Sylvamo (SLVM) Competitors

90.0% of Clearwater Paper shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of Sylvamo shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Clearwater Paper shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Sylvamo shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sylvamo has a net margin of 2.31% compared to Clearwater Paper's net margin of -3.24%. Sylvamo's return on equity of 8.36% beat Clearwater Paper's return on equity.

Sylvamo has higher revenue and earnings than Clearwater Paper. Clearwater Paper is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sylvamo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Clearwater Paper presently has a consensus price target of $18.50, suggesting a potential downside of 14.57%. Sylvamo has a consensus price target of $46.67, suggesting a potential upside of 25.67%. Given Sylvamo's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sylvamo is more favorable than Clearwater Paper.

Clearwater Paper has a beta of 0.24, meaning that its stock price is 76% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sylvamo has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Clearwater Paper had 1 more articles in the media than Sylvamo. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Clearwater Paper and 2 mentions for Sylvamo. Sylvamo's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Clearwater Paper's score of 0.45 indicating that Sylvamo is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

85.8% of Mercer International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of Sylvamo shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Mercer International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Sylvamo shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Sylvamo has a net margin of 2.31% compared to Mercer International's net margin of -27.86%. Sylvamo's return on equity of 8.36% beat Mercer International's return on equity.

Mercer International pays an annual dividend of $0.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 16.7%. Sylvamo pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Mercer International pays out -0.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sylvamo pays out 95.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sylvamo has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Mercer International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Sylvamo has higher revenue and earnings than Mercer International. Mercer International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sylvamo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Sylvamo had 2 more articles in the media than Mercer International. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Sylvamo and 0 mentions for Mercer International. Sylvamo's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Mercer International's score of 0.00 indicating that Sylvamo is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Mercer International has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sylvamo has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market.

Mercer International currently has a consensus price target of $1.13, suggesting a potential upside of 169.05%. Sylvamo has a consensus price target of $46.67, suggesting a potential upside of 25.67%. Given Mercer International's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Mercer International is more favorable than Sylvamo.

Sylvamo has higher revenue and earnings than IT Tech Packaging. IT Tech Packaging is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sylvamo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Sylvamo has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IT Tech Packaging has a beta of -0.24, indicating that its share price is 124% less volatile than the broader market.

Sylvamo has a net margin of 2.31% compared to IT Tech Packaging's net margin of -12.35%. Sylvamo's return on equity of 8.36% beat IT Tech Packaging's return on equity.

In the previous week, Sylvamo had 2 more articles in the media than IT Tech Packaging. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Sylvamo and 0 mentions for IT Tech Packaging. Sylvamo's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat IT Tech Packaging's score of 0.00 indicating that Sylvamo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

91.2% of Sylvamo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.0% of IT Tech Packaging shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Sylvamo shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of IT Tech Packaging shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sylvamo presently has a consensus price target of $46.67, suggesting a potential upside of 25.67%. Given Sylvamo's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Sylvamo is more favorable than IT Tech Packaging.

Sylvamo has a beta of 0.87, indicating that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Suzano has a beta of 0.56, indicating that its stock price is 44% less volatile than the broader market.

Sylvamo pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Suzano pays an annual dividend of $0.18 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Sylvamo pays out 95.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Suzano pays out 14.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Sylvamo has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Sylvamo is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Sylvamo currently has a consensus price target of $46.67, suggesting a potential upside of 25.67%. Suzano has a consensus price target of $13.20, suggesting a potential upside of 44.98%. Given Suzano's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Suzano is more favorable than Sylvamo.

In the previous week, Suzano had 2 more articles in the media than Sylvamo. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Suzano and 2 mentions for Sylvamo. Suzano's average media sentiment score of 3.00 beat Sylvamo's score of 1.31 indicating that Suzano is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Suzano has higher revenue and earnings than Sylvamo. Suzano is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Sylvamo, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Suzano has a net margin of 17.20% compared to Sylvamo's net margin of 2.31%. Suzano's return on equity of 14.92% beat Sylvamo's return on equity.

91.2% of Sylvamo shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.5% of Suzano shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Sylvamo shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.