Go Pro

QuantumScape (QS) Competitors

QuantumScape logo
$5.42 +0.21 (+3.93%)
As of 11:42 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QS vs. LCID, RIVN, SLDP, TSLA, and CHPT

Should you buy QuantumScape stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares QuantumScape with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with QuantumScape include Lucid Group (LCID), Rivian Automotive (RIVN), Solid Power (SLDP), Tesla (TSLA), and ChargePoint (CHPT).

How does QuantumScape compare to Lucid Group?

QuantumScape (NYSE:QS) and Lucid Group (NASDAQ:LCID) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

QuantumScape has a beta of 2.61, indicating that its share price is 161% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lucid Group has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

QuantumScape currently has a consensus price target of $9.47, indicating a potential upside of 73.22%. Lucid Group has a consensus price target of $9.56, indicating a potential upside of 22.85%. Given QuantumScape's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe QuantumScape is more favorable than Lucid Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
QuantumScape
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83
Lucid Group
4 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

29.9% of QuantumScape shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.2% of Lucid Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of QuantumScape shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 60.0% of Lucid Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Lucid Group had 35 more articles in the media than QuantumScape. MarketBeat recorded 43 mentions for Lucid Group and 8 mentions for QuantumScape. QuantumScape's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat Lucid Group's score of 0.24 indicating that QuantumScape is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
QuantumScape
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lucid Group
10 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
19 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

QuantumScape has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lucid Group. QuantumScape is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lucid Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
QuantumScapeN/AN/A-$477.86M-$0.67N/A
Lucid Group$1.35B2.24-$2.70B-$13.19N/A

QuantumScape has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Lucid Group's net margin of -248.09%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -39.90% beat Lucid Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
QuantumScapeN/A -39.90% -35.31%
Lucid Group -248.09%-304.01%-41.43%

Summary

QuantumScape beats Lucid Group on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does QuantumScape compare to Rivian Automotive?

QuantumScape (NYSE:QS) and Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ:RIVN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

29.9% of QuantumScape shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.3% of Rivian Automotive shares are held by institutional investors. 3.9% of QuantumScape shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Rivian Automotive shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

QuantumScape has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of -54.96%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -39.90% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
QuantumScapeN/A -39.90% -35.31%
Rivian Automotive -54.96%-73.90%-23.91%

QuantumScape has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Rivian Automotive. QuantumScape is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rivian Automotive, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
QuantumScapeN/AN/A-$477.86M-$0.67N/A
Rivian Automotive$5.39B3.98-$3.65B-$2.58N/A

In the previous week, Rivian Automotive had 72 more articles in the media than QuantumScape. MarketBeat recorded 80 mentions for Rivian Automotive and 8 mentions for QuantumScape. Rivian Automotive's average media sentiment score of 0.48 beat QuantumScape's score of 0.30 indicating that Rivian Automotive is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
QuantumScape
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Rivian Automotive
21 Very Positive mention(s)
18 Positive mention(s)
21 Neutral mention(s)
8 Negative mention(s)
4 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

QuantumScape has a beta of 2.61, indicating that its stock price is 161% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rivian Automotive has a beta of 1.61, indicating that its stock price is 61% more volatile than the broader market.

QuantumScape currently has a consensus price target of $9.47, suggesting a potential upside of 73.22%. Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $18.95, suggesting a potential upside of 20.43%. Given QuantumScape's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe QuantumScape is more favorable than Rivian Automotive.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
QuantumScape
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83
Rivian Automotive
6 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.26

Summary

Rivian Automotive beats QuantumScape on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does QuantumScape compare to Solid Power?

QuantumScape (NYSE:QS) and Solid Power (NASDAQ:SLDP) are related companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

29.9% of QuantumScape shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.7% of Solid Power shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of QuantumScape shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Solid Power shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

QuantumScape has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Solid Power's net margin of -485.47%. Solid Power's return on equity of -21.57% beat QuantumScape's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
QuantumScapeN/A -39.90% -35.31%
Solid Power -485.47%-21.57%-20.02%

In the previous week, QuantumScape had 5 more articles in the media than Solid Power. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for QuantumScape and 3 mentions for Solid Power. Solid Power's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat QuantumScape's score of 0.30 indicating that Solid Power is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
QuantumScape
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Solid Power
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

QuantumScape has a beta of 2.61, meaning that its share price is 161% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solid Power has a beta of 1.92, meaning that its share price is 92% more volatile than the broader market.

Solid Power has higher revenue and earnings than QuantumScape. QuantumScape is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solid Power, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
QuantumScapeN/AN/A-$477.86M-$0.67N/A
Solid Power$21.75M22.29-$93.41M-$0.48N/A

QuantumScape presently has a consensus price target of $9.47, suggesting a potential upside of 73.22%. Solid Power has a consensus price target of $6.92, suggesting a potential upside of 220.96%. Given Solid Power's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Solid Power is more favorable than QuantumScape.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
QuantumScape
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83
Solid Power
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Summary

Solid Power beats QuantumScape on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does QuantumScape compare to Tesla?

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) and QuantumScape (NYSE:QS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk and dividends.

Tesla has a beta of 1.8, meaning that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, QuantumScape has a beta of 2.61, meaning that its stock price is 161% more volatile than the broader market.

Tesla has a net margin of 3.67% compared to QuantumScape's net margin of 0.00%. Tesla's return on equity of 3.82% beat QuantumScape's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tesla3.67% 3.82% 2.27%
QuantumScape N/A -39.90%-35.31%

In the previous week, Tesla had 255 more articles in the media than QuantumScape. MarketBeat recorded 263 mentions for Tesla and 8 mentions for QuantumScape. Tesla's average media sentiment score of 0.39 beat QuantumScape's score of 0.30 indicating that Tesla is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Tesla
92 Very Positive mention(s)
40 Positive mention(s)
47 Neutral mention(s)
60 Negative mention(s)
24 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
QuantumScape
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Tesla has higher revenue and earnings than QuantumScape. QuantumScape is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tesla, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tesla$103.62B12.29$3.79B$1.08298.56
QuantumScapeN/AN/A-$477.86M-$0.67N/A

Tesla currently has a consensus target price of $401.74, indicating a potential upside of 24.59%. QuantumScape has a consensus target price of $9.47, indicating a potential upside of 73.22%. Given QuantumScape's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe QuantumScape is more favorable than Tesla.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Tesla
4 Sell rating(s)
19 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.42
QuantumScape
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83

66.2% of Tesla shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of QuantumScape shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.9% of Tesla shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of QuantumScape shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Tesla beats QuantumScape on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does QuantumScape compare to ChargePoint?

ChargePoint (NYSE:CHPT) and QuantumScape (NYSE:QS) are related companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and media sentiment.

QuantumScape has a net margin of 0.00% compared to ChargePoint's net margin of -49.66%. QuantumScape's return on equity of -39.90% beat ChargePoint's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ChargePoint-49.66% -504.42% -18.93%
QuantumScape N/A -39.90%-35.31%

In the previous week, QuantumScape had 6 more articles in the media than ChargePoint. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for QuantumScape and 2 mentions for ChargePoint. QuantumScape's average media sentiment score of 0.30 beat ChargePoint's score of -0.11 indicating that QuantumScape is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ChargePoint
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
QuantumScape
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

ChargePoint has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, QuantumScape has a beta of 2.61, meaning that its share price is 161% more volatile than the broader market.

37.8% of ChargePoint shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.9% of QuantumScape shares are held by institutional investors. 4.2% of ChargePoint shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.9% of QuantumScape shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ChargePoint has higher revenue and earnings than QuantumScape. QuantumScape is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ChargePoint, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ChargePoint$415.40M0.32-$220.20M-$8.68N/A
QuantumScapeN/AN/A-$477.86M-$0.67N/A

ChargePoint presently has a consensus target price of $8.31, suggesting a potential upside of 50.73%. QuantumScape has a consensus target price of $9.47, suggesting a potential upside of 73.22%. Given QuantumScape's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe QuantumScape is more favorable than ChargePoint.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ChargePoint
3 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80
QuantumScape
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83

Summary

QuantumScape beats ChargePoint on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get QuantumScape News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QS vs. The Competition

MetricQuantumScapeAutomobile Components IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$3.40B$5.13B$13.29B$23.74B
Dividend YieldN/A2.23%53.32%4.21%
P/E Ratio-6.7811.3747.6331.44
Price / SalesN/A22.6190.73164.82
Price / CashN/A11.2418.9318.73
Price / Book2.571.864.564.81
Net Income-$477.86M$72.14M$444.15M$1.07B
7 Day Performance5.50%1.01%1.29%0.68%
1 Month Performance-22.70%2.56%0.82%0.44%
1 Year Performance-33.84%14.34%4.08%20.45%

QuantumScape Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QS
QuantumScape
2.0003 of 5 stars
$5.43
+3.9%
$9.47
+74.5%
-36.8%$3.37BN/AN/A850
LCID
Lucid Group
3.0194 of 5 stars
$8.12
+2.0%
$9.56
+17.7%
-69.5%$3.11B$1.35BN/A9,000
RIVN
Rivian Automotive
3.842 of 5 stars
$16.83
+3.1%
$18.95
+12.6%
+22.9%$22.23B$5.39BN/A15,232
SLDP
Solid Power
2.608 of 5 stars
$2.07
+3.5%
$6.92
+234.1%
-33.8%$449.97M$21.75MN/A240
TSLA
Tesla
4.6813 of 5 stars
$308.85
+3.5%
$402.24
+30.2%
+2.8%$1.18T$94.83B285.97134,785

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:QS) was last updated on 8/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners