S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
S&P 500   3,811.15
DOW   30,932.37
QQQ   314.14
Log in
NYSE:SHAK

Shake Shack Competitors

$118.48
-0.44 (-0.37 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$113.53
Now: $118.48
$121.81
50-Day Range
$90.87
MA: $114.93
$130.76
52-Week Range
$30.01
Now: $118.48
$138.38
Volume1.12 million shs
Average Volume963,418 shs
Market Capitalization$4.91 billion
P/E RatioN/A
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta1.78

Competitors

Shake Shack (NYSE:SHAK) Vs. KMX, TSCO, QSR, ULTA, DRI, and BURL

Should you be buying SHAK stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "retail/wholesale" are considered alternatives and competitors to Shake Shack, including CarMax (KMX), Tractor Supply (TSCO), Restaurant Brands International (QSR), Ulta Beauty (ULTA), Darden Restaurants (DRI), and Burlington Stores (BURL).

CarMax (NYSE:KMX) and Shake Shack (NYSE:SHAK) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for CarMax and Shake Shack, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
CarMax211212.75
Shake Shack110602.29

CarMax presently has a consensus price target of $109.8750, suggesting a potential downside of 8.06%. Shake Shack has a consensus price target of $87.8333, suggesting a potential downside of 25.87%. Given CarMax's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe CarMax is more favorable than Shake Shack.

Profitability

This table compares CarMax and Shake Shack's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
CarMax4.01%20.30%3.77%
Shake Shack-4.80%-5.11%-1.85%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares CarMax and Shake Shack's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CarMax$20.32 billion0.96$888.43 million$5.3322.42
Shake Shack$594.52 million8.26$19.83 million$0.72164.56

CarMax has higher revenue and earnings than Shake Shack. CarMax is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shake Shack, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

CarMax has a beta of 1.76, indicating that its stock price is 76% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Shake Shack has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

97.6% of CarMax shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of Shake Shack shares are held by institutional investors. 2.1% of CarMax shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Shake Shack shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CarMax beats Shake Shack on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Tractor Supply (NASDAQ:TSCO) and Shake Shack (NYSE:SHAK) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Tractor Supply and Shake Shack, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Tractor Supply015912.44
Shake Shack110602.29

Tractor Supply presently has a consensus price target of $143.5833, suggesting a potential downside of 9.67%. Shake Shack has a consensus price target of $87.8333, suggesting a potential downside of 25.87%. Given Tractor Supply's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Tractor Supply is more favorable than Shake Shack.

Profitability

This table compares Tractor Supply and Shake Shack's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Tractor Supply7.62%46.65%12.23%
Shake Shack-4.80%-5.11%-1.85%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Tractor Supply and Shake Shack's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tractor Supply$8.35 billion2.21$562.35 million$4.6833.97
Shake Shack$594.52 million8.26$19.83 million$0.72164.56

Tractor Supply has higher revenue and earnings than Shake Shack. Tractor Supply is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shake Shack, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.96, indicating that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Shake Shack has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

88.3% of Tractor Supply shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of Shake Shack shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Tractor Supply shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Shake Shack shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Tractor Supply beats Shake Shack on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Restaurant Brands International (NYSE:QSR) and Shake Shack (NYSE:SHAK) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

79.5% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of Shake Shack shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Restaurant Brands International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Shake Shack shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Shake Shack's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Restaurant Brands International11.00%26.67%4.70%
Shake Shack-4.80%-5.11%-1.85%

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Restaurant Brands International and Shake Shack, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Restaurant Brands International161802.68
Shake Shack110602.29

Restaurant Brands International presently has a consensus price target of $65.1818, suggesting a potential upside of 8.78%. Shake Shack has a consensus price target of $87.8333, suggesting a potential downside of 25.87%. Given Restaurant Brands International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Restaurant Brands International is more favorable than Shake Shack.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Restaurant Brands International and Shake Shack's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Restaurant Brands International$5.60 billion3.26$643 million$2.7222.03
Shake Shack$594.52 million8.26$19.83 million$0.72164.56

Restaurant Brands International has higher revenue and earnings than Shake Shack. Restaurant Brands International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shake Shack, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Restaurant Brands International has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Shake Shack has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Restaurant Brands International beats Shake Shack on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ulta Beauty (NASDAQ:ULTA) and Shake Shack (NYSE:SHAK) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

86.8% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of Shake Shack shares are held by institutional investors. 4.7% of Ulta Beauty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Shake Shack shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Ulta Beauty and Shake Shack's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Ulta Beauty3.63%15.94%5.59%
Shake Shack-4.80%-5.11%-1.85%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Ulta Beauty and Shake Shack, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Ulta Beauty0101502.60
Shake Shack110602.29

Ulta Beauty presently has a consensus price target of $283.16, suggesting a potential downside of 12.15%. Shake Shack has a consensus price target of $87.8333, suggesting a potential downside of 25.87%. Given Ulta Beauty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Ulta Beauty is more favorable than Shake Shack.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Ulta Beauty and Shake Shack's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Ulta Beauty$7.40 billion2.45$705.95 million$11.9127.06
Shake Shack$594.52 million8.26$19.83 million$0.72164.56

Ulta Beauty has higher revenue and earnings than Shake Shack. Ulta Beauty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shake Shack, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Ulta Beauty has a beta of 1.73, indicating that its stock price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Shake Shack has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Ulta Beauty beats Shake Shack on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Darden Restaurants (NYSE:DRI) and Shake Shack (NYSE:SHAK) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.4% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of Shake Shack shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Darden Restaurants shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Shake Shack shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Darden Restaurants and Shake Shack's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Darden Restaurants-1.70%10.47%2.51%
Shake Shack-4.80%-5.11%-1.85%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Darden Restaurants and Shake Shack, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Darden Restaurants0102002.67
Shake Shack110602.29

Darden Restaurants presently has a consensus price target of $114.1833, suggesting a potential downside of 16.85%. Shake Shack has a consensus price target of $87.8333, suggesting a potential downside of 25.87%. Given Darden Restaurants' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Darden Restaurants is more favorable than Shake Shack.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Darden Restaurants and Shake Shack's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Darden Restaurants$7.81 billion2.29$-52,400,000.00$3.1343.88
Shake Shack$594.52 million8.26$19.83 million$0.72164.56

Shake Shack has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Darden Restaurants. Darden Restaurants is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shake Shack, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Darden Restaurants has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Shake Shack has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Darden Restaurants beats Shake Shack on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Burlington Stores (NYSE:BURL) and Shake Shack (NYSE:SHAK) are both retail/wholesale companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

89.6% of Shake Shack shares are held by institutional investors. 1.5% of Burlington Stores shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 15.0% of Shake Shack shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Burlington Stores and Shake Shack's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Burlington Stores-2.92%-33.07%-1.76%
Shake Shack-4.80%-5.11%-1.85%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Burlington Stores and Shake Shack, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Burlington Stores032002.87
Shake Shack110602.29

Burlington Stores presently has a consensus price target of $246.1364, suggesting a potential downside of 4.90%. Shake Shack has a consensus price target of $87.8333, suggesting a potential downside of 25.87%. Given Burlington Stores' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Burlington Stores is more favorable than Shake Shack.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Burlington Stores and Shake Shack's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Burlington Stores$7.29 billion2.35$465.12 million$7.4134.93
Shake Shack$594.52 million8.26$19.83 million$0.72164.56

Burlington Stores has higher revenue and earnings than Shake Shack. Burlington Stores is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Shake Shack, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Burlington Stores has a beta of 0.75, indicating that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Shake Shack has a beta of 1.78, indicating that its stock price is 78% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Burlington Stores beats Shake Shack on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Shake Shack Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
CarMax logo
KMX
CarMax
2.0$119.51-0.5%$19.43 billion$20.32 billion26.32Decrease in Short Interest
Tractor Supply logo
TSCO
Tractor Supply
2.1$158.96-1.4%$18.49 billion$8.35 billion24.68
Restaurant Brands International logo
QSR
Restaurant Brands International
2.1$59.92-2.6%$18.29 billion$5.60 billion32.57
Ulta Beauty logo
ULTA
Ulta Beauty
1.7$322.33-1.7%$18.16 billion$7.40 billion81.40
Darden Restaurants logo
DRI
Darden Restaurants
2.0$137.33-1.0%$17.90 billion$7.81 billion-143.05
Burlington Stores logo
BURL
Burlington Stores
1.2$258.82-1.1%$17.14 billion$7.29 billion-99.55Upcoming Earnings
L Brands logo
LB
L Brands
1.3$54.66-4.2%$15.20 billion$12.91 billion-70.08Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Gap Down
Domino's Pizza logo
DPZ
Domino's Pizza
2.2$346.51-2.2%$13.65 billion$3.62 billion29.69Earnings Announcement
Dividend Increase
Analyst Report
High Trading Volume
Analyst Revision
Tapestry logo
TPR
Tapestry
1.6$42.14-0.6%$11.71 billion$4.96 billion-26.34
Advance Auto Parts logo
AAP
Advance Auto Parts
1.9$160.35-0.2%$10.51 billion$9.71 billion23.31
Five Below logo
FIVE
Five Below
1.4$186.12-0.1%$10.40 billion$1.85 billion95.45
Williams-Sonoma logo
WSM
Williams-Sonoma
1.8$131.29-2.3%$10.06 billion$5.90 billion25.30
RH logo
RH
RH
1.2$490.37-3.5%$10.00 billion$2.65 billion62.55Gap Down
Lithia Motors logo
LAD
Lithia Motors
2.6$373.95-0.8%$9.92 billion$12.67 billion24.76
The Gap logo
GPS
The Gap
1.1$24.95-1.1%$9.33 billion$16.38 billion-8.54Upcoming Earnings
Levi Strauss & Co. logo
LEVI
Levi Strauss & Co.
1.8$23.26-0.2%$9.26 billion$5.76 billion-96.91
Kohl's logo
KSS
Kohl's
1.3$55.25-1.5%$8.71 billion$19.97 billion-35.42Upcoming Earnings
Fiverr International logo
FVRR
Fiverr International
1.2$269.97-2.2%$8.37 billion$107.07 million-627.82Gap Down
MINISO Group logo
MNSO
MINISO Group
1.3$26.67-1.9%$8.11 billion$1.28 billion0.00Gap Down
Stitch Fix logo
SFIX
Stitch Fix
1.4$76.31-8.3%$8.00 billion$1.71 billion-133.88Upcoming Earnings
Casey's General Stores logo
CASY
Casey's General Stores
1.8$201.96-1.0%$7.46 billion$9.18 billion22.90Upcoming Earnings
Performance Food Group logo
PFGC
Performance Food Group
1.7$54.24-1.7%$7.25 billion$25.09 billion-46.76
GameStop logo
GME
GameStop
0.9$101.74-6.9%$7.10 billion$6.47 billion-23.94Gap Down
Capri logo
CPRI
Capri
1.6$46.67-0.1%$7.05 billion$5.55 billion-17.22
Tempur Sealy International logo
TPX
Tempur Sealy International
1.9$33.41-0.0%$6.86 billion$3.11 billion28.56
TripAdvisor logo
TRIP
TripAdvisor
1.3$49.62-12.3%$6.68 billion$1.56 billion-32.86High Trading Volume
DICK'S Sporting Goods logo
DKS
DICK'S Sporting Goods
2.1$71.37-2.3%$6.39 billion$8.75 billion17.58
Texas Roadhouse logo
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse
1.5$90.88-0.0%$6.31 billion$2.76 billion116.51
AutoNation logo
AN
AutoNation
1.0$75.02-0.8%$6.17 billion$21.34 billion17.09
Nordstrom logo
JWN
Nordstrom
1.1$36.45-1.4%$5.75 billion$15.52 billion-10.78Upcoming Earnings
Penske Automotive Group logo
PAG
Penske Automotive Group
2.0$67.98-1.4%$5.46 billion$23.18 billion12.32
Herbalife Nutrition logo
HLF
Herbalife Nutrition
2.2$44.98-0.4%$5.30 billion$4.88 billion17.43
QRTEB
Qurate Retail
0.7$12.44-2.6%$5.19 billion$13.46 billion7.68Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
Qurate Retail logo
QRTEA
Qurate Retail
1.7$12.42-2.6%$5.18 billion$13.46 billion7.67Earnings Announcement
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Builders FirstSource logo
BLDR
Builders FirstSource
1.8$43.26-6.1%$5.05 billion$7.28 billion23.77Earnings Announcement
Foot Locker logo
FL
Foot Locker
2.7$48.09-9.6%$5.01 billion$8.01 billion14.31Earnings Announcement
High Trading Volume
Unusual Options Activity
Gap Up
Canada Goose logo
GOOS
Canada Goose
1.6$44.83-3.4%$4.95 billion$720.34 million80.06Decrease in Short Interest
Macy's logo
M
Macy's
1.7$15.21-3.4%$4.72 billion$24.56 billion-1.25Earnings Announcement
Insider Buying
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
The Wendy's logo
WEN
The Wendy's
2.2$20.43-1.8%$4.58 billion$1.71 billion42.56Upcoming Earnings
Dividend Increase
American Eagle Outfitters logo
AEO
American Eagle Outfitters
1.6$25.70-0.4%$4.27 billion$4.31 billion-20.24Upcoming Earnings
Wingstop logo
WING
Wingstop
1.7$136.15-2.2%$4.04 billion$199.68 million141.82
BigCommerce logo
BIGC
BigCommerce
1.1$59.11-6.3%$4.01 billionN/A0.00Insider Selling
Companhia Brasileira de Distribuição logo
CBD
Companhia Brasileira de Distribuição
1.4$14.97-2.7%$3.99 billion$13.76 billion34.02Increase in Short Interest
Gap Down
Jumia Technologies logo
JMIA
Jumia Technologies
0.9$44.31-4.3%$3.95 billion$180.10 million-12.99Analyst Revision
Gap Up
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store logo
CBRL
Cracker Barrel Old Country Store
1.3$154.87-0.5%$3.67 billion$2.52 billion39.01Earnings Announcement
Analyst Revision
Vivint Smart Home logo
VVNT
Vivint Smart Home
1.6$17.00-2.2%$3.46 billionN/A121.43Decrease in Short Interest
Beacon Roofing Supply logo
BECN
Beacon Roofing Supply
1.0$47.83-0.9%$3.32 billion$6.94 billion-28.99
Stamps.com logo
STMP
Stamps.com
1.6$181.93-1.3%$3.32 billion$571.85 million22.54Decrease in Short Interest
Urban Outfitters logo
URBN
Urban Outfitters
1.6$33.90-1.9%$3.31 billion$3.98 billion-423.75Upcoming Earnings
Asbury Automotive Group logo
ABG
Asbury Automotive Group
1.4$169.45-1.1%$3.27 billion$7.21 billion15.69
This page was last updated on 3/1/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.