Travelers Companies (TRV) Competitors

Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 21.33% compared to Travelers Companies' net margin of 15.54%. Travelers Companies' return on equity of 24.06% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity.

Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Cincinnati Financial pays an annual dividend of $3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Travelers Companies pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Travelers Companies has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years and Cincinnati Financial has raised its dividend for 65 consecutive years. Cincinnati Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

82.4% of Travelers Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.2% of Cincinnati Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Travelers Companies shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Cincinnati Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Travelers Companies had 8 more articles in the media than Cincinnati Financial. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Travelers Companies and 10 mentions for Cincinnati Financial. Travelers Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Cincinnati Financial's score of 0.43 indicating that Travelers Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Travelers Companies presently has a consensus target price of $309.07, suggesting a potential downside of 9.54%. Cincinnati Financial has a consensus target price of $183.25, suggesting a potential downside of 4.57%. Given Cincinnati Financial's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cincinnati Financial is more favorable than Travelers Companies.

Travelers Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Cincinnati Financial. Travelers Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cincinnati Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Allstate has higher revenue and earnings than Travelers Companies. Allstate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Travelers Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Allstate has a net margin of 17.81% compared to Travelers Companies' net margin of 15.54%. Allstate's return on equity of 42.66% beat Travelers Companies' return on equity.

In the previous week, Allstate had 4 more articles in the media than Travelers Companies. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Allstate and 18 mentions for Travelers Companies. Travelers Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Allstate's score of 0.80 indicating that Travelers Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Allstate presently has a consensus price target of $240.33, suggesting a potential downside of 3.81%. Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $309.07, suggesting a potential downside of 9.54%. Given Allstate's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Allstate is more favorable than Travelers Companies.

76.5% of Allstate shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Travelers Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Allstate shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Travelers Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Allstate has a beta of 0.16, indicating that its share price is 84% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Allstate pays an annual dividend of $4.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Allstate pays out 9.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Travelers Companies pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Allstate has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Travelers Companies has raised its dividend for 21 consecutive years. Allstate is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Travelers Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Axis Capital. Axis Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Travelers Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.4% of Axis Capital shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.4% of Travelers Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Axis Capital shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Travelers Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Axis Capital presently has a consensus price target of $122.10, indicating a potential upside of 7.76%. Travelers Companies has a consensus price target of $309.07, indicating a potential downside of 9.54%. Given Axis Capital's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Axis Capital is more favorable than Travelers Companies.

Axis Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Axis Capital pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Travelers Companies pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Travelers Companies has increased its dividend for 21 consecutive years. Axis Capital is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Travelers Companies had 17 more articles in the media than Axis Capital. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Travelers Companies and 1 mentions for Axis Capital. Travelers Companies' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Axis Capital's score of 0.43 indicating that Travelers Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Axis Capital has a net margin of 16.00% compared to Travelers Companies' net margin of 15.54%. Travelers Companies' return on equity of 24.06% beat Axis Capital's return on equity.

Axis Capital has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.46, meaning that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Travelers Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Brown & Brown. Travelers Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brown & Brown, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Travelers Companies had 6 more articles in the media than Brown & Brown. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Travelers Companies and 12 mentions for Brown & Brown. Brown & Brown's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Travelers Companies' score of 1.03 indicating that Brown & Brown is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Travelers Companies presently has a consensus price target of $309.07, suggesting a potential downside of 9.54%. Brown & Brown has a consensus price target of $78.25, suggesting a potential upside of 11.99%. Given Brown & Brown's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Brown & Brown is more favorable than Travelers Companies.

Brown & Brown has a net margin of 17.94% compared to Travelers Companies' net margin of 15.54%. Travelers Companies' return on equity of 24.06% beat Brown & Brown's return on equity.

Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its share price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brown & Brown has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its share price is 40% less volatile than the broader market.

82.4% of Travelers Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Brown & Brown shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Travelers Companies shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Brown & Brown shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Travelers Companies pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Brown & Brown pays an annual dividend of $0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Travelers Companies pays out 14.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Brown & Brown pays out 21.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Travelers Companies has increased its dividend for 21 consecutive years. Travelers Companies is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.