Travelers Companies (TRV) Competitors

Travelers Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Cincinnati Financial. Travelers Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cincinnati Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Cincinnati Financial pays an annual dividend of $3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Travelers Companies pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Travelers Companies has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years and Cincinnati Financial has raised its dividend for 65 consecutive years. Cincinnati Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Travelers Companies presently has a consensus price target of $309.07, indicating a potential upside of 1.46%. Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $183.25, indicating a potential upside of 8.43%. Given Cincinnati Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Cincinnati Financial is more favorable than Travelers Companies.

In the previous week, Travelers Companies had 18 more articles in the media than Cincinnati Financial. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Travelers Companies and 1 mentions for Cincinnati Financial. Travelers Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Cincinnati Financial's score of 0.97 indicating that Travelers Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 21.33% compared to Travelers Companies' net margin of 15.54%. Travelers Companies' return on equity of 24.06% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity.

82.4% of Travelers Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.2% of Cincinnati Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Travelers Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Cincinnati Financial shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Travelers Companies currently has a consensus target price of $309.07, suggesting a potential upside of 1.46%. Allstate has a consensus target price of $240.33, suggesting a potential upside of 8.46%. Given Allstate's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Allstate is more favorable than Travelers Companies.

In the previous week, Allstate had 3 more articles in the media than Travelers Companies. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Allstate and 19 mentions for Travelers Companies. Travelers Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Allstate's score of 1.14 indicating that Travelers Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Allstate has a net margin of 17.81% compared to Travelers Companies' net margin of 15.54%. Allstate's return on equity of 42.66% beat Travelers Companies' return on equity.

Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Allstate pays an annual dividend of $4.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Travelers Companies pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Allstate pays out 9.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Travelers Companies has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years and Allstate has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Allstate is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Allstate has higher revenue and earnings than Travelers Companies. Allstate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Travelers Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.48, suggesting that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allstate has a beta of 0.18, suggesting that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

82.4% of Travelers Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of Allstate shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Travelers Companies shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Allstate shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Travelers Companies had 12 more articles in the media than Axis Capital. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Travelers Companies and 7 mentions for Axis Capital. Travelers Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Axis Capital's score of 0.50 indicating that Travelers Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Travelers Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Axis Capital. Axis Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Travelers Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.4% of Axis Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Travelers Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Axis Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Travelers Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Axis Capital has a net margin of 16.00% compared to Travelers Companies' net margin of 15.54%. Travelers Companies' return on equity of 24.06% beat Axis Capital's return on equity.

Axis Capital has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Axis Capital currently has a consensus price target of $122.10, indicating a potential upside of 20.33%. Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $309.07, indicating a potential upside of 1.46%. Given Axis Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Axis Capital is more favorable than Travelers Companies.

Axis Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Axis Capital pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Travelers Companies pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Travelers Companies has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years. Axis Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Brown & Brown has a net margin of 17.94% compared to Travelers Companies' net margin of 15.54%. Travelers Companies' return on equity of 24.06% beat Brown & Brown's return on equity.

Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Brown & Brown pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Travelers Companies pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brown & Brown pays out 21.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Travelers Companies has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years. Travelers Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Travelers Companies and Travelers Companies both had 19 articles in the media. Travelers Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Brown & Brown's score of 1.23 indicating that Travelers Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Travelers Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Brown & Brown. Travelers Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brown & Brown, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Travelers Companies currently has a consensus price target of $309.07, suggesting a potential upside of 1.46%. Brown & Brown has a consensus price target of $78.44, suggesting a potential upside of 30.82%. Given Brown & Brown's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Brown & Brown is more favorable than Travelers Companies.

82.4% of Travelers Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Brown & Brown shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Travelers Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Brown & Brown shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.