Allstate (ALL) Competitors

Allstate has higher revenue and earnings than Cincinnati Financial. Allstate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cincinnati Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Allstate has a beta of 0.19, indicating that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.57, indicating that its stock price is 43% less volatile than the broader market.

Allstate presently has a consensus price target of $241.67, suggesting a potential upside of 17.02%. Cincinnati Financial has a consensus price target of $183.25, suggesting a potential upside of 16.41%. Given Allstate's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Allstate is more favorable than Cincinnati Financial.

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 21.33% compared to Allstate's net margin of 17.81%. Allstate's return on equity of 42.66% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity.

Allstate pays an annual dividend of $4.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Cincinnati Financial pays an annual dividend of $3.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Allstate pays out 9.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 21.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Allstate has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years and Cincinnati Financial has raised its dividend for 65 consecutive years. Cincinnati Financial is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Allstate had 15 more articles in the media than Cincinnati Financial. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Allstate and 5 mentions for Cincinnati Financial. Cincinnati Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.06 beat Allstate's score of 0.68 indicating that Cincinnati Financial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

76.5% of Allstate shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.2% of Cincinnati Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Allstate shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Cincinnati Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Chubb presently has a consensus target price of $349.90, indicating a potential upside of 12.31%. Allstate has a consensus target price of $241.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.02%. Given Allstate's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Allstate is more favorable than Chubb.

Chubb has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Allstate. Allstate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Chubb, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

83.8% of Chubb shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of Allstate shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Chubb shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Allstate shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chubb pays an annual dividend of $3.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Allstate pays an annual dividend of $4.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Chubb pays out 13.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Allstate pays out 9.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chubb has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years and Allstate has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Allstate is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Chubb has a net margin of 18.58% compared to Allstate's net margin of 17.81%. Allstate's return on equity of 42.66% beat Chubb's return on equity.

Chubb has a beta of 0.41, meaning that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allstate has a beta of 0.19, meaning that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Chubb had 9 more articles in the media than Allstate. MarketBeat recorded 29 mentions for Chubb and 20 mentions for Allstate. Chubb's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Allstate's score of 0.68 indicating that Chubb is being referred to more favorably in the media.

CNA Financial pays an annual dividend of $1.92 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Allstate pays an annual dividend of $4.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. CNA Financial pays out 43.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Allstate pays out 9.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CNA Financial has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Allstate has raised its dividend for 15 consecutive years.

Allstate has a net margin of 17.81% compared to CNA Financial's net margin of 8.08%. Allstate's return on equity of 42.66% beat CNA Financial's return on equity.

98.5% of CNA Financial shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of Allstate shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of CNA Financial shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Allstate shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

CNA Financial has a beta of 0.31, suggesting that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allstate has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

Allstate has higher revenue and earnings than CNA Financial. Allstate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CNA Financial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Allstate had 18 more articles in the media than CNA Financial. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Allstate and 2 mentions for CNA Financial. CNA Financial's average media sentiment score of 1.40 beat Allstate's score of 0.68 indicating that CNA Financial is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Allstate has a consensus price target of $241.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.02%. Given Allstate's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Allstate is more favorable than CNA Financial.

In the previous week, Allstate had 4 more articles in the media than The Hartford Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Allstate and 16 mentions for The Hartford Insurance Group. The Hartford Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 1.14 beat Allstate's score of 0.68 indicating that The Hartford Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

The Hartford Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Allstate pays an annual dividend of $4.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. The Hartford Insurance Group pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Allstate pays out 9.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Hartford Insurance Group has increased its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Allstate has increased its dividend for 15 consecutive years. Allstate is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

93.4% of The Hartford Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.5% of Allstate shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of The Hartford Insurance Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Allstate shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

The Hartford Insurance Group has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Allstate has a beta of 0.19, suggesting that its stock price is 81% less volatile than the broader market.

The Hartford Insurance Group currently has a consensus price target of $149.31, indicating a potential upside of 17.30%. Allstate has a consensus price target of $241.67, indicating a potential upside of 17.02%. Given The Hartford Insurance Group's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe The Hartford Insurance Group is more favorable than Allstate.

Allstate has higher revenue and earnings than The Hartford Insurance Group. Allstate is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Hartford Insurance Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Allstate has a net margin of 17.81% compared to The Hartford Insurance Group's net margin of 14.10%. Allstate's return on equity of 42.66% beat The Hartford Insurance Group's return on equity.