.50 +24.9%	-18.4%	$4.61B	$6.32B	19.17	13,800	Positive News
BC Brunswick	4.1346 of 5 stars	$72.04 -3.2%	$88.00 +22.2%	+8.2%	$4.67B	$5.36B	N/A	14,000	Positive News
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations	4.7497 of 5 stars	$42.49 -1.4%	$55.71 +31.1%	-31.5%	$5.07B	$4.46B	34.52	10,000	Positive News Analyst Forecast Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:HAYW) was last updated on 9/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Hayward (HAYW) Competitors