White Mountains Insurance Group (WTM) Competitors

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its share price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.62% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 8.53%. CNA Financial's return on equity of 12.23% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

98.5% of CNA Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of CNA Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, CNA Financial had 17 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for CNA Financial and 2 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. White Mountains Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat CNA Financial's score of -0.02 indicating that White Mountains Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

CNA Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. CNA Financial pays out 40.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CNA Financial has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years. CNA Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

CNA Financial has higher revenue and earnings than White Mountains Insurance Group. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNA Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

White Mountains Insurance Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Erie Indemnity. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Erie Indemnity, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Erie Indemnity has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.62% compared to Erie Indemnity's net margin of 13.97%. Erie Indemnity's return on equity of 21.50% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Erie Indemnity pays an annual dividend of $5.85 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Erie Indemnity pays out 53.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Erie Indemnity has increased its dividend for 36 consecutive years. Erie Indemnity is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Erie Indemnity had 1 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Erie Indemnity and 2 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. White Mountains Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Erie Indemnity's score of 0.24 indicating that White Mountains Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

33.7% of Erie Indemnity shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 45.8% of Erie Indemnity shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

White Mountains Insurance Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Old Republic International. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Old Republic International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Old Republic International has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.32, suggesting that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Old Republic International currently has a consensus target price of $42.00, indicating a potential upside of 7.00%. Given Old Republic International's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Old Republic International is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.62% compared to Old Republic International's net margin of 10.83%. Old Republic International's return on equity of 15.71% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Old Republic International pays an annual dividend of $1.26 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Old Republic International pays out 33.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Old Republic International has increased its dividend for 45 consecutive years. Old Republic International is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Old Republic International had 13 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Old Republic International and 2 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. Old Republic International's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat White Mountains Insurance Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Old Republic International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

70.9% of Old Republic International shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Old Republic International shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Axis Capital had 15 more articles in the media than White Mountains Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Axis Capital and 2 mentions for White Mountains Insurance Group. Axis Capital's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat White Mountains Insurance Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Axis Capital is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Axis Capital has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, White Mountains Insurance Group has a beta of 0.32, meaning that its stock price is 68% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Axis Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. White Mountains Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.0%. Axis Capital pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. White Mountains Insurance Group pays out 0.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

White Mountains Insurance Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Axis Capital. White Mountains Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Axis Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.4% of Axis Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Axis Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.0% of White Mountains Insurance Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

White Mountains Insurance Group has a net margin of 29.62% compared to Axis Capital's net margin of 16.00%. Axis Capital's return on equity of 18.12% beat White Mountains Insurance Group's return on equity.

Axis Capital presently has a consensus target price of $122.50, indicating a potential upside of 23.96%. Given Axis Capital's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Axis Capital is more favorable than White Mountains Insurance Group.