Free Trial
→ The Iran War Just Broke the Gold Market (From Behind the Markets) (Ad)tc pixel Free TSI Stock Alerts

TCW Strategic Income Fund (TSI) Competitors

TCW Strategic Income Fund logo
$4.55 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 05/5/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$4.54 -0.01 (-0.33%)
As of 05/5/2026 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

TSI vs. BCSF, PFLT, NMFC, CGBD, and PHK

Should you be buying TCW Strategic Income Fund stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of TCW Strategic Income Fund include Bain Capital Specialty Finance (BCSF), PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (PFLT), New Mountain Finance (NMFC), Carlyle Secured Lending (CGBD), and PIMCO High Income Fund (PHK). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to Bain Capital Specialty Finance?

Bain Capital Specialty Finance (NYSE:BCSF) and TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, dividends and media sentiment.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.9%. TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%. Bain Capital Specialty Finance pays out 109.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Bain Capital Specialty Finance has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Bain Capital Specialty Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a net margin of 36.14% compared to TCW Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Bain Capital Specialty Finance's return on equity of 10.74% beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bain Capital Specialty Finance36.14% 10.74% 4.51%
TCW Strategic Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the S&P 500.

35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Bain Capital Specialty Finance shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has higher revenue and earnings than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bain Capital Specialty Finance$273.24M3.34$98.76M$1.539.20
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Bain Capital Specialty Finance presently has a consensus target price of $14.00, suggesting a potential downside of 0.51%. Given Bain Capital Specialty Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Bain Capital Specialty Finance is more favorable than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
TCW Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, Bain Capital Specialty Finance had 1 more articles in the media than TCW Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Bain Capital Specialty Finance and 1 mentions for TCW Strategic Income Fund. TCW Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Bain Capital Specialty Finance's score of 0.32 indicating that TCW Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bain Capital Specialty Finance Neutral
TCW Strategic Income Fund Positive

Summary

Bain Capital Specialty Finance beats TCW Strategic Income Fund on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to PennantPark Floating Rate Capital?

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital (NYSE:PFLT) and TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has higher revenue and earnings than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital$47.21M19.28$66.36M$0.3426.98
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a net margin of 13.03% compared to TCW Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's return on equity of 9.72% beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital13.03% 9.72% 3.91%
TCW Strategic Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital presently has a consensus target price of $10.25, indicating a potential upside of 11.74%. Given PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe PennantPark Floating Rate Capital is more favorable than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
TCW Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

19.8% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of PennantPark Floating Rate Capital shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, PennantPark Floating Rate Capital had 3 more articles in the media than TCW Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for PennantPark Floating Rate Capital and 1 mentions for TCW Strategic Income Fund. TCW Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat PennantPark Floating Rate Capital's score of 0.32 indicating that TCW Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital Neutral
TCW Strategic Income Fund Positive

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.23 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.4%. TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%. PennantPark Floating Rate Capital pays out 361.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital has a beta of 0.78, suggesting that its share price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its share price is 70% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

PennantPark Floating Rate Capital beats TCW Strategic Income Fund on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to New Mountain Finance?

TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) and New Mountain Finance (NASDAQ:NMFC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.1% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.9% of New Mountain Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, New Mountain Finance had 14 more articles in the media than TCW Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for New Mountain Finance and 1 mentions for TCW Strategic Income Fund. TCW Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat New Mountain Finance's score of 0.36 indicating that TCW Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TCW Strategic Income Fund Positive
New Mountain Finance Neutral

New Mountain Finance has higher revenue and earnings than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
New Mountain Finance$327.08M2.53$16.49M-$0.58N/A

TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its share price is 70% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, New Mountain Finance has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its share price is 43% less volatile than the S&P 500.

TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%. New Mountain Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.2%. New Mountain Finance pays out -220.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

TCW Strategic Income Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to New Mountain Finance's net margin of -18.65%. New Mountain Finance's return on equity of 10.69% beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TCW Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
New Mountain Finance -18.65%10.69%4.39%

New Mountain Finance has a consensus price target of $9.25, suggesting a potential upside of 9.99%. Given New Mountain Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe New Mountain Finance is more favorable than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TCW Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
New Mountain Finance
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.71

Summary

New Mountain Finance beats TCW Strategic Income Fund on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) and Carlyle Secured Lending (NASDAQ:CGBD) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Carlyle Secured Lending has a net margin of 27.38% compared to TCW Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Carlyle Secured Lending's return on equity of 8.56% beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TCW Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
Carlyle Secured Lending 27.38%8.56%3.90%

Carlyle Secured Lending has a consensus price target of $13.20, indicating a potential upside of 9.18%. Given Carlyle Secured Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Carlyle Secured Lending is more favorable than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TCW Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Carlyle Secured Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.38

35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.5% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Carlyle Secured Lending has higher revenue and earnings than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Carlyle Secured Lending$255.57M3.32$69.97M$1.0211.85

TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%. Carlyle Secured Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.2%. Carlyle Secured Lending pays out 156.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Carlyle Secured Lending had 2 more articles in the media than TCW Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Carlyle Secured Lending and 1 mentions for TCW Strategic Income Fund. Carlyle Secured Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's score of 1.00 indicating that Carlyle Secured Lending is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TCW Strategic Income Fund Positive
Carlyle Secured Lending Positive

TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Carlyle Secured Lending has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Carlyle Secured Lending beats TCW Strategic Income Fund on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to PIMCO High Income Fund?

PIMCO High Income Fund (NYSE:PHK) and TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

PIMCO High Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.58 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.4%. TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.29 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
PIMCO High Income FundN/A N/A N/A
TCW Strategic Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
PIMCO High Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, PIMCO High Income Fund had 2 more articles in the media than TCW Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for PIMCO High Income Fund and 1 mentions for TCW Strategic Income Fund. TCW Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat PIMCO High Income Fund's score of 0.98 indicating that TCW Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
PIMCO High Income Fund Positive
TCW Strategic Income Fund Positive

PIMCO High Income Fund has a beta of 0.6, suggesting that its share price is 40% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.3, suggesting that its share price is 70% less volatile than the S&P 500.

11.8% of PIMCO High Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

PIMCO High Income Fund and TCW Strategic Income Fund tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TCW Strategic Income Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TSI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TSI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TSI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTCW Strategic Income FundFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$217.42M$4.39B$13.34B$22.85B
Dividend Yield6.34%7.24%5.80%4.05%
P/E RatioN/A0.0623.2728.55
Price / SalesN/A45.01181.7424.25
Price / CashN/A5.4820.2425.18
Price / BookN/A3.313.435.37
Net IncomeN/A$388.27M$1.11B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.44%1.01%0.84%1.75%
1 Month Performance0.22%3.61%4.12%6.04%
1 Year Performance-6.76%15.18%13.82%31.36%

TCW Strategic Income Fund Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TSI
TCW Strategic Income Fund
N/A$4.55
flat		N/A-6.7%$217.42MN/AN/AN/A
BCSF
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
2.4393 of 5 stars		$13.42
+0.3%		$14.00
+4.3%		-7.7%$870.22M$114.51M8.771,000
PFLT
PennantPark Floating Rate Capital
4.1436 of 5 stars		$8.73
-0.6%		$10.25
+17.4%		N/A$865.20M$261.43M25.65658
NMFC
New Mountain Finance
3.9703 of 5 stars		$8.39
+0.2%		$9.25
+10.3%		-13.8%$825.71M$14.84M55.88N/A
CGBD
Carlyle Secured Lending
4.3486 of 5 stars		$11.49
-0.5%		$13.20
+14.9%		-15.1%$805.40M$80.99M11.26N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:TSI) was last updated on 5/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran's New Leader Just Said Something That Should Terrify Every American
Iran's Supreme Leader has declared the Strait of Hormuz closed as leverage against the U.S. - and with 40% of ...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
I’m sounding the alarm
Meta is cutting 10% of its workforce. Microsoft offered voluntary retirement to 7% of U.S. employees. Oracle, ...
Porter & Company | Sponsoredtc pixel
PH: Do THESE 4 things to your bank account now …
In a few short months, the US government could gain unprecedented powers over personal bank accounts - includi...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Satellite Images Spot Potential $10 Trillion Discovery
'Dark Energy': Elon Musk's Next Potential $10 Trillion Move A highly secure site in West Texas now houses a...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Emmy-winning analyst releases his next big story Whitney Tilson shocked the nation on 60 Minutes when he ac...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
A U.S. Resource Gap Is a National Issue - and Opportunity
America still does not domestically produce one mineral tied to batteries, energy storage, and national defens...
i2i Marketing Group, LLC | Sponsoredtc pixel
How to collect $1,170/month from silver
There is a silver fund paying up to 20% in yearly distributions - no mining stocks, no options required. The s...
Investors Alley | Sponsoredtc pixel