Teleflex (TFX) Competitors

Zimmer Biomet has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teleflex has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Zimmer Biomet pays an annual dividend of $0.96 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Teleflex pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Zimmer Biomet pays out 23.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teleflex pays out -5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teleflex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Zimmer Biomet currently has a consensus price target of $103.00, suggesting a potential upside of 7.93%. Teleflex has a consensus price target of $152.90, suggesting a potential upside of 22.82%. Given Teleflex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Teleflex is more favorable than Zimmer Biomet.

Zimmer Biomet has higher revenue and earnings than Teleflex. Teleflex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zimmer Biomet, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Zimmer Biomet has a net margin of 9.48% compared to Teleflex's net margin of -39.67%. Zimmer Biomet's return on equity of 13.12% beat Teleflex's return on equity.

In the previous week, Zimmer Biomet had 2 more articles in the media than Teleflex. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Zimmer Biomet and 4 mentions for Teleflex. Teleflex's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Zimmer Biomet's score of 0.66 indicating that Teleflex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

88.9% of Zimmer Biomet shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.6% of Teleflex shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Zimmer Biomet shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Teleflex shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

95.6% of Teleflex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.9% of Penumbra shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Teleflex shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Penumbra shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Penumbra has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Teleflex. Teleflex is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Penumbra, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Teleflex has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Penumbra has a beta of 0.7, suggesting that its share price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Penumbra has a net margin of 10.67% compared to Teleflex's net margin of -39.67%. Teleflex's return on equity of 11.93% beat Penumbra's return on equity.

In the previous week, Teleflex and Teleflex both had 4 articles in the media. Teleflex's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Penumbra's score of 0.87 indicating that Teleflex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Teleflex currently has a consensus price target of $152.90, suggesting a potential upside of 22.82%. Penumbra has a consensus price target of $367.07, suggesting a potential upside of 15.57%. Given Teleflex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Teleflex is more favorable than Penumbra.

90.2% of Baxter International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.6% of Teleflex shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Baxter International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Teleflex shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Teleflex had 2 more articles in the media than Baxter International. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Teleflex and 2 mentions for Baxter International. Teleflex's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Baxter International's score of 0.92 indicating that Teleflex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Baxter International has a net margin of -9.27% compared to Teleflex's net margin of -39.67%. Baxter International's return on equity of 16.57% beat Teleflex's return on equity.

Baxter International pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Teleflex pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Baxter International pays out -1.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Teleflex pays out -5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Teleflex is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Baxter International presently has a consensus target price of $22.45, suggesting a potential downside of 1.49%. Teleflex has a consensus target price of $152.90, suggesting a potential upside of 22.82%. Given Teleflex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Teleflex is more favorable than Baxter International.

Baxter International has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Teleflex has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Teleflex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Baxter International. Baxter International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teleflex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Smith & Nephew SNATS has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Teleflex's net margin of -39.67%. Teleflex's return on equity of 11.93% beat Smith & Nephew SNATS's return on equity.

95.6% of Teleflex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.6% of Smith & Nephew SNATS shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.7% of Teleflex shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Smith & Nephew SNATS shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Smith & Nephew SNATS has higher revenue and earnings than Teleflex.

Teleflex has a beta of 0.82, suggesting that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Smith & Nephew SNATS has a beta of 0.55, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Teleflex presently has a consensus price target of $152.90, suggesting a potential upside of 22.82%. Smith & Nephew SNATS has a consensus price target of $31.91, suggesting a potential upside of 15.77%. Given Teleflex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Teleflex is more favorable than Smith & Nephew SNATS.

Teleflex pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Smith & Nephew SNATS pays an annual dividend of $0.93 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Teleflex pays out -5.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Teleflex had 2 more articles in the media than Smith & Nephew SNATS. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Teleflex and 2 mentions for Smith & Nephew SNATS. Teleflex's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Smith & Nephew SNATS's score of 0.66 indicating that Teleflex is being referred to more favorably in the media.