Noah (NOAH) Competitors

Trinity Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Noah. Noah is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trinity Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Trinity Capital has a net margin of 43.45% compared to Noah's net margin of 20.28%. Trinity Capital's return on equity of 14.94% beat Noah's return on equity.

Trinity Capital presently has a consensus price target of $16.67, indicating a potential downside of 10.47%. Noah has a consensus price target of $10.75, indicating a potential upside of 23.68%. Given Noah's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Noah is more favorable than Trinity Capital.

24.6% of Trinity Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.7% of Noah shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.3% of Trinity Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 47.2% of Noah shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Trinity Capital has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Noah has a beta of 0.81, meaning that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Trinity Capital had 3 more articles in the media than Noah. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Trinity Capital and 0 mentions for Noah. Trinity Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Noah's score of 0.00 indicating that Trinity Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Trinity Capital pays an annual dividend of $2.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.0%. Noah pays an annual dividend of $0.63 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Trinity Capital pays out 116.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Noah pays out 58.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trinity Capital has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Trinity Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Noah has a net margin of 20.28% compared to RMG ML Sports' net margin of 0.00%. Noah's return on equity of 5.80% beat RMG ML Sports' return on equity.

In the previous week, RMG ML Sports' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Noah'saverage media sentiment score.

Noah has a consensus target price of $10.75, suggesting a potential upside of 23.68%. Given Noah's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Noah is more favorable than RMG ML Sports.

RMG ML Sports has a beta of 1.57, suggesting that its stock price is 57% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Noah has a beta of 0.81, suggesting that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the broader market.

Noah has higher revenue and earnings than RMG ML Sports. RMG ML Sports is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Noah, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

12.6% of RMG ML Sports shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.7% of Noah shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.1% of RMG ML Sports shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 47.2% of Noah shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Noah has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its share price is 19% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Capital Southwest has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Capital Southwest has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Noah. Noah is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Capital Southwest, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Capital Southwest has a net margin of 46.68% compared to Noah's net margin of 20.28%. Capital Southwest's return on equity of 13.88% beat Noah's return on equity.

42.7% of Noah shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 23.4% of Capital Southwest shares are held by institutional investors. 47.2% of Noah shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Capital Southwest shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Noah pays an annual dividend of $0.63 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Capital Southwest pays an annual dividend of $2.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.2%. Noah pays out 58.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Capital Southwest pays out 128.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Capital Southwest has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Capital Southwest is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Capital Southwest had 4 more articles in the media than Noah. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Capital Southwest and 0 mentions for Noah. Capital Southwest's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Noah's score of 0.00 indicating that Capital Southwest is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Noah currently has a consensus target price of $10.75, indicating a potential upside of 23.68%. Capital Southwest has a consensus target price of $23.60, indicating a potential downside of 6.65%. Given Noah's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Noah is more favorable than Capital Southwest.

Noah has higher revenue and earnings than Wealthfront. Wealthfront is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Noah, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Noah has a net margin of 20.28% compared to Wealthfront's net margin of 0.00%. Noah's return on equity of 5.80% beat Wealthfront's return on equity.

Noah currently has a consensus price target of $10.75, indicating a potential upside of 23.68%. Wealthfront has a consensus price target of $12.42, indicating a potential upside of 32.52%. Given Wealthfront's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Wealthfront is more favorable than Noah.

42.7% of Noah shares are held by institutional investors. 47.2% of Noah shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.4% of Wealthfront shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Wealthfront had 6 more articles in the media than Noah. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Wealthfront and 0 mentions for Noah. Wealthfront's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Noah's score of 0.00 indicating that Wealthfront is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Noah pays an annual dividend of $0.63 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Wealthfront pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Noah pays out 58.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Wealthfront pays out -31.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.