Assured Guaranty (AGO) Competitors

In the previous week, Assured Guaranty had 1 more articles in the media than The Hartford Insurance Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Assured Guaranty and 7 mentions for The Hartford Insurance Group. Assured Guaranty's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat The Hartford Insurance Group's score of 0.16 indicating that Assured Guaranty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

The Hartford Insurance Group pays an annual dividend of $2.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.9%. Assured Guaranty pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. The Hartford Insurance Group pays out 15.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Assured Guaranty pays out 20.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The Hartford Insurance Group has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Assured Guaranty has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years.

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 37.34% compared to The Hartford Insurance Group's net margin of 15.00%. The Hartford Insurance Group's return on equity of 21.66% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity.

The Hartford Insurance Group has higher revenue and earnings than Assured Guaranty. The Hartford Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Assured Guaranty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

The Hartford Insurance Group presently has a consensus price target of $149.07, indicating a potential upside of 18.67%. Assured Guaranty has a consensus price target of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 32.52%. Given Assured Guaranty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Assured Guaranty is more favorable than The Hartford Insurance Group.

The Hartford Insurance Group has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.73, suggesting that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

93.4% of The Hartford Insurance Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Assured Guaranty shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of The Hartford Insurance Group shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Assured Guaranty shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Assured Guaranty pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Loews pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.2%. Assured Guaranty pays out 20.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Loews pays out 3.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Assured Guaranty has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years. Assured Guaranty is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

92.2% of Assured Guaranty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.3% of Loews shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Assured Guaranty shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 19.0% of Loews shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Assured Guaranty had 7 more articles in the media than Loews. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Assured Guaranty and 1 mentions for Loews. Assured Guaranty's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Loews' score of 0.43 indicating that Assured Guaranty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Loews has higher revenue and earnings than Assured Guaranty. Assured Guaranty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Loews, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Assured Guaranty presently has a consensus target price of $91.00, suggesting a potential upside of 32.52%. Given Assured Guaranty's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Assured Guaranty is more favorable than Loews.

Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.73, meaning that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Loews has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 37.34% compared to Loews' net margin of 9.02%. Loews' return on equity of 8.60% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity.

MetLife has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market.

MetLife has higher revenue and earnings than Assured Guaranty. Assured Guaranty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than MetLife, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

MetLife currently has a consensus target price of $104.31, indicating a potential upside of 10.42%. Assured Guaranty has a consensus target price of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 32.52%. Given Assured Guaranty's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Assured Guaranty is more favorable than MetLife.

95.0% of MetLife shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.2% of Assured Guaranty shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of MetLife shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.7% of Assured Guaranty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 37.34% compared to MetLife's net margin of 4.57%. MetLife's return on equity of 23.39% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity.

In the previous week, MetLife had 18 more articles in the media than Assured Guaranty. MarketBeat recorded 26 mentions for MetLife and 8 mentions for Assured Guaranty. Assured Guaranty's average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat MetLife's score of -0.06 indicating that Assured Guaranty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

MetLife pays an annual dividend of $2.37 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Assured Guaranty pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. MetLife pays out 45.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Assured Guaranty pays out 20.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. MetLife has raised its dividend for 12 consecutive years and Assured Guaranty has raised its dividend for 7 consecutive years. MetLife is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

American Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than Assured Guaranty. Assured Guaranty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than American Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Assured Guaranty has a net margin of 37.34% compared to American Financial Group's net margin of 11.51%. American Financial Group's return on equity of 20.35% beat Assured Guaranty's return on equity.

92.2% of Assured Guaranty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.4% of American Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.7% of Assured Guaranty shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.9% of American Financial Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Assured Guaranty pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. American Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $3.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Assured Guaranty pays out 20.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. American Financial Group pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Assured Guaranty has increased its dividend for 7 consecutive years and American Financial Group has increased its dividend for 19 consecutive years. American Financial Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Assured Guaranty currently has a consensus price target of $91.00, indicating a potential upside of 32.52%. American Financial Group has a consensus price target of $156.00, indicating a potential upside of 12.34%. Given Assured Guaranty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Assured Guaranty is more favorable than American Financial Group.

Assured Guaranty has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, American Financial Group has a beta of 0.59, indicating that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Assured Guaranty had 1 more articles in the media than American Financial Group. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Assured Guaranty and 7 mentions for American Financial Group. American Financial Group's average media sentiment score of 1.65 beat Assured Guaranty's score of 0.66 indicating that American Financial Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.