Go Pro

Illumina (ILMN) Competitors

Illumina logo
$190.87 -1.66 (-0.86%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$190.92 +0.06 (+0.03%)
As of 04:42 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ILMN vs. QGEN, TMO, A, WAT, and MTD

Should you buy Illumina stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Illumina with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Illumina include Qiagen (QGEN), Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO), Agilent Technologies (A), Waters (WAT), and Mettler-Toledo International (MTD). These companies are all part of the "medical" sector.

How does Illumina compare to Qiagen?

Qiagen (NYSE:QGEN) and Illumina (NASDAQ:ILMN) are both medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and risk.

Illumina has higher revenue and earnings than Qiagen. Qiagen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illumina, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Qiagen$2.10B3.98$424.88M$1.9121.24
Illumina$4.39B6.57$850M$5.5034.70

Qiagen presently has a consensus target price of $43.34, suggesting a potential upside of 6.82%. Illumina has a consensus target price of $156.88, suggesting a potential downside of 17.81%. Given Qiagen's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Qiagen is more favorable than Illumina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Qiagen
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.36
Illumina
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37

Illumina has a net margin of 19.42% compared to Qiagen's net margin of 19.16%. Illumina's return on equity of 31.01% beat Qiagen's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Qiagen19.16% 14.40% 8.40%
Illumina 19.42%31.01%12.22%

70.0% of Qiagen shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Illumina shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.0% of Qiagen shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Illumina shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Illumina had 19 more articles in the media than Qiagen. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Illumina and 4 mentions for Qiagen. Illumina's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat Qiagen's score of 0.99 indicating that Illumina is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Qiagen
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Illumina
17 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Qiagen has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Illumina has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Illumina beats Qiagen on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Illumina compare to Thermo Fisher Scientific?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (NYSE:TMO) and Illumina (NASDAQ:ILMN) are both large-cap medical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and analyst recommendations.

89.2% of Thermo Fisher Scientific shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Illumina shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of Thermo Fisher Scientific shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Illumina shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Illumina has a net margin of 19.42% compared to Thermo Fisher Scientific's net margin of 15.15%. Illumina's return on equity of 31.01% beat Thermo Fisher Scientific's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thermo Fisher Scientific15.15% 16.86% 8.15%
Illumina 19.42%31.01%12.22%

In the previous week, Thermo Fisher Scientific had 18 more articles in the media than Illumina. MarketBeat recorded 41 mentions for Thermo Fisher Scientific and 23 mentions for Illumina. Thermo Fisher Scientific's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Illumina's score of 1.10 indicating that Thermo Fisher Scientific is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thermo Fisher Scientific
33 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Illumina
17 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Thermo Fisher Scientific has higher revenue and earnings than Illumina. Thermo Fisher Scientific is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illumina, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thermo Fisher Scientific$45.20B4.33$6.70B$18.1928.93
Illumina$4.39B6.57$850M$5.5034.70

Thermo Fisher Scientific has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its stock price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Illumina has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Thermo Fisher Scientific currently has a consensus price target of $602.14, indicating a potential upside of 14.43%. Illumina has a consensus price target of $156.88, indicating a potential downside of 17.81%. Given Thermo Fisher Scientific's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Thermo Fisher Scientific is more favorable than Illumina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thermo Fisher Scientific
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.84
Illumina
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37

Summary

Thermo Fisher Scientific beats Illumina on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Illumina compare to Agilent Technologies?

Agilent Technologies (NYSE:A) and Illumina (NASDAQ:ILMN) are both large-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Agilent Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Illumina. Agilent Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illumina, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agilent Technologies$7.23B5.21$1.30B$4.9826.81
Illumina$4.39B6.57$850M$5.5034.70

Agilent Technologies has a net margin of 19.55% compared to Illumina's net margin of 19.42%. Illumina's return on equity of 31.01% beat Agilent Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agilent Technologies19.55% 24.33% 12.99%
Illumina 19.42%31.01%12.22%

In the previous week, Illumina had 6 more articles in the media than Agilent Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Illumina and 17 mentions for Agilent Technologies. Agilent Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Illumina's score of 1.10 indicating that Agilent Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Agilent Technologies
15 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Illumina
17 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Agilent Technologies presently has a consensus target price of $159.35, indicating a potential upside of 19.38%. Illumina has a consensus target price of $156.88, indicating a potential downside of 17.81%. Given Agilent Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Agilent Technologies is more favorable than Illumina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Agilent Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.89
Illumina
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37

Agilent Technologies has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Illumina has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

87.4% of Agilent Technologies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Illumina shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Agilent Technologies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Illumina shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Agilent Technologies beats Illumina on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Illumina compare to Waters?

Illumina (NASDAQ:ILMN) and Waters (NYSE:WAT) are both large-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Illumina has a net margin of 19.42% compared to Waters' net margin of 11.91%. Illumina's return on equity of 31.01% beat Waters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Illumina19.42% 31.01% 12.22%
Waters 11.91%15.60%8.90%

In the previous week, Waters had 4 more articles in the media than Illumina. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Waters and 23 mentions for Illumina. Waters' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Illumina's score of 1.10 indicating that Waters is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Illumina
17 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Waters
19 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

89.4% of Illumina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Waters shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Illumina shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Waters shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Illumina has a beta of 1.47, indicating that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waters has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its stock price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Illumina presently has a consensus price target of $156.88, indicating a potential downside of 17.81%. Waters has a consensus price target of $401.60, indicating a potential upside of 8.27%. Given Waters' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Waters is more favorable than Illumina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Illumina
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37
Waters
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71

Illumina has higher revenue and earnings than Waters. Illumina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Illumina$4.39B6.57$850M$5.5034.70
Waters$3.17B11.51$642.63M$7.8747.13

Summary

Waters beats Illumina on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Illumina compare to Mettler-Toledo International?

Illumina (NASDAQ:ILMN) and Mettler-Toledo International (NYSE:MTD) are both large-cap medical companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Mettler-Toledo International has a net margin of 21.40% compared to Illumina's net margin of 19.42%. Illumina's return on equity of 31.01% beat Mettler-Toledo International's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Illumina19.42% 31.01% 12.22%
Mettler-Toledo International 21.40%-622.80%24.97%

In the previous week, Illumina had 11 more articles in the media than Mettler-Toledo International. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Illumina and 12 mentions for Mettler-Toledo International. Mettler-Toledo International's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Illumina's score of 1.10 indicating that Mettler-Toledo International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Illumina
17 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Mettler-Toledo International
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Illumina currently has a consensus target price of $156.88, indicating a potential downside of 17.81%. Mettler-Toledo International has a consensus target price of $1,408.55, indicating a potential upside of 9.53%. Given Mettler-Toledo International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mettler-Toledo International is more favorable than Illumina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Illumina
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37
Mettler-Toledo International
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.46

Illumina has a beta of 1.47, suggesting that its share price is 47% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mettler-Toledo International has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Mettler-Toledo International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Illumina. Mettler-Toledo International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illumina, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Illumina$4.39B6.57$850M$5.5034.70
Mettler-Toledo International$4.09B6.35$869.19M$42.6430.16

89.4% of Illumina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.1% of Mettler-Toledo International shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Illumina shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Mettler-Toledo International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Illumina and Mettler-Toledo International tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Illumina News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ILMN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ILMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ILMN vs. The Competition

MetricIlluminaMED IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$28.88B$3.64B$6.77B$12.60B
Dividend YieldN/A2.18%2.67%9.67%
P/E Ratio34.7021.3526.9123.97
Price / Sales6.57174.30507.7291.38
Price / Cash27.50150.2449.7159.37
Price / Book10.718.0010.566.16
Net Income$850M$23.81M$3.60B$331.71M
7 Day Performance1.99%-3.23%-2.15%-1.94%
1 Month Performance18.27%-0.70%0.11%-2.49%
1 Year Performance87.07%41.99%22.63%17.28%

Illumina Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ILMN
Illumina
3.3036 of 5 stars
$190.87
-0.9%
$156.88
-17.8%
+103.1%$28.88B$4.39B34.708,650
QGEN
Qiagen
4.2726 of 5 stars
$41.63
+0.5%
$43.34
+4.1%
-19.9%$8.54B$2.09B21.745,654
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific
4.5039 of 5 stars
$534.99
+1.2%
$602.14
+12.6%
+29.0%$196.41B$44.56B29.41125,000
A
Agilent Technologies
4.8838 of 5 stars
$135.54
+1.1%
$159.35
+17.6%
+18.7%$37.86B$6.95B27.2218,100
WAT
Waters
3.5401 of 5 stars
$376.82
+1.0%
$401.60
+6.6%
+30.7%$36.64B$3.17B47.887,900

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ILMN) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners