Venator Materials (VNTRQ) Competitors

Materion has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Venator Materials. Venator Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Materion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Materion had 6 more articles in the media than Venator Materials. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Materion and 0 mentions for Venator Materials. Materion's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Venator Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that Materion is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Materion presently has a consensus price target of $223.00, suggesting a potential upside of 3.49%. Given Materion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Materion is more favorable than Venator Materials.

Materion has a beta of 1.03, meaning that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Venator Materials has a beta of 1.68, meaning that its stock price is 68% more volatile than the broader market.

Materion has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Venator Materials' net margin of -18.19%. Materion's return on equity of 12.45% beat Venator Materials' return on equity.

93.6% of Materion shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Venator Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of Materion shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.7% of Venator Materials shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

0.5% of Venator Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Cabot shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.7% of Venator Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.1% of Cabot shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Cabot has higher revenue and earnings than Venator Materials. Venator Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cabot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Venator Materials has a beta of 1.68, suggesting that its stock price is 68% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cabot has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Cabot has a net margin of 7.97% compared to Venator Materials' net margin of -18.19%. Cabot's return on equity of 21.33% beat Venator Materials' return on equity.

Cabot has a consensus price target of $80.25, suggesting a potential downside of 3.80%. Given Cabot's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Cabot is more favorable than Venator Materials.

In the previous week, Cabot had 1 more articles in the media than Venator Materials. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Cabot and 0 mentions for Venator Materials. Cabot's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Venator Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that Cabot is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Neptune Insurance has a consensus target price of $27.73, indicating a potential downside of 0.43%. Given Neptune Insurance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Neptune Insurance is more favorable than Venator Materials.

Neptune Insurance has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Venator Materials' net margin of -18.19%. Neptune Insurance's return on equity of 0.00% beat Venator Materials' return on equity.

Neptune Insurance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Venator Materials. Venator Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Neptune Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Neptune Insurance had 14 more articles in the media than Venator Materials. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Neptune Insurance and 0 mentions for Venator Materials. Venator Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Neptune Insurance's score of -0.15 indicating that Venator Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

0.5% of Venator Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.7% of Venator Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 74.3% of Neptune Insurance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Skeena Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Venator Materials' net margin of -18.19%. Skeena Resources' return on equity of -46.80% beat Venator Materials' return on equity.

In the previous week, Skeena Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Venator Materials' score of 0.00 indicating that Skeena Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Venator Materials has a beta of 1.68, meaning that its share price is 68% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skeena Resources has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market.

0.5% of Venator Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.2% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.7% of Venator Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Skeena Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Skeena Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Venator Materials. Skeena Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Venator Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.