Global Net Lease (GNL) Competitors

In the previous week, Global Net Lease had 3 more articles in the media than Broadstone Net Lease. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Global Net Lease and 1 mentions for Broadstone Net Lease. Global Net Lease's average media sentiment score of 0.50 beat Broadstone Net Lease's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Net Lease is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

89.1% of Broadstone Net Lease shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.2% of Global Net Lease shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Broadstone Net Lease shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Global Net Lease shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Broadstone Net Lease pays an annual dividend of $1.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Global Net Lease pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Broadstone Net Lease pays out 180.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Net Lease pays out -190.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Broadstone Net Lease has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Global Net Lease is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Broadstone Net Lease has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Global Net Lease. Global Net Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadstone Net Lease, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Broadstone Net Lease has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Net Lease has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Broadstone Net Lease currently has a consensus target price of $20.56, suggesting a potential downside of 0.05%. Global Net Lease has a consensus target price of $10.40, suggesting a potential upside of 12.98%. Given Global Net Lease's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Global Net Lease is more favorable than Broadstone Net Lease.

Broadstone Net Lease has a net margin of 27.01% compared to Global Net Lease's net margin of -8.72%. Broadstone Net Lease's return on equity of 4.17% beat Global Net Lease's return on equity.

Cousins Properties has a net margin of -0.52% compared to Global Net Lease's net margin of -8.72%. Cousins Properties' return on equity of -0.11% beat Global Net Lease's return on equity.

Cousins Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Global Net Lease. Cousins Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Global Net Lease, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cousins Properties pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Global Net Lease pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Cousins Properties pays out -4,266.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Net Lease pays out -190.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Cousins Properties had 2 more articles in the media than Global Net Lease. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Cousins Properties and 4 mentions for Global Net Lease. Cousins Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Global Net Lease's score of 0.50 indicating that Cousins Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cousins Properties currently has a consensus target price of $28.73, suggesting a potential upside of 1.53%. Global Net Lease has a consensus target price of $10.40, suggesting a potential upside of 12.98%. Given Global Net Lease's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Global Net Lease is more favorable than Cousins Properties.

94.4% of Cousins Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.2% of Global Net Lease shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Cousins Properties shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Global Net Lease shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cousins Properties has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Net Lease has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

Essential Properties Realty Trust has higher revenue and earnings than Global Net Lease. Global Net Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Essential Properties Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Global Net Lease pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Essential Properties Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Global Net Lease pays out -190.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Essential Properties Realty Trust pays out 97.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Essential Properties Realty Trust has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. Global Net Lease is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Essential Properties Realty Trust has a net margin of 43.46% compared to Global Net Lease's net margin of -8.72%. Essential Properties Realty Trust's return on equity of 6.30% beat Global Net Lease's return on equity.

Global Net Lease has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Essential Properties Realty Trust has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Net Lease presently has a consensus target price of $10.40, suggesting a potential upside of 12.98%. Essential Properties Realty Trust has a consensus target price of $36.41, suggesting a potential upside of 23.98%. Given Essential Properties Realty Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Essential Properties Realty Trust is more favorable than Global Net Lease.

61.2% of Global Net Lease shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Essential Properties Realty Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Global Net Lease shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Essential Properties Realty Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Essential Properties Realty Trust had 1 more articles in the media than Global Net Lease. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Essential Properties Realty Trust and 4 mentions for Global Net Lease. Essential Properties Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Global Net Lease's score of 0.50 indicating that Essential Properties Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Four Corners Property Trust has a net margin of 38.74% compared to Global Net Lease's net margin of -8.72%. Four Corners Property Trust's return on equity of 7.38% beat Global Net Lease's return on equity.

Global Net Lease currently has a consensus price target of $10.40, indicating a potential upside of 12.98%. Four Corners Property Trust has a consensus price target of $28.13, indicating a potential upside of 14.96%. Given Four Corners Property Trust's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Four Corners Property Trust is more favorable than Global Net Lease.

Global Net Lease has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Four Corners Property Trust has a beta of 0.8, suggesting that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Global Net Lease had 1 more articles in the media than Four Corners Property Trust. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Global Net Lease and 3 mentions for Four Corners Property Trust. Four Corners Property Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Global Net Lease's score of 0.50 indicating that Four Corners Property Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

61.2% of Global Net Lease shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.7% of Four Corners Property Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Global Net Lease shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Four Corners Property Trust shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Four Corners Property Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Global Net Lease. Global Net Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Four Corners Property Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Global Net Lease pays an annual dividend of $0.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.3%. Four Corners Property Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Global Net Lease pays out -190.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Four Corners Property Trust pays out 131.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Four Corners Property Trust has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Global Net Lease is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.