Trinity Industries (TRN) Competitors

In the previous week, Trinity Industries had 18 more articles in the media than Greenbrier Companies. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Trinity Industries and 2 mentions for Greenbrier Companies. Greenbrier Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.29 beat Trinity Industries' score of 0.82 indicating that Greenbrier Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.48, meaning that its stock price is 48% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Trinity Industries has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Greenbrier Companies' net margin of 5.12%. Trinity Industries' return on equity of 21.86% beat Greenbrier Companies' return on equity.

Greenbrier Companies presently has a consensus price target of $49.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.30%. Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.50, suggesting a potential downside of 1.01%. Given Trinity Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Trinity Industries is more favorable than Greenbrier Companies.

95.6% of Greenbrier Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Trinity Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Greenbrier Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Trinity Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Trinity Industries has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Greenbrier Companies. Greenbrier Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trinity Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Greenbrier Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. Trinity Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Greenbrier Companies pays out 29.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trinity Industries pays out 39.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Greenbrier Companies has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Trinity Industries has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Trinity Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Trinity Industries had 12 more articles in the media than Oshkosh. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Trinity Industries and 8 mentions for Oshkosh. Trinity Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Oshkosh's score of 0.77 indicating that Trinity Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.33, suggesting that its stock price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Oshkosh has higher revenue and earnings than Trinity Industries. Trinity Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Oshkosh, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

92.4% of Oshkosh shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Trinity Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Oshkosh shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Trinity Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Oshkosh pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Trinity Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Oshkosh pays out 22.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trinity Industries pays out 39.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Oshkosh has raised its dividend for 13 consecutive years and Trinity Industries has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Trinity Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Oshkosh currently has a consensus target price of $165.56, suggesting a potential upside of 7.95%. Trinity Industries has a consensus target price of $35.50, suggesting a potential downside of 1.01%. Given Oshkosh's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Oshkosh is more favorable than Trinity Industries.

Trinity Industries has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 6.21%. Trinity Industries' return on equity of 21.86% beat Oshkosh's return on equity.

Toro has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Toro pays an annual dividend of $1.56 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Trinity Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Toro pays out 46.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trinity Industries pays out 39.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Toro has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years and Trinity Industries has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Trinity Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Toro has higher revenue and earnings than Trinity Industries. Trinity Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Toro, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

87.9% of Toro shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Trinity Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Toro shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Trinity Industries shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Trinity Industries has a net margin of 12.37% compared to Toro's net margin of 7.28%. Toro's return on equity of 29.60% beat Trinity Industries' return on equity.

Toro presently has a consensus price target of $100.40, indicating a potential upside of 6.70%. Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.01%. Given Toro's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Toro is more favorable than Trinity Industries.

In the previous week, Trinity Industries had 16 more articles in the media than Toro. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Trinity Industries and 4 mentions for Toro. Trinity Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.82 beat Toro's score of 0.72 indicating that Trinity Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

AGCO has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Trinity Industries has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the S&P 500.

AGCO has higher revenue and earnings than Trinity Industries. Trinity Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than AGCO, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Trinity Industries has a net margin of 12.37% compared to AGCO's net margin of 7.21%. Trinity Industries' return on equity of 21.86% beat AGCO's return on equity.

In the previous week, AGCO had 3 more articles in the media than Trinity Industries. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for AGCO and 20 mentions for Trinity Industries. AGCO's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Trinity Industries' score of 0.82 indicating that AGCO is being referred to more favorably in the media.

78.8% of AGCO shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of Trinity Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of AGCO shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Trinity Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

AGCO currently has a consensus price target of $123.09, indicating a potential upside of 7.36%. Trinity Industries has a consensus price target of $35.50, indicating a potential downside of 1.01%. Given AGCO's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe AGCO is more favorable than Trinity Industries.

AGCO pays an annual dividend of $1.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Trinity Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. AGCO pays out 12.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Trinity Industries pays out 39.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. AGCO has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Trinity Industries has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. Trinity Industries is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.