Free Trial
→ SpaceX is offering you shares. Don't take them. (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free TSI Stock Alerts

TCW Strategic Income Fund (TSI) Competitors

TCW Strategic Income Fund logo
$4.47 -0.01 (-0.22%)
As of 11:37 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

TSI vs. MFIC, PHK, OXLC, BCSF, and PFLT

Should you buy TCW Strategic Income Fund stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares TCW Strategic Income Fund with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with TCW Strategic Income Fund include MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), PIMCO High Income Fund (PHK), Oxford Lane Capital (OXLC), Bain Capital Specialty Finance (BCSF), and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) and TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, MidCap Financial Investment and MidCap Financial Investment both had 1 articles in the media. MidCap Financial Investment's average media sentiment score of 1.89 beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's score of 1.00 indicating that MidCap Financial Investment is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
MidCap Financial Investment Very Positive
TCW Strategic Income Fund Positive

MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.3%. TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 3,100.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 1.90% compared to TCW Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 10.86% beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MidCap Financial Investment1.90% 10.86% 4.31%
TCW Strategic Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

MidCap Financial Investment has higher revenue and earnings than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M2.58$63.17M$0.04251.68
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.6, meaning that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

MidCap Financial Investment currently has a consensus price target of $11.54, indicating a potential upside of 14.59%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.22
TCW Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

MidCap Financial Investment beats TCW Strategic Income Fund on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to PIMCO High Income Fund?

TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) and PIMCO High Income Fund (NYSE:PHK) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk and media sentiment.

35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.8% of PIMCO High Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, TCW Strategic Income Fund had 1 more articles in the media than PIMCO High Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for TCW Strategic Income Fund and 0 mentions for PIMCO High Income Fund. TCW Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat PIMCO High Income Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that TCW Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TCW Strategic Income Fund Positive
PIMCO High Income Fund Neutral

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TCW Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
PIMCO High Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PIMCO High Income Fund has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
PIMCO High Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. PIMCO High Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.7%.

Summary

TCW Strategic Income Fund beats PIMCO High Income Fund on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to Oxford Lane Capital?

TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) and Oxford Lane Capital (NASDAQ:OXLC) are both small-cap financial services companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TCW Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
Oxford Lane Capital N/A N/A N/A

35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Oxford Lane Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Oxford Lane Capital pays an annual dividend of $4.35 per share and has a dividend yield of 49.0%. Oxford Lane Capital pays out 67.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Oxford Lane Capital has a beta of 0.63, meaning that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Oxford Lane Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Oxford Lane Capital-$580.18M-1.39$585.52M$6.461.37

In the previous week, Oxford Lane Capital had 1 more articles in the media than TCW Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Oxford Lane Capital and 1 mentions for TCW Strategic Income Fund. Oxford Lane Capital's average media sentiment score of 1.41 beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's score of 1.00 indicating that Oxford Lane Capital is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TCW Strategic Income Fund Positive
Oxford Lane Capital Positive

Summary

Oxford Lane Capital beats TCW Strategic Income Fund on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to Bain Capital Specialty Finance?

TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) and Bain Capital Specialty Finance (NYSE:BCSF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability, earnings and media sentiment.

TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. Bain Capital Specialty Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.5%. Bain Capital Specialty Finance pays out 147.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Bain Capital Specialty Finance has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Bain Capital Specialty Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Bain Capital Specialty Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has higher revenue and earnings than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Bain Capital Specialty Finance$273.24M2.96$98.76M$1.1410.95

In the previous week, TCW Strategic Income Fund had 1 more articles in the media than Bain Capital Specialty Finance. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for TCW Strategic Income Fund and 0 mentions for Bain Capital Specialty Finance. TCW Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Bain Capital Specialty Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that TCW Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TCW Strategic Income Fund Positive
Bain Capital Specialty Finance Neutral

TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a net margin of 27.00% compared to TCW Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Bain Capital Specialty Finance's return on equity of 10.44% beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TCW Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
Bain Capital Specialty Finance 27.00%10.44%4.35%

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a consensus target price of $14.00, indicating a potential upside of 12.13%. Given Bain Capital Specialty Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Bain Capital Specialty Finance is more favorable than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TCW Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Bain Capital Specialty Finance beats TCW Strategic Income Fund on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) and PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital had 3 more articles in the media than TCW Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and 1 mentions for TCW Strategic Income Fund. TCW Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.78 indicating that TCW Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TCW Strategic Income Fund Positive
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Positive

35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.2%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.7%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 198.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 23.08% compared to TCW Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 9.95% beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TCW Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital 23.08%9.95%3.87%

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a consensus price target of $9.80, suggesting a potential upside of 25.40%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TCW Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63

TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher revenue and earnings than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$261.43M2.97$66.36M$0.6212.60

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats TCW Strategic Income Fund on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TCW Strategic Income Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TSI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TSI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TSI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTCW Strategic Income FundFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$213.58M$4.80B$14.03B$23.44B
Dividend Yield6.99%6.98%5.75%4.05%
P/E RatioN/A0.0220.1631.48
Price / SalesN/A50.59148.5020.41
Price / CashN/A4.8619.5018.65
Price / BookN/A3.142.274.70
Net IncomeN/A$388.27M$1.14B$1.08B
7 Day Performance-0.56%0.79%2.10%1.29%
1 Month Performance-1.22%0.72%3.58%3.35%
1 Year Performance-9.24%13.49%13.15%23.01%

TCW Strategic Income Fund Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TSI
TCW Strategic Income Fund
N/A$4.47
-0.2%		N/A-8.7%$213.58MN/AN/AN/A
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
2.1776 of 5 stars		$10.36
+0.1%		$11.54
+11.4%		-17.6%$852.12M$320.88M258.69N/A
PHK
PIMCO High Income Fund
N/A$4.53
+0.3%		N/A-4.4%$843.78MN/AN/A147,000
OXLC
Oxford Lane Capital
3.118 of 5 stars		$9.31
-0.5%		N/A-57.5%$841.57M-$580.18M1.44601
BCSF
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
2.1776 of 5 stars		$12.96
+1.1%		$14.00
+8.0%		-20.0%$838.12M$273.24M11.331,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:TSI) was last updated on 6/16/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
DOJ Admits It In Court—Your Cash Can Be Seized Without Warning
The Department of Justice recently argued in court that cash may not be legally your property - raising concer...
Priority Gold | Sponsoredtc pixel
"You'll own nothing and be happy" (it's not a theory anymore)
Since 1913, the evidence is clear… Once they force everyone onto CBDCs, there will be no escape. Every tran...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel
This Could Be the Biggest Monetary Shift in 50 Years
Tucked inside U.S. Code Title 31, Section 5117 is a provision allowing the Treasury to reprice America's gold ...
Americas Gold Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
A 3M Oz. Historical Gold Resource And A Market That Hasn't Caught Up
One Canadian junior explorer controls a gold and copper system in British Columbia's Kootenay Golden Arc - a d...
Wall Street Logic | Sponsoredtc pixel
How to play the Biggest IPO in stock market history!
SpaceX is eyeing a near-$2 trillion IPO valuation, and retail investors are already lining up - but early insi...
InvestPub | Sponsoredtc pixel
Rickards Predicts: Trump to buy tiny $2 stock?
Jim Rickards believes the Trump administration is about to take a direct stake in a $2 stock sitting on the la...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX IPO hides a much bigger story
The SpaceX IPO could be the biggest in history at $1.75 trillion - but the real story isn't the IPO itself. ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel