Oppenheimer (OPY) Competitors

84.2% of Morgan Stanley shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.3% of Oppenheimer shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Morgan Stanley shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.9% of Oppenheimer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Morgan Stanley currently has a consensus price target of $224.75, suggesting a potential upside of 5.03%. Given Morgan Stanley's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Morgan Stanley is more favorable than Oppenheimer.

Morgan Stanley has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oppenheimer has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Morgan Stanley had 237 more articles in the media than Oppenheimer. MarketBeat recorded 247 mentions for Morgan Stanley and 10 mentions for Oppenheimer. Morgan Stanley's average media sentiment score of 1.62 beat Oppenheimer's score of 0.81 indicating that Morgan Stanley is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Morgan Stanley pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Oppenheimer pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Morgan Stanley pays out 37.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oppenheimer pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Morgan Stanley has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Oppenheimer has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Morgan Stanley is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Morgan Stanley has higher revenue and earnings than Oppenheimer. Oppenheimer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Morgan Stanley, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Morgan Stanley has a net margin of 15.65% compared to Oppenheimer's net margin of 5.72%. Oppenheimer's return on equity of 19.51% beat Morgan Stanley's return on equity.

The Goldman Sachs Group has a net margin of 15.53% compared to Oppenheimer's net margin of 5.72%. Oppenheimer's return on equity of 19.51% beat The Goldman Sachs Group's return on equity.

The Goldman Sachs Group has higher revenue and earnings than Oppenheimer. Oppenheimer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Goldman Sachs Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

The Goldman Sachs Group has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its stock price is 30% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oppenheimer has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

The Goldman Sachs Group pays an annual dividend of $18.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Oppenheimer pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. The Goldman Sachs Group pays out 27.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oppenheimer pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Goldman Sachs Group has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Oppenheimer has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. The Goldman Sachs Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, The Goldman Sachs Group had 83 more articles in the media than Oppenheimer. MarketBeat recorded 93 mentions for The Goldman Sachs Group and 10 mentions for Oppenheimer. Oppenheimer's average media sentiment score of 0.81 beat The Goldman Sachs Group's score of 0.76 indicating that Oppenheimer is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

The Goldman Sachs Group currently has a consensus target price of $1,062.86, suggesting a potential upside of 2.90%. Given The Goldman Sachs Group's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe The Goldman Sachs Group is more favorable than Oppenheimer.

71.2% of The Goldman Sachs Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.3% of Oppenheimer shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of The Goldman Sachs Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.9% of Oppenheimer shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Oppenheimer has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles Schwab has a beta of 0.76, meaning that its stock price is 24% less volatile than the broader market.

Charles Schwab has higher revenue and earnings than Oppenheimer. Oppenheimer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Charles Schwab, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Charles Schwab had 29 more articles in the media than Oppenheimer. MarketBeat recorded 39 mentions for Charles Schwab and 10 mentions for Oppenheimer. Charles Schwab's average media sentiment score of 1.16 beat Oppenheimer's score of 0.81 indicating that Charles Schwab is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Oppenheimer pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Charles Schwab pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Oppenheimer pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Charles Schwab pays out 23.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Oppenheimer has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Charles Schwab has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

32.3% of Oppenheimer shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.4% of Charles Schwab shares are owned by institutional investors. 34.9% of Oppenheimer shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of Charles Schwab shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Charles Schwab has a net margin of 38.79% compared to Oppenheimer's net margin of 5.72%. Charles Schwab's return on equity of 24.73% beat Oppenheimer's return on equity.

Charles Schwab has a consensus price target of $121.17, suggesting a potential upside of 12.56%. Given Charles Schwab's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Charles Schwab is more favorable than Oppenheimer.

Raymond James Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Oppenheimer. Oppenheimer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Raymond James Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Raymond James Financial has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oppenheimer has a beta of 1.09, meaning that its share price is 9% more volatile than the broader market.

Raymond James Financial presently has a consensus target price of $181.00, suggesting a potential upside of 0.82%. Given Raymond James Financial's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Raymond James Financial is more favorable than Oppenheimer.

Raymond James Financial has a net margin of 13.57% compared to Oppenheimer's net margin of 5.72%. Oppenheimer's return on equity of 19.51% beat Raymond James Financial's return on equity.

In the previous week, Raymond James Financial and Raymond James Financial both had 10 articles in the media. Raymond James Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Oppenheimer's score of 0.81 indicating that Raymond James Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

83.8% of Raymond James Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.3% of Oppenheimer shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Raymond James Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 34.9% of Oppenheimer shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Raymond James Financial pays an annual dividend of $2.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Oppenheimer pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Raymond James Financial pays out 18.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oppenheimer pays out 9.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Raymond James Financial has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Oppenheimer has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Raymond James Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.