Do analysts prefer MLKN or HNI?

HNI has a consensus price target of $65.00, suggesting a potential upside of 74.89%. Given HNI's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe HNI is more favorable than MillerKnoll. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MillerKnoll 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 HNI 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, MLKN or HNI?

HNI has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MillerKnoll. HNI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MillerKnoll $3.67B 0.32 -$36.90M $0.14 123.14 HNI $2.84B 0.93 $54.20M $0.41 90.65

Is MLKN or HNI more profitable?

MillerKnoll has a net margin of 0.28% compared to HNI's net margin of 0.04%. HNI's return on equity of 13.17% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MillerKnoll 0.28% 10.11% 3.34% HNI 0.04% 13.17% 5.16%

Does the media favor MLKN or HNI?

In the previous week, MillerKnoll had 5 more articles in the media than HNI. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for MillerKnoll and 2 mentions for HNI. HNI's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that HNI is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MillerKnoll 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral HNI 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate SLVM or MLKN?

Sylvamo presently has a consensus price target of $54.00, indicating a potential upside of 36.23%. Given Sylvamo's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Sylvamo is more favorable than MillerKnoll. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Sylvamo 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.20 MillerKnoll 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, SLVM or MLKN?

Sylvamo has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MillerKnoll. Sylvamo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Sylvamo $3.35B 0.47 $132M $2.53 15.67 MillerKnoll $3.67B 0.32 -$36.90M $0.14 123.14

Is SLVM or MLKN more profitable?

Sylvamo has a net margin of 3.11% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 0.28%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 10.11% beat Sylvamo's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Sylvamo 3.11% 9.79% 3.46% MillerKnoll 0.28% 10.11% 3.34%

Do analysts rate MLKN or PACK?

Ranpak has a consensus price target of $6.83, indicating a potential downside of 10.48%. Given Ranpak's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ranpak is more favorable than MillerKnoll. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MillerKnoll 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Ranpak 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MLKN or PACK?

MillerKnoll has higher revenue and earnings than Ranpak. Ranpak is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MillerKnoll $3.67B 0.32 -$36.90M $0.14 123.14 Ranpak $395M 1.65 -$38.30M -$0.44 N/A

Is MLKN or PACK more profitable?

MillerKnoll has a net margin of 0.28% compared to Ranpak's net margin of -9.28%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 10.11% beat Ranpak's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MillerKnoll 0.28% 10.11% 3.34% Ranpak -9.28% -7.04% -3.34%

Do analysts recommend RYAM or MLKN?

Rayonier Advanced Materials presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 75.11%. Given Rayonier Advanced Materials' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Rayonier Advanced Materials is more favorable than MillerKnoll. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Rayonier Advanced Materials 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 MillerKnoll 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media refer more to RYAM or MLKN?

In the previous week, MillerKnoll had 5 more articles in the media than Rayonier Advanced Materials. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for MillerKnoll and 2 mentions for Rayonier Advanced Materials. Rayonier Advanced Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that Rayonier Advanced Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Rayonier Advanced Materials 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral MillerKnoll 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer MATV or MLKN?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Mativ 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 MillerKnoll 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MATV or MLKN?

MillerKnoll has higher revenue and earnings than Mativ. Mativ is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Mativ $1.99B 0.22 -$337.40M $1.34 5.99 MillerKnoll $3.67B 0.32 -$36.90M $0.14 123.14

Is MATV or MLKN more profitable?

Mativ has a net margin of 3.86% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 0.28%. Mativ's return on equity of 11.77% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Mativ 3.86% 11.77% 2.57% MillerKnoll 0.28% 10.11% 3.34%

MillerKnoll (MLKN) Competitors

$17.24 +1.18 (+7.35%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$16.42 -0.81 (-4.73%)

As of 07:51 PM Eastern

Compare

MLKN vs. HNI, SLVM, PACK, RYAM, and MATV

Should you buy MillerKnoll stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares MillerKnoll with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with MillerKnoll include HNI (HNI), Sylvamo (SLVM), Ranpak (PACK), Rayonier Advanced Materials (RYAM), and Mativ (MATV).

How does MillerKnoll compare to HNI?

MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) and HNI (NYSE:HNI) are related companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

MillerKnoll has a net margin of 0.28% compared to HNI's net margin of 0.04%. HNI's return on equity of 13.17% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MillerKnoll	0.28%	10.11%	3.34%
HNI	0.04%	13.17%	5.16%

87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.3% of HNI shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of HNI shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, MillerKnoll had 5 more articles in the media than HNI. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for MillerKnoll and 2 mentions for HNI. HNI's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that HNI is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MillerKnoll	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
HNI	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HNI has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

MillerKnoll pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. HNI pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. MillerKnoll pays out 535.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. HNI pays out 341.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. HNI has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years.

HNI has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MillerKnoll. HNI is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MillerKnoll	$3.67B	0.32	-$36.90M	$0.14	123.14
HNI	$2.84B	0.93	$54.20M	$0.41	90.65

HNI has a consensus price target of $65.00, suggesting a potential upside of 74.89%. Given HNI's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe HNI is more favorable than MillerKnoll.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MillerKnoll	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
HNI	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

HNI beats MillerKnoll on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MillerKnoll compare to Sylvamo?

Sylvamo (NYSE:SLVM) and MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) are both small-cap business supplies companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, risk and dividends.

91.2% of Sylvamo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Sylvamo shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sylvamo has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Sylvamo has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MillerKnoll. Sylvamo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Sylvamo	$3.35B	0.47	$132M	$2.53	15.67
MillerKnoll	$3.67B	0.32	-$36.90M	$0.14	123.14

Sylvamo pays an annual dividend of $1.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. MillerKnoll pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Sylvamo pays out 71.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MillerKnoll pays out 535.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Sylvamo has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Sylvamo is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Sylvamo presently has a consensus price target of $54.00, indicating a potential upside of 36.23%. Given Sylvamo's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Sylvamo is more favorable than MillerKnoll.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Sylvamo	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20
MillerKnoll	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Sylvamo has a net margin of 3.11% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 0.28%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 10.11% beat Sylvamo's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Sylvamo	3.11%	9.79%	3.46%
MillerKnoll	0.28%	10.11%	3.34%

In the previous week, MillerKnoll had 7 more articles in the media than Sylvamo. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for MillerKnoll and 0 mentions for Sylvamo. Sylvamo's average media sentiment score of 1.79 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that Sylvamo is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Sylvamo	Very Positive
MillerKnoll	Neutral

Summary

Sylvamo beats MillerKnoll on 14 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MillerKnoll compare to Ranpak?

MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) and Ranpak (NYSE:PACK) are both small-cap business supplies companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends and profitability.

Ranpak has a consensus price target of $6.83, indicating a potential downside of 10.48%. Given Ranpak's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Ranpak is more favorable than MillerKnoll.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MillerKnoll	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Ranpak	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

MillerKnoll has higher revenue and earnings than Ranpak. Ranpak is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MillerKnoll	$3.67B	0.32	-$36.90M	$0.14	123.14
Ranpak	$395M	1.65	-$38.30M	-$0.44	N/A

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ranpak has a beta of 3.14, suggesting that its stock price is 214% more volatile than the broader market.

MillerKnoll has a net margin of 0.28% compared to Ranpak's net margin of -9.28%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 10.11% beat Ranpak's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MillerKnoll	0.28%	10.11%	3.34%
Ranpak	-9.28%	-7.04%	-3.34%

In the previous week, MillerKnoll had 7 more articles in the media than Ranpak. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for MillerKnoll and 0 mentions for Ranpak. MillerKnoll's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ranpak'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
MillerKnoll	Neutral
Ranpak	Neutral

87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 85.9% of Ranpak shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.8% of Ranpak shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

MillerKnoll beats Ranpak on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MillerKnoll compare to Rayonier Advanced Materials?

Rayonier Advanced Materials (NYSE:RYAM) and MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) are both small-cap business supplies companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

MillerKnoll has higher revenue and earnings than Rayonier Advanced Materials. Rayonier Advanced Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Rayonier Advanced Materials	$1.47B	0.37	-$420.67M	-$7.05	N/A
MillerKnoll	$3.67B	0.32	-$36.90M	$0.14	123.14

MillerKnoll has a net margin of 0.28% compared to Rayonier Advanced Materials' net margin of -32.86%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 10.11% beat Rayonier Advanced Materials' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Rayonier Advanced Materials	-32.86%	-43.24%	-7.60%
MillerKnoll	0.28%	10.11%	3.34%

Rayonier Advanced Materials has a beta of 1.74, suggesting that its stock price is 74% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, MillerKnoll had 5 more articles in the media than Rayonier Advanced Materials. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for MillerKnoll and 2 mentions for Rayonier Advanced Materials. Rayonier Advanced Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that Rayonier Advanced Materials is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Rayonier Advanced Materials	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
MillerKnoll	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

68.6% of Rayonier Advanced Materials shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by institutional investors. 3.2% of Rayonier Advanced Materials shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Rayonier Advanced Materials presently has a consensus price target of $14.00, suggesting a potential upside of 75.11%. Given Rayonier Advanced Materials' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Rayonier Advanced Materials is more favorable than MillerKnoll.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Rayonier Advanced Materials	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
MillerKnoll	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

MillerKnoll beats Rayonier Advanced Materials on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MillerKnoll compare to Mativ?

Mativ (NYSE:MATV) and MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) are both small-cap business supplies companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Mativ	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
MillerKnoll	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

95.0% of Mativ shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by institutional investors. 1.8% of Mativ shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Mativ has a beta of 0.87, meaning that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.41, meaning that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Mativ pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. MillerKnoll pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Mativ pays out 29.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MillerKnoll pays out 535.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Mativ has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Mativ is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

MillerKnoll has higher revenue and earnings than Mativ. Mativ is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Mativ	$1.99B	0.22	-$337.40M	$1.34	5.99
MillerKnoll	$3.67B	0.32	-$36.90M	$0.14	123.14

Mativ has a net margin of 3.86% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 0.28%. Mativ's return on equity of 11.77% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Mativ	3.86%	11.77%	2.57%
MillerKnoll	0.28%	10.11%	3.34%

In the previous week, MillerKnoll had 7 more articles in the media than Mativ. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for MillerKnoll and 0 mentions for Mativ. Mativ's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled MillerKnoll'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Mativ	Neutral
MillerKnoll	Neutral

Summary

MillerKnoll beats Mativ on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MillerKnoll News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MLKN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MLKN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	MillerKnoll	FURNITURE Industry	Discretionary Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.10B	$609.07M	$7.18B	$12.24B
Dividend Yield	4.67%	3.33%	3.08%	5.82%
P/E Ratio	8.41	22.44	20.60	23.98
Price / Sales	0.32	0.40	3.96	120.62
Price / Cash	3.89	7.77	15.18	54.51
Price / Book	0.92	1.14	3.72	6.41
Net Income	-$36.90M	$20.75M	$247.03M	$337.14M
7 Day Performance	9.46%	-2.15%	-0.29%	-0.48%
1 Month Performance	11.59%	-0.59%	0.51%	0.49%
1 Year Performance	-2.71%	-5.14%	3.10%	28.16%

MillerKnoll Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MLKN MillerKnoll	2.2717 of 5 stars	$17.24 +7.3%	N/A	-7.3%	$1.10B	$3.67B	8.41	10,382	News Coverage Earnings Report
HNI HNI	4.7264 of 5 stars	$34.08 -2.2%	$65.00 +90.7%	-27.5%	$2.48B	$3.59B	83.13	19,500	Positive News
SLVM Sylvamo	4.9819 of 5 stars	$38.94 -1.8%	$54.00 +38.7%	-24.0%	$1.58B	$3.35B	15.39	6,500	Positive News
PACK Ranpak	0.5381 of 5 stars	$7.28 -0.8%	$6.83 -6.2%	+111.1%	$627.90M	$395M	N/A	880	Gap Down
RYAM Rayonier Advanced Materials	2.2171 of 5 stars	$8.24 -9.0%	$14.00 +70.0%	+110.4%	$610.32M	$1.43B	N/A	2,325

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MLKN) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

MillerKnoll (MLKN) Competitors