Noah Competitors

Noah (NYSE:NOAH) and Affiliated Managers Group (NYSE:AMG) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

53.2% of Noah shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.8% of Affiliated Managers Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Affiliated Managers Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Noah and Affiliated Managers Group's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Noah has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Affiliated Managers Group. Affiliated Managers Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Noah, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Noah and Affiliated Managers Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and price targets for Noah and Affiliated Managers Group, as reported by MarketBeat.

Noah presently has a consensus price target of $53.46, indicating a potential upside of 27.59%. Affiliated Managers Group has a consensus price target of $133.60, indicating a potential downside of 14.02%. Given Noah's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Noah is more favorable than Affiliated Managers Group.

Risk and Volatility

Noah has a beta of 1.46, indicating that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Affiliated Managers Group has a beta of 1.44, indicating that its share price is 44% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Noah beats Affiliated Managers Group on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Janus Henderson Group (NYSE:JHG) and Noah (NYSE:NOAH) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for Janus Henderson Group and Noah, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Janus Henderson Group presently has a consensus target price of $25.1286, indicating a potential downside of 23.85%. Noah has a consensus target price of $53.46, indicating a potential upside of 27.59%. Given Noah's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Noah is more favorable than Janus Henderson Group.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Janus Henderson Group and Noah's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Janus Henderson Group has higher revenue and earnings than Noah. Janus Henderson Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Noah, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

77.2% of Janus Henderson Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 53.2% of Noah shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of Janus Henderson Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Janus Henderson Group and Noah's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Janus Henderson Group has a beta of 1.48, suggesting that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Noah has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Noah (NYSE:NOAH) and Evercore (NYSE:EVR) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Noah and Evercore's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

53.2% of Noah shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.8% of Evercore shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.8% of Evercore shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility & Risk

Noah has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Evercore has a beta of 1.75, suggesting that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for Noah and Evercore, as provided by MarketBeat.

Noah currently has a consensus target price of $53.46, suggesting a potential upside of 27.59%. Evercore has a consensus target price of $138.7778, suggesting a potential upside of 0.44%. Given Noah's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Noah is more favorable than Evercore.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Noah and Evercore's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Evercore has higher revenue and earnings than Noah. Noah is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Evercore, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Evercore beats Noah on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Noah (NYSE:NOAH) and Lazard (NYSE:LAZ) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Risk & Volatility

Noah has a beta of 1.46, meaning that its share price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lazard has a beta of 1.66, meaning that its share price is 66% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

53.2% of Noah shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.5% of Lazard shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.6% of Lazard shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Noah and Lazard, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Noah currently has a consensus price target of $53.46, suggesting a potential upside of 27.59%. Lazard has a consensus price target of $42.6667, suggesting a potential downside of 6.14%. Given Noah's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Noah is more favorable than Lazard.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Noah and Lazard's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Lazard has higher revenue and earnings than Noah. Lazard is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Noah, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Noah and Lazard's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Lazard beats Noah on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Noah (NYSE:NOAH) and Hamilton Lane (NASDAQ:HLNE) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Noah has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hamilton Lane has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

53.2% of Noah shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 60.9% of Hamilton Lane shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.6% of Hamilton Lane shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Noah and Hamilton Lane, as provided by MarketBeat.

Noah presently has a consensus target price of $53.46, suggesting a potential upside of 27.59%. Hamilton Lane has a consensus target price of $87.50, suggesting a potential downside of 3.42%. Given Noah's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Noah is more favorable than Hamilton Lane.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Noah and Hamilton Lane's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Noah has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hamilton Lane. Noah is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hamilton Lane, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Noah and Hamilton Lane's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Noah (NYSE:NOAH) and Houlihan Lokey (NYSE:HLI) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends and earnings.

Volatility & Risk

Noah has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Houlihan Lokey has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Noah and Houlihan Lokey's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Houlihan Lokey has higher revenue and earnings than Noah. Noah is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Houlihan Lokey, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Noah and Houlihan Lokey's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

53.2% of Noah shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.5% of Houlihan Lokey shares are owned by institutional investors. 27.0% of Houlihan Lokey shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Noah and Houlihan Lokey, as provided by MarketBeat.

Noah presently has a consensus target price of $53.46, suggesting a potential upside of 27.59%. Houlihan Lokey has a consensus target price of $66.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.87%. Given Noah's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Noah is more favorable than Houlihan Lokey.

Summary

Houlihan Lokey beats Noah on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.