Which has preferable valuation and earnings, GKOS or WRBY?

Warby Parker has higher revenue and earnings than Glaukos. Glaukos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warby Parker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Glaukos $507.44M 15.64 -$187.69M -$3.28 N/A Warby Parker $890.57M 3.09 $1.64M $0.02 1,285.50

Is GKOS or WRBY more profitable?

Warby Parker has a net margin of 0.15% compared to Glaukos' net margin of -34.34%. Warby Parker's return on equity of 2.30% beat Glaukos' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Glaukos -34.34% -6.92% -5.25% Warby Parker 0.15% 2.30% 1.18%

Does the media prefer GKOS or WRBY?

In the previous week, Warby Parker had 4 more articles in the media than Glaukos. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Warby Parker and 6 mentions for Glaukos. Glaukos' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Warby Parker's score of 0.83 indicating that Glaukos is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Glaukos 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Warby Parker 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, WRBY or LQDA?

Warby Parker has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidia. Liquidia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warby Parker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Warby Parker $890.57M 3.09 $1.64M $0.02 1,285.50 Liquidia $158.32M 41.59 -$68.92M $0.14 528.86

Is WRBY or LQDA more profitable?

Liquidia has a net margin of 7.74% compared to Warby Parker's net margin of 0.15%. Liquidia's return on equity of 46.82% beat Warby Parker's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Warby Parker 0.15% 2.30% 1.18% Liquidia 7.74% 46.82% 7.06%

Does the media refer more to WRBY or LQDA?

In the previous week, Liquidia had 4 more articles in the media than Warby Parker. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Liquidia and 10 mentions for Warby Parker. Warby Parker's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Liquidia's score of 0.74 indicating that Warby Parker is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Warby Parker 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Liquidia 5 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 7 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend WRBY or STVN?

Warby Parker presently has a consensus target price of $29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.74%. Given Warby Parker's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Warby Parker is more favorable than Stevanato Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Warby Parker 0 Sell rating(s) 5 Hold rating(s) 9 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.64 Stevanato Group 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 2 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.86

Which has better earnings & valuation, WRBY or STVN?

Stevanato Group has higher revenue and earnings than Warby Parker. Stevanato Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warby Parker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Warby Parker $890.57M 3.09 $1.64M $0.02 1,285.50 Stevanato Group €1.34B 3.79 €158.21M €0.59 28.46

Does the media refer more to WRBY or STVN?

In the previous week, Warby Parker had 6 more articles in the media than Stevanato Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Warby Parker and 4 mentions for Stevanato Group. Stevanato Group's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Warby Parker's score of 0.83 indicating that Stevanato Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Warby Parker 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Stevanato Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, LIVN or WRBY?

Warby Parker has lower revenue, but higher earnings than LivaNova. LivaNova is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warby Parker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio LivaNova $1.39B 3.11 -$242.47M $1.95 40.35 Warby Parker $890.57M 3.09 $1.64M $0.02 1,285.50

Is LIVN or WRBY more profitable?

LivaNova has a net margin of 7.48% compared to Warby Parker's net margin of 0.15%. LivaNova's return on equity of 16.48% beat Warby Parker's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets LivaNova 7.48% 16.48% 7.59% Warby Parker 0.15% 2.30% 1.18%

Does the media refer more to LIVN or WRBY?

In the previous week, Warby Parker had 9 more articles in the media than LivaNova. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Warby Parker and 1 mentions for LivaNova. LivaNova's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Warby Parker's score of 0.83 indicating that LivaNova is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment LivaNova 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Warby Parker 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Warby Parker (WRBY) Competitors

$25.71 -1.28 (-4.74%)

Closing price 06/23/2026 03:58 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$25.67 -0.04 (-0.15%)

As of 06/23/2026 07:53 PM Eastern

Compare

WRBY vs. GKOS, LQDA, BLCO, STVN, and LIVN

Should you buy Warby Parker stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Warby Parker with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Warby Parker include Glaukos (GKOS), Liquidia (LQDA), Bausch + Lomb (BLCO), Stevanato Group (STVN), and LivaNova (LIVN). These companies are all part of the "medical equipment" industry.

How does Warby Parker compare to Glaukos?

Glaukos (NYSE:GKOS) and Warby Parker (NYSE:WRBY) are both mid-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, risk, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Glaukos has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Warby Parker has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Warby Parker had 4 more articles in the media than Glaukos. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Warby Parker and 6 mentions for Glaukos. Glaukos' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat Warby Parker's score of 0.83 indicating that Glaukos is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Glaukos	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Warby Parker	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Warby Parker has higher revenue and earnings than Glaukos. Glaukos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warby Parker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Glaukos	$507.44M	15.64	-$187.69M	-$3.28	N/A
Warby Parker	$890.57M	3.09	$1.64M	$0.02	1,285.50

Glaukos presently has a consensus price target of $149.17, suggesting a potential upside of 10.42%. Warby Parker has a consensus price target of $29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.74%. Given Warby Parker's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Warby Parker is more favorable than Glaukos.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Glaukos	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.79
Warby Parker	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64

Warby Parker has a net margin of 0.15% compared to Glaukos' net margin of -34.34%. Warby Parker's return on equity of 2.30% beat Glaukos' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Glaukos	-34.34%	-6.92%	-5.25%
Warby Parker	0.15%	2.30%	1.18%

99.0% of Glaukos shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Warby Parker shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.9% of Glaukos shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.8% of Warby Parker shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Warby Parker beats Glaukos on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Warby Parker compare to Liquidia?

Warby Parker (NYSE:WRBY) and Liquidia (NASDAQ:LQDA) are both mid-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

93.2% of Warby Parker shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.5% of Liquidia shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.8% of Warby Parker shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 25.6% of Liquidia shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Warby Parker has a beta of 1.96, meaning that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Liquidia has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Warby Parker currently has a consensus price target of $29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.74%. Liquidia has a consensus price target of $67.43, suggesting a potential downside of 8.93%. Given Warby Parker's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Warby Parker is more favorable than Liquidia.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Warby Parker	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64
Liquidia	2 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	3 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.90

Liquidia has a net margin of 7.74% compared to Warby Parker's net margin of 0.15%. Liquidia's return on equity of 46.82% beat Warby Parker's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Warby Parker	0.15%	2.30%	1.18%
Liquidia	7.74%	46.82%	7.06%

Warby Parker has higher revenue and earnings than Liquidia. Liquidia is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warby Parker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Warby Parker	$890.57M	3.09	$1.64M	$0.02	1,285.50
Liquidia	$158.32M	41.59	-$68.92M	$0.14	528.86

In the previous week, Liquidia had 4 more articles in the media than Warby Parker. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Liquidia and 10 mentions for Warby Parker. Warby Parker's average media sentiment score of 0.83 beat Liquidia's score of 0.74 indicating that Warby Parker is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Warby Parker	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Liquidia	5 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	7 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Liquidia beats Warby Parker on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Warby Parker compare to Bausch + Lomb?

Warby Parker (NYSE:WRBY) and Bausch + Lomb (NYSE:BLCO) are both mid-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, Warby Parker had 10 more articles in the media than Bausch + Lomb. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Warby Parker and 0 mentions for Bausch + Lomb. Bausch + Lomb's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Warby Parker's score of 0.83 indicating that Bausch + Lomb is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Warby Parker	Positive
Bausch + Lomb	Positive

Warby Parker has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bausch + Lomb. Bausch + Lomb is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warby Parker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Warby Parker	$890.57M	3.09	$1.64M	$0.02	1,285.50
Bausch + Lomb	$5.21B	1.05	-$360M	-$0.62	N/A

Warby Parker has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bausch + Lomb has a beta of 0.58, indicating that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

93.2% of Warby Parker shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.1% of Bausch + Lomb shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.8% of Warby Parker shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Bausch + Lomb shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Warby Parker has a net margin of 0.15% compared to Bausch + Lomb's net margin of -4.21%. Bausch + Lomb's return on equity of 3.60% beat Warby Parker's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Warby Parker	0.15%	2.30%	1.18%
Bausch + Lomb	-4.21%	3.60%	1.69%

Warby Parker presently has a consensus target price of $29.50, indicating a potential upside of 14.74%. Bausch + Lomb has a consensus target price of $17.92, indicating a potential upside of 17.49%. Given Bausch + Lomb's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Bausch + Lomb is more favorable than Warby Parker.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Warby Parker	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64
Bausch + Lomb	1 Sell rating(s)	9 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.21

Summary

Warby Parker beats Bausch + Lomb on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Warby Parker compare to Stevanato Group?

Warby Parker (NYSE:WRBY) and Stevanato Group (NYSE:STVN) are both mid-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Stevanato Group has higher revenue and earnings than Warby Parker. Stevanato Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warby Parker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Warby Parker	$890.57M	3.09	$1.64M	$0.02	1,285.50
Stevanato Group	€1.34B	3.79	€158.21M	€0.59	28.46

Warby Parker presently has a consensus target price of $29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.74%. Given Warby Parker's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Warby Parker is more favorable than Stevanato Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Warby Parker	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64
Stevanato Group	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	2 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.86

Stevanato Group has a net margin of 11.76% compared to Warby Parker's net margin of 0.15%. Stevanato Group's return on equity of 10.27% beat Warby Parker's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Warby Parker	0.15%	2.30%	1.18%
Stevanato Group	11.76%	10.27%	6.08%

In the previous week, Warby Parker had 6 more articles in the media than Stevanato Group. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Warby Parker and 4 mentions for Stevanato Group. Stevanato Group's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Warby Parker's score of 0.83 indicating that Stevanato Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Warby Parker	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Stevanato Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

93.2% of Warby Parker shares are held by institutional investors. 16.8% of Warby Parker shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Warby Parker has a beta of 1.96, indicating that its share price is 96% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stevanato Group has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Stevanato Group beats Warby Parker on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Warby Parker compare to LivaNova?

LivaNova (NASDAQ:LIVN) and Warby Parker (NYSE:WRBY) are both mid-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

97.6% of LivaNova shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.2% of Warby Parker shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of LivaNova shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.8% of Warby Parker shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

LivaNova currently has a consensus target price of $80.75, suggesting a potential upside of 2.63%. Warby Parker has a consensus target price of $29.50, suggesting a potential upside of 14.74%. Given Warby Parker's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Warby Parker is more favorable than LivaNova.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
LivaNova	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	6 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Warby Parker	0 Sell rating(s)	5 Hold rating(s)	9 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.64

Warby Parker has lower revenue, but higher earnings than LivaNova. LivaNova is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Warby Parker, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
LivaNova	$1.39B	3.11	-$242.47M	$1.95	40.35
Warby Parker	$890.57M	3.09	$1.64M	$0.02	1,285.50

LivaNova has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Warby Parker has a beta of 1.96, suggesting that its stock price is 96% more volatile than the broader market.

LivaNova has a net margin of 7.48% compared to Warby Parker's net margin of 0.15%. LivaNova's return on equity of 16.48% beat Warby Parker's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
LivaNova	7.48%	16.48%	7.59%
Warby Parker	0.15%	2.30%	1.18%

In the previous week, Warby Parker had 9 more articles in the media than LivaNova. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Warby Parker and 1 mentions for LivaNova. LivaNova's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Warby Parker's score of 0.83 indicating that LivaNova is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
LivaNova	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Warby Parker	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

LivaNova beats Warby Parker on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Warby Parker News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WRBY and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WRBY vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Warby Parker	CONS PD Industry	Staples Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$2.89B	$29.83B	$16.08B	$23.25B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.29%	3.54%	4.07%
P/E Ratio	1,286.14	72.46	25.58	31.08
Price / Sales	3.09	1.58	47.14	16.29
Price / Cash	42.90	31.30	16.29	24.45
Price / Book	7.39	10.90	5.80	4.64
Net Income	$1.64M	$1.30B	$678.29M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	5.78%	-1.03%	0.23%	0.15%
1 Month Performance	2.43%	12.00%	0.93%	0.18%
1 Year Performance	18.60%	-13.26%	-12.02%	23.21%

Warby Parker Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WRBY Warby Parker	3.7191 of 5 stars	$25.71 -4.7%	$29.50 +14.7%	+16.8%	$2.89B	$890.57M	1,286.14	4,036
GKOS Glaukos	3.4382 of 5 stars	$130.20 +2.7%	$148.00 +13.7%	+39.6%	$7.45B	$507.44M	N/A	1,094	Analyst Downgrade
LQDA Liquidia	3.1751 of 5 stars	$71.80 +0.8%	$60.29 -16.0%	+458.4%	$6.33B	$158.32M	512.89	50	Analyst Forecast
BLCO Bausch + Lomb	3.5022 of 5 stars	$14.99 -0.6%	$17.92 +19.5%	+27.0%	$5.38B	$5.10B	N/A	13,000
STVN Stevanato Group	3.3408 of 5 stars	€16.62 -0.1%	N/A	-28.9%	€5.03B	€1.34B	28.16	6,010

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:WRBY) was last updated on 6/24/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Warby Parker (WRBY) Competitors

WRBY vs. GKOS, LQDA, BLCO, STVN, and LIVN

How does Warby Parker compare to Glaukos?

Summary

How does Warby Parker compare to Liquidia?

Summary

How does Warby Parker compare to Bausch + Lomb?

Summary

How does Warby Parker compare to Stevanato Group?

Summary

How does Warby Parker compare to LivaNova?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WRBY vs. The Competition

Warby Parker Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Warby Parker (WRBY) Competitors

WRBY vs. GKOS, LQDA, BLCO, STVN, and LIVN

How does Warby Parker compare to Glaukos?

Which has more volatility & risk, GKOS or WRBY?

Does the media prefer GKOS or WRBY?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, GKOS or WRBY?

Do analysts prefer GKOS or WRBY?

Is GKOS or WRBY more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of GKOS or WRBY?

Summary

How does Warby Parker compare to Liquidia?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in WRBY or LQDA?

Which has more risk & volatility, WRBY or LQDA?

Do analysts prefer WRBY or LQDA?

Is WRBY or LQDA more profitable?

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, WRBY or LQDA?

Does the media refer more to WRBY or LQDA?

Summary

How does Warby Parker compare to Bausch + Lomb?

Does the media favor WRBY or BLCO?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, WRBY or BLCO?

Which has more risk & volatility, WRBY or BLCO?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in WRBY or BLCO?

Is WRBY or BLCO more profitable?

Do analysts recommend WRBY or BLCO?

Summary

How does Warby Parker compare to Stevanato Group?

Which has better earnings & valuation, WRBY or STVN?

Do analysts recommend WRBY or STVN?

Is WRBY or STVN more profitable?

Does the media refer more to WRBY or STVN?

Do insiders & institutionals hold more shares of WRBY or STVN?

Which has more risk and volatility, WRBY or STVN?

Summary

How does Warby Parker compare to LivaNova?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in LIVN or WRBY?

Do analysts prefer LIVN or WRBY?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, LIVN or WRBY?

Which has more volatility & risk, LIVN or WRBY?

Is LIVN or WRBY more profitable?

Does the media refer more to LIVN or WRBY?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WRBY vs. The Competition

Warby Parker Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools