Palmer Square Capital BDC (PSBD) Competitors

In the previous week, Prospect Capital had 4 more articles in the media than Palmer Square Capital BDC. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Prospect Capital and 2 mentions for Palmer Square Capital BDC. Palmer Square Capital BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Prospect Capital's score of 0.81 indicating that Palmer Square Capital BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Prospect Capital presently has a consensus price target of $2.00, indicating a potential downside of 10.71%. Palmer Square Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 1.05%. Given Palmer Square Capital BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Palmer Square Capital BDC is more favorable than Prospect Capital.

Prospect Capital has a net margin of 19.33% compared to Palmer Square Capital BDC's net margin of -26.73%. Prospect Capital's return on equity of 12.15% beat Palmer Square Capital BDC's return on equity.

Prospect Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.42 per share and has a dividend yield of 18.7%. Palmer Square Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.9%. Prospect Capital pays out 840.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Palmer Square Capital BDC pays out -145.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Prospect Capital has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its share price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Palmer Square Capital BDC has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Prospect Capital has higher revenue and earnings than Palmer Square Capital BDC. Palmer Square Capital BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Prospect Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

9.1% of Prospect Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.5% of Palmer Square Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Prospect Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Palmer Square Capital BDC shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Oaktree Specialty Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.5%. Palmer Square Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.9%. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 250.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Palmer Square Capital BDC pays out -145.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Palmer Square Capital BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Oaktree Specialty Lending had 1 more articles in the media than Palmer Square Capital BDC. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Oaktree Specialty Lending and 2 mentions for Palmer Square Capital BDC. Oaktree Specialty Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Palmer Square Capital BDC's score of 1.15 indicating that Oaktree Specialty Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Oaktree Specialty Lending presently has a consensus target price of $11.83, indicating a potential downside of 6.16%. Palmer Square Capital BDC has a consensus target price of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 1.05%. Given Palmer Square Capital BDC's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Palmer Square Capital BDC is more favorable than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Palmer Square Capital BDC. Palmer Square Capital BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oaktree Specialty Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

36.8% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.5% of Palmer Square Capital BDC shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Oaktree Specialty Lending shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Palmer Square Capital BDC shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 14.45% compared to Palmer Square Capital BDC's net margin of -26.73%. Palmer Square Capital BDC's return on equity of 11.22% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Palmer Square Capital BDC has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

28.7% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.5% of Palmer Square Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Goldman Sachs BDC shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Palmer Square Capital BDC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 17.19% compared to Palmer Square Capital BDC's net margin of -26.73%. Palmer Square Capital BDC's return on equity of 11.22% beat Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Palmer Square Capital BDC has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Goldman Sachs BDC currently has a consensus price target of $8.75, suggesting a potential downside of 12.28%. Palmer Square Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $10.50, suggesting a potential upside of 1.05%. Given Palmer Square Capital BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Palmer Square Capital BDC is more favorable than Goldman Sachs BDC.

In the previous week, Goldman Sachs BDC and Goldman Sachs BDC both had 2 articles in the media. Palmer Square Capital BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Goldman Sachs BDC's score of 0.00 indicating that Palmer Square Capital BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Goldman Sachs BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.8%. Palmer Square Capital BDC pays an annual dividend of $1.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.9%. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 246.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Palmer Square Capital BDC pays out -145.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Palmer Square Capital BDC is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Goldman Sachs BDC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Palmer Square Capital BDC. Palmer Square Capital BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goldman Sachs BDC, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Palmer Square Capital BDC has a consensus price target of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 1.05%. Given Palmer Square Capital BDC's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Palmer Square Capital BDC is more favorable than Resolute Holdings Management.

In the previous week, Palmer Square Capital BDC had 1 more articles in the media than Resolute Holdings Management. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Palmer Square Capital BDC and 1 mentions for Resolute Holdings Management. Palmer Square Capital BDC's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Resolute Holdings Management's score of 0.95 indicating that Palmer Square Capital BDC is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Resolute Holdings Management has a beta of -1.31, suggesting that its stock price is 231% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Palmer Square Capital BDC has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

6.5% of Palmer Square Capital BDC shares are held by institutional investors. 52.8% of Resolute Holdings Management shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Palmer Square Capital BDC shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Palmer Square Capital BDC has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Resolute Holdings Management. Palmer Square Capital BDC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Resolute Holdings Management, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Resolute Holdings Management has a net margin of 4.21% compared to Palmer Square Capital BDC's net margin of -26.73%. Palmer Square Capital BDC's return on equity of 11.22% beat Resolute Holdings Management's return on equity.