Go Pro

Illumina (ILMN) Competitors

Illumina logo
$238.82 -0.80 (-0.33%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

ILMN vs. QGEN, TMO, IQV, A, and WAT

Should you buy Illumina stock or one of its competitors? Illumina's main competitors and comparable companies include Qiagen (QGEN), Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO), IQVIA (IQV), Agilent Technologies (A), and Waters (WAT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "life sciences tools & services" industry.

How does Illumina compare to Qiagen?

Illumina (NASDAQ:ILMN) and Qiagen (NYSE:QGEN) are both healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk and institutional ownership.

Illumina has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Qiagen has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

Illumina presently has a consensus price target of $199.13, indicating a potential downside of 16.62%. Qiagen has a consensus price target of $43.51, indicating a potential downside of 2.75%. Given Qiagen's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Qiagen is more favorable than Illumina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Illumina
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Qiagen
0 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Illumina has higher revenue and earnings than Qiagen. Qiagen is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illumina, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Illumina$4.34B8.30$850M$5.3644.56
Qiagen$2.09B4.41$424.88M$1.9522.94

In the previous week, Illumina had 6 more articles in the media than Qiagen. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Illumina and 9 mentions for Qiagen. Illumina's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Qiagen's score of 0.70 indicating that Illumina is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Illumina
8 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Qiagen
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Qiagen has a net margin of 19.49% compared to Illumina's net margin of 18.36%. Illumina's return on equity of 29.84% beat Qiagen's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Illumina18.36% 29.84% 12.17%
Qiagen 19.49%14.47%8.34%

89.4% of Illumina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.0% of Qiagen shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Illumina shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 9.0% of Qiagen shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Illumina beats Qiagen on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Illumina compare to Thermo Fisher Scientific?

Thermo Fisher Scientific (NYSE:TMO) and Illumina (NASDAQ:ILMN) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and profitability.

Thermo Fisher Scientific has higher revenue and earnings than Illumina. Thermo Fisher Scientific is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illumina, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thermo Fisher Scientific$44.56B5.47$6.70B$18.5935.47
Illumina$4.34B8.30$850M$5.3644.56

Thermo Fisher Scientific has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Illumina has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

Thermo Fisher Scientific currently has a consensus target price of $624.64, suggesting a potential downside of 5.28%. Illumina has a consensus target price of $199.13, suggesting a potential downside of 16.62%. Given Thermo Fisher Scientific's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Thermo Fisher Scientific is more favorable than Illumina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Thermo Fisher Scientific
2 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
17 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.73
Illumina
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

In the previous week, Thermo Fisher Scientific had 8 more articles in the media than Illumina. MarketBeat recorded 23 mentions for Thermo Fisher Scientific and 15 mentions for Illumina. Thermo Fisher Scientific's average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Illumina's score of 0.89 indicating that Thermo Fisher Scientific is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Thermo Fisher Scientific
14 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Illumina
8 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

89.2% of Thermo Fisher Scientific shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Illumina shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Thermo Fisher Scientific shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Illumina shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Illumina has a net margin of 18.36% compared to Thermo Fisher Scientific's net margin of 15.04%. Illumina's return on equity of 29.84% beat Thermo Fisher Scientific's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thermo Fisher Scientific15.04% 17.09% 8.12%
Illumina 18.36%29.84%12.17%

Summary

Thermo Fisher Scientific beats Illumina on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Illumina compare to IQVIA?

Illumina (NASDAQ:ILMN) and IQVIA (NYSE:IQV) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Illumina has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, IQVIA has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

IQVIA has higher revenue and earnings than Illumina. IQVIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illumina, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Illumina$4.34B8.30$850M$5.3644.56
IQVIA$16.31B2.73$1.36B$8.0633.58

Illumina currently has a consensus price target of $199.13, indicating a potential downside of 16.62%. IQVIA has a consensus price target of $248.00, indicating a potential downside of 8.38%. Given IQVIA's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe IQVIA is more favorable than Illumina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Illumina
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
IQVIA
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.88

In the previous week, Illumina had 5 more articles in the media than IQVIA. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Illumina and 10 mentions for IQVIA. Illumina's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat IQVIA's score of 0.59 indicating that Illumina is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Illumina
8 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
IQVIA
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

89.4% of Illumina shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.6% of IQVIA shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Illumina shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of IQVIA shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Illumina has a net margin of 18.36% compared to IQVIA's net margin of 8.10%. IQVIA's return on equity of 30.25% beat Illumina's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Illumina18.36% 29.84% 12.17%
IQVIA 8.10%30.25%6.54%

Summary

IQVIA beats Illumina on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Illumina compare to Agilent Technologies?

Agilent Technologies (NYSE:A) and Illumina (NASDAQ:ILMN) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Agilent Technologies has a net margin of 19.53% compared to Illumina's net margin of 18.36%. Illumina's return on equity of 29.84% beat Agilent Technologies' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Agilent Technologies19.53% 24.45% 13.09%
Illumina 18.36%29.84%12.17%

Agilent Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Illumina. Agilent Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illumina, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Agilent Technologies$6.95B6.58$1.30B$5.0831.90
Illumina$4.34B8.30$850M$5.3644.56

Agilent Technologies has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Illumina has a beta of 1.46, indicating that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

89.4% of Illumina shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.9% of Illumina shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Illumina had 6 more articles in the media than Agilent Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Illumina and 9 mentions for Agilent Technologies. Agilent Technologies' average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Illumina's score of 0.89 indicating that Agilent Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Agilent Technologies
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Illumina
8 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Agilent Technologies currently has a consensus price target of $170.33, indicating a potential upside of 5.11%. Illumina has a consensus price target of $199.13, indicating a potential downside of 16.62%. Given Agilent Technologies' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Agilent Technologies is more favorable than Illumina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Agilent Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80
Illumina
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Summary

Agilent Technologies beats Illumina on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Illumina compare to Waters?

Waters (NYSE:WAT) and Illumina (NASDAQ:ILMN) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

Illumina has higher revenue and earnings than Waters. Illumina is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Waters$3.17B13.17$642.63M$4.01105.82
Illumina$4.34B8.30$850M$5.3644.56

Waters currently has a consensus target price of $434.60, suggesting a potential upside of 2.42%. Illumina has a consensus target price of $199.13, suggesting a potential downside of 16.62%. Given Waters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Waters is more favorable than Illumina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Waters
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
Illumina
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Illumina has a net margin of 18.36% compared to Waters' net margin of 3.58%. Illumina's return on equity of 29.84% beat Waters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Waters3.58% 11.27% 6.73%
Illumina 18.36%29.84%12.17%

In the previous week, Illumina had 1 more articles in the media than Waters. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Illumina and 14 mentions for Waters. Illumina's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Waters' score of 0.57 indicating that Illumina is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Waters
6 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Illumina
8 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Waters has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Illumina has a beta of 1.46, suggesting that its share price is 46% more volatile than the broader market.

94.0% of Waters shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Illumina shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Waters shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Illumina shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Illumina beats Waters on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Illumina News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ILMN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ILMN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ILMN vs. The Competition

MetricIlluminaLife Sciences Tools & Services IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$36.18B$10.40B$7.26B$12.97B
Dividend YieldN/A1.46%2.53%12.80%
P/E Ratio44.5656.96214.5321.21
Price / Sales8.30107.71647.6290.51
Price / Cash35.6927.4728.0434.72
Price / Book13.405.7110.566.36
Net Income$850M$56.67B$3.49B$358.17M
7 Day Performance14.70%4.48%-0.23%0.54%
1 Month Performance8.85%0.32%-2.80%-2.95%
1 Year Performance132.43%28.96%18.25%6.08%

Illumina Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ILMN
Illumina
2.2203 of 5 stars
$238.82
-0.3%
$199.13
-16.6%
+133.2%$36.18B$4.34B44.568,650
QGEN
Qiagen
3.8276 of 5 stars
$42.37
-2.5%
$43.93
+3.7%
-10.4%$8.96B$2.09B21.715,654
TMO
Thermo Fisher Scientific
3.8305 of 5 stars
$603.43
-1.7%
$624.64
+3.5%
+35.6%$226.94B$44.56B32.46125,000
IQV
IQVIA
3.4965 of 5 stars
$259.49
-3.1%
$243.63
-6.1%
+42.4%$44.07B$16.98B32.1993,000
A
Agilent Technologies
4.4004 of 5 stars
$146.80
-2.7%
$170.33
+16.0%
+23.8%$42.53B$7.37B28.9018,100

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ILMN) was last updated on 9/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners