Trinity Industries (TRN) Competitors

Trinity Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Greenbrier Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Trinity Industries pays out 31.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Greenbrier Companies pays out 54.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trinity Industries has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Greenbrier Companies has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Trinity Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Greenbrier Companies had 2 more articles in the media than Trinity Industries. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Greenbrier Companies and 4 mentions for Trinity Industries. Trinity Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Greenbrier Companies' score of -0.12 indicating that Trinity Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Trinity Industries has a net margin of 15.39% compared to Greenbrier Companies' net margin of 3.21%. Trinity Industries' return on equity of 18.13% beat Greenbrier Companies' return on equity.

Trinity Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greenbrier Companies. Trinity Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greenbrier Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

86.6% of Trinity Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.6% of Greenbrier Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Trinity Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Greenbrier Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trinity Industries presently has a consensus target price of $32.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.17%. Greenbrier Companies has a consensus target price of $40.33, suggesting a potential downside of 4.89%. Given Trinity Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Trinity Industries is more favorable than Greenbrier Companies.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.53, meaning that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the broader market.

Trinity Industries has a net margin of 15.39% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 4.63%. Trinity Industries' return on equity of 18.13% beat Oshkosh's return on equity.

Oshkosh has higher revenue and earnings than Trinity Industries. Trinity Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oshkosh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Trinity Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Oshkosh pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Trinity Industries pays out 31.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 28.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Trinity Industries has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years and Oshkosh has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years. Trinity Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Oshkosh had 9 more articles in the media than Trinity Industries. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Oshkosh and 4 mentions for Trinity Industries. Trinity Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Oshkosh's score of 0.16 indicating that Trinity Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Trinity Industries presently has a consensus target price of $32.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.17%. Oshkosh has a consensus target price of $163.79, indicating a potential upside of 15.73%. Given Oshkosh's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Oshkosh is more favorable than Trinity Industries.

86.6% of Trinity Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.4% of Oshkosh shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Trinity Industries shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Oshkosh shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oshkosh has a beta of 1.27, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

92.7% of Federal Signal shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Trinity Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 3.3% of Federal Signal shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Trinity Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Federal Signal has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Trinity Industries has a net margin of 15.39% compared to Federal Signal's net margin of 11.65%. Federal Signal's return on equity of 21.31% beat Trinity Industries' return on equity.

Trinity Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Federal Signal. Trinity Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Federal Signal, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Federal Signal had 1 more articles in the media than Trinity Industries. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Federal Signal and 4 mentions for Trinity Industries. Trinity Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Federal Signal's score of 0.85 indicating that Trinity Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Federal Signal presently has a consensus price target of $135.25, indicating a potential upside of 16.07%. Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $32.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.17%. Given Federal Signal's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Federal Signal is more favorable than Trinity Industries.

Federal Signal pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Trinity Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Federal Signal pays out 12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trinity Industries pays out 31.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Federal Signal has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Trinity Industries has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Trinity Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Trinity Industries has a net margin of 15.39% compared to Terex's net margin of 2.64%. Trinity Industries' return on equity of 18.13% beat Terex's return on equity.

92.9% of Terex shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Trinity Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Terex shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Trinity Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Terex had 14 more articles in the media than Trinity Industries. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Terex and 4 mentions for Trinity Industries. Trinity Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Terex's score of 0.75 indicating that Trinity Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Terex pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Trinity Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Terex pays out 34.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trinity Industries pays out 31.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Terex has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Trinity Industries has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Trinity Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Terex currently has a consensus price target of $77.10, suggesting a potential upside of 33.72%. Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $32.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.17%. Given Terex's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Terex is more favorable than Trinity Industries.

Trinity Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Terex. Trinity Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Terex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Terex has a beta of 1.48, indicating that its share price is 48% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.36, indicating that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.