Go Pro
→ Trump's New Dollar (From Porter & Company) (Ad)tc pixel Free TSI Stock Alerts

TCW Strategic Income Fund (TSI) Competitors

TCW Strategic Income Fund logo
$4.38 0.00 (0.00%)
As of 08/21/2026 03:57 PM Eastern
Compare

TSI vs. MFIC, BTO, BCSF, CGBD, and PEO

Should you buy TCW Strategic Income Fund stock or one of its competitors? TCW Strategic Income Fund's main competitors and comparable companies include MidCap Financial Investment (MFIC), John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO), Bain Capital Specialty Finance (BCSF), Carlyle Secured Lending (CGBD), and Adams Natural Resources Fund (PEO). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "capital markets" industry.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to MidCap Financial Investment?

TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) and MidCap Financial Investment (NASDAQ:MFIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. MidCap Financial Investment pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.7%. MidCap Financial Investment pays out -344.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

TCW Strategic Income Fund has a net margin of 0.00% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -9.85%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 11.17% beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TCW Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
MidCap Financial Investment -9.85%11.17%4.41%

35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 28.5% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of MidCap Financial Investment shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

MidCap Financial Investment has higher revenue and earnings than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
MidCap Financial Investment$320.88M2.51$63.17M-$0.36N/A

TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.61, meaning that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus target price of $11.11, indicating a potential upside of 13.80%. Given MidCap Financial Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe MidCap Financial Investment is more favorable than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TCW Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
MidCap Financial Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.11

In the previous week, TCW Strategic Income Fund and TCW Strategic Income Fund both had 1 articles in the media. TCW Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat MidCap Financial Investment's score of 0.00 indicating that TCW Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TCW Strategic Income Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
MidCap Financial Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

MidCap Financial Investment beats TCW Strategic Income Fund on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund?

TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) and John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (NYSE:BTO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings and media sentiment.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
John Hancock Financial Opportunities FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund pays an annual dividend of $2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%.

In the previous week, John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund had 1 more articles in the media than TCW Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund and 1 mentions for TCW Strategic Income Fund. TCW Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund's score of 1.72 indicating that TCW Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TCW Strategic Income Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.29, suggesting that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TCW Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund N/A N/A N/A

35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.6% of John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

TCW Strategic Income Fund beats John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to Bain Capital Specialty Finance?

TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) and Bain Capital Specialty Finance (NYSE:BCSF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Bain Capital Specialty Finance had 1 more articles in the media than TCW Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Bain Capital Specialty Finance and 1 mentions for TCW Strategic Income Fund. TCW Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Bain Capital Specialty Finance's score of -0.17 indicating that TCW Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TCW Strategic Income Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a consensus target price of $12.75, indicating a potential upside of 5.37%. Given Bain Capital Specialty Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Bain Capital Specialty Finance is more favorable than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TCW Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a net margin of 24.22% compared to TCW Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Bain Capital Specialty Finance's return on equity of 10.40% beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TCW Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
Bain Capital Specialty Finance 24.22%10.40%4.33%

TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bain Capital Specialty Finance has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Bain Capital Specialty Finance shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Bain Capital Specialty Finance has higher revenue and earnings than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Bain Capital Specialty Finance$273.24M2.87$98.76M$0.9912.22

TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Bain Capital Specialty Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.9%. Bain Capital Specialty Finance pays out 169.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Bain Capital Specialty Finance has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Bain Capital Specialty Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Bain Capital Specialty Finance beats TCW Strategic Income Fund on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to Carlyle Secured Lending?

Carlyle Secured Lending (NASDAQ:CGBD) and TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

Carlyle Secured Lending pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.3%. TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Carlyle Secured Lending pays out 274.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Carlyle Secured Lending has higher revenue and earnings than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Carlyle Secured Lending$255.57M3.06$69.97M$0.5122.25
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

24.5% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Carlyle Secured Lending shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Carlyle Secured Lending presently has a consensus price target of $12.50, suggesting a potential upside of 10.13%. Given Carlyle Secured Lending's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Carlyle Secured Lending is more favorable than TCW Strategic Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Carlyle Secured Lending
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
TCW Strategic Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Carlyle Secured Lending has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.29, indicating that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Carlyle Secured Lending and Carlyle Secured Lending both had 1 articles in the media. Carlyle Secured Lending's average media sentiment score of 1.90 beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's score of 1.73 indicating that Carlyle Secured Lending is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Carlyle Secured Lending
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
TCW Strategic Income Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Carlyle Secured Lending has a net margin of 14.26% compared to TCW Strategic Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Carlyle Secured Lending's return on equity of 8.85% beat TCW Strategic Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Carlyle Secured Lending14.26% 8.85% 3.90%
TCW Strategic Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Carlyle Secured Lending beats TCW Strategic Income Fund on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TCW Strategic Income Fund compare to Adams Natural Resources Fund?

TCW Strategic Income Fund (NYSE:TSI) and Adams Natural Resources Fund (NYSE:PEO) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

TCW Strategic Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Adams Natural Resources Fund pays an annual dividend of $2.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.1%.

In the previous week, Adams Natural Resources Fund had 2 more articles in the media than TCW Strategic Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Adams Natural Resources Fund and 1 mentions for TCW Strategic Income Fund. TCW Strategic Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.73 beat Adams Natural Resources Fund's score of 1.42 indicating that TCW Strategic Income Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TCW Strategic Income Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Adams Natural Resources Fund
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

TCW Strategic Income Fund has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its stock price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Adams Natural Resources Fund has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TCW Strategic Income FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Adams Natural Resources FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

35.2% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.5% of Adams Natural Resources Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of TCW Strategic Income Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Adams Natural Resources Fund shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TCW Strategic Income FundN/A N/A N/A
Adams Natural Resources Fund N/A N/A N/A

Summary

TCW Strategic Income Fund beats Adams Natural Resources Fund on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TCW Strategic Income Fund News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TSI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TSI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TSI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricTCW Strategic Income FundCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$208.35M$5.66B$13.63B$24.30B
Dividend Yield7.72%7.38%5.89%3.70%
P/E RatioN/A37.4627.9226.32
Price / SalesN/A1,270.78522.0121.05
Price / CashN/A48.3130.7119.80
Price / BookN/A3.752.844.90
Net IncomeN/A$417.46M$1.31B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.68%-0.25%-0.30%-0.65%
1 Month Performance-0.45%2.06%2.37%3.38%
1 Year Performance-11.07%5.71%9.68%14.90%

TCW Strategic Income Fund Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TSI
TCW Strategic Income Fund
N/A$4.38
flat		N/A-11.1%$208.35MN/AN/AN/A
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
2.1114 of 5 stars		$9.81
+1.6%		$11.11
+13.2%		-25.7%$808.08M-$11.90MN/AN/A
BTO
John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund
N/A$39.67
-3.3%		N/A+9.3%$786.14M$71.28MN/A2,719
BCSF
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
1.8039 of 5 stars		$12.09
+0.1%		$12.75
+5.5%		-21.7%$784.15M$273.24M12.211,000
CGBD
Carlyle Secured Lending
2.3082 of 5 stars		$11.33
+1.1%		$12.50
+10.3%		-18.9%$779.62M$255.57M22.22N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:TSI) was last updated on 8/23/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump Takes Emergency Action - Plus Elon Musk's New Venture
Elon Musk has quietly launched a new venture - one that has nothing to do with rockets, EVs, or Neuralink. Tru...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Iran War Shock: What I Was Told In That Private Meeting
You’re Being LIED To About The Iran War Forget EVERYTHING you’ve heard about the Iran war. Especially th...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
My top 3 AI picks for the next decade
Alexander Green bought Apple in 1996, recommended Nvidia at a split-adjusted 66 cents in 2004, and picked up A...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
Buy this stock today
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, is sharing a strategy he calls 'Sell This, Buy That' - a way to mo...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel