Go Pro
→ Your $29.97 book is free today (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free QS Stock Alerts

QuantumScape (QS) Competitors

QuantumScape logo
$5.98 +0.28 (+4.91%)
As of 08/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Compare

QS vs. LCID, RIVN, SLDP, TSLA, and CHPT

Should you buy QuantumScape stock or one of its competitors? QuantumScape's main competitors and comparable companies include Lucid Group (LCID), Rivian Automotive (RIVN), Solid Power (SLDP), Tesla (TSLA), and ChargePoint (CHPT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does QuantumScape compare to Lucid Group?

Lucid Group (NASDAQ:LCID) and QuantumScape (NYSE:QS) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Lucid Group has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, QuantumScape has a beta of 2.66, indicating that its stock price is 166% more volatile than the broader market.

QuantumScape has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of -249.21%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -39.90% beat Lucid Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lucid Group-249.21% -1,391.51% -47.61%
QuantumScape N/A -39.90%-35.31%

QuantumScape has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lucid Group. QuantumScape is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lucid Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lucid Group$1.35B1.60-$2.70B-$13.69N/A
QuantumScapeN/AN/A-$477.86M-$0.67N/A

75.2% of Lucid Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of QuantumScape shares are owned by institutional investors. 60.0% of Lucid Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of QuantumScape shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Lucid Group presently has a consensus target price of $9.22, suggesting a potential upside of 67.37%. QuantumScape has a consensus target price of $9.47, suggesting a potential upside of 58.31%. Given Lucid Group's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Lucid Group is more favorable than QuantumScape.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lucid Group
3 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83
QuantumScape
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83

In the previous week, Lucid Group had 2 more articles in the media than QuantumScape. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Lucid Group and 13 mentions for QuantumScape. Lucid Group's average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat QuantumScape's score of 0.12 indicating that Lucid Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lucid Group
5 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
QuantumScape
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Lucid Group beats QuantumScape on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does QuantumScape compare to Rivian Automotive?

Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ:RIVN) and QuantumScape (NYSE:QS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

QuantumScape has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of -54.96%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -39.90% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Rivian Automotive-54.96% -73.90% -23.91%
QuantumScape N/A -39.90%-35.31%

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its share price is 61% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, QuantumScape has a beta of 2.66, indicating that its share price is 166% more volatile than the broader market.

Rivian Automotive currently has a consensus target price of $18.95, indicating a potential upside of 11.69%. QuantumScape has a consensus target price of $9.47, indicating a potential upside of 58.31%. Given QuantumScape's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe QuantumScape is more favorable than Rivian Automotive.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Rivian Automotive
7 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.19
QuantumScape
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83

QuantumScape has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Rivian Automotive. QuantumScape is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rivian Automotive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Rivian Automotive$5.39B4.56-$3.65B-$2.58N/A
QuantumScapeN/AN/A-$477.86M-$0.67N/A

In the previous week, Rivian Automotive had 11 more articles in the media than QuantumScape. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Rivian Automotive and 13 mentions for QuantumScape. Rivian Automotive's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat QuantumScape's score of 0.12 indicating that Rivian Automotive is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Rivian Automotive
9 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
QuantumScape
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

66.3% of Rivian Automotive shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of QuantumScape shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Rivian Automotive shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of QuantumScape shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Rivian Automotive beats QuantumScape on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does QuantumScape compare to Solid Power?

Solid Power (NASDAQ:SLDP) and QuantumScape (NYSE:QS) are related companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

QuantumScape has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Solid Power's net margin of -485.47%. Solid Power's return on equity of -19.69% beat QuantumScape's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solid Power-485.47% -19.69% -18.39%
QuantumScape N/A -39.90%-35.31%

Solid Power has higher revenue and earnings than QuantumScape. QuantumScape is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solid Power, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solid Power$21.75M24.86-$93.41M-$0.45N/A
QuantumScapeN/AN/A-$477.86M-$0.67N/A

33.7% of Solid Power shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of QuantumScape shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Solid Power shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of QuantumScape shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Solid Power presently has a consensus target price of $6.92, indicating a potential upside of 191.84%. QuantumScape has a consensus target price of $9.47, indicating a potential upside of 58.31%. Given Solid Power's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Solid Power is more favorable than QuantumScape.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solid Power
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
QuantumScape
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83

In the previous week, QuantumScape had 11 more articles in the media than Solid Power. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for QuantumScape and 2 mentions for Solid Power. QuantumScape's average media sentiment score of 0.12 beat Solid Power's score of 0.01 indicating that QuantumScape is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Solid Power
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
QuantumScape
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Solid Power has a beta of 1.92, suggesting that its share price is 92% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, QuantumScape has a beta of 2.66, suggesting that its share price is 166% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Solid Power beats QuantumScape on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does QuantumScape compare to Tesla?

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) and QuantumScape (NYSE:QS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Tesla has a net margin of 3.67% compared to QuantumScape's net margin of 0.00%. Tesla's return on equity of 3.82% beat QuantumScape's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tesla3.67% 3.82% 2.27%
QuantumScape N/A -39.90%-35.31%

Tesla presently has a consensus price target of $401.74, suggesting a potential upside of 10.72%. QuantumScape has a consensus price target of $9.47, suggesting a potential upside of 58.31%. Given QuantumScape's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe QuantumScape is more favorable than Tesla.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tesla
4 Sell rating(s)
19 Hold rating(s)
22 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
QuantumScape
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83

Tesla has a beta of 1.83, indicating that its share price is 83% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, QuantumScape has a beta of 2.66, indicating that its share price is 166% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Tesla had 203 more articles in the media than QuantumScape. MarketBeat recorded 216 mentions for Tesla and 13 mentions for QuantumScape. Tesla's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat QuantumScape's score of 0.12 indicating that Tesla is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tesla
84 Very Positive mention(s)
43 Positive mention(s)
50 Neutral mention(s)
26 Negative mention(s)
12 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
QuantumScape
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

66.2% of Tesla shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of QuantumScape shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.9% of Tesla shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of QuantumScape shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Tesla has higher revenue and earnings than QuantumScape. QuantumScape is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tesla, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tesla$94.83B15.11$3.79B$1.08335.98
QuantumScapeN/AN/A-$477.86M-$0.67N/A

Summary

Tesla beats QuantumScape on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does QuantumScape compare to ChargePoint?

ChargePoint (NYSE:CHPT) and QuantumScape (NYSE:QS) are related companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

In the previous week, QuantumScape had 10 more articles in the media than ChargePoint. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for QuantumScape and 3 mentions for ChargePoint. QuantumScape's average media sentiment score of 0.12 beat ChargePoint's score of -0.32 indicating that QuantumScape is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ChargePoint
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
QuantumScape
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

ChargePoint has higher revenue and earnings than QuantumScape. QuantumScape is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ChargePoint, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ChargePoint$411.22M0.37-$220.20M-$8.68N/A
QuantumScapeN/AN/A-$477.86M-$0.67N/A

ChargePoint has a beta of 1.75, suggesting that its stock price is 75% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, QuantumScape has a beta of 2.66, suggesting that its stock price is 166% more volatile than the broader market.

37.8% of ChargePoint shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of QuantumScape shares are held by institutional investors. 4.2% of ChargePoint shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of QuantumScape shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

QuantumScape has a net margin of 0.00% compared to ChargePoint's net margin of -49.66%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -39.90% beat ChargePoint's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ChargePoint-49.66% -504.42% -18.93%
QuantumScape N/A -39.90%-35.31%

ChargePoint presently has a consensus target price of $8.31, suggesting a potential upside of 32.79%. QuantumScape has a consensus target price of $9.47, suggesting a potential upside of 58.31%. Given QuantumScape's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe QuantumScape is more favorable than ChargePoint.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ChargePoint
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
QuantumScape
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83

Summary

QuantumScape beats ChargePoint on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get QuantumScape News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QS vs. The Competition

Export
MetricQuantumScapeAutomobile Components IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.70B$5.13B$13.21B$24.30B
Dividend YieldN/A2.25%56.57%3.70%
P/E Ratio-7.3811.2646.9630.31
Price / SalesN/A24.2588.6619.89
Price / CashN/A11.0929.1332.49
Price / Book2.811.843.936.77
Net Income-$477.86M$72.28M$445.72M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.39%0.22%-0.26%-0.65%
1 Month Performance17.03%2.82%2.74%3.38%
1 Year Performance-26.67%7.86%-1.57%14.90%

QuantumScape Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QS
QuantumScape
1.9931 of 5 stars		$5.98
+4.9%		$9.47
+58.3%		-26.7%$3.70BN/AN/A850
LCID
Lucid Group
3.5285 of 5 stars		$5.63
-4.9%		$9.22
+63.8%		-72.9%$2.33B$1.35BN/A9,000
RIVN
Rivian Automotive
1.9161 of 5 stars		$16.01
+1.8%		$18.95
+18.4%		+29.6%$22.77B$5.39BN/A15,232
SLDP
Solid Power
1.8301 of 5 stars		$2.29
-1.3%		$6.92
+202.0%		-50.4%$529.38M$21.75MN/A240
TSLA
Tesla
3.8767 of 5 stars		$345.13
-1.7%		$401.74
+16.4%		+6.7%$1.39T$94.83B319.57134,785

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:QS) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel