Free Trial

Hayward (HAYW) Competitors

Hayward logo
$12.40 +0.01 (+0.04%)
Closing price 10/2/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$12.40 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 10/2/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

HAYW vs. POOL, UFPI, BC, MAS, and MHK

Should you buy Hayward stock or one of its competitors? Hayward's main competitors and comparable companies include Pool (POOL), UFP Industries (UFPI), Brunswick (BC), Masco (MAS), and Mohawk Industries (MHK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Hayward compare to Pool?

Pool (NASDAQ:POOL) and Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Pool's net margin of 7.40%. Pool's return on equity of 32.74% beat Hayward's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Pool7.40% 32.74% 10.91%
Hayward 13.83%11.61%5.91%

99.0% of Pool shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.0% of Pool shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Hayward shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Pool has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hayward has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pool had 13 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Pool and 5 mentions for Hayward. Pool's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Hayward's score of -0.09 indicating that Pool is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Pool
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
3 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Hayward
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Pool has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Pool is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Pool$5.29B1.11$406.40M$10.8714.85
Hayward$1.12B2.34$151.57M$0.7416.76

Pool currently has a consensus target price of $230.10, suggesting a potential upside of 42.55%. Hayward has a consensus target price of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 41.07%. Given Pool's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Pool is more favorable than Hayward.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Pool
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.23
Hayward
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

Summary

Pool beats Hayward on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hayward compare to UFP Industries?

Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) and UFP Industries (NASDAQ:UFPI) are both mid-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to UFP Industries' net margin of 3.99%. Hayward's return on equity of 11.61% beat UFP Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hayward13.83% 11.61% 5.91%
UFP Industries 3.99%8.00%6.11%

Hayward has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, UFP Industries has a beta of 1.22, meaning that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, UFP Industries had 3 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for UFP Industries and 5 mentions for Hayward. UFP Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.07 beat Hayward's score of -0.09 indicating that UFP Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hayward
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
UFP Industries
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

81.8% of UFP Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Hayward shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of UFP Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hayward presently has a consensus price target of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 41.07%. UFP Industries has a consensus price target of $104.50, suggesting a potential upside of 35.45%. Given Hayward's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Hayward is more favorable than UFP Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hayward
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
UFP Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

UFP Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Hayward is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than UFP Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hayward$1.12B2.34$151.57M$0.7416.76
UFP Industries$6.32B0.67$294.79M$4.3617.69

Summary

UFP Industries beats Hayward on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hayward compare to Brunswick?

Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) and Brunswick (NYSE:BC) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Hayward has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brunswick. Brunswick is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hayward$1.12B2.34$151.57M$0.7416.76
Brunswick$5.36B0.79-$137.30M-$1.31N/A

Hayward has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brunswick has a beta of 1.38, meaning that its share price is 38% more volatile than the broader market.

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Brunswick's net margin of -1.53%. Brunswick's return on equity of 15.28% beat Hayward's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hayward13.83% 11.61% 5.91%
Brunswick -1.53%15.28%4.60%

Hayward currently has a consensus target price of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 41.07%. Brunswick has a consensus target price of $88.00, suggesting a potential upside of 34.43%. Given Hayward's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Hayward is more favorable than Brunswick.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hayward
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
Brunswick
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, Brunswick had 3 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Brunswick and 5 mentions for Hayward. Brunswick's average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Hayward's score of -0.09 indicating that Brunswick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hayward
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Brunswick
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

99.3% of Brunswick shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Hayward shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Brunswick shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Brunswick beats Hayward on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hayward compare to Masco?

Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) and Masco (NYSE:MAS) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Hayward currently has a consensus price target of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 41.07%. Masco has a consensus price target of $79.56, indicating a potential upside of 16.37%. Given Hayward's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Hayward is more favorable than Masco.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hayward
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
Masco
1 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.26

Hayward has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Masco has a beta of 1.3, meaning that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Masco has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Masco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hayward$1.12B2.34$151.57M$0.7416.76
Masco$7.56B1.78$810M$4.3515.72

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Masco's net margin of 11.61%. Masco's return on equity of 2,379.08% beat Hayward's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hayward13.83% 11.61% 5.91%
Masco 11.61%2,379.08%17.21%

In the previous week, Masco had 2 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Masco and 5 mentions for Hayward. Masco's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Hayward's score of -0.09 indicating that Masco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hayward
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Masco
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

93.9% of Masco shares are held by institutional investors. 4.7% of Hayward shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Masco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Masco beats Hayward on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hayward compare to Mohawk Industries?

Mohawk Industries (NYSE:MHK) and Hayward (NYSE:HAYW) are related mid-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hayward has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Hayward has a net margin of 13.83% compared to Mohawk Industries' net margin of 4.15%. Hayward's return on equity of 11.61% beat Mohawk Industries' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mohawk Industries4.15% 7.50% 4.60%
Hayward 13.83%11.61%5.91%

79.0% of Mohawk Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.9% of Mohawk Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Hayward shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Mohawk Industries had 1 more articles in the media than Hayward. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Mohawk Industries and 5 mentions for Hayward. Mohawk Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Hayward's score of -0.09 indicating that Mohawk Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Mohawk Industries
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Hayward
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Mohawk Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Hayward. Mohawk Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hayward, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mohawk Industries$10.79B0.79$369.90M$7.5516.73
Hayward$1.12B2.34$151.57M$0.7416.76

Mohawk Industries presently has a consensus target price of $132.08, indicating a potential upside of 4.59%. Hayward has a consensus target price of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 41.07%. Given Hayward's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hayward is more favorable than Mohawk Industries.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mohawk Industries
0 Sell rating(s)
12 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.31
Hayward
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22

Summary

Mohawk Industries beats Hayward on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hayward News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HAYW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HAYW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HAYW vs. The Competition

MetricHaywardBuilding Products IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$2.63B$8.25B$10.19B$22.78B
Dividend YieldN/A2.15%96.63%3.72%
P/E Ratio16.7647.1826.6627.81
Price / Sales2.3418.83270.3520.21
Price / Cash11.6114.5424.0419.11
Price / Book1.697.124.824.67
Net Income$151.57M$4.88B$614.98M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.04%-0.15%0.07%-0.08%
1 Month Performance-10.95%-4.23%-2.56%-5.61%
1 Year Performance-19.79%-5.79%2.72%5.09%

Hayward Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HAYW
Hayward
4.4144 of 5 stars
$12.41
+0.0%
$17.50
+41.1%
-19.8%$2.63B$1.12B16.761,980
POOL
Pool
4.7782 of 5 stars
$170.27
+1.4%
$230.10
+35.1%
-47.9%$6.18B$5.29B15.656,000
UFPI
UFP Industries
4.7527 of 5 stars
$83.21
+3.7%
$104.50
+25.6%
-16.3%$4.58B$6.23B19.0513,800
BC
Brunswick
4.1858 of 5 stars
$67.01
+1.5%
$88.00
+31.3%
-1.3%$4.34B$5.36BN/A14,000
MAS
Masco
4.153 of 5 stars
$69.68
+2.9%
$79.56
+14.2%
-2.9%$13.70B$7.56B15.9818,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:HAYW) was last updated on 10/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners