iHuman (IH) Competitors

iHuman (NYSE:IH) and QuantaSing Group (NASDAQ:QSG) are both small-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

Does the media refer more to IH or QSG?

In the previous week, QuantaSing Group had 1 more articles in the media than iHuman. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for QuantaSing Group and 1 mentions for iHuman. QuantaSing Group's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat iHuman's score of 0.00 indicating that QuantaSing Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
iHuman	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
QuantaSing Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Which has more volatility & risk, IH or QSG?

iHuman has a beta of 0.38, indicating that its share price is 62% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, QuantaSing Group has a beta of -0.96, indicating that its share price is 196% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, IH or QSG?

QuantaSing Group has higher revenue and earnings than iHuman. QuantaSing Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iHuman, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
iHuman	$126.34M	1.30	$13.51M	$0.27	11.69
QuantaSing Group	$522.26M	0.97	$53.05M	$1.11	8.91

Is IH or QSG more profitable?

QuantaSing Group has a net margin of 14.27% compared to iHuman's net margin of 11.44%. QuantaSing Group's return on equity of 68.92% beat iHuman's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
iHuman	11.44%	11.00%	7.38%
QuantaSing Group	14.27%	68.92%	28.97%

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in IH or QSG?

4.9% of iHuman shares are held by institutional investors. 63.6% of iHuman shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Do analysts rate IH or QSG?

QuantaSing Group has a consensus target price of $9.52, suggesting a potential downside of 3.74%. Given QuantaSing Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe QuantaSing Group is more favorable than iHuman.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
iHuman	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
QuantaSing Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

QuantaSing Group beats iHuman on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.