Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund (MSDL) Competitors

42.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Golub Capital BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund and Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund both had 2 articles in the media. Golub Capital BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund's score of 0.37 indicating that Golub Capital BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.0%. Golub Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.7%. Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund pays out 178.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Golub Capital BDC pays out 171.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 24.64% compared to Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund's net margin of 22.84%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 10.20% beat Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund's return on equity.

Golub Capital BDC has higher revenue and earnings than Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund. Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Golub Capital BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund currently has a consensus target price of $15.54, indicating a potential upside of 3.40%. Golub Capital BDC has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.36%. Given Golub Capital BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Golub Capital BDC is more favorable than Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund.

In the previous week, FS KKR Capital had 22 more articles in the media than Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for FS KKR Capital and 2 mentions for Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund. Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.37 beat FS KKR Capital's score of 0.23 indicating that Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund has a net margin of 22.84% compared to FS KKR Capital's net margin of -38.65%. Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund's return on equity of 9.73% beat FS KKR Capital's return on equity.

FS KKR Capital has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund has lower revenue, but higher earnings than FS KKR Capital. FS KKR Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

36.3% of FS KKR Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of FS KKR Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FS KKR Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.7%. Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.0%. FS KKR Capital pays out -85.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund pays out 178.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. FS KKR Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

FS KKR Capital currently has a consensus price target of $10.58, indicating a potential upside of 5.46%. Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund has a consensus price target of $15.54, indicating a potential upside of 3.40%. Given FS KKR Capital's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe FS KKR Capital is more favorable than Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund.

In the previous week, Hercules Capital had 2 more articles in the media than Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hercules Capital and 2 mentions for Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund. Hercules Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund's score of 0.37 indicating that Hercules Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

19.7% of Hercules Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Hercules Capital shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Hercules Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund. Hercules Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Hercules Capital has a net margin of 59.85% compared to Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund's net margin of 22.84%. Hercules Capital's return on equity of 16.05% beat Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund's return on equity.

Hercules Capital has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Hercules Capital presently has a consensus target price of $18.21, suggesting a potential upside of 20.07%. Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund has a consensus target price of $15.54, suggesting a potential upside of 3.40%. Given Hercules Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Hercules Capital is more favorable than Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund.

Hercules Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.6%. Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.0%. Hercules Capital pays out 90.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund pays out 178.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hercules Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Sixth Street Specialty Lending had 3 more articles in the media than Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Sixth Street Specialty Lending and 2 mentions for Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund's score of 0.37 indicating that Sixth Street Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

70.3% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by institutional investors. 3.8% of Sixth Street Specialty Lending shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has higher revenue and earnings than Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund. Sixth Street Specialty Lending is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a net margin of 25.25% compared to Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund's net margin of 22.84%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending's return on equity of 11.92% beat Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund's return on equity.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund has a beta of 0.53, indicating that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending presently has a consensus target price of $19.83, suggesting a potential upside of 18.86%. Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund has a consensus target price of $15.54, suggesting a potential upside of 3.40%. Given Sixth Street Specialty Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Sixth Street Specialty Lending is more favorable than Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund.

Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.1%. Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.0%. Sixth Street Specialty Lending pays out 146.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Morgan Stanley Direct Lending Fund pays out 178.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.