Do analysts rate MLKN or HNI?

HNI has a consensus target price of $65.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.77%. Given HNI's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe HNI is more favorable than MillerKnoll. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MillerKnoll 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 HNI 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MLKN or HNI?

MillerKnoll has higher revenue and earnings than HNI. MillerKnoll is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HNI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MillerKnoll $3.84B 0.37 $91.50M $1.32 15.65 HNI $2.84B 1.17 $54.20M $0.09 513.03

Is MLKN or HNI more profitable?

MillerKnoll has a net margin of 2.38% compared to HNI's net margin of 0.10%. HNI's return on equity of 13.66% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MillerKnoll 2.38% 9.77% 3.25% HNI 0.10% 13.66% 5.23%

Does the media prefer MLKN or HNI?

In the previous week, MillerKnoll and MillerKnoll both had 4 articles in the media. HNI's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that HNI is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MillerKnoll 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral HNI 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate MLKN or PBI?

Pitney Bowes has a consensus target price of $18.45, indicating a potential upside of 9.63%. Given Pitney Bowes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pitney Bowes is more favorable than MillerKnoll. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MillerKnoll 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Pitney Bowes 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.71

Does the media prefer MLKN or PBI?

In the previous week, Pitney Bowes had 4 more articles in the media than MillerKnoll. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Pitney Bowes and 4 mentions for MillerKnoll. Pitney Bowes' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that Pitney Bowes is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MillerKnoll 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Pitney Bowes 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate MLKN or TILE?

Interface has a consensus target price of $40.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.21%. Given Interface's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Interface is more favorable than MillerKnoll. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MillerKnoll 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Interface 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.25

Is MLKN or TILE more profitable?

Interface has a net margin of 10.10% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 2.38%. Interface's return on equity of 21.77% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MillerKnoll 2.38% 9.77% 3.25% Interface 10.10% 21.77% 11.18%

Does the media favor MLKN or TILE?

In the previous week, MillerKnoll and MillerKnoll both had 4 articles in the media. Interface's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that Interface is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MillerKnoll 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Interface 3 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend MLKN or CIX?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MillerKnoll 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 CompX International 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Does the media refer more to MLKN or CIX?

In the previous week, MillerKnoll had 3 more articles in the media than CompX International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for MillerKnoll and 1 mentions for CompX International. CompX International's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that CompX International is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MillerKnoll 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral CompX International 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend MLKN or ACCO?

Acco Brands has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 43.71%. Given Acco Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Acco Brands is more favorable than MillerKnoll. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MillerKnoll 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Acco Brands 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Which has better valuation & earnings, MLKN or ACCO?

MillerKnoll has higher revenue and earnings than Acco Brands. Acco Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MillerKnoll $3.84B 0.37 $91.50M $1.32 15.65 Acco Brands $1.52B 0.25 $41.30M $0.62 6.73

Does the media favor MLKN or ACCO?

In the previous week, MillerKnoll and MillerKnoll both had 4 articles in the media. Acco Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that Acco Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MillerKnoll 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Acco Brands 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

MillerKnoll (MLKN) Competitors

$20.66 -0.49 (-2.32%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$20.62 -0.04 (-0.17%)

As of 07:59 PM Eastern

Compare

MLKN vs. HNI, PBI, TILE, CIX, and ACCO

Should you buy MillerKnoll stock or one of its competitors? MillerKnoll's main competitors and comparable companies include HNI (HNI), Pitney Bowes (PBI), Interface (TILE), CompX International (CIX), and Acco Brands (ACCO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "office services & supplies" industry.

How does MillerKnoll compare to HNI?

MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) and HNI (NYSE:HNI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

MillerKnoll has a net margin of 2.38% compared to HNI's net margin of 0.10%. HNI's return on equity of 13.66% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MillerKnoll	2.38%	9.77%	3.25%
HNI	0.10%	13.66%	5.23%

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HNI has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

MillerKnoll has higher revenue and earnings than HNI. MillerKnoll is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HNI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MillerKnoll	$3.84B	0.37	$91.50M	$1.32	15.65
HNI	$2.84B	1.17	$54.20M	$0.09	513.03

HNI has a consensus target price of $65.00, indicating a potential upside of 40.77%. Given HNI's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe HNI is more favorable than MillerKnoll.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MillerKnoll	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
HNI	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.3% of HNI shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of HNI shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, MillerKnoll and MillerKnoll both had 4 articles in the media. HNI's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that HNI is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MillerKnoll	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
HNI	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

MillerKnoll pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. HNI pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. MillerKnoll pays out 56.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HNI pays out 1,555.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. HNI has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. MillerKnoll is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

MillerKnoll beats HNI on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MillerKnoll compare to Pitney Bowes?

MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) and Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

MillerKnoll pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. MillerKnoll pays out 56.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pitney Bowes pays out 32.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pitney Bowes has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

In the previous week, Pitney Bowes had 4 more articles in the media than MillerKnoll. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Pitney Bowes and 4 mentions for MillerKnoll. Pitney Bowes' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that Pitney Bowes is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MillerKnoll	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Pitney Bowes	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Pitney Bowes shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pitney Bowes has a consensus target price of $18.45, indicating a potential upside of 9.63%. Given Pitney Bowes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Pitney Bowes is more favorable than MillerKnoll.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MillerKnoll	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Pitney Bowes	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71

Pitney Bowes has a net margin of 10.04% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 2.38%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 9.77% beat Pitney Bowes' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MillerKnoll	2.38%	9.77%	3.25%
Pitney Bowes	10.04%	-31.37%	8.02%

Pitney Bowes has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MillerKnoll. Pitney Bowes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MillerKnoll	$3.84B	0.37	$91.50M	$1.32	15.65
Pitney Bowes	$1.89B	1.22	$144.70M	$1.22	13.80

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.64, meaning that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Pitney Bowes beats MillerKnoll on 14 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MillerKnoll compare to Interface?

MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) and Interface (NASDAQ:TILE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Interface has a consensus target price of $40.50, suggesting a potential upside of 18.21%. Given Interface's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Interface is more favorable than MillerKnoll.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MillerKnoll	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Interface	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.25

Interface has a net margin of 10.10% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 2.38%. Interface's return on equity of 21.77% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MillerKnoll	2.38%	9.77%	3.25%
Interface	10.10%	21.77%	11.18%

87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.3% of Interface shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Interface shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Interface has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MillerKnoll. Interface is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MillerKnoll	$3.84B	0.37	$91.50M	$1.32	15.65
Interface	$1.39B	1.43	$116.10M	$2.47	13.87

In the previous week, MillerKnoll and MillerKnoll both had 4 articles in the media. Interface's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that Interface is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MillerKnoll	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Interface	3 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interface has a beta of 1.92, meaning that its stock price is 92% more volatile than the broader market.

MillerKnoll pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Interface pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. MillerKnoll pays out 56.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Interface pays out 4.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Summary

Interface beats MillerKnoll on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MillerKnoll compare to CompX International?

MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) and CompX International (NYSE:CIX) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and risk.

87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.5% of CompX International shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of CompX International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MillerKnoll	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
CompX International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

CompX International has a net margin of 12.48% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 2.38%. CompX International's return on equity of 11.51% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MillerKnoll	2.38%	9.77%	3.25%
CompX International	12.48%	11.51%	10.52%

MillerKnoll has higher revenue and earnings than CompX International. MillerKnoll is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CompX International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MillerKnoll	$3.84B	0.37	$91.50M	$1.32	15.65
CompX International	$161.83M	2.84	$22.59M	$1.79	20.87

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CompX International has a beta of 0.89, indicating that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the broader market.

MillerKnoll pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. CompX International pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. MillerKnoll pays out 56.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CompX International pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CompX International has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. MillerKnoll is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, MillerKnoll had 3 more articles in the media than CompX International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for MillerKnoll and 1 mentions for CompX International. CompX International's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that CompX International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MillerKnoll	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
CompX International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

MillerKnoll beats CompX International on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MillerKnoll compare to Acco Brands?

MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) and Acco Brands (NYSE:ACCO) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

MillerKnoll has higher revenue and earnings than Acco Brands. Acco Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MillerKnoll	$3.84B	0.37	$91.50M	$1.32	15.65
Acco Brands	$1.52B	0.25	$41.30M	$0.62	6.73

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Acco Brands has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Acco Brands has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 43.71%. Given Acco Brands' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Acco Brands is more favorable than MillerKnoll.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MillerKnoll	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Acco Brands	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Acco Brands has a net margin of 3.74% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 2.38%. Acco Brands' return on equity of 12.57% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MillerKnoll	2.38%	9.77%	3.25%
Acco Brands	3.74%	12.57%	3.69%

In the previous week, MillerKnoll and MillerKnoll both had 4 articles in the media. Acco Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat MillerKnoll's score of 0.00 indicating that Acco Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MillerKnoll	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Acco Brands	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Acco Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.3% of Acco Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

MillerKnoll pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Acco Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. MillerKnoll pays out 56.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Acco Brands pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Acco Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

MillerKnoll beats Acco Brands on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MillerKnoll News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MLKN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MLKN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	MillerKnoll	Commercial Services & Supplies Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.45B	$4.15B	$10.24B	$13.13B
Dividend Yield	3.55%	5.05%	97.05%	12.94%
P/E Ratio	15.65	26.84	25.55	25.39
Price / Sales	0.37	891.01	298.40	108.47
Price / Cash	5.17	21.46	23.90	51.66
Price / Book	1.05	4.10	4.81	6.33
Net Income	$91.50M	$147.00M	$614.63M	$358.24M
7 Day Performance	-2.50%	-1.75%	1.20%	1.20%
1 Month Performance	-10.91%	-2.07%	-3.35%	-2.04%
1 Year Performance	1.08%	0.25%	4.20%	5.41%

MillerKnoll Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MLKN MillerKnoll	3.3856 of 5 stars	$20.66 -2.3%	N/A	+5.5%	$1.45B	$3.84B	15.65	10,544	Positive News Upcoming Earnings High Trading Volume
HNI HNI	4.061 of 5 stars	$46.71 -0.3%	$65.00 +39.2%	+3.5%	$3.38B	$2.84B	519.06	19,500
PBI Pitney Bowes	4.5436 of 5 stars	$17.33 +1.6%	$18.45 +6.5%	+52.7%	$2.34B	$1.89B	14.20	6,600	Insider Trade
TILE Interface	3.7131 of 5 stars	$34.43 +0.9%	$40.50 +17.6%	+17.8%	$1.98B	$1.39B	13.94	3,570	Positive News
CIX CompX International	N/A	$38.15 +7.0%	N/A	+56.9%	$439.32M	$161.83M	25.10	549	News Coverage High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MLKN) was last updated on 9/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

MillerKnoll (MLKN) Competitors

MLKN vs. HNI, PBI, TILE, CIX, and ACCO

How does MillerKnoll compare to HNI?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to Pitney Bowes?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to Interface?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to CompX International?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to Acco Brands?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MLKN vs. The Competition

MillerKnoll Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

MillerKnoll (MLKN) Competitors

MLKN vs. HNI, PBI, TILE, CIX, and ACCO

How does MillerKnoll compare to HNI?

Is MLKN or HNI more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, MLKN or HNI?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MLKN or HNI?

Do analysts rate MLKN or HNI?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of MLKN or HNI?

Does the media prefer MLKN or HNI?

Is MLKN or HNI a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to Pitney Bowes?

Is MLKN or PBI a better dividend stock?

Does the media prefer MLKN or PBI?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MLKN or PBI?

Do analysts rate MLKN or PBI?

Is MLKN or PBI more profitable?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MLKN or PBI?

Which has more volatility and risk, MLKN or PBI?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to Interface?

Do analysts rate MLKN or TILE?

Is MLKN or TILE more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in MLKN or TILE?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MLKN or TILE?

Does the media favor MLKN or TILE?

Which has more risk and volatility, MLKN or TILE?

Is MLKN or TILE a better dividend stock?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to CompX International?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MLKN or CIX?

Do analysts recommend MLKN or CIX?

Is MLKN or CIX more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, MLKN or CIX?

Which has more volatility and risk, MLKN or CIX?

Is MLKN or CIX a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to MLKN or CIX?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to Acco Brands?

Which has better valuation & earnings, MLKN or ACCO?

Which has more risk & volatility, MLKN or ACCO?

Do analysts recommend MLKN or ACCO?

Is MLKN or ACCO more profitable?

Does the media favor MLKN or ACCO?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MLKN or ACCO?

Is MLKN or ACCO a better dividend stock?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MLKN vs. The Competition

MillerKnoll Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools