Trinity Industries (TRN) Competitors

95.6% of Greenbrier Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Trinity Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.7% of Greenbrier Companies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Trinity Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Greenbrier Companies currently has a consensus price target of $45.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.95%. Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.00, indicating a potential upside of 26.93%. Given Trinity Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trinity Industries is more favorable than Greenbrier Companies.

Trinity Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greenbrier Companies. Trinity Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenbrier Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Greenbrier Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Trinity Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Greenbrier Companies pays out 40.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trinity Industries pays out 29.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Greenbrier Companies has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Trinity Industries has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Trinity Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Trinity Industries has a net margin of 16.62% compared to Greenbrier Companies' net margin of 4.07%. Trinity Industries' return on equity of 18.51% beat Greenbrier Companies' return on equity.

Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its share price is 42% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Greenbrier Companies had 1 more articles in the media than Trinity Industries. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Greenbrier Companies and 4 mentions for Trinity Industries. Trinity Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.78 beat Greenbrier Companies' score of 0.48 indicating that Trinity Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Oshkosh has higher revenue and earnings than Trinity Industries. Trinity Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oshkosh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Trinity Industries has a net margin of 16.62% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 5.24%. Trinity Industries' return on equity of 18.51% beat Oshkosh's return on equity.

Oshkosh pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Trinity Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Oshkosh pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trinity Industries pays out 29.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Oshkosh has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Trinity Industries has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Trinity Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Trinity Industries had 3 more articles in the media than Oshkosh. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Trinity Industries and 1 mentions for Oshkosh. Trinity Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.78 beat Oshkosh's score of 0.79 indicating that Trinity Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Oshkosh presently has a consensus price target of $170.71, suggesting a potential upside of 28.12%. Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.93%. Given Oshkosh's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Oshkosh is more favorable than Trinity Industries.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

92.4% of Oshkosh shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Trinity Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Oshkosh shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Trinity Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trinity Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Federal Signal. Trinity Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Federal Signal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Trinity Industries has a net margin of 16.62% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 11.66%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.36% beat Trinity Industries' return on equity.

Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Trinity Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Federal Signal pays out 12.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trinity Industries pays out 29.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Federal Signal has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Trinity Industries has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Trinity Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

92.7% of Federal Signal shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Trinity Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Trinity Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Trinity Industries had 3 more articles in the media than Federal Signal. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Trinity Industries and 1 mentions for Federal Signal. Trinity Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.78 beat Federal Signal's score of -0.80 indicating that Trinity Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.23, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.35, suggesting that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Federal Signal currently has a consensus price target of $140.50, suggesting a potential upside of 22.32%. Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.93%. Given Trinity Industries' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trinity Industries is more favorable than Federal Signal.

Terex pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Trinity Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Terex pays out 34.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trinity Industries pays out 29.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Terex has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Trinity Industries has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Trinity Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

92.9% of Terex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Trinity Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Terex shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Trinity Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trinity Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Terex. Trinity Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Terex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Terex has a beta of 1.5, meaning that its share price is 50% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its share price is 35% more volatile than the broader market.

Trinity Industries has a net margin of 16.62% compared to Terex's net margin of 2.23%. Trinity Industries' return on equity of 18.51% beat Terex's return on equity.

Terex currently has a consensus price target of $78.91, indicating a potential upside of 41.59%. Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.00, indicating a potential upside of 26.93%. Given Terex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Terex is more favorable than Trinity Industries.

In the previous week, Terex had 10 more articles in the media than Trinity Industries. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Terex and 4 mentions for Trinity Industries. Trinity Industries' average media sentiment score of 1.78 beat Terex's score of 0.97 indicating that Trinity Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.