Which has higher earnings & valuation, HAYW or POOL?

Pool has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Pool is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hayward $1.12B 2.74 $151.57M $0.74 19.60 Pool $5.29B 1.29 $406.40M $10.87 17.32

Is HAYW or POOL more profitable?

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Pool's net margin of 7.40%. Pool's return on equity of 32.74% beat Hayward's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hayward 13.83% 11.61% 5.91% Pool 7.40% 32.74% 10.91%

Does the media prefer HAYW or POOL?

In the previous week, Pool had 24 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Pool and 12 mentions for Hayward. Pool's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Hayward's score of 0.83 indicating that Pool is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hayward 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Pool 26 Very Positive mention(s) 6 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher valuation & earnings, UFPI or HAYW?

UFP Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Hayward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UFP Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio UFP Industries $6.32B 0.78 $294.79M $4.36 20.47 Hayward $1.12B 2.74 $151.57M $0.74 19.60

Is UFPI or HAYW more profitable?

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to UFP Industries' net margin of 3.99%. Hayward's return on equity of 11.61% beat UFP Industries' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets UFP Industries 3.99% 8.00% 6.11% Hayward 13.83% 11.61% 5.91%

Does the media favor UFPI or HAYW?

In the previous week, UFP Industries had 8 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for UFP Industries and 12 mentions for Hayward. Hayward's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat UFP Industries' score of 0.54 indicating that Hayward is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment UFP Industries 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hayward 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has higher earnings and valuation, HAYW or BC?

Hayward has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hayward $1.12B 2.74 $151.57M $0.74 19.60 Brunswick $5.36B 0.98 -$137.30M -$1.31 N/A

Is HAYW or BC more profitable?

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Hayward's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hayward 13.83% 11.61% 5.91% Brunswick -1.53% 15.28% 4.60%

Does the media refer more to HAYW or BC?

In the previous week, Hayward had 5 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Hayward and 7 mentions for Brunswick. Hayward's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Brunswick's score of 0.69 indicating that Hayward is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hayward 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Brunswick 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Does the media favor FBIN or HAYW?

In the previous week, Hayward had 3 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Hayward and 9 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Hayward's score of 0.83 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Fortune Brands Innovations 6 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hayward 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, HAYW or MAS?

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Hayward $1.12B 2.74 $151.57M $0.74 19.60 Masco $7.56B 1.91 $810M $4.35 16.83

Is HAYW or MAS more profitable?

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Masco's net margin of 11.61%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Hayward's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Hayward 13.83% 11.61% 5.91% Masco 11.61% 2,379.08% 17.21%

Does the media refer more to HAYW or MAS?

In the previous week, Masco had 21 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Masco and 12 mentions for Hayward. Masco's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Hayward's score of 0.83 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Hayward 6 Very Positive mention(s) 3 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Masco 20 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Hayward (HAYW) Competitors

$14.51 -0.07 (-0.50%)

Closing price 08/24/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$14.61 +0.11 (+0.74%)

As of 04:21 AM Eastern

Compare

HAYW vs. POOL, UFPI, BC, FBIN, and MAS

Should you buy Hayward stock or one of its competitors? Hayward's main competitors and comparable companies include Pool (POOL), UFP Industries (UFPI), Brunswick (BC), Fortune Brands Innovations (FBIN), and Masco (MAS). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Hayward compare to Pool?

Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) and Pool (NASDAQ:POOL) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Hayward currently has a consensus target price of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.63%. Pool has a consensus target price of $233.10, suggesting a potential upside of 23.83%. Given Pool's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Pool is more favorable than Hayward.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hayward	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Pool	2 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.23

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Pool's net margin of 7.40%. Pool's return on equity of 32.74% beat Hayward's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hayward	13.83%	11.61%	5.91%
Pool	7.40%	32.74%	10.91%

Pool has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Pool is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hayward	$1.12B	2.74	$151.57M	$0.74	19.60
Pool	$5.29B	1.29	$406.40M	$10.87	17.32

Hayward has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pool has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

99.0% of Pool shares are held by institutional investors. 4.7% of Hayward shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of Pool shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Pool had 24 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Pool and 12 mentions for Hayward. Pool's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Hayward's score of 0.83 indicating that Pool is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hayward	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Pool	26 Very Positive mention(s)	6 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Pool beats Hayward on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hayward compare to UFP Industries?

UFP Industries (NASDAQ:UFPI) and Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and profitability.

UFP Industries has a beta of 1.23, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hayward has a beta of 1.09, indicating that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

UFP Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Hayward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UFP Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
UFP Industries	$6.32B	0.78	$294.79M	$4.36	20.47
Hayward	$1.12B	2.74	$151.57M	$0.74	19.60

81.8% of UFP Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Hayward shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to UFP Industries' net margin of 3.99%. Hayward's return on equity of 11.61% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
UFP Industries	3.99%	8.00%	6.11%
Hayward	13.83%	11.61%	5.91%

UFP Industries presently has a consensus price target of $104.50, suggesting a potential upside of 17.11%. Hayward has a consensus price target of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.63%. Given Hayward's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Hayward is more favorable than UFP Industries.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
UFP Industries	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Hayward	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

In the previous week, UFP Industries had 8 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for UFP Industries and 12 mentions for Hayward. Hayward's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat UFP Industries' score of 0.54 indicating that Hayward is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
UFP Industries	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hayward	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

UFP Industries beats Hayward on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hayward compare to Brunswick?

Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) and Brunswick (NYSE:BC) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Hayward has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hayward	$1.12B	2.74	$151.57M	$0.74	19.60
Brunswick	$5.36B	0.98	-$137.30M	-$1.31	N/A

Hayward has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hayward had 5 more articles in the media than Brunswick. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Hayward and 7 mentions for Brunswick. Hayward's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Brunswick's score of 0.69 indicating that Hayward is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hayward	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Brunswick	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Hayward presently has a consensus target price of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 20.63%. Brunswick has a consensus target price of $88.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.23%. Given Hayward's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hayward is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hayward	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Brunswick	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Hayward shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Hayward's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hayward	13.83%	11.61%	5.91%
Brunswick	-1.53%	15.28%	4.60%

Summary

Hayward beats Brunswick on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hayward compare to Fortune Brands Innovations?

Fortune Brands Innovations (NYSE:FBIN) and Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

Fortune Brands Innovations has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Hayward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fortune Brands Innovations, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Fortune Brands Innovations	$4.39B	1.22	$298.80M	$1.23	36.55
Hayward	$1.12B	2.74	$151.57M	$0.74	19.60

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations' net margin of 3.39%. Fortune Brands Innovations' return on equity of 19.50% beat Hayward's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Fortune Brands Innovations	3.39%	19.50%	7.09%
Hayward	13.83%	11.61%	5.91%

Fortune Brands Innovations currently has a consensus target price of $55.71, suggesting a potential upside of 23.93%. Hayward has a consensus target price of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.63%. Given Fortune Brands Innovations' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more favorable than Hayward.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Fortune Brands Innovations	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.31
Hayward	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

87.6% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Fortune Brands Innovations shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Hayward shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Hayward had 3 more articles in the media than Fortune Brands Innovations. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Hayward and 9 mentions for Fortune Brands Innovations. Fortune Brands Innovations' average media sentiment score of 1.28 beat Hayward's score of 0.83 indicating that Fortune Brands Innovations is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Fortune Brands Innovations	6 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hayward	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hayward has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Fortune Brands Innovations beats Hayward on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hayward compare to Masco?

Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Hayward has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Masco's net margin of 11.61%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Hayward's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hayward	13.83%	11.61%	5.91%
Masco	11.61%	2,379.08%	17.21%

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hayward	$1.12B	2.74	$151.57M	$0.74	19.60
Masco	$7.56B	1.91	$810M	$4.35	16.83

Hayward currently has a consensus target price of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.63%. Masco has a consensus target price of $79.88, suggesting a potential upside of 9.12%. Given Hayward's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Hayward is more favorable than Masco.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hayward	0 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Masco	1 Sell rating(s)	10 Hold rating(s)	7 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

93.9% of Masco shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Hayward shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Masco had 21 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 33 mentions for Masco and 12 mentions for Hayward. Masco's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Hayward's score of 0.83 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hayward	6 Very Positive mention(s)	3 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Masco	20 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Masco beats Hayward on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hayward News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HAYW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

HAYW vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Hayward	Building Products Industry	Industrials Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$3.09B	$8.64B	$10.70B	$24.29B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.11%	97.24%	3.70%
P/E Ratio	19.60	52.75	26.47	30.14
Price / Sales	2.74	19.57	328.39	17.34
Price / Cash	13.66	15.09	24.31	19.80
Price / Book	1.97	7.57	4.84	4.90
Net Income	$151.57M	$4.88B	$612.94M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-0.68%	-0.14%	-0.93%	0.50%
1 Month Performance	0.50%	4.40%	2.16%	2.86%
1 Year Performance	-10.97%	-1.29%	11.10%	14.91%

Hayward Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
HAYW Hayward	3.4477 of 5 stars	$14.51 -0.5%	$17.50 +20.6%	-12.3%	$3.09B	$1.12B	19.60	1,980
POOL Pool	4.8117 of 5 stars	$188.92 -0.8%	$235.67 +24.7%	-41.9%	$6.87B	$5.29B	17.39	6,000	Positive News Analyst Forecast
UFPI UFP Industries	4.3761 of 5 stars	$87.80 -0.6%	$103.75 +18.2%	-16.7%	$4.85B	$6.32B	20.15	13,800	Analyst Forecast
BC Brunswick	3.1774 of 5 stars	$81.40 -1.1%	$88.00 +8.1%	+23.4%	$5.27B	$5.36B	N/A	14,000
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations	4.8234 of 5 stars	$45.63 -2.0%	$55.33 +21.3%	-26.9%	$5.44B	$4.46B	37.07	10,000	Analyst Forecast

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:HAYW) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Hayward (HAYW) Competitors