Go Pro

Mativ (MATV) Competitors

Mativ logo
$11.89 +0.08 (+0.71%)
Closing price 09/15/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$11.90 +0.00 (+0.01%)
As of 09/15/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

MATV vs. NGVT, IOSP, MTX, HUN, and VNTRQ

Should you buy Mativ stock or one of its competitors? Mativ's main competitors and comparable companies include Ingevity (NGVT), Innospec (IOSP), Minerals Technologies (MTX), Huntsman (HUN), and Venator Materials (VNTRQ). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "specialty chemicals" industry.

How does Mativ compare to Ingevity?

Ingevity (NYSE:NGVT) and Mativ (NYSE:MATV) are both materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Ingevity has a net margin of 4.65% compared to Mativ's net margin of 4.50%. Ingevity's return on equity of 284.70% beat Mativ's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Ingevity4.65% 284.70% 10.82%
Mativ 4.50%13.53%3.08%

91.6% of Ingevity shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Mativ shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of Ingevity shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Mativ shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Ingevity has a beta of 1.17, suggesting that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mativ has a beta of 0.93, suggesting that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

Ingevity has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mativ. Mativ is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ingevity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ingevity$1.17B2.00-$167.10M$1.4746.14
Mativ$1.99B0.33-$337.40M$1.587.53

In the previous week, Ingevity had 3 more articles in the media than Mativ. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Ingevity and 0 mentions for Mativ. Ingevity's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Mativ's score of 0.00 indicating that Ingevity is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Ingevity Positive
Mativ Neutral

Ingevity currently has a consensus target price of $80.00, indicating a potential upside of 17.95%. Given Ingevity's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Ingevity is more favorable than Mativ.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Ingevity
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
Mativ
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Ingevity beats Mativ on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mativ compare to Innospec?

Innospec (NASDAQ:IOSP) and Mativ (NYSE:MATV) are both materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Innospec
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Mativ
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Innospec has a net margin of 6.60% compared to Mativ's net margin of 4.50%. Mativ's return on equity of 13.53% beat Innospec's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Innospec6.60% 9.22% 6.74%
Mativ 4.50%13.53%3.08%

Innospec has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mativ has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its share price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

96.6% of Innospec shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Mativ shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Innospec shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Mativ shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Innospec has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Mativ. Mativ is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Innospec, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Innospec$1.84B1.23$116.60M$4.9018.74
Mativ$1.99B0.33-$337.40M$1.587.53

In the previous week, Innospec had 3 more articles in the media than Mativ. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Innospec and 0 mentions for Mativ. Innospec's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Mativ's score of 0.00 indicating that Innospec is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Innospec Positive
Mativ Neutral

Innospec pays an annual dividend of $1.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Mativ pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Innospec pays out 37.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mativ pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Innospec has increased its dividend for 11 consecutive years and Mativ has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Mativ is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Innospec beats Mativ on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mativ compare to Minerals Technologies?

Mativ (NYSE:MATV) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are both materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Minerals Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Mativ. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mativ, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mativ$1.99B0.33-$337.40M$1.587.53
Minerals Technologies$2.07B1.02-$18.40M-$2.17N/A

Mativ has a net margin of 4.50% compared to Minerals Technologies' net margin of -3.13%. Mativ's return on equity of 13.53% beat Minerals Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mativ4.50% 13.53% 3.08%
Minerals Technologies -3.13%10.63%5.20%

Mativ pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Mativ pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out -22.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Mativ has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

95.0% of Mativ shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Mativ shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Minerals Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 6 more articles in the media than Mativ. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 0 mentions for Mativ. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Mativ's score of 0.00 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mativ Neutral
Minerals Technologies Positive

Mativ has a beta of 0.93, indicating that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the broader market.

Minerals Technologies has a consensus price target of $90.00, indicating a potential upside of 33.02%. Given Minerals Technologies' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Minerals Technologies is more favorable than Mativ.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mativ
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Minerals Technologies
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Minerals Technologies beats Mativ on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mativ compare to Huntsman?

Huntsman (NYSE:HUN) and Mativ (NYSE:MATV) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Huntsman had 20 more articles in the media than Mativ. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Huntsman and 0 mentions for Mativ. Huntsman's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Mativ's score of 0.00 indicating that Huntsman is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Huntsman Positive
Mativ Neutral

Huntsman has higher revenue and earnings than Mativ. Huntsman is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mativ, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Huntsman$5.68B0.28-$284M-$1.04N/A
Mativ$1.99B0.33-$337.40M$1.587.53

Huntsman pays an annual dividend of $0.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Mativ pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Huntsman pays out -33.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Mativ pays out 25.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Huntsman has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Mativ has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Huntsman is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.7, meaning that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mativ has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market.

84.8% of Huntsman shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.0% of Mativ shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.8% of Huntsman shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Mativ shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Mativ has a net margin of 4.50% compared to Huntsman's net margin of -3.05%. Mativ's return on equity of 13.53% beat Huntsman's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Huntsman-3.05% -3.49% -1.45%
Mativ 4.50%13.53%3.08%

Huntsman currently has a consensus target price of $12.23, suggesting a potential upside of 32.58%. Given Huntsman's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Huntsman is more favorable than Mativ.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Huntsman
3 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Mativ
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Huntsman beats Mativ on 11 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Mativ compare to Venator Materials?

Mativ (NYSE:MATV) and Venator Materials (NYSE:VNTRQ) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

95.0% of Mativ shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Venator Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Mativ shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.7% of Venator Materials shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Mativ
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Venator Materials
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Mativ has a net margin of 4.50% compared to Venator Materials' net margin of -18.19%. Mativ's return on equity of 13.53% beat Venator Materials' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Mativ4.50% 13.53% 3.08%
Venator Materials -18.19%-47.15%-8.22%

Mativ has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Venator Materials has a beta of 1.68, meaning that its stock price is 68% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Mativ's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Venator Materials'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Mativ Neutral
Venator Materials Neutral

Venator Materials has higher revenue and earnings than Mativ. Venator Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mativ, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Mativ$1.99B0.33-$337.40M$1.587.53
Venator Materials$2.17B0.74-$188M-$3.28N/A

Summary

Mativ beats Venator Materials on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Mativ News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MATV and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MATV and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MATV vs. The Competition

MetricMativChemicals IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$650.94M$11.20B$4.86B$23.25B
Dividend Yield3.39%2.86%4.70%3.58%
P/E Ratio7.5336.6225.2528.40
Price / Sales0.3349.2717,587.4120.36
Price / Cash1.0514.9426.7634.34
Price / Book1.303.199.774.69
Net Income-$337.40M$222.40M$158.15M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-4.26%-1.59%-3.08%-1.48%
1 Month Performance-2.45%-1.74%5.39%-4.27%
1 Year Performance-2.91%17.67%79.03%8.97%

Mativ Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MATV
Mativ
1.9961 of 5 stars
$11.89
+0.7%
N/A-2.3%$650.94M$1.99B7.535,000
NGVT
Ingevity
2.3818 of 5 stars
$69.56
+3.6%
$80.00
+15.0%
+15.6%$2.39B$1.16B47.321,500
IOSP
Innospec
3.3833 of 5 stars
$93.19
+0.1%
N/A+13.9%$2.30B$1.78B19.022,450
MTX
Minerals Technologies
3.5031 of 5 stars
$69.13
-0.4%
$90.00
+30.2%
+7.1%$2.15B$2.07BN/A3,782
HUN
Huntsman
4.4539 of 5 stars
$9.53
-0.1%
$12.62
+32.4%
-11.6%$1.67B$5.68BN/A6,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:MATV) was last updated on 9/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners