Fidelis Insurance (FIHL) Competitors

Fidelis Insurance has a net margin of 9.02% compared to Voya Financial's net margin of 8.24%. Voya Financial's return on equity of 13.84% beat Fidelis Insurance's return on equity.

Voya Financial presently has a consensus price target of $99.25, indicating a potential upside of 0.30%. Fidelis Insurance has a consensus price target of $21.92, indicating a potential downside of 12.58%. Given Voya Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Voya Financial is more favorable than Fidelis Insurance.

Voya Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Fidelis Insurance pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Voya Financial pays out 28.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelis Insurance pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Voya Financial has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Fidelis Insurance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

96.1% of Voya Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Fidelis Insurance shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Voya Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Voya Financial had 13 more articles in the media than Fidelis Insurance. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Voya Financial and 0 mentions for Fidelis Insurance. Voya Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Fidelis Insurance's score of 0.00 indicating that Voya Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Voya Financial has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelis Insurance has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Voya Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelis Insurance. Fidelis Insurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Voya Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Kinsale Capital Group had 8 more articles in the media than Fidelis Insurance. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Kinsale Capital Group and 0 mentions for Fidelis Insurance. Kinsale Capital Group's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Fidelis Insurance's score of 0.00 indicating that Kinsale Capital Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Fidelis Insurance pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Kinsale Capital Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Fidelis Insurance pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kinsale Capital Group pays out 4.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Kinsale Capital Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Kinsale Capital Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Fidelis Insurance. Fidelis Insurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kinsale Capital Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kinsale Capital Group has a net margin of 27.48% compared to Fidelis Insurance's net margin of 9.02%. Kinsale Capital Group's return on equity of 25.82% beat Fidelis Insurance's return on equity.

Fidelis Insurance has a beta of 0.36, meaning that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kinsale Capital Group has a beta of 0.9, meaning that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

82.0% of Fidelis Insurance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.4% of Kinsale Capital Group shares are held by institutional investors. 5.6% of Kinsale Capital Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelis Insurance presently has a consensus price target of $21.92, indicating a potential downside of 12.58%. Kinsale Capital Group has a consensus price target of $375.80, indicating a potential upside of 9.02%. Given Kinsale Capital Group's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Kinsale Capital Group is more favorable than Fidelis Insurance.

90.0% of Jackson Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Fidelis Insurance shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Jackson Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Jackson Financial presently has a consensus price target of $126.40, indicating a potential upside of 4.76%. Fidelis Insurance has a consensus price target of $21.92, indicating a potential downside of 12.58%. Given Jackson Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Jackson Financial is more favorable than Fidelis Insurance.

Jackson Financial pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Fidelis Insurance pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Jackson Financial pays out -58.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelis Insurance pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Jackson Financial has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Jackson Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Jackson Financial had 9 more articles in the media than Fidelis Insurance. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Jackson Financial and 0 mentions for Fidelis Insurance. Jackson Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Fidelis Insurance's score of 0.00 indicating that Jackson Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Jackson Financial has a beta of 1.32, meaning that its share price is 32% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelis Insurance has a beta of 0.36, meaning that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelis Insurance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Jackson Financial. Jackson Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelis Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fidelis Insurance has a net margin of 9.02% compared to Jackson Financial's net margin of 0.00%. Jackson Financial's return on equity of 17.21% beat Fidelis Insurance's return on equity.

Fidelis Insurance has a consensus target price of $21.92, indicating a potential downside of 12.58%. Given Fidelis Insurance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Fidelis Insurance is more favorable than Brookfield Reinsurance.

Fidelis Insurance has a net margin of 9.02% compared to Brookfield Reinsurance's net margin of 0.10%. Fidelis Insurance's return on equity of 8.62% beat Brookfield Reinsurance's return on equity.

In the previous week, Brookfield Reinsurance had 1 more articles in the media than Fidelis Insurance. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Brookfield Reinsurance and 0 mentions for Fidelis Insurance. Brookfield Reinsurance's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Fidelis Insurance'saverage media sentiment score.

Brookfield Reinsurance has a beta of 1.53, indicating that its share price is 53% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelis Insurance has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

Brookfield Reinsurance has higher revenue and earnings than Fidelis Insurance. Fidelis Insurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Reinsurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

7.2% of Brookfield Reinsurance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Fidelis Insurance shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Brookfield Reinsurance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Brookfield Reinsurance pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Fidelis Insurance pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Brookfield Reinsurance pays out 110.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Fidelis Insurance pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelis Insurance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.