Free Trial

Minerals Technologies (MTX) Competitors

Minerals Technologies logo
$54.03 -1.97 (-3.52%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$54.12 +0.09 (+0.16%)
As of 04:35 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Polygon.io. Learn more.

MTX vs. ALB, CE, NEU, BCPC, SXT, FUL, ASH, IOSP, KWR, and SCL

Should you be buying Minerals Technologies stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Minerals Technologies include Albemarle (ALB), Celanese (CE), NewMarket (NEU), Balchem (BCPC), Sensient Technologies (SXT), H.B. Fuller (FUL), Ashland (ASH), Innospec (IOSP), Quaker Chemical (KWR), and Stepan (SCL). These companies are all part of the "specialty chemicals" industry.

Minerals Technologies vs. Its Competitors

Albemarle (NYSE:ALB) and Minerals Technologies (NYSE:MTX) are both basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, community ranking, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Albemarle pays an annual dividend of $1.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Minerals Technologies pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Albemarle pays out -14.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Minerals Technologies pays out -57.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Albemarle has increased its dividend for 30 consecutive years and Minerals Technologies has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Albemarle is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

92.9% of Albemarle shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Albemarle shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Minerals Technologies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Minerals Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Albemarle. Minerals Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Albemarle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Albemarle$5.09B1.40-$1.18B-$11.12-5.45
Minerals Technologies$2.08B0.83$167.10M-$0.77-70.17

Albemarle currently has a consensus target price of $91.62, suggesting a potential upside of 51.07%. Minerals Technologies has a consensus target price of $80.00, suggesting a potential upside of 48.07%. Given Albemarle's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Albemarle is more favorable than Minerals Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Albemarle
2 Sell rating(s)
14 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.14
Minerals Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Minerals Technologies has a net margin of 7.89% compared to Albemarle's net margin of -21.93%. Minerals Technologies' return on equity of 11.49% beat Albemarle's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Albemarle-21.93% -1.72% -0.84%
Minerals Technologies 7.89%11.49%5.90%

Albemarle received 550 more outperform votes than Minerals Technologies when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 61.78% of users gave Albemarle an outperform vote while only 53.38% of users gave Minerals Technologies an outperform vote.

CompanyUnderperformOutperform
AlbemarleOutperform Votes
779
61.78%
Underperform Votes
482
38.22%
Minerals TechnologiesOutperform Votes
229
53.38%
Underperform Votes
200
46.62%

In the previous week, Minerals Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Albemarle. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Minerals Technologies and 2 mentions for Albemarle. Minerals Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.33 beat Albemarle's score of 0.56 indicating that Minerals Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Albemarle
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Minerals Technologies
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Albemarle has a beta of 1.61, suggesting that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Minerals Technologies has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Minerals Technologies beats Albemarle on 12 of the 21 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Minerals Technologies News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for MTX and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MTX and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

MTX vs. The Competition

MetricMinerals TechnologiesIndustrial inorganic chemicals IndustryMaterials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.71B$23.89B$3.17B$19.63B
Dividend Yield0.73%3.39%5.03%3.82%
P/E Ratio10.4311.4169.7135.03
Price / Sales0.832.5126,914,679,906,569,100.0042.85
Price / Cash8.7356.3524.2617.51
Price / Book0.977.195.384.78
Net Income$167.10M$731.97M$155.18M$1.02B
7 Day Performance-6.35%-2.90%1.00%-0.35%
1 Month Performance-8.11%-6.96%7.33%1.04%
1 Year Performance-35.10%-28.10%23.61%9.19%

Minerals Technologies Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
MTX
Minerals Technologies
4.2959 of 5 stars
$54.03
-3.5%
$80.00
+48.1%
-33.7%$1.71B$2.08B10.434,070Positive News
ALB
Albemarle
4.2217 of 5 stars
$62.28
+4.1%
$91.62
+47.1%
-44.5%$7.33B$5.09B-5.567,400
CE
Celanese
4.2052 of 5 stars
$56.98
+2.7%
$61.94
+8.7%
-61.0%$6.23B$10.06B-4.0913,300Gap Down
NEU
NewMarket
2.7154 of 5 stars
$648.83
+0.7%
N/A+22.5%$6.12B$2.79B13.462,060High Trading Volume
BCPC
Balchem
4.3388 of 5 stars
$168.07
+1.1%
$180.00
+7.1%
+6.9%$5.48B$964.54M42.771,340Positive News
SXT
Sensient Technologies
2.7899 of 5 stars
$96.71
+0.7%
$93.00
-3.8%
+22.7%$4.11B$1.56B32.904,090Positive News
Analyst Forecast
FUL
H.B. Fuller
4.0654 of 5 stars
$57.14
+1.7%
$62.50
+9.4%
-28.8%$3.10B$3.55B24.747,000
ASH
Ashland
4.4369 of 5 stars
$51.88
+3.5%
$68.60
+32.2%
-48.5%$2.37B$1.95B-78.613,900Trending News
Gap Down
IOSP
Innospec
3.5433 of 5 stars
$87.52
+1.6%
N/A-31.6%$2.18B$1.79B61.632,100Positive News
KWR
Quaker Chemical
4.3211 of 5 stars
$120.21
+9.6%
$159.25
+32.5%
-32.4%$2.13B$1.81B17.634,600News Coverage
High Trading Volume
SCL
Stepan
3.6029 of 5 stars
$56.03
+2.3%
N/A-35.1%$1.27B$2.22B25.352,450

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:MTX) was last updated on 6/13/2025 by MarketBeat.com Staff
From Our Partners