Travelers Companies (TRV) Competitors

In the previous week, Cincinnati Financial had 1 more articles in the media than Travelers Companies. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Cincinnati Financial and 11 mentions for Travelers Companies. Cincinnati Financial's average media sentiment score of 0.86 beat Travelers Companies' score of 0.58 indicating that Cincinnati Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

65.2% of Cincinnati Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of Travelers Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Cincinnati Financial shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Travelers Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Cincinnati Financial presently has a consensus target price of $195.40, indicating a potential upside of 20.37%. Travelers Companies has a consensus target price of $354.53, indicating a potential downside of 2.07%. Given Cincinnati Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Cincinnati Financial is more favorable than Travelers Companies.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 23.84% compared to Travelers Companies' net margin of 16.95%. Travelers Companies' return on equity of 25.41% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.53, suggesting that its share price is 47% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its share price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

Travelers Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Cincinnati Financial. Cincinnati Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Travelers Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cincinnati Financial pays an annual dividend of $3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Cincinnati Financial pays out 17.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Travelers Companies pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cincinnati Financial has raised its dividend for 65 consecutive years and Travelers Companies has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years. Cincinnati Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Allstate has a net margin of 18.97% compared to Travelers Companies' net margin of 16.95%. Allstate's return on equity of 41.64% beat Travelers Companies' return on equity.

Allstate has a beta of 0.15, suggesting that its stock price is 85% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.44, suggesting that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market.

76.5% of Allstate shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.5% of Travelers Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Allstate shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Travelers Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Allstate had 10 more articles in the media than Travelers Companies. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Allstate and 11 mentions for Travelers Companies. Travelers Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Allstate's score of 0.21 indicating that Travelers Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Allstate has higher revenue and earnings than Travelers Companies. Allstate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Travelers Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Allstate presently has a consensus target price of $266.89, suggesting a potential upside of 17.66%. Travelers Companies has a consensus target price of $354.53, suggesting a potential downside of 2.07%. Given Allstate's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Allstate is more favorable than Travelers Companies.

Allstate pays an annual dividend of $4.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Allstate pays out 8.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Travelers Companies pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Allstate has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Travelers Companies has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years. Allstate is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Travelers Companies presently has a consensus price target of $354.53, suggesting a potential downside of 2.07%. Axis Capital has a consensus price target of $120.31, suggesting a potential upside of 27.04%. Given Axis Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Axis Capital is more favorable than Travelers Companies.

In the previous week, Travelers Companies had 7 more articles in the media than Axis Capital. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Travelers Companies and 4 mentions for Axis Capital. Travelers Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.58 beat Axis Capital's score of 0.02 indicating that Travelers Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.44, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Axis Capital has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Travelers Companies has a net margin of 16.95% compared to Axis Capital's net margin of 16.23%. Travelers Companies' return on equity of 25.41% beat Axis Capital's return on equity.

82.5% of Travelers Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Axis Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Travelers Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Axis Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Axis Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Travelers Companies pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Axis Capital pays out 12.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Travelers Companies has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years. Axis Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Travelers Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Axis Capital. Axis Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Travelers Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Travelers Companies had 2 more articles in the media than Brown & Brown. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Travelers Companies and 9 mentions for Brown & Brown. Brown & Brown's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Travelers Companies' score of 0.58 indicating that Brown & Brown is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Travelers Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Brown & Brown. Travelers Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brown & Brown, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Travelers Companies currently has a consensus target price of $354.53, suggesting a potential downside of 2.07%. Brown & Brown has a consensus target price of $76.60, suggesting a potential upside of 27.15%. Given Brown & Brown's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brown & Brown is more favorable than Travelers Companies.

Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Brown & Brown pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Travelers Companies pays out 13.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brown & Brown pays out 20.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Travelers Companies has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years. Travelers Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.44, meaning that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.58, meaning that its stock price is 42% less volatile than the broader market.

Brown & Brown has a net margin of 17.75% compared to Travelers Companies' net margin of 16.95%. Travelers Companies' return on equity of 25.41% beat Brown & Brown's return on equity.

82.5% of Travelers Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Brown & Brown shares are held by institutional investors. 1.4% of Travelers Companies shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Brown & Brown shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.