Do analysts rate MLKN or HNI?

HNI has a consensus target price of $65.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.39%. Given HNI's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe HNI is more favorable than MillerKnoll. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MillerKnoll 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 HNI 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MLKN or HNI?

MillerKnoll has higher revenue and earnings than HNI. MillerKnoll is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HNI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio MillerKnoll $3.84B 0.41 $91.50M $1.32 17.61 HNI $2.84B 1.27 $54.20M $0.09 553.88

Is MLKN or HNI more profitable?

MillerKnoll has a net margin of 2.38% compared to HNI's net margin of 0.10%. HNI's return on equity of 13.66% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MillerKnoll 2.38% 9.77% 3.25% HNI 0.10% 13.66% 5.23%

Does the media refer more to MLKN or HNI?

In the previous week, HNI had 6 more articles in the media than MillerKnoll. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for HNI and 4 mentions for MillerKnoll. MillerKnoll's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat HNI's score of 1.16 indicating that MillerKnoll is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MillerKnoll 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive HNI 6 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate PBI or MLKN?

Pitney Bowes currently has a consensus price target of $18.45, suggesting a potential upside of 8.25%. Given Pitney Bowes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pitney Bowes is more favorable than MillerKnoll. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Pitney Bowes 0 Sell rating(s) 3 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.71 MillerKnoll 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Does the media prefer PBI or MLKN?

In the previous week, Pitney Bowes had 2 more articles in the media than MillerKnoll. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pitney Bowes and 4 mentions for MillerKnoll. MillerKnoll's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Pitney Bowes' score of 1.05 indicating that MillerKnoll is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Pitney Bowes 4 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MillerKnoll 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts recommend MLKN or TILE?

Interface has a consensus target price of $40.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.98%. Given Interface's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Interface is more favorable than MillerKnoll. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score MillerKnoll 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 Interface 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Is MLKN or TILE more profitable?

Interface has a net margin of 10.10% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 2.38%. Interface's return on equity of 21.77% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets MillerKnoll 2.38% 9.77% 3.25% Interface 10.10% 21.77% 11.18%

Does the media refer more to MLKN or TILE?

In the previous week, Interface had 8 more articles in the media than MillerKnoll. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Interface and 4 mentions for MillerKnoll. MillerKnoll's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Interface's score of 1.03 indicating that MillerKnoll is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment MillerKnoll 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Interface 8 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer ACCO or MLKN?

Acco Brands presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.38%. Given Acco Brands' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Acco Brands is more favorable than MillerKnoll. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Acco Brands 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33 MillerKnoll 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

Does the media prefer ACCO or MLKN?

In the previous week, Acco Brands had 1 more articles in the media than MillerKnoll. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Acco Brands and 4 mentions for MillerKnoll. MillerKnoll's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Acco Brands' score of 0.88 indicating that MillerKnoll is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Acco Brands 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive MillerKnoll 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Do analysts recommend CIX or MLKN?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score CompX International 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 MillerKnoll 0 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.33

MillerKnoll (MLKN) Competitors

$23.24 +0.08 (+0.35%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$23.26 +0.02 (+0.09%)

As of 04:41 PM Eastern

Compare

MLKN vs. HNI, PBI, TILE, ACCO, and CIX

Should you buy MillerKnoll stock or one of its competitors? MillerKnoll's main competitors and comparable companies include HNI (HNI), Pitney Bowes (PBI), Interface (TILE), Acco Brands (ACCO), and CompX International (CIX). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "office services & supplies" industry.

How does MillerKnoll compare to HNI?

MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) and HNI (NYSE:HNI) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and profitability.

MillerKnoll pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. HNI pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. MillerKnoll pays out 56.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. HNI pays out 1,555.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. HNI has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. MillerKnoll is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

MillerKnoll has a net margin of 2.38% compared to HNI's net margin of 0.10%. HNI's return on equity of 13.66% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MillerKnoll	2.38%	9.77%	3.25%
HNI	0.10%	13.66%	5.23%

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, HNI has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, HNI had 6 more articles in the media than MillerKnoll. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for HNI and 4 mentions for MillerKnoll. MillerKnoll's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat HNI's score of 1.16 indicating that MillerKnoll is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MillerKnoll	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
HNI	6 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

HNI has a consensus target price of $65.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.39%. Given HNI's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe HNI is more favorable than MillerKnoll.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MillerKnoll	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
HNI	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

MillerKnoll has higher revenue and earnings than HNI. MillerKnoll is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HNI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MillerKnoll	$3.84B	0.41	$91.50M	$1.32	17.61
HNI	$2.84B	1.27	$54.20M	$0.09	553.88

87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.3% of HNI shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of HNI shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

MillerKnoll beats HNI on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MillerKnoll compare to Pitney Bowes?

Pitney Bowes (NYSE:PBI) and MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Pitney Bowes currently has a consensus price target of $18.45, suggesting a potential upside of 8.25%. Given Pitney Bowes' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Pitney Bowes is more favorable than MillerKnoll.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Pitney Bowes	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.71
MillerKnoll	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Pitney Bowes has a net margin of 10.04% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 2.38%. MillerKnoll's return on equity of 9.77% beat Pitney Bowes' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Pitney Bowes	10.04%	-31.37%	8.02%
MillerKnoll	2.38%	9.77%	3.25%

Pitney Bowes has a beta of 1.63, meaning that its share price is 63% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Pitney Bowes had 2 more articles in the media than MillerKnoll. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Pitney Bowes and 4 mentions for MillerKnoll. MillerKnoll's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Pitney Bowes' score of 1.05 indicating that MillerKnoll is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Pitney Bowes	4 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MillerKnoll	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Pitney Bowes pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. MillerKnoll pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Pitney Bowes pays out 32.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MillerKnoll pays out 56.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Pitney Bowes has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

67.9% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.5% of Pitney Bowes shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Pitney Bowes has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MillerKnoll. Pitney Bowes is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Pitney Bowes	$1.87B	1.25	$144.70M	$1.22	13.97
MillerKnoll	$3.84B	0.41	$91.50M	$1.32	17.61

Summary

Pitney Bowes beats MillerKnoll on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MillerKnoll compare to Interface?

MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) and Interface (NASDAQ:TILE) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Interface has a beta of 1.9, indicating that its share price is 90% more volatile than the broader market.

Interface has lower revenue, but higher earnings than MillerKnoll. Interface is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
MillerKnoll	$3.84B	0.41	$91.50M	$1.32	17.61
Interface	$1.44B	1.57	$116.10M	$2.47	15.77

Interface has a net margin of 10.10% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 2.38%. Interface's return on equity of 21.77% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
MillerKnoll	2.38%	9.77%	3.25%
Interface	10.10%	21.77%	11.18%

MillerKnoll pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Interface pays an annual dividend of $0.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. MillerKnoll pays out 56.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Interface pays out 4.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Interface had 8 more articles in the media than MillerKnoll. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Interface and 4 mentions for MillerKnoll. MillerKnoll's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Interface's score of 1.03 indicating that MillerKnoll is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
MillerKnoll	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Interface	8 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.3% of Interface shares are held by institutional investors. 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Interface shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Interface has a consensus target price of $40.50, suggesting a potential upside of 3.98%. Given Interface's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Interface is more favorable than MillerKnoll.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
MillerKnoll	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
Interface	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

Interface beats MillerKnoll on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MillerKnoll compare to Acco Brands?

Acco Brands (NYSE:ACCO) and MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

MillerKnoll has higher revenue and earnings than Acco Brands. Acco Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MillerKnoll, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Acco Brands	$1.52B	0.26	$41.30M	$0.62	6.80
MillerKnoll	$3.84B	0.41	$91.50M	$1.32	17.61

Acco Brands presently has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential upside of 42.38%. Given Acco Brands' higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Acco Brands is more favorable than MillerKnoll.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Acco Brands	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33
MillerKnoll	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Acco Brands pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%. MillerKnoll pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Acco Brands pays out 48.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MillerKnoll pays out 56.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Acco Brands is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Acco Brands has a net margin of 3.74% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 2.38%. Acco Brands' return on equity of 12.57% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Acco Brands	3.74%	12.57%	3.69%
MillerKnoll	2.38%	9.77%	3.25%

In the previous week, Acco Brands had 1 more articles in the media than MillerKnoll. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Acco Brands and 4 mentions for MillerKnoll. MillerKnoll's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Acco Brands' score of 0.88 indicating that MillerKnoll is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Acco Brands	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
MillerKnoll	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Acco Brands has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

84.6% of Acco Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by institutional investors. 5.3% of Acco Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

MillerKnoll beats Acco Brands on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does MillerKnoll compare to CompX International?

CompX International (NYSE:CIX) and MillerKnoll (NASDAQ:MLKN) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

CompX International has a net margin of 12.48% compared to MillerKnoll's net margin of 2.38%. CompX International's return on equity of 11.51% beat MillerKnoll's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CompX International	12.48%	11.51%	10.52%
MillerKnoll	2.38%	9.77%	3.25%

In the previous week, MillerKnoll had 4 more articles in the media than CompX International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for MillerKnoll and 0 mentions for CompX International. MillerKnoll's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat CompX International's score of 0.00 indicating that MillerKnoll is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
CompX International	Neutral
MillerKnoll	Very Positive

CompX International has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MillerKnoll has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

MillerKnoll has higher revenue and earnings than CompX International. MillerKnoll is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CompX International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CompX International	$161.83M	2.42	$22.59M	$1.79	17.74
MillerKnoll	$3.84B	0.41	$91.50M	$1.32	17.61

CompX International pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. MillerKnoll pays an annual dividend of $0.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. CompX International pays out 67.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. MillerKnoll pays out 56.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CompX International has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. CompX International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

7.5% of CompX International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of CompX International shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.5% of MillerKnoll shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CompX International	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
MillerKnoll	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.33

Summary

MillerKnoll beats CompX International on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get MillerKnoll News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MLKN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MLKN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	MillerKnoll	Commercial Services & Supplies Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$1.58B	$4.22B	$10.63B	$12.78B
Dividend Yield	3.30%	5.07%	97.13%	10.79%
P/E Ratio	17.61	29.55	26.46	24.19
Price / Sales	0.41	1,267.61	355.14	129.13
Price / Cash	5.63	22.45	24.31	36.86
Price / Book	1.18	4.18	4.85	6.52
Net Income	$91.50M	$146.68M	$611.55M	$347.97M
7 Day Performance	0.22%	0.22%	-0.88%	1.57%
1 Month Performance	5.25%	2.38%	2.25%	5.24%
1 Year Performance	6.12%	5.72%	11.33%	17.87%

MillerKnoll Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MLKN MillerKnoll	3.7514 of 5 stars	$23.24 +0.3%	N/A	+4.4%	$1.58B	$3.84B	17.61	10,544	Positive News
HNI HNI	4.6413 of 5 stars	$48.16 -1.4%	$65.00 +35.0%	+9.4%	$3.53B	$2.84B	535.17	19,500
PBI Pitney Bowes	4.5705 of 5 stars	$16.01 -2.5%	$18.45 +15.2%	+40.0%	$2.25B	$1.89B	13.12	6,600	Positive News
TILE Interface	3.337 of 5 stars	$38.04 +0.2%	$40.50 +6.5%	+40.4%	$2.20B	$1.39B	15.40	3,570	News Coverage Positive News Dividend Announcement Insider Trade
ACCO Acco Brands	4.9169 of 5 stars	$4.24 -2.3%	$6.00 +41.5%	+4.7%	$400.61M	$1.52B	6.84	4,700

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:MLKN) was last updated on 8/25/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

MillerKnoll (MLKN) Competitors

MLKN vs. HNI, PBI, TILE, ACCO, and CIX

How does MillerKnoll compare to HNI?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to Pitney Bowes?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to Interface?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to Acco Brands?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to CompX International?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MLKN vs. The Competition

MillerKnoll Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

MillerKnoll (MLKN) Competitors

MLKN vs. HNI, PBI, TILE, ACCO, and CIX

How does MillerKnoll compare to HNI?

Is MLKN or HNI a better dividend stock?

Is MLKN or HNI more profitable?

Which has more risk & volatility, MLKN or HNI?

Does the media refer more to MLKN or HNI?

Do analysts rate MLKN or HNI?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MLKN or HNI?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of MLKN or HNI?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to Pitney Bowes?

Do analysts rate PBI or MLKN?

Is PBI or MLKN more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, PBI or MLKN?

Does the media prefer PBI or MLKN?

Is PBI or MLKN a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of PBI or MLKN?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, PBI or MLKN?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to Interface?

Which has more risk & volatility, MLKN or TILE?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MLKN or TILE?

Is MLKN or TILE more profitable?

Is MLKN or TILE a better dividend stock?

Does the media refer more to MLKN or TILE?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of MLKN or TILE?

Do analysts recommend MLKN or TILE?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to Acco Brands?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, ACCO or MLKN?

Do analysts prefer ACCO or MLKN?

Is ACCO or MLKN a better dividend stock?

Is ACCO or MLKN more profitable?

Does the media prefer ACCO or MLKN?

Which has more risk and volatility, ACCO or MLKN?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in ACCO or MLKN?

Summary

How does MillerKnoll compare to CompX International?

Is CIX or MLKN more profitable?

Does the media prefer CIX or MLKN?

Which has more risk & volatility, CIX or MLKN?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CIX or MLKN?

Is CIX or MLKN a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of CIX or MLKN?

Do analysts recommend CIX or MLKN?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MLKN vs. The Competition

MillerKnoll Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools