Go Pro

Waters (WAT) Competitors

Waters logo
$425.59 +0.06 (+0.01%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$425.26 -0.33 (-0.08%)
As of 04:26 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

WAT vs. BRKR, RGEN, TECH, A, and DHR

Should you buy Waters stock or one of its competitors? Waters's main competitors and comparable companies include Bruker (BRKR), Repligen (RGEN), Bio-Techne (TECH), Agilent Technologies (A), and Danaher (DHR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "life sciences tools & services" industry.

How does Waters compare to Bruker?

Waters (NYSE:WAT) and Bruker (NASDAQ:BRKR) are both healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Waters had 8 more articles in the media than Bruker. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Waters and 5 mentions for Bruker. Bruker's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Waters' score of 0.18 indicating that Bruker is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Waters
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Bruker
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

94.0% of Waters shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.5% of Bruker shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Waters shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 27.2% of Bruker shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Waters has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bruker. Bruker is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Waters$3.17B13.24$642.63M$4.01106.36
Bruker$3.44B2.84-$8.60M-$0.70N/A

Waters has a net margin of 3.58% compared to Bruker's net margin of -2.35%. Bruker's return on equity of 12.47% beat Waters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Waters3.58% 11.27% 6.73%
Bruker -2.35%12.47%4.91%

Waters has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bruker has a beta of 1.22, indicating that its share price is 22% more volatile than the broader market.

Waters currently has a consensus target price of $437.10, indicating a potential upside of 2.48%. Bruker has a consensus target price of $57.86, indicating a potential downside of 9.56%. Given Waters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Waters is more favorable than Bruker.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Waters
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Bruker
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.64

Summary

Waters beats Bruker on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Waters compare to Repligen?

Repligen (NASDAQ:RGEN) and Waters (NYSE:WAT) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Repligen has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waters has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Waters has higher revenue and earnings than Repligen. Waters is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Repligen, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Repligen$738.26M14.14$48.89M$0.73253.43
Waters$3.17B13.24$642.63M$4.01106.36

Repligen has a net margin of 5.29% compared to Waters' net margin of 3.58%. Waters' return on equity of 11.27% beat Repligen's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Repligen5.29% 5.30% 3.79%
Waters 3.58%11.27%6.73%

97.6% of Repligen shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Waters shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Repligen shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Waters shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Repligen currently has a consensus target price of $168.57, suggesting a potential downside of 8.88%. Waters has a consensus target price of $437.10, suggesting a potential upside of 2.48%. Given Waters' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Waters is more favorable than Repligen.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Repligen
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89
Waters
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

In the previous week, Waters had 2 more articles in the media than Repligen. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Waters and 11 mentions for Repligen. Repligen's average media sentiment score of 0.23 beat Waters' score of 0.18 indicating that Repligen is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Repligen
1 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Waters
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Waters beats Repligen on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Waters compare to Bio-Techne?

Waters (NYSE:WAT) and Bio-Techne (NASDAQ:TECH) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Bio-Techne has a net margin of 14.97% compared to Waters' net margin of 3.58%. Bio-Techne's return on equity of 13.23% beat Waters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Waters3.58% 11.27% 6.73%
Bio-Techne 14.97%13.23%10.61%

Waters has higher revenue and earnings than Bio-Techne. Bio-Techne is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Waters$3.17B13.24$642.63M$4.01106.36
Bio-Techne$1.22B9.35$181.86M$1.1562.96

94.0% of Waters shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.0% of Bio-Techne shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Waters shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Bio-Techne shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Waters currently has a consensus price target of $437.10, suggesting a potential upside of 2.48%. Bio-Techne has a consensus price target of $68.92, suggesting a potential downside of 4.81%. Given Waters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Waters is more favorable than Bio-Techne.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Waters
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Bio-Techne
0 Sell rating(s)
15 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.12

In the previous week, Waters had 9 more articles in the media than Bio-Techne. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Waters and 4 mentions for Bio-Techne. Waters' average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Bio-Techne's score of 0.07 indicating that Waters is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Waters
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Bio-Techne
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Waters has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bio-Techne has a beta of 1.3, suggesting that its share price is 30% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Waters beats Bio-Techne on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Waters compare to Agilent Technologies?

Agilent Technologies (NYSE:A) and Waters (NYSE:WAT) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Waters had 1 more articles in the media than Agilent Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Waters and 12 mentions for Agilent Technologies. Agilent Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Waters' score of 0.18 indicating that Agilent Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Agilent Technologies
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Waters
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Agilent Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $170.33, indicating a potential upside of 1.26%. Waters has a consensus price target of $437.10, indicating a potential upside of 2.48%. Given Waters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Waters is more favorable than Agilent Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Agilent Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Waters
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

94.0% of Waters shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Waters shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Agilent Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Waters. Agilent Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agilent Technologies$6.95B6.83$1.30B$5.0833.11
Waters$3.17B13.24$642.63M$4.01106.36

Agilent Technologies has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waters has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Agilent Technologies has a net margin of 19.53% compared to Waters' net margin of 3.58%. Agilent Technologies' return on equity of 24.45% beat Waters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agilent Technologies19.53% 24.45% 13.09%
Waters 3.58%11.27%6.73%

Summary

Agilent Technologies beats Waters on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Waters compare to Danaher?

Danaher (NYSE:DHR) and Waters (NYSE:WAT) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

Danaher has a beta of 0.76, suggesting that its share price is 24% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waters has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

79.1% of Danaher shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Waters shares are held by institutional investors. 10.8% of Danaher shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Waters shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Danaher has a net margin of 15.95% compared to Waters' net margin of 3.58%. Waters' return on equity of 11.27% beat Danaher's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Danaher15.95% 11.04% 6.81%
Waters 3.58%11.27%6.73%

Danaher has higher revenue and earnings than Waters. Danaher is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Danaher$24.57B6.15$3.61B$5.6338.20
Waters$3.17B13.24$642.63M$4.01106.36

Danaher currently has a consensus target price of $232.50, suggesting a potential upside of 8.11%. Waters has a consensus target price of $437.10, suggesting a potential upside of 2.48%. Given Danaher's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Danaher is more favorable than Waters.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Danaher
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88
Waters
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

In the previous week, Danaher had 1 more articles in the media than Waters. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Danaher and 13 mentions for Waters. Danaher's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Waters' score of 0.18 indicating that Danaher is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Danaher
7 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Waters
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Danaher beats Waters on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Waters News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WAT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WAT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WAT vs. The Competition

MetricWatersLife Sciences Tools & Services IndustryHealthcare SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$41.81B$10.67B$7.11B$22.72B
Dividend YieldN/A1.45%2.53%3.74%
P/E Ratio106.1375.03274.4227.75
Price / Sales13.21109.34600.7220.15
Price / Cash26.4227.7677.3839.56
Price / Book9.906.8510.924.64
Net Income$642.63M$57.48B$3.50B$1.08B
7 Day Performance-1.93%2.76%-2.07%-1.06%
1 Month Performance3.26%7.78%-6.32%-5.02%
1 Year Performance32.34%35.62%8.92%5.78%

Waters Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WAT
Waters
2.5037 of 5 stars
$425.59
+0.0%
$437.10
+2.7%
+33.0%$41.81B$3.17B106.137,900
BRKR
Bruker
1.8974 of 5 stars
$63.28
-1.4%
$57.00
-9.9%
+78.4%$9.78B$3.44BN/A11,085
RGEN
Repligen
2.3763 of 5 stars
$194.09
+2.3%
$168.57
-13.1%
+21.5%$10.70B$738.26M265.882,000
TECH
Bio-Techne
2.7442 of 5 stars
$72.51
-0.1%
$68.92
-4.9%
+20.8%$11.39B$1.22B63.053,000
A
Agilent Technologies
4.2403 of 5 stars
$175.42
+1.5%
$170.33
-2.9%
+19.9%$48.71B$6.95B34.5318,100

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:WAT) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners