The Hanover Insurance Group (THG) Competitors

American Financial Group has a beta of 0.62, indicating that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Hanover Insurance Group has a beta of 0.27, indicating that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

American Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. The Hanover Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $3.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. American Financial Group pays out 33.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Hanover Insurance Group pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. American Financial Group has increased its dividend for 19 consecutive years and The Hanover Insurance Group has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years.

American Financial Group presently has a consensus price target of $150.75, suggesting a potential upside of 6.37%. The Hanover Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $223.29, suggesting a potential downside of 4.12%. Given American Financial Group's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe American Financial Group is more favorable than The Hanover Insurance Group.

The Hanover Insurance Group has a net margin of 11.17% compared to American Financial Group's net margin of 10.76%. The Hanover Insurance Group's return on equity of 21.72% beat American Financial Group's return on equity.

In the previous week, The Hanover Insurance Group had 5 more articles in the media than American Financial Group. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for The Hanover Insurance Group and 15 mentions for American Financial Group. The Hanover Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat American Financial Group's score of 0.60 indicating that The Hanover Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

64.4% of American Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of The Hanover Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of American Financial Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of The Hanover Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

American Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than The Hanover Insurance Group. The Hanover Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than American Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

The Hanover Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $3.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Allstate pays an annual dividend of $4.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. The Hanover Insurance Group pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Allstate pays out 9.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Hanover Insurance Group has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years and Allstate has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Allstate is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

The Hanover Insurance Group presently has a consensus target price of $223.29, suggesting a potential downside of 4.12%. Allstate has a consensus target price of $254.80, suggesting a potential downside of 3.68%. Given Allstate's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Allstate is more favorable than The Hanover Insurance Group.

86.6% of The Hanover Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of Allstate shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of The Hanover Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Allstate shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

The Hanover Insurance Group has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allstate has a beta of 0.16, meaning that its stock price is 84% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Allstate had 4 more articles in the media than The Hanover Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Allstate and 20 mentions for The Hanover Insurance Group. Allstate's average media sentiment score of 1.10 beat The Hanover Insurance Group's score of 0.78 indicating that Allstate is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Allstate has a net margin of 17.81% compared to The Hanover Insurance Group's net margin of 11.17%. Allstate's return on equity of 42.66% beat The Hanover Insurance Group's return on equity.

Allstate has higher revenue and earnings than The Hanover Insurance Group. Allstate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Hanover Insurance Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Axis Capital presently has a consensus price target of $122.42, indicating a potential upside of 15.95%. The Hanover Insurance Group has a consensus price target of $223.29, indicating a potential downside of 4.12%. Given Axis Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Axis Capital is more favorable than The Hanover Insurance Group.

Axis Capital has higher earnings, but lower revenue than The Hanover Insurance Group. Axis Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Hanover Insurance Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Axis Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. The Hanover Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $3.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Axis Capital pays out 12.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Hanover Insurance Group pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Hanover Insurance Group has raised its dividend for 20 consecutive years. Axis Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Axis Capital has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, The Hanover Insurance Group has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

93.4% of Axis Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.6% of The Hanover Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Axis Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of The Hanover Insurance Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Axis Capital had 6 more articles in the media than The Hanover Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for Axis Capital and 20 mentions for The Hanover Insurance Group. The Hanover Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat Axis Capital's score of 0.40 indicating that The Hanover Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Axis Capital has a net margin of 16.23% compared to The Hanover Insurance Group's net margin of 11.17%. The Hanover Insurance Group's return on equity of 21.72% beat Axis Capital's return on equity.

Chubb has a net margin of 18.10% compared to The Hanover Insurance Group's net margin of 11.17%. The Hanover Insurance Group's return on equity of 21.72% beat Chubb's return on equity.

The Hanover Insurance Group has a beta of 0.27, meaning that its share price is 73% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chubb has a beta of 0.39, meaning that its share price is 61% less volatile than the broader market.

Chubb has higher revenue and earnings than The Hanover Insurance Group. The Hanover Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chubb, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

The Hanover Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $3.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Chubb pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. The Hanover Insurance Group pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chubb pays out 14.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Hanover Insurance Group has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years and Chubb has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years.

The Hanover Insurance Group currently has a consensus target price of $223.29, indicating a potential downside of 4.12%. Chubb has a consensus target price of $360.09, indicating a potential upside of 2.57%. Given Chubb's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Chubb is more favorable than The Hanover Insurance Group.

In the previous week, Chubb had 14 more articles in the media than The Hanover Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 34 mentions for Chubb and 20 mentions for The Hanover Insurance Group. Chubb's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat The Hanover Insurance Group's score of 0.78 indicating that Chubb is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

86.6% of The Hanover Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.8% of Chubb shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.8% of The Hanover Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Chubb shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.