NYSE:NOAH

Noah Competitors

$41.90
+0.20 (+0.48 %)
(As of 04/22/2021 03:59 PM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$41.64
Now: $41.90
$42.54
50-Day Range
$41.13
MA: $44.11
$46.94
52-Week Range
$23.59
Now: $41.90
$52.77
Volume10,243 shs
Average Volume221,827 shs
Market Capitalization$2.57 billion
P/E Ratio19.40
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.46

Competitors

Noah (NYSE:NOAH) Vs. AMG, JHG, EVR, LAZ, HLNE, and HLI

Should you be buying NOAH stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "investment advice" are considered alternatives and competitors to Noah, including Affiliated Managers Group (AMG), Janus Henderson Group (JHG), Evercore (EVR), Lazard (LAZ), Hamilton Lane (HLNE), and Houlihan Lokey (HLI).

Noah (NYSE:NOAH) and Affiliated Managers Group (NYSE:AMG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

53.2% of Noah shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Affiliated Managers Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Affiliated Managers Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Noah and Affiliated Managers Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Noah$253.09 million10.14$119.10 million$2.4117.39
Affiliated Managers Group$2.24 billion2.90$15.70 million$14.2210.95

Noah has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Affiliated Managers Group. Affiliated Managers Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Noah, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Noah and Affiliated Managers Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Noah33.83%12.67%10.48%
Affiliated Managers Group5.37%19.15%8.64%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Noah and Affiliated Managers Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Noah01302.75
Affiliated Managers Group12202.20

Noah presently has a consensus price target of $53.46, indicating a potential upside of 27.59%. Affiliated Managers Group has a consensus price target of $133.60, indicating a potential downside of 14.02%. Given Noah's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Noah is more favorable than Affiliated Managers Group.

Risk and Volatility

Noah has a beta of 1.46, indicating that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Affiliated Managers Group has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its share price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Noah beats Affiliated Managers Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Janus Henderson Group (NYSE:JHG) and Noah (NYSE:NOAH) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Janus Henderson Group and Noah, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Janus Henderson Group26101.89
Noah01302.75

Janus Henderson Group presently has a consensus target price of $25.1286, indicating a potential downside of 23.85%. Noah has a consensus target price of $53.46, indicating a potential upside of 27.59%. Given Noah's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Noah is more favorable than Janus Henderson Group.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Janus Henderson Group and Noah's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Janus Henderson Group$2.19 billion2.59$427.60 million$2.4713.36
Noah$253.09 million10.14$119.10 million$2.4117.39

Janus Henderson Group has higher revenue and earnings than Noah. Janus Henderson Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Noah, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

77.2% of Janus Henderson Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.2% of Noah shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Janus Henderson Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Janus Henderson Group and Noah's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Janus Henderson Group3.71%10.41%6.93%
Noah33.83%12.67%10.48%

Risk & Volatility

Janus Henderson Group has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Noah has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Noah (NYSE:NOAH) and Evercore (NYSE:EVR) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Noah and Evercore's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Noah33.83%12.67%10.48%
Evercore11.80%27.11%12.25%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

53.2% of Noah shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Evercore shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.8% of Evercore shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Noah has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Evercore has a beta of 1.75, suggesting that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Noah and Evercore, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Noah01302.75
Evercore01713.00

Noah currently has a consensus target price of $53.46, suggesting a potential upside of 27.59%. Evercore has a consensus target price of $138.7778, suggesting a potential upside of 0.44%. Given Noah's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Noah is more favorable than Evercore.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Noah and Evercore's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Noah$253.09 million10.14$119.10 million$2.4117.39
Evercore$2.01 billion2.89$297.44 million$7.7017.94

Evercore has higher revenue and earnings than Noah. Noah is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evercore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Evercore beats Noah on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Noah (NYSE:NOAH) and Lazard (NYSE:LAZ) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Risk & Volatility

Noah has a beta of 1.46, meaning that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lazard has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

53.2% of Noah shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.5% of Lazard shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Lazard shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Noah and Lazard, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Noah01302.75
Lazard14402.33

Noah currently has a consensus price target of $53.46, suggesting a potential upside of 27.59%. Lazard has a consensus price target of $42.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 6.14%. Given Noah's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Noah is more favorable than Lazard.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Noah and Lazard's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Noah$253.09 million10.14$119.10 million$2.4117.39
Lazard$2.67 billion1.79$286.50 million$3.2813.86

Lazard has higher revenue and earnings than Noah. Lazard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Noah, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Noah and Lazard's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Noah33.83%12.67%10.48%
Lazard11.62%47.79%6.01%

Summary

Lazard beats Noah on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Noah (NYSE:NOAH) and Hamilton Lane (NASDAQ:HLNE) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Noah has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hamilton Lane has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

53.2% of Noah shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Hamilton Lane shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.6% of Hamilton Lane shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Noah and Hamilton Lane, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Noah01302.75
Hamilton Lane03202.40

Noah presently has a consensus target price of $53.46, suggesting a potential upside of 27.59%. Hamilton Lane has a consensus target price of $87.50, suggesting a potential downside of 3.42%. Given Noah's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Noah is more favorable than Hamilton Lane.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Noah and Hamilton Lane's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Noah$253.09 million10.14$119.10 million$2.4117.39
Hamilton Lane$274.05 million17.44$60.83 million$2.0145.07

Noah has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hamilton Lane. Noah is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hamilton Lane, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Noah and Hamilton Lane's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Noah33.83%12.67%10.48%
Hamilton Lane19.78%44.51%20.35%

Noah (NYSE:NOAH) and Houlihan Lokey (NYSE:HLI) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Noah has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Houlihan Lokey has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Noah and Houlihan Lokey's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Noah$253.09 million10.14$119.10 million$2.4117.39
Houlihan Lokey$1.16 billion4.04$183.79 million$3.2021.23

Houlihan Lokey has higher revenue and earnings than Noah. Noah is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Houlihan Lokey, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Noah and Houlihan Lokey's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Noah33.83%12.67%10.48%
Houlihan Lokey18.06%19.18%12.48%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

53.2% of Noah shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.5% of Houlihan Lokey shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.0% of Houlihan Lokey shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Noah and Houlihan Lokey, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Noah01302.75
Houlihan Lokey24001.67

Noah presently has a consensus target price of $53.46, suggesting a potential upside of 27.59%. Houlihan Lokey has a consensus target price of $66.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.87%. Given Noah's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Noah is more favorable than Houlihan Lokey.

Summary

Houlihan Lokey beats Noah on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Noah Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Affiliated Managers Group logo
AMG
Affiliated Managers Group
2.3$155.64+1.6%$6.74 billion$2.24 billion67.38Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Janus Henderson Group logo
JHG
Janus Henderson Group
1.9$33.01+1.5%$5.78 billion$2.19 billion75.02Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Evercore logo
EVR
Evercore
2.4$138.16+0.6%$5.77 billion$2.01 billion24.76Upcoming Earnings
Lazard logo
LAZ
Lazard
2.4$45.46+1.6%$4.85 billion$2.67 billion17.83Analyst Report
Hamilton Lane logo
HLNE
Hamilton Lane
1.5$90.60+1.0%$4.73 billion$274.05 million46.94Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Houlihan Lokey logo
HLI
Houlihan Lokey
2.1$67.95+0.4%$4.70 billion$1.16 billion22.35
AllianceBernstein logo
AB
AllianceBernstein
2.0$41.53+2.0%$4.00 billion$3.52 billion15.05Upcoming Earnings
Artisan Partners Asset Management logo
APAM
Artisan Partners Asset Management
2.2$53.73+0.7%$3.71 billion$799 million18.28Upcoming Earnings
Moelis & Company logo
MC
Moelis & Company
1.7$55.35+0.3%$3.53 billion$746.53 million43.93Upcoming Earnings
Cohen & Steers logo
CNS
Cohen & Steers
2.1$66.67+2.4%$3.29 billion$410.83 million27.55Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Focus Financial Partners logo
FOCS
Focus Financial Partners
1.6$45.08+2.1%$3.17 billion$1.22 billion187.83Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
StepStone Group logo
STEP
StepStone Group
1.1$32.97+0.0%$3.13 billionN/A0.00
Federated Hermes logo
FHI
Federated Hermes
1.4$29.60+1.5%$2.98 billion$1.33 billion9.58Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Downgrade
GCM Grosvenor logo
GCMG
GCM Grosvenor
1.4$12.16+3.7%$2.18 billionN/A0.00Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Virtus Investment Partners logo
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners
1.7$251.69+0.7%$1.94 billion$563.25 million37.96Upcoming Earnings
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Victory Capital logo
VCTR
Victory Capital
1.6$28.30+0.4%$1.91 billion$612.37 million10.68Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
BrightSphere Investment Group logo
BSIG
BrightSphere Investment Group
2.0$22.97+0.7%$1.84 billion$819.50 million12.35Upcoming Earnings
PJT Partners logo
PJT
PJT Partners
1.9$71.17+0.9%$1.71 billion$717.64 million20.39Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
AssetMark Financial logo
AMK
AssetMark Financial
1.6$22.16+0.0%$1.61 billion$417.94 million-1,107.45Analyst Downgrade
News Coverage
Sculptor Capital Management logo
SCU
Sculptor Capital Management
1.3$21.82+0.3%$1.24 billion$597.35 million-10.96Insider Selling
Pzena Investment Management logo
PZN
Pzena Investment Management
0.9$10.15+3.4%$747.29 million$150.75 million48.34Dividend Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
News Coverage
Diamond Hill Investment Group logo
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
1.4$159.65+0.7%$507.84 million$136.62 million13.82Upcoming Earnings
Barings BDC logo
BBDC
Barings BDC
2.2$10.28+0.7%$496.41 million$75.65 million-257.00
Fidus Investment logo
FDUS
Fidus Investment
1.5$16.85+2.1%$402.97 million$77.11 million18.72Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
PUYI
Puyi
0.5$5.04+2.2%$303.73 million$18.33 million0.00
Value Line logo
VALU
Value Line
1.1$30.80+0.7%$296.89 million$40.30 million16.56Dividend Increase
Gap Down
Saratoga Investment logo
SAR
Saratoga Investment
1.6$24.99+0.0%$279.25 million$58.45 million8.65
Monroe Capital logo
MRCC
Monroe Capital
1.1$10.65+0.5%$227.95 million$68.19 million-53.25
Silvercrest Asset Management Group logo
SAMG
Silvercrest Asset Management Group
2.3$14.78+1.6%$216.59 million$102.15 million13.20Upcoming Earnings
WHG
Westwood Holdings Group
1.1$16.53+2.7%$143.07 million$84.08 million71.87Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
StoneCastle Financial logo
BANX
StoneCastle Financial
1.5$19.80+0.5%$130.58 million$16.35 million63.87
Manning & Napier logo
MN
Manning & Napier
0.5$7.13+1.8%$124.44 million$136 million39.61Upcoming Earnings
U.S. Global Investors logo
GROW
U.S. Global Investors
0.4$7.79+3.0%$113.90 million$4.48 million0.00
Great Elm Capital logo
GECC
Great Elm Capital
1.7$3.26+2.1%$78.28 million$27.04 million-1.34
HNNA
Hennessy Advisors
1.4$9.43+4.1%$66.53 million$33.39 million8.90Gap Down
PHCF
Puhui Wealth Investment Management
0.4$4.09+2.4%$45.92 million$2.18 million0.00Gap Down
Medley Management logo
MDLY
Medley Management
0.5$4.74+1.5%$3.13 million$48.84 million-0.59Insider Selling
Gap Down
This page was last updated on 4/22/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.