Loews (L) Competitors

American Financial Group has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its share price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loews has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

64.4% of American Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.3% of Loews shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.9% of American Financial Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Loews shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

American Financial Group has a net margin of 10.76% compared to Loews' net margin of 8.83%. American Financial Group's return on equity of 19.50% beat Loews' return on equity.

Loews has higher revenue and earnings than American Financial Group. American Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loews, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, American Financial Group had 6 more articles in the media than Loews. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for American Financial Group and 6 mentions for Loews. Loews' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat American Financial Group's score of 1.18 indicating that Loews is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

American Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Loews pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. American Financial Group pays out 33.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loews pays out 3.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. American Financial Group has increased its dividend for 19 consecutive years. American Financial Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

American Financial Group presently has a consensus target price of $150.75, indicating a potential upside of 5.18%. Given American Financial Group's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe American Financial Group is more favorable than Loews.

In the previous week, Axis Capital had 7 more articles in the media than Loews. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Axis Capital and 6 mentions for Loews. Loews' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Axis Capital's score of 0.51 indicating that Loews is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Loews has higher revenue and earnings than Axis Capital. Axis Capital is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loews, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Axis Capital has a consensus price target of $124.70, indicating a potential upside of 8.76%. Given Axis Capital's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Axis Capital is more favorable than Loews.

Loews pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Axis Capital pays an annual dividend of $1.76 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Loews pays out 3.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Axis Capital pays out 13.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Loews has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Axis Capital has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Axis Capital has a net margin of 16.00% compared to Loews' net margin of 8.83%. Axis Capital's return on equity of 18.12% beat Loews' return on equity.

58.3% of Loews shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.4% of Axis Capital shares are held by institutional investors. 19.0% of Loews shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Axis Capital shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Berkshire Hathaway had 2 more articles in the media than Loews. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Berkshire Hathaway and 6 mentions for Loews. Loews' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Berkshire Hathaway's score of 0.14 indicating that Loews is being referred to more favorably in the media.

58.3% of Loews shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.3% of Berkshire Hathaway shares are held by institutional investors. 19.0% of Loews shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.1% of Berkshire Hathaway shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Loews has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Berkshire Hathaway has a beta of 0.61, indicating that its stock price is 39% less volatile than the broader market.

Berkshire Hathaway has a consensus price target of $524.50, suggesting a potential upside of 5.54%. Given Berkshire Hathaway's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Berkshire Hathaway is more favorable than Loews.

Berkshire Hathaway has a net margin of 19.31% compared to Loews' net margin of 8.83%. Loews' return on equity of 8.51% beat Berkshire Hathaway's return on equity.

Berkshire Hathaway has higher revenue and earnings than Loews. Berkshire Hathaway is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loews, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $358.81, suggesting a potential upside of 1.23%. Given Chubb's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Chubb is more favorable than Loews.

Loews has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Chubb has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Chubb has a net margin of 18.58% compared to Loews' net margin of 8.83%. Chubb's return on equity of 14.30% beat Loews' return on equity.

Chubb has higher revenue and earnings than Loews. Chubb is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loews, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Chubb had 16 more articles in the media than Loews. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Chubb and 6 mentions for Loews. Loews' average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Chubb's score of 1.01 indicating that Loews is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Loews pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Chubb pays an annual dividend of $4.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Loews pays out 3.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Chubb pays out 14.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Chubb has increased its dividend for 31 consecutive years. Chubb is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

58.3% of Loews shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.8% of Chubb shares are held by institutional investors. 19.0% of Loews shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Chubb shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.