Loews (L) Competitors

American Financial Group has a beta of 0.6, indicating that its stock price is 40% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loews has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Loews has higher revenue and earnings than American Financial Group. American Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loews, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

64.4% of American Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.3% of Loews shares are held by institutional investors. 16.9% of American Financial Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Loews shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Loews had 1 more articles in the media than American Financial Group. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Loews and 11 mentions for American Financial Group. Loews' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat American Financial Group's score of 1.12 indicating that Loews is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

American Financial Group presently has a consensus target price of $156.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.95%. Given American Financial Group's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe American Financial Group is more favorable than Loews.

American Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Loews pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. American Financial Group pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loews pays out 3.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. American Financial Group has increased its dividend for 19 consecutive years. American Financial Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

American Financial Group has a net margin of 11.51% compared to Loews' net margin of 9.02%. American Financial Group's return on equity of 20.35% beat Loews' return on equity.

Axis Capital has a net margin of 16.23% compared to Loews' net margin of 9.02%. Axis Capital's return on equity of 17.00% beat Loews' return on equity.

58.3% of Loews shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Axis Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 19.0% of Loews shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Axis Capital shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Loews has higher revenue and earnings than Axis Capital. Axis Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loews, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Loews had 2 more articles in the media than Axis Capital. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Loews and 10 mentions for Axis Capital. Loews' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Axis Capital's score of 0.42 indicating that Loews is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Axis Capital has a consensus price target of $121.23, suggesting a potential upside of 23.33%. Given Axis Capital's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Axis Capital is more favorable than Loews.

Loews pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Axis Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Loews pays out 3.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Axis Capital pays out 12.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Loews has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Axis Capital has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

39.3% of Berkshire Hathaway shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.3% of Loews shares are held by institutional investors. 6.1% of Berkshire Hathaway shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Loews shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Berkshire Hathaway has a beta of 0.61, suggesting that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loews has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Berkshire Hathaway has a net margin of 22.30% compared to Loews' net margin of 9.02%. Loews' return on equity of 8.60% beat Berkshire Hathaway's return on equity.

In the previous week, Berkshire Hathaway had 4 more articles in the media than Loews. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Berkshire Hathaway and 12 mentions for Loews. Loews' average media sentiment score of 1.18 beat Berkshire Hathaway's score of 0.22 indicating that Loews is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Berkshire Hathaway currently has a consensus target price of $542.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.28%. Given Berkshire Hathaway's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Berkshire Hathaway is more favorable than Loews.

Berkshire Hathaway has higher revenue and earnings than Loews. Berkshire Hathaway is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loews, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Chubb had 8 more articles in the media than Loews. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Chubb and 12 mentions for Loews. Chubb's average media sentiment score of 1.21 beat Loews' score of 1.18 indicating that Chubb is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Chubb presently has a consensus price target of $361.00, suggesting a potential upside of 6.65%. Given Chubb's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Chubb is more favorable than Loews.

83.8% of Chubb shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.3% of Loews shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Chubb shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Loews shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Chubb pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Loews pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Chubb pays out 14.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loews pays out 3.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chubb has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years. Chubb is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Chubb has higher revenue and earnings than Loews. Chubb is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loews, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chubb has a net margin of 18.10% compared to Loews' net margin of 9.02%. Chubb's return on equity of 14.47% beat Loews' return on equity.

Chubb has a beta of 0.37, indicating that its stock price is 63% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loews has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.