Allstate (ALL) Competitors

In the previous week, Allstate had 20 more articles in the media than Cincinnati Financial. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Allstate and 5 mentions for Cincinnati Financial. Allstate's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Cincinnati Financial's score of 0.51 indicating that Allstate is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Cincinnati Financial pays an annual dividend of $3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Allstate pays an annual dividend of $4.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Allstate pays out 9.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Cincinnati Financial has raised its dividend for 65 consecutive years and Allstate has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Cincinnati Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.57, suggesting that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allstate has a beta of 0.18, suggesting that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

Cincinnati Financial presently has a consensus target price of $183.25, suggesting a potential upside of 7.63%. Allstate has a consensus target price of $240.33, suggesting a potential upside of 8.88%. Given Allstate's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Allstate is more favorable than Cincinnati Financial.

Allstate has higher revenue and earnings than Cincinnati Financial. Allstate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cincinnati Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 21.33% compared to Allstate's net margin of 17.81%. Allstate's return on equity of 42.66% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity.

65.2% of Cincinnati Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of Allstate shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Cincinnati Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Allstate shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Chubb pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. Allstate pays an annual dividend of $4.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Chubb pays out 14.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Allstate pays out 9.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chubb has raised its dividend for 31 consecutive years and Allstate has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Allstate is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Chubb has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allstate has a beta of 0.18, meaning that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

Chubb has a net margin of 18.58% compared to Allstate's net margin of 17.81%. Allstate's return on equity of 42.66% beat Chubb's return on equity.

Chubb has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Allstate. Allstate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chubb, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Chubb had 11 more articles in the media than Allstate. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Chubb and 25 mentions for Allstate. Chubb's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Allstate's score of 1.07 indicating that Chubb is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Chubb currently has a consensus target price of $349.10, indicating a potential upside of 7.78%. Allstate has a consensus target price of $240.33, indicating a potential upside of 8.88%. Given Allstate's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Allstate is more favorable than Chubb.

83.8% of Chubb shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of Allstate shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Chubb shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Allstate shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Allstate has a net margin of 17.81% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 8.08%. Allstate's return on equity of 42.66% beat CNA Financial's return on equity.

In the previous week, Allstate had 24 more articles in the media than CNA Financial. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Allstate and 1 mentions for CNA Financial. Allstate's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat CNA Financial's score of 0.00 indicating that Allstate is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Allstate pays an annual dividend of $4.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. CNA Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Allstate pays out 9.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CNA Financial pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Allstate has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years and CNA Financial has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years.

Allstate currently has a consensus price target of $240.33, suggesting a potential upside of 8.88%. Given Allstate's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Allstate is more favorable than CNA Financial.

Allstate has a beta of 0.18, indicating that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CNA Financial has a beta of 0.3, indicating that its stock price is 70% less volatile than the broader market.

76.5% of Allstate shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of CNA Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Allstate shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of CNA Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Allstate has higher revenue and earnings than CNA Financial. Allstate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNA Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

The Hartford Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Allstate pays an annual dividend of $4.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. The Hartford Insurance Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Allstate pays out 9.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Hartford Insurance Group has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Allstate has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Allstate is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

The Hartford Insurance Group has a beta of 0.47, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allstate has a beta of 0.18, indicating that its share price is 82% less volatile than the broader market.

Allstate has a net margin of 17.81% compared to The Hartford Insurance Group's net margin of 14.10%. Allstate's return on equity of 42.66% beat The Hartford Insurance Group's return on equity.

The Hartford Insurance Group currently has a consensus price target of $147.31, indicating a potential upside of 14.85%. Allstate has a consensus price target of $240.33, indicating a potential upside of 8.88%. Given The Hartford Insurance Group's higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe The Hartford Insurance Group is more favorable than Allstate.

In the previous week, Allstate had 9 more articles in the media than The Hartford Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Allstate and 16 mentions for The Hartford Insurance Group. The Hartford Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Allstate's score of 1.07 indicating that The Hartford Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Allstate has higher revenue and earnings than The Hartford Insurance Group. Allstate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Hartford Insurance Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

93.4% of The Hartford Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of Allstate shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of The Hartford Insurance Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Allstate shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.