TransAlta Competitors

TransAlta (NYSE:TAC) and Algonquin Power & Utilities (NYSE:AQN) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares TransAlta and Algonquin Power & Utilities' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares TransAlta and Algonquin Power & Utilities' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Algonquin Power & Utilities has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TransAlta. TransAlta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Algonquin Power & Utilities, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

58.1% of TransAlta shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 45.9% of Algonquin Power & Utilities shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for TransAlta and Algonquin Power & Utilities, as provided by MarketBeat.

TransAlta presently has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 32.34%. Algonquin Power & Utilities has a consensus target price of $16.5278, indicating a potential upside of 6.91%. Given TransAlta's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe TransAlta is more favorable than Algonquin Power & Utilities.

Risk and Volatility

TransAlta has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Algonquin Power & Utilities has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its stock price is 61% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

TransAlta pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Algonquin Power & Utilities pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. TransAlta pays out -144.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Algonquin Power & Utilities pays out 98.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. TransAlta has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Algonquin Power & Utilities has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Algonquin Power & Utilities is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Algonquin Power & Utilities beats TransAlta on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

TransAlta (NYSE:TAC) and NRG Energy (NYSE:NRG) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares TransAlta and NRG Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares TransAlta and NRG Energy's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

NRG Energy has higher revenue and earnings than TransAlta. TransAlta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NRG Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

58.1% of TransAlta shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of NRG Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of NRG Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for TransAlta and NRG Energy, as provided by MarketBeat.

TransAlta presently has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 32.34%. NRG Energy has a consensus target price of $45.3125, indicating a potential upside of 24.11%. Given TransAlta's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe TransAlta is more favorable than NRG Energy.

Risk and Volatility

TransAlta has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, NRG Energy has a beta of 1, meaning that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the S&P 500.

Dividends

TransAlta pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. NRG Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. TransAlta pays out -144.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. NRG Energy pays out 32.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TransAlta has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and NRG Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Summary

NRG Energy beats TransAlta on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

TransAlta (NYSE:TAC) and Enel Américas (NYSE:ENIA) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Profitability

This table compares TransAlta and Enel Américas' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares TransAlta and Enel Américas' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Enel Américas has higher revenue and earnings than TransAlta.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

58.1% of TransAlta shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.0% of Enel Américas shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Enel Américas shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for TransAlta and Enel Américas, as provided by MarketBeat.

TransAlta presently has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 32.34%. Enel Américas has a consensus target price of $9.20, indicating a potential upside of 21.69%. Given TransAlta's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe TransAlta is more favorable than Enel Américas.

Risk and Volatility

TransAlta has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Enel Américas has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

TransAlta pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Enel Américas pays an annual dividend of $0.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. TransAlta pays out -144.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TransAlta has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. TransAlta is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

TransAlta (NYSE:TAC) and Vistra (NYSE:VST) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations and earnings.

Dividends

TransAlta pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Vistra pays an annual dividend of $0.54 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. TransAlta pays out -144.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Vistra pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TransAlta has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Vistra has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares TransAlta and Vistra's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares TransAlta and Vistra's top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Vistra has higher revenue and earnings than TransAlta. TransAlta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vistra, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk and Volatility

TransAlta has a beta of 1.2, meaning that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Vistra has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings for TransAlta and Vistra, as provided by MarketBeat.

TransAlta presently has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 32.34%. Vistra has a consensus target price of $27.1667, indicating a potential upside of 57.49%. Given Vistra's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Vistra is more favorable than TransAlta.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

58.1% of TransAlta shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Vistra shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Vistra shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Vistra beats TransAlta on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

TransAlta (NYSE:TAC) and Brookfield Renewable (NYSE:BEPC) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and earnings.

Dividends

TransAlta pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Brookfield Renewable pays an annual dividend of $1.16 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. TransAlta pays out -144.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. TransAlta has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Profitability

This table compares TransAlta and Brookfield Renewable's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TransAlta and Brookfield Renewable's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

TransAlta has higher revenue and earnings than Brookfield Renewable.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for TransAlta and Brookfield Renewable, as provided by MarketBeat.

TransAlta currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 32.34%. Brookfield Renewable has a consensus target price of $48.00, indicating a potential upside of 3.94%. Given TransAlta's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe TransAlta is more favorable than Brookfield Renewable.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

58.1% of TransAlta shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.2% of Brookfield Renewable shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

TransAlta beats Brookfield Renewable on 7 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

TransAlta (NYSE:TAC) and Pinnacle West Capital (NYSE:PNW) are both mid-cap utilities companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and earnings.

Dividends

TransAlta pays an annual dividend of $0.13 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Pinnacle West Capital pays an annual dividend of $3.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. TransAlta pays out -144.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Pinnacle West Capital pays out 69.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. TransAlta has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Pinnacle West Capital has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Pinnacle West Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Profitability

This table compares TransAlta and Pinnacle West Capital's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares TransAlta and Pinnacle West Capital's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Pinnacle West Capital has higher revenue and earnings than TransAlta. TransAlta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pinnacle West Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

TransAlta has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pinnacle West Capital has a beta of 0.25, suggesting that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for TransAlta and Pinnacle West Capital, as provided by MarketBeat.

TransAlta currently has a consensus target price of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 32.34%. Pinnacle West Capital has a consensus target price of $86.25, indicating a potential upside of 23.34%. Given TransAlta's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe TransAlta is more favorable than Pinnacle West Capital.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

58.1% of TransAlta shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.8% of Pinnacle West Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Pinnacle West Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Pinnacle West Capital beats TransAlta on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.